Llama 3.2 1B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Tesla C1080
4 GB · Q8_0 · 30.0 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
2,755 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Llama 3.2 1B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
818 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2,755
tok/s
2,341–3,306 |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 2.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,755
tok/s
2,341–3,306 |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 2.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,200
tok/s
1,320–3,519 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 2.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
2,200
tok/s
1,320–3,519 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 2.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,759
tok/s
1,056–2,815 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 2.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,684
tok/s
1,431–2,021 |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 2.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,684
tok/s
1,431–2,021 |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 2.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,611
tok/s
967–2,578 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 2.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,430
tok/s
858–2,288 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 2.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,430
tok/s
858–2,288 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 2.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,430
tok/s
858–2,288 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 2.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,357
tok/s
1,153–1,628 |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 2.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,157
tok/s
983–1,388 |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 2.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,157
tok/s
983–1,388 |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 2.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,157
tok/s
983–1,388 |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 2.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,157
tok/s
983–1,388 |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 2.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,157
tok/s
983–1,388 |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 2.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
881
tok/s
529–1,410 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 2.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
881
tok/s
529–1,410 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 2.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
734
tok/s
440–1,175 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 2.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
718
tok/s
431–1,150 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 2.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
702
tok/s
597–843 |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 2.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
702
tok/s
597–843 |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 2.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
702
tok/s
597–843 |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 2.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
702
tok/s
597–843 |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 2.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Meta AI
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 24 September 2024
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Text summarization, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning, Translation
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 1.2B
- Training data
- 9,000,000,000,000 tokens
https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-3.2-1B
"Llama 3.2 was pretrained on up to 9 trillion tokens of data from publicly available sources."
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 6.6 × 10²² FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting,Hardware
6ND = 6*1230000000.00*9000000000000 = 6.642e+22 370000 hours * 3600 s * 133800000000000 FLOPS/s* 0.3 = 5.346648e+22
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB
- Chip-hours
- 370,000
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Training code
- Unreleased
LLAMA 3.2 COMMUNITY LICENSE AGREEMENT https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-models/blob/main/models/llama3_2/LICENSE
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Llama 3.2: Revolutionizing edge AI and vision with open, customizable models
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Llama 3.2 1B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 2,755 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 2,755 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 2,200 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 2,200 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 1,759 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 1,684 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 1,684 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 1,611 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 1,430 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 1,430 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Llama 3.2 1B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 GeForce RTX 4010 4 GB · needs 2.2 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 33.1 tok/s
- 02 RTX A400 4 GB · needs 2.2 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 33.1 tok/s
- 03 RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 4 GB · needs 2.2 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 44.1 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile 4 GB · needs 2.2 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 66.1 tok/s
- 05 Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 4 GB · needs 2.2 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 11.8 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 6450M 4 GB · needs 2.2 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 34.4 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6550M 4 GB · needs 2.2 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 38.7 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6550S 4 GB · needs 2.2 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 34.4 tok/s
- 09 Arc A310 4 GB · needs 2.2 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 27.8 tok/s
- 10 Arc Pro A30M 4 GB · needs 2.2 GB · Q8_0 · comfortable 28.7 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What you need to run it
Minimum card
Tesla C1080
Memory needed
2.2 GB
Fastest
2,755 tok/s
Llama 3.2 1B reaches a parameter count of 1.2B. That is small enough that hardware is rarely the obstacle, including on cards several years old. The number of cards we track that can run it: 818.
The least hardware that works is Tesla C1080, with a memory capacity of 4 GB, running it at a compression of Q8_0 and producing around 30.0 tokens per second.
At the other end sits B200, generating roughly 2,755 tokens per second on the strength of a memory bandwidth of 8,000 GB/s.
Where it came from
Llama 3.2 1B was published by Meta AI, in the country recorded as United States of America, during September 2024. It comes out of an organisation categorised as industry.
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as performing the task of language modeling/generation, Text summarization, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning, Translation.
Published weights mean the model runs on your machine rather than someone else's, which is what makes the hardware question below answerable at all.
Understanding the speeds
Half the cards that hold it manage more than 77.4 tokens per second. Producing text faster than most people read it: 799 of them.
It is a dense model, so every parameter is read for every token produced. That makes speed track memory bandwidth almost exactly — a card with twice the bandwidth generates roughly twice as fast.
Because the architecture is recorded, the memory column is derived rather than estimated.
Training and provenance
Training it took a computation budget of roughly 6.6 × 10²² FLOP, on hardware recorded as NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB. That figure measures what producing the model cost, and has no bearing on how fast it answers.
It was trained on a corpus of about 9,000,000,000,000 tokens of text.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Llama 3.2 1B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Check what it needs before anything else
Start from what it actually needs, which is the requirement of Llama 3.2 1B, needing around 2.2 GB at a compression of Q8_0. No amount of processing power compensates for a card that cannot hold it.
-
02
Match the context to your actual use
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect, because at long context a card that handles short questions easily can be dropped by Llama 3.2 1B.
-
03
Set a quality floor
Compression is what makes a model fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy, reaching a compression of Q8_0 on the smallest card that fits. Setting a minimum quality drops the cards that only manage it by squeezing further than you would want, and holds the comparison at one level.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for Llama 3.2 1B. It will not match a gaming ordering, because generation is bound by memory bandwidth. The card topping the list is B200, at 2,755 tok/s.
-
05
Check the fit verdict before buying
A tight fit runs, but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation, in the case of Llama 3.2 1B. Comfortable means you can grow the context later. That difference matters more than a few tokens per second, so buy for comfortable if you expect to.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once you have settled on Llama 3.2 1B.
Answers
Llama 3.2 1B — common questions
Llama 3.2 1B— who created it?
It was published by Meta AI, based in United States of America, an organisation categorised as industry.
Llama 3.2 1B— when was it released?
It was published in September 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
Llama 3.2 1B— what is it used for?
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as handling the task of language modeling/generation, Text summarization, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning, Translation. A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.
Llama 3.2 1B— where can I download it?
The weights are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
Llama 3.2 1B— how much compute was used to train it?
Training consumed around 6.6 × 10²² FLOP, on hardware recorded as NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Llama 3.2 1B— can I run it if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part held in system memory drags the whole thing down. Every figure here assumes the whole model is resident on the card.
Llama 3.2 1B— would two GPUs run it faster?
Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. The number of cards already holding it on their own: 818. So a second card is rarely the answer here.
Llama 3.2 1B— why does the quantisation differ between cards?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard it has to be squeezed. The number of distinct levels in the table above: 1. Bigger cards get the more accurate version, and the quality floor above pins the comparison to one level.
Llama 3.2 1B— how accurate are these speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked, which is why each is published as a range rather than a single number. One example: 2,341–3,306 tok/s on B200. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
Llama 3.2 1B— what GPU do I need to run it?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds it is Tesla C1080, with a memory capacity of 4 GB. It runs the model at a compression of Q8_0 using about 2.2 GB, and produces roughly 30.0 tokens per second. The number of cards able to run it in total: 818.
Llama 3.2 1B— how fast is it on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is B200, at about 2,755 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and the number of cards clearing that: 799.
Llama 3.2 1B— how much VRAM does it need?
It needs about 2.2 GB at a compression of Q8_0, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Llama 3.2 1B— can I run it on a GPU holding 8 GB?
Yes. The card CMP 170HX 8 GB, holding 8 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 2.2 GB and generating roughly 513 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.
Llama 3.2 1B— can I run it on a GPU holding 12 GB?
Yes. The card GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, holding 12 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 2.2 GB and generating roughly 314 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.
Llama 3.2 1B— can I run it on a GPU holding 16 GB?
Yes. The card Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, holding 16 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 2.2 GB and generating roughly 389 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.
Llama 3.2 1B— can I run it on a GPU holding 24 GB?
Yes. The card GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, holding 24 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 2.2 GB and generating roughly 461 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.
Llama 3.2 1B— is it open source?
Its weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
Llama 3.2 1B— how many parameters does it have?
It has a parameter count of 1.2B. https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-3.2-1B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.