Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Tesla C1080
4 GB · Q3_K_M · 24.9 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
847 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
818 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
847
tok/s
720–1,016 |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 5.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
847
tok/s
720–1,016 |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 5.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
676
tok/s
406–1,082 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 5.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
676
tok/s
406–1,082 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 5.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
541
tok/s
325–866 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 5.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
518
tok/s
440–621 |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 5.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
518
tok/s
440–621 |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 5.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
496
tok/s
297–793 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 5.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
440
tok/s
264–704 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 5.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
440
tok/s
264–704 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 5.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
440
tok/s
264–704 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 5.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
417
tok/s
355–501 |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 5.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
356
tok/s
302–427 |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 5.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
356
tok/s
302–427 |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 5.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
356
tok/s
302–427 |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 5.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
356
tok/s
302–427 |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 5.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
356
tok/s
302–427 |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 5.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
271
tok/s
163–433 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 5.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
271
tok/s
163–433 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 5.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
226
tok/s
135–361 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 5.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
221
tok/s
133–353 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 5.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
216
tok/s
184–259 |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 5.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
216
tok/s
184–259 |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 5.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
216
tok/s
184–259 |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 5.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
216
tok/s
184–259 |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 5.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- NVIDIA
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 4 November 2024
- Authors
- Saurav Muralidharan, Sharath Turuvekere Sreenivas, Raviraj Joshi, Marcin Chochowski, Mostofa Patwary, Mohammad Shoeybi, Bryan Catanzaro, Jan Kautz, Pavlo Molchanov
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Chat, Question answering
- Base model
- Llama 3.1-8B
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 4B
- Training data
- tokens
4b Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B-Width-Base uses a model embedding size of 3072, 32 attention heads, MLP intermediate dimension of 9216, with 32 layers in total. Additionally, it uses Grouped-Query Attention (GQA) and Rotary Position Embeddings (RoPE). Architecture Type: Transformer Decoder (Auto-Regressive Language Model) Network Architecture: Llama-3.1
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB
- Chips used
- 8
- Power draw
- 6.3 kW
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Compact Language Models via Pruning and Knowledge Distillation
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 847 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 847 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 676 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 676 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 541 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 518 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 518 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 496 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 440 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 440 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 GeForce RTX 4010 4 GB · needs 3.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 27.4 tok/s
- 02 RTX A400 4 GB · needs 3.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 27.4 tok/s
- 03 RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 4 GB · needs 3.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 36.6 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile 4 GB · needs 3.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 54.9 tok/s
- 05 Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 4 GB · needs 3.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 9.8 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 6450M 4 GB · needs 3.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 28.5 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6550M 4 GB · needs 3.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 32.1 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6550S 4 GB · needs 3.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 28.5 tok/s
- 09 Arc A310 4 GB · needs 3.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 23.0 tok/s
- 10 Arc Pro A30M 4 GB · needs 3.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 23.8 tok/s
What the numbers mean
Hardware requirements in practice
Minimum card
Tesla C1080
Memory needed
3.4 GB
Fastest
847 tok/s
Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B is small enough at 4B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 818 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
The entry point is the Tesla C1080: 4 GB of memory, Q3_K_M compression, roughly 24.9 tokens per second.
A B200 is the fastest we calculate for it: about 847 tokens per second, from 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
Where it came from
Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B was published by NVIDIA, in United States of America, in November 2024. industry is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling/generation, Chat, Question answering.
It builds on Llama 3.1-8B, which is why it shares that model's general shape and size.
The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached.
Understanding the speeds
Half the cards that hold it manage more than 35.2 tokens per second, and 781 exceed reading speed outright.
Being dense, it reads all of itself per token, which is why the ordering by speed below follows the ordering by memory bandwidth so closely.
Because the architecture is recorded, the memory column is derived rather than estimated.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start from the memory column
The table lists every card that can hold Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B — around 3.4 GB at Q3_K_M. That figure, not the card's headline performance, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Match the context to your actual use
Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B stops fitting a card that seemed fine.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a floor drops the cards that only manage Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B by squeezing it further than you would want.
-
04
Sort by speed
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B. It will not match a gaming ordering — generation is bound by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 847 tok/s.
-
05
Check the fit verdict before buying
A tight fit runs Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation; comfortable has headroom. If you expect to grow the context, buy for comfortable.
-
06
Check the card from the other side
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. Worth a look before buying for Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B alone — a card is usually bought for more than one model.
Answers
Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B — common questions
Can I run Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 5.7 GB and generating roughly 158 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 5.7 GB and generating roughly 96.6 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 5.7 GB and generating roughly 120 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 5.7 GB and generating roughly 142 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B open source?
Its weights are published, so Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B have?
Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B has 4B parameters. 4b Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B-Width-Base uses a model embedding size of 3072, 32 attention heads, MLP intermediate dimension of 9216, with 32 layers in total. Additionally, it uses Grouped-Query Attention (GQA) and Rotary Position Embeddings (RoPE). Architecture Type: Transformer Decoder (Auto-Regressive Language Model) Network Architecture: Llama-3.1. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B?
Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B was published by NVIDIA, based in United States of America, categorised as industry.
When was Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B released?
Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B was published in November 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B used for?
Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling/generation, Chat, Question answering. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.
Where can I download Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B?
The weights for Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
Can I run Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B if it does not fit in my GPU?
It can be split between the card and system memory, but Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B generates painfully slowly that way. Nothing on this page assumes offloading.
Would two GPUs run Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B faster?
Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. Since 818 of the cards we track already hold Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B on their own, a second card is rarely the answer here.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B has to be squeezed — 4 distinct levels appear in the table above. Set a minimum quality to compare at one.
How accurate are these Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 720–1,016 tok/s on the B200 rather than a single number.
What GPU do I need to run Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B is the Tesla C1080, with 4 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 3.4 GB, and produces roughly 24.9 tokens per second. 818 cards in total can run it.
How fast is Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 847 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 781 of the cards that can run Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B clear that.
How much VRAM does Llama-3.1-Minitron-4B need?
About 3.4 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.