Llama 3.2 3B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Tesla C1080
4 GB · Q4_K_M · 26.5 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
1,056 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Llama 3.2 3B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
818 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1,056
tok/s
897–1,267 |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 4.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
1,056
tok/s
897–1,267 |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 4.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
843
tok/s
506–1,349 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 4.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
843
tok/s
506–1,349 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 4.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
674
tok/s
404–1,079 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 4.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
645
tok/s
548–774 |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 4.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
645
tok/s
548–774 |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 4.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
617
tok/s
370–988 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 4.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
548
tok/s
329–877 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 4.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
548
tok/s
329–877 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 4.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
548
tok/s
329–877 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 4.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
520
tok/s
442–624 |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 4.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
443
tok/s
377–532 |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 4.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
443
tok/s
377–532 |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 4.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
443
tok/s
377–532 |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 4.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
443
tok/s
377–532 |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 4.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
443
tok/s
377–532 |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 4.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
338
tok/s
203–540 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 4.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
338
tok/s
203–540 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 4.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
281
tok/s
169–450 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 4.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
275
tok/s
165–440 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 4.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
269
tok/s
229–323 |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 4.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
269
tok/s
229–323 |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 4.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
269
tok/s
229–323 |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 4.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
269
tok/s
229–323 |
H100 CNX NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 4.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Meta AI
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 24 September 2024
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Text summarization, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning, Translation
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 3.2B
- Training data
- 9,000,000,000,000 tokens
https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-3.2-1B
"Llama 3.2 was pretrained on up to 9 trillion tokens of data from publicly available sources."
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 1.7 × 10²³ FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting,Hardware
6ND = 6*3210000000.00*9000000000000 = 1.7334e+23 460000 hours * 3600 s * 133800000000000 FLOPS/s* 0.3 = 6.647184e+22
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB
- Chip-hours
- 460,000
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Training code
- Unreleased
LLAMA 3.2 COMMUNITY LICENSE AGREEMENT https://github.com/meta-llama/llama-models/blob/main/models/llama3_2/LICENSE
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Likely above 10²³ FLOP
- Yes
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Llama 3.2: Revolutionizing edge AI and vision with open, customizable models
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Llama 3.2 3B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 1,056 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 1,056 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 843 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 843 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 674 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 645 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 645 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 617 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 548 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 548 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Llama 3.2 3B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 GeForce RTX 4010 4 GB · needs 3.3 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 29.2 tok/s
- 02 RTX A400 4 GB · needs 3.3 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 29.2 tok/s
- 03 RTX 500 Mobile Ada Generation 4 GB · needs 3.3 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 39.0 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile 4 GB · needs 3.3 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 58.5 tok/s
- 05 Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 4 GB · needs 3.3 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 10.4 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 6450M 4 GB · needs 3.3 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 30.4 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6550M 4 GB · needs 3.3 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 34.2 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6550S 4 GB · needs 3.3 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 30.4 tok/s
- 09 Arc A310 4 GB · needs 3.3 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 24.6 tok/s
- 10 Arc Pro A30M 4 GB · needs 3.3 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 25.3 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What it takes to run this model
Minimum card
Tesla C1080
Memory needed
3.3 GB
Fastest
1,056 tok/s
Llama 3.2 3B reaches a parameter count of 3.2B. That is small enough that hardware is rarely the obstacle, including on cards several years old. The number of cards we track that can run it: 818.
The smallest card that holds it is Tesla C1080, with a memory capacity of 4 GB, running it at a compression of Q4_K_M and producing around 26.5 tokens per second.
The quickest result comes from B200, generating roughly 1,056 tokens per second on the strength of a memory bandwidth of 8,000 GB/s.
What this model is
Llama 3.2 3B was published by Meta AI, in the country recorded as United States of America, during September 2024. The category the publisher falls under is industry.
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as performing the task of language modeling/generation, Text summarization, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning, Translation.
The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached.
What decides the speed
Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range sits at 39.0 tokens per second. Exceeding reading speed outright: 785 of them.
Being dense, it reads all of itself per token, which is why the ordering by speed below follows the ordering by memory bandwidth so closely.
Because the architecture is recorded, the memory column is derived rather than estimated.
Training and provenance
Producing it required arithmetic totalling around 1.7 × 10²³ FLOP, on hardware recorded as NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB. That figure measures what producing the model cost, and has no bearing on how fast it answers.
The training set ran to roughly 9,000,000,000,000 tokens of text.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Llama 3.2 3B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start from the memory column
The table lists every card able to hold Llama 3.2 3B, needing around 3.3 GB at a compression of Q4_K_M. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Match the context to your actual use
Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason a card that seemed fine stops fitting Llama 3.2 3B.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold, reaching a compression of Q4_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a minimum quality drops the cards that only manage it by squeezing further than you would want, and holds the comparison at one level.
-
04
Sort by speed
Ranking by tokens per second follows memory bandwidth rather than core counts, for Llama 3.2 3B. It will not match a gaming ordering, because generation is bound by memory bandwidth. The card topping the list is B200, at 1,056 tok/s.
-
05
Look at the headroom, not just the fit
A tight fit runs, but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation, in the case of Llama 3.2 3B. Comfortable means you can grow the context later. That difference matters more than a few tokens per second, so buy for comfortable if you expect to.
-
06
Check the card from the other side
Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once you have settled on Llama 3.2 3B.
Answers
Llama 3.2 3B — common questions
Llama 3.2 3B— how fast is it on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is B200, at about 1,056 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and the number of cards clearing that: 785.
Llama 3.2 3B— how much VRAM does it need?
It needs about 3.3 GB at a compression of Q4_K_M, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Llama 3.2 3B— can I run it on a GPU holding 8 GB?
Yes. The card CMP 170HX 8 GB, holding 8 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 4.8 GB and generating roughly 197 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.
Llama 3.2 3B— can I run it on a GPU holding 12 GB?
Yes. The card GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, holding 12 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 4.8 GB and generating roughly 120 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.
Llama 3.2 3B— can I run it on a GPU holding 16 GB?
Yes. The card Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, holding 16 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 4.8 GB and generating roughly 149 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.
Llama 3.2 3B— can I run it on a GPU holding 24 GB?
Yes. The card GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, holding 24 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 4.8 GB and generating roughly 177 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.
Llama 3.2 3B— is it open source?
Its weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
Llama 3.2 3B— how many parameters does it have?
It has a parameter count of 3.2B. https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-3.2-1B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Llama 3.2 3B— who created it?
It was published by Meta AI, based in United States of America, an organisation categorised as industry.
Llama 3.2 3B— when was it released?
It was published in September 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
Llama 3.2 3B— what is it used for?
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as handling the task of language modeling/generation, Text summarization, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning, Translation. A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.
Llama 3.2 3B— where can I download it?
The weights are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
Llama 3.2 3B— how much compute was used to train it?
Training consumed around 1.7 × 10²³ FLOP, on hardware recorded as NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Llama 3.2 3B— can I run it if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part held in system memory drags the whole thing down. Every figure here assumes the whole model is resident on the card.
Llama 3.2 3B— would two GPUs run it faster?
A second card roughly doubles the memory available but not the generation rate. The number already able to run it alone: 818. So a second card is rarely the answer here.
Llama 3.2 3B— why does the quantisation differ between cards?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard it has to be squeezed. The number of distinct levels in the table above: 3. Bigger cards get the more accurate version, and the quality floor above pins the comparison to one level.
Llama 3.2 3B— how accurate are these speed estimates?
These are estimates with real error bars, and any of them could reasonably land anywhere in its published range depending on which runtime you use. The fastest result here: 897–1,267 tok/s on B200. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
Llama 3.2 3B— what GPU do I need to run it?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds it is Tesla C1080, with a memory capacity of 4 GB. It runs the model at a compression of Q4_K_M using about 3.3 GB, and produces roughly 26.5 tokens per second. The number of cards able to run it in total: 818.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.