CogVideoX TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Tesla C1080
4 GB · IQ4_XS · 18.1 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
678 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run CogVideoX?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
818 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
678
tok/s
407–1,084 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 6.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
678
tok/s
407–1,084 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 6.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
541
tok/s
325–866 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 6.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
541
tok/s
325–866 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 6.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
433
tok/s
260–692 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 6.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
414
tok/s
249–663 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 6.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
414
tok/s
249–663 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 6.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
396
tok/s
238–634 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 6.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
352
tok/s
211–563 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 6.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
352
tok/s
211–563 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 6.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
352
tok/s
211–563 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 6.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
334
tok/s
200–534 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 6.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
285
tok/s
171–455 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 6.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
285
tok/s
171–455 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 6.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
285
tok/s
171–455 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 6.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
285
tok/s
171–455 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 6.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
285
tok/s
171–455 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 6.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
217
tok/s
130–347 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 6.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
217
tok/s
130–347 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 6.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
181
tok/s
108–289 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 6.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
177
tok/s
106–283 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 6.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
173
tok/s
104–276 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 6.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
173
tok/s
104–276 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 6.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
173
tok/s
104–276 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 6.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
173
tok/s
104–276 · low confidence |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 6.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Z.ai (Zhipu AI),Tsinghua University
- Organisation type
- Industry,Academia
- Country
- China
- Published
- 8 October 2024
- Authors
- Zhuoyi Yang, Jiayan Teng, Wendi Zheng, Ming Ding, Shiyu Huang, Jiazheng Xu, Yuanming Yang, Wenyi Hong, Xiaohan Zhang, Guanyu Feng, Da Yin, Xiaotao Gu, Yuxuan Zhang, Weihan Wang, Yean Cheng, Ting Liu, Bin Xu, Yuxiao Dong, Jie Tang
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Video
- Task
- Video generation, Text-to-video
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 5B
- Training data
- tokens
5 billion
"35M single-shot clips remain, with each clip averaging about 6 seconds" "During training, we first train a 3D VAE at 256 × 256 resolution and 17 frames to save computation. Randomly select 8 or 16 fps to enhance the model’s robustness" "we conduct a two-stage training process by first training on a video of 17 frames and finetuning by context parallel on videos of 161 frames." They provide many training details for smaller models but not this one
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Training code
- Open source
- Hugging Face
- THUDM
CogVideoX License (commercial usage allowed for companies with up to 1 million visits per month) https://huggingface.co/THUDM/CogVideoX-5b https://github.com/THUDM/CogVideo Apache 2.0 for code
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Likely above 10²³ FLOP
- Yes
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- CogVideoX: Text-to-Video Diffusion Models with An Expert Transformer
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run CogVideoX
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 678 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 678 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 541 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 541 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 433 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 414 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 414 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 396 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 352 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 352 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run CogVideoX
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 GeForce RTX 4010 4 GB · needs 3.4 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 20.0 tok/s
- 02 RTX A400 4 GB · needs 3.4 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 20.0 tok/s
- 03 RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 4 GB · needs 3.4 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 26.6 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile 4 GB · needs 3.4 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 39.9 tok/s
- 05 Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 4 GB · needs 3.4 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 7.1 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 6450M 4 GB · needs 3.4 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 20.8 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6550M 4 GB · needs 3.4 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 23.4 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6550S 4 GB · needs 3.4 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 20.8 tok/s
- 09 Arc A310 4 GB · needs 3.4 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 16.8 tok/s
- 10 Arc Pro A30M 4 GB · needs 3.4 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 17.3 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What it takes to run this model
Minimum card
Tesla C1080
Memory needed
3.4 GB
Fastest
678 tok/s
CogVideoX is small enough at 5B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 818 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
The smallest card that holds it is the Tesla C1080 with 4 GB, running it at IQ4_XS and producing around 18.1 tokens per second.
Top of the range is the B200, at roughly 678 tokens per second thanks to 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth.
What this model is
CogVideoX was published by Z.ai (Zhipu AI),Tsinghua University, in China, in October 2024. It comes out of industry,Academia.
It works in Video, and is recorded as doing video generation, Text-to-video.
The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached. It is published under the THUDM organisation on Hugging Face.
What decides the speed
Half the cards that hold it manage more than 27.1 tokens per second, and 771 exceed reading speed outright.
Being dense, it reads all of itself per token, which is why the ordering by speed below follows the ordering by memory bandwidth so closely.
Its internal architecture is not on file, so memory is approximated from the parameter count and marked accordingly. Expect the real figure to differ, more so at long context.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for CogVideoX
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Read the memory figure first
Every card here has been checked against CogVideoX — around 3.4 GB at IQ4_XS. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason CogVideoX stops fitting a card that seemed fine.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy of CogVideoX — IQ4_XS on the smallest card that fits. Set a floor to hold the comparison at one level.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
Ranking by tokens per second for CogVideoX follows memory bandwidth, not core counts, which is why the B200 tops it at 678 tok/s.
-
05
Check the fit verdict before buying
The fit column separates cards that just manage CogVideoX from those with room to spare. Buy for the second if the context might grow.
-
06
See what else that card runs
Each card page repeats this sweep for every model we hold. It answers what else the hardware is good for, beyond CogVideoX.
Answers
CogVideoX — common questions
How much VRAM does CogVideoX need?
About 3.4 GB at IQ4_XS compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run CogVideoX on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 6.1 GB and generating roughly 126 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run CogVideoX on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 6.1 GB and generating roughly 77.3 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run CogVideoX on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 6.1 GB and generating roughly 95.7 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run CogVideoX on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 6.1 GB and generating roughly 114 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is CogVideoX open source?
Its weights are published, so CogVideoX can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does CogVideoX have?
CogVideoX has 5B parameters. 5 billion. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created CogVideoX?
CogVideoX was published by Z.ai (Zhipu AI),Tsinghua University, based in China, categorised as industry,Academia.
When was CogVideoX released?
CogVideoX was published in October 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is CogVideoX used for?
CogVideoX works in Video, and is recorded as handling video generation, Text-to-video. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.
Where can I download CogVideoX?
Its weights are published under the THUDM organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
Can I run CogVideoX if it does not fit in my GPU?
Partly. Layers that do not fit sit in system memory and run at a fraction of the speed, so a mostly-offloaded CogVideoX is rarely worth using. Every figure here assumes the whole model is on the card.
Would two GPUs run CogVideoX faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed. That matters for CogVideoX only if one card cannot hold it — 818 can, so a second adds little.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for CogVideoX?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. Across the cards that run CogVideoX, 4 compression levels are used; the floor control above pins it to one.
How accurate are these CogVideoX speed estimates?
They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range — 407–1,084 tok/s on the B200, for instance. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
What GPU do I need to run CogVideoX?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds CogVideoX is the Tesla C1080, with 4 GB of memory. It runs the model at IQ4_XS using about 3.4 GB, and produces roughly 18.1 tokens per second. 818 cards in total can run it.
How fast is CogVideoX on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 678 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 771 of the cards that can run CogVideoX clear that.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.