PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Tesla C1080
4 GB · Q6_K · 18.3 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
1,160 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
818 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1,160
tok/s
696–1,857 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 3.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,160
tok/s
696–1,857 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 3.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
927
tok/s
556–1,483 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 3.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
927
tok/s
556–1,483 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 3.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
741
tok/s
445–1,186 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 3.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
709
tok/s
426–1,135 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 3.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
709
tok/s
426–1,135 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 3.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
679
tok/s
407–1,086 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 3.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
602
tok/s
361–964 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 3.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
602
tok/s
361–964 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 3.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
602
tok/s
361–964 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 3.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
571
tok/s
343–914 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
487
tok/s
292–780 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
487
tok/s
292–780 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 3.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
487
tok/s
292–780 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
487
tok/s
292–780 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
487
tok/s
292–780 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
371
tok/s
223–594 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 3.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
371
tok/s
223–594 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 3.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
309
tok/s
186–495 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 3.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
303
tok/s
182–484 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 3.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
296
tok/s
178–473 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 3.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
296
tok/s
178–473 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 3.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
296
tok/s
178–473 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 3.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
296
tok/s
178–473 · low confidence |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 3.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 19 February 2025
- Authors
- Omar Sanseviero, Andreas Steiner
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Vision, Multimodal, Language
- Task
- Image captioning, Visual question answering, Object detection, Image segmentation, Object recognition, Character recognition (OCR)
- Base model
- Gemma 2 2B,SigLIP 400M
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 2.9B
- Training data
- 256,000,000,000 tokens
https://huggingface.co/google/paligemma-3b-mix-224
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.03555 Stage 1: "mixture of 1 billion examples" "The image resolution is 224px2" "PaliGemma 2 processes a 224px2/448px2/896px2 image with a SigLIP-400m encoder with patch size 14px2, yielding 256/1024/ 4096 tokens 10^9 * 256 = 256B tokens
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 4 × 10²² FLOP
- How it was established
- Hardware,Operation counting
- Fine-tuning compute
- 4.3 × 10²¹ FLOP
3.12e+22 FLOP [base LLM compute] + 4.9467301e+21 [base VAE compute] + 4.2509643e+21 FLOP [finetune compute] = 4.0397694e+22FLOP
197000000000000 FLOP / chip / sec * 256 chips * 72 hours [see training time notes] * 3600 sec / hour * 0.3 [assumed utilization] = 3.9215923e+21 FLOP 6 FLOP / parameter / token * 3 * 10^9 parameters * 256000000000 tokens [see dataset size details] = 4.608e+21 FLOP sqrt(3.9215923e+21*4.608e+21) = 4.2509643e+21 FLOP
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- Google TPU v5e
- Chips used
- 256
- Wall-clock time
- 72 hours
- Power draw
- 113.1 kW
"PaliGemma 2 3B has roughly the same training cost as PaliGemma (3 days for Stage 1 using 256 chips)"
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (non-commercial)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
gemma license https://huggingface.co/google/paligemma2-3b-mix-224 "The model is available in the bfloat16 format for research purposes only." apache 2.0 for inference https://github.com/google-research/big_vision
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Introducing PaliGemma 2 mix: A vision-language model for multiple tasks
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 1,160 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 1,160 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 927 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 927 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 741 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 709 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 709 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 679 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 602 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 602 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 GeForce RTX 4010 4 GB · needs 3.1 GB · Q6_K · tight 20.2 tok/s
- 02 RTX A400 4 GB · needs 3.1 GB · Q6_K · tight 20.2 tok/s
- 03 RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 4 GB · needs 3.1 GB · Q6_K · tight 27.0 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile 4 GB · needs 3.1 GB · Q6_K · tight 40.5 tok/s
- 05 Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 4 GB · needs 3.1 GB · Q6_K · tight 7.2 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 6450M 4 GB · needs 3.1 GB · Q6_K · tight 21.0 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6550M 4 GB · needs 3.1 GB · Q6_K · tight 23.7 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6550S 4 GB · needs 3.1 GB · Q6_K · tight 21.0 tok/s
- 09 Arc A310 4 GB · needs 3.1 GB · Q6_K · tight 17.0 tok/s
- 10 Arc Pro A30M 4 GB · needs 3.1 GB · Q6_K · tight 17.5 tok/s
What the numbers mean
The hardware side
Minimum card
Tesla C1080
Memory needed
3.1 GB
Fastest
1,160 tok/s
PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 is small enough at 2.9B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 818 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
At the low end, a Tesla C1080 handles it — 4 GB, at Q6_K, for about 18.3 tokens per second.
The quickest result comes from a B200 at around 1,160 tokens per second — its 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth is what buys that.
Where it came from
PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 was published by Google, in United States of America, in February 2025. industry is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Vision, Multimodal, Language, and is recorded as doing image captioning, Visual question answering, Object detection, Image segmentation, Object recognition, Character recognition (OCR).
It builds on Gemma 2 2B,SigLIP 400M, which is why it shares that model's general shape and size.
The weights being open is what puts this page in the calculator rather than only in the catalogue: it is a model you can actually hold. It is published under the google organisation on Hugging Face.
Understanding the speeds
The median result is around 36.8 tokens per second; 783 cards produce text faster than most people read it.
Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.
Without the attention layout on record, the memory column is an approximation. It is close enough to choose hardware by, and least reliable at long context.
How it was trained
Training it took roughly 4 × 10²² FLOP of computation, on Google TPU v5e — a measure of what producing the model cost, not of how fast it answers.
It was trained on about 256,000,000,000 tokens of text.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Read the memory figure first
The table lists every card that can hold PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 — around 3.1 GB at Q6_K. That figure, not the card's headline performance, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Decide how long your conversations run
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect: at long context PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 can slip off a card that handles short questions easily.
-
03
Set a quality floor
The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy of PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 — Q6_K on the smallest card that fits. Set a floor to hold the comparison at one level.
-
04
Compare tokens per second, not specifications
The speed ordering for PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 1,160 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
Tight means PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 loads and works, with no room to raise the context later. Comfortable means you can. The difference matters more than a few tokens per second.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 is settled.
Answers
PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 — common questions
Who created PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224?
PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 was published by Google, based in United States of America, categorised as industry.
When was PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 released?
PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 was published in February 2025.
What is PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 used for?
PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 works in Vision, Multimodal, Language, and is recorded as handling image captioning, Visual question answering, Object detection, Image segmentation, Object recognition, Character recognition (OCR). A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.
Where can I download PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224?
Its weights are published under the google organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
How much compute was used to train PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224?
Around 4 × 10²² FLOP, on Google TPU v5e. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 if it does not fit in my GPU?
It can be split between the card and system memory, but PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 generates painfully slowly that way. Nothing on this page assumes offloading.
Would two GPUs run PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed. That matters for PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 only if one card cannot hold it — 818 can, so a second adds little.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 has to be squeezed — 2 distinct levels appear in the table above. Set a minimum quality to compare at one.
How accurate are these PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 696–1,857 tok/s on the B200 rather than a single number.
What GPU do I need to run PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 is the Tesla C1080, with 4 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q6_K using about 3.1 GB, and produces roughly 18.3 tokens per second. 818 cards in total can run it.
How fast is PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 1,160 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 783 of the cards that can run PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 clear that.
How much VRAM does PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 need?
About 3.1 GB at Q6_K compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 3.8 GB and generating roughly 216 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 3.8 GB and generating roughly 132 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 3.8 GB and generating roughly 164 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 3.8 GB and generating roughly 194 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 open source?
Its weights are published, so PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 have?
PaliGemma 2 3B Mix 224 has 2.9B parameters. https://huggingface.co/google/paligemma-3b-mix-224. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.