DeepSeek-V2.5 TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
Smallest card that fits
Radeon Instinct MI250
128 GB · Q3_K_M · 68.8 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
142 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run DeepSeek-V2.5?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
17 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
142
tok/s
85–228 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 157.4 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
137
tok/s
82–220 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 102.5 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
120
tok/s
72–192 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 116.2 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
120
tok/s
72–192 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 116.2 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
112
tok/s
67–179 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 102.5 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
79.8
tok/s
48–128 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 239.9 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
74.0
tok/s
44–118 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 157.4 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
74.0
tok/s
44–118 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 157.4 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
68.8
tok/s
41–110 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 102.5 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
68.8
tok/s
41–110 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 102.5 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
67.8
tok/s
41–108 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 184.9 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
63.7
tok/s
38–102 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 239.9 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
63.7
tok/s
38–102 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 239.9 GB | Q8_0 | Tight |
|
57.4
tok/s
34–92 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 102.5 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
56.1
tok/s
34–90 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 102.5 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
7.4
tok/s
4–12 · low confidence |
GB10 NVIDIA | 128 GB | 273 GB/s | Oct 2025 | 102.5 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
7.4
tok/s
4–12 · low confidence |
Jetson T5000 NVIDIA | 128 GB | 273 GB/s | Aug 2025 | 102.5 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- DeepSeek
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- China
- Published
- 6 September 2024
- Authors
- DeepSeek-AI, Aixin Liu, Bei Feng, Bin Wang, Bingxuan Wang, Bo Liu, Chenggang Zhao, Chengqi Dengr, Chong Ruan, Damai Dai, Daya Guo, Dejian Yang, Deli Chen, Dongjie Ji, Erhang Li, Fangyun Lin, Fuli Luo, Guangbo Hao, Guanting Chen, Guowei Li, H. Zhang, Hanwei Xu, Hao Yang, Haowei Zhang, Honghui Ding, Huajian Xin, Huazuo Gao, Hui Li, Hui Qu, J.L. Cai, Jian Liang, Jianzhong Guo, Jiaqi Ni, Jiashi Li, Ji…
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Chat, Code generation
- Approach
- Self-supervised learning
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 236B
- Training data
- tokens
- Batch size
- 36,864,000
21B active params, 236B total
The original V2 had a dataset of 8.1T unique tokens, and coder-V2 added an additional 1.391T unique tokens of code and math. But it appears no additional training was done to combine them into this model.
Maximum batch size comes from training of V2-coder, which used long context training with 288 batches of 128k tokens = 36,864,000
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 1.8 × 10²⁴ FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting
V2.5 is a merge of V2-coder and V2-chat V2-coder is trained for 6T additional tokens from an intermediate checkpoint of V2, which had been trained for 4.2T tokens. Total: 10.2T V2-chat is fine-tuned from V2, saw 8.2T tokens in pre-training Unique steps: 8.2T + 6T = 14.2T FLOPs: 6 * 21B * 14.2T = 1.7892e24
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Data centre
- There is no paper to reference, no information about hardware used for training found in media.
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- deepseek-ai
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Likely above 10²³ FLOP
- Yes
- Why it is tracked
- Training cost
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- DeepSeek-V2.5
- Last updated
- 19 February 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs for DeepSeek-V2.5
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q5_K_M 142 tok/s
- 02 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q3_K_M 137 tok/s
- 03 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · IQ4_XS 120 tok/s
- 04 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · IQ4_XS 120 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q3_K_M 112 tok/s
- 06 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 79.8 tok/s
- 07 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q5_K_M 74.0 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI308X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q5_K_M 74.0 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI250 128 GB · 3,280 GB/s · Q3_K_M 68.8 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI250X 128 GB · 3,280 GB/s · Q3_K_M 68.8 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run DeepSeek-V2.5
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 GB10 128 GB · needs 102.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 7.4 tok/s
- 02 Jetson T5000 128 GB · needs 102.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 7.4 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · needs 102.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 112 tok/s
- 04 Data Center GPU Max 1550 128 GB · needs 102.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 57.4 tok/s
- 05 Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 128 GB · needs 102.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 56.1 tok/s
- 06 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · needs 102.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 137 tok/s
- 07 Radeon Instinct MI250 128 GB · needs 102.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 68.8 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI250X 128 GB · needs 102.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 68.8 tok/s
- 09 H200 NVL 141 GB · needs 116.2 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 120 tok/s
- 10 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · needs 116.2 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 120 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What it takes to run this model
Minimum card
Radeon Instinct MI250
Memory needed
102.5 GB
Fastest
142 tok/s
At 236B parameters, DeepSeek-V2.5 is beyond what any single graphics card holds. Running it means either splitting it across several cards or renting hardware built for the job — 17 of the cards we track can hold it on their own, and all of them are datacentre parts.
The smallest card that holds it is the Radeon Instinct MI250 with 128 GB, running it at Q3_K_M and producing around 68.8 tokens per second.
At the other end, a B200 generates roughly 142 tokens per second on it, on the strength of 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
Where it came from
DeepSeek-V2.5 was published by DeepSeek, in China, in September 2024. industry is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling/generation, Chat, Code generation.
The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached. It is published under the deepseek-ai organisation on Hugging Face.
Understanding the speeds
The median result is around 68.8 tokens per second; 15 cards produce text faster than most people read it.
Because it routes each token through a subset of its weights, it produces text at the pace of a much smaller model. The catch is memory: all of it still has to fit, so the speed is a bonus rather than a discount on hardware.
Its internal architecture is not on file, so memory is approximated from the parameter count and marked accordingly. Expect the real figure to differ, more so at long context.
How it was trained
Producing it required around 1.8 × 10²⁴ FLOP of arithmetic, which is a statement about the training budget rather than about inference.
It is tracked in the underlying dataset for one reason in particular: training cost.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for DeepSeek-V2.5
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Check what it needs before anything else
Every card here has been checked against DeepSeek-V2.5 — around 102.5 GB at Q3_K_M. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Match the context to your actual use
Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason DeepSeek-V2.5 stops fitting a card that seemed fine.
-
03
Set a quality floor
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a floor drops the cards that only manage DeepSeek-V2.5 by squeezing it further than you would want.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
The speed ordering for DeepSeek-V2.5 is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 142 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
The fit column separates cards that just manage DeepSeek-V2.5 from those with room to spare. Buy for the second if the context might grow.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once DeepSeek-V2.5 is settled.
Answers
DeepSeek-V2.5 — common questions
Would two GPUs run DeepSeek-V2.5 faster?
Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. Since 17 of the cards we track already hold DeepSeek-V2.5 on their own, a second card is rarely the answer here.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for DeepSeek-V2.5?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. Across the cards that run DeepSeek-V2.5, 5 compression levels are used; the floor control above pins it to one.
How accurate are these DeepSeek-V2.5 speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 85–228 tok/s on the B200 rather than a single number.
What GPU do I need to run DeepSeek-V2.5?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds DeepSeek-V2.5 is the Radeon Instinct MI250, with 128 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 102.5 GB, and produces roughly 68.8 tokens per second. 17 cards in total can run it.
How fast is DeepSeek-V2.5 on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 142 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 15 of the cards that can run DeepSeek-V2.5 clear that.
How much VRAM does DeepSeek-V2.5 need?
About 102.5 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Is DeepSeek-V2.5 open source?
Its weights are published, so DeepSeek-V2.5 can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does DeepSeek-V2.5 have?
DeepSeek-V2.5 has 236B parameters. 21B active params, 236B total. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created DeepSeek-V2.5?
DeepSeek-V2.5 was published by DeepSeek, based in China, categorised as industry.
When was DeepSeek-V2.5 released?
DeepSeek-V2.5 was published in September 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is DeepSeek-V2.5 used for?
DeepSeek-V2.5 works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling/generation, Chat, Code generation. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.
Where can I download DeepSeek-V2.5?
Its weights are published under the deepseek-ai organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
How much compute was used to train DeepSeek-V2.5?
Around 1.8 × 10²⁴ FLOP. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run DeepSeek-V2.5 if it does not fit in my GPU?
It can be split between the card and system memory, but DeepSeek-V2.5 generates painfully slowly that way — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 43.6 GB. Nothing on this page assumes offloading.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.