InternVL2-40B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
Smallest card that fits
Tesla M40 24 GB
24 GB · Q3_K_M · 7.0 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
84.5 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run InternVL2-40B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
126 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
84.5
tok/s
51–135 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 43.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
84.5
tok/s
51–135 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 43.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
67.5
tok/s
40–108 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 43.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
67.5
tok/s
40–108 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 43.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
54.0
tok/s
32–86 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 43.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
51.7
tok/s
31–83 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 43.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
51.7
tok/s
31–83 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 43.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
49.4
tok/s
30–79 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 43.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
45.6
tok/s
27–73 · low confidence |
DRIVE A100 PROD NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 25.0 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
45.6
tok/s
27–73 · low confidence |
GRID A100A NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 25.0 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
43.9
tok/s
26–70 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 43.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
43.9
tok/s
26–70 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 43.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
43.9
tok/s
26–70 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 43.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
43.7
tok/s
26–70 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,790 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 25.0 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
43.7
tok/s
26–70 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 D NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,790 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 25.0 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
41.6
tok/s
25–67 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 43.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
38.2
tok/s
23–61 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 NVIDIA | 24 GB | 1,340 GB/s | Aug 2025 | 20.3 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
35.5
tok/s
21–57 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 43.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
35.5
tok/s
21–57 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 43.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
35.5
tok/s
21–57 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 43.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
35.5
tok/s
21–57 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 43.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
35.5
tok/s
21–57 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 43.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
34.8
tok/s
21–56 · low confidence |
A30X NVIDIA | 24 GB | 1,220 GB/s | Apr 2021 | 20.3 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
28.8
tok/s
17–46 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti NVIDIA | 24 GB | 1,010 GB/s | Jan 2022 | 20.3 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
28.8
tok/s
17–46 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 4090 NVIDIA | 24 GB | 1,010 GB/s | Sep 2022 | 20.3 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Shanghai AI Lab
- Organisation type
- Academia
- Country
- China
- Published
- 4 July 2024
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Multimodal, Language, Vision, Video
- Task
- Visual question answering, Language modeling/generation, Question answering, Video description, Character recognition (OCR)
- Base model
- Nous-Hermes-2-Yi-34B,InternViT-6B
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 40.1B
- Training data
- tokens
- Epochs
- 1
40.1B
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Open source
- Hugging Face
- OpenGVLab
MIT license https://huggingface.co/OpenGVLab/InternVL2-40B MIT license https://github.com/OpenGVLab/InternVL "Release training / evaluation code for InternVL2 series" is checked off
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
- Citations
- 190
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- InternVL2: Better than the Best—Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with the Progressive Scaling Strategy
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs for InternVL2-40B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 84.5 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 84.5 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 67.5 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 67.5 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 54.0 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 51.7 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 51.7 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 49.4 tok/s
- 09 DRIVE A100 PROD 32 GB · 1,870 GB/s · Q4_K_M 45.6 tok/s
- 10 GRID A100A 32 GB · 1,870 GB/s · Q4_K_M 45.6 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run InternVL2-40B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Arc Pro B60 24 GB · needs 20.3 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 8.5 tok/s
- 02 GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 24 GB · needs 20.3 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 38.2 tok/s
- 03 RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 24 GB · needs 20.3 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 12.3 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile 24 GB · needs 20.3 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 25.5 tok/s
- 05 RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24 GB · needs 20.3 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 19.2 tok/s
- 06 GeForce RTX 4090 D 24 GB · needs 20.3 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 28.8 tok/s
- 07 RTX 4500 Ada Generation 24 GB · needs 20.3 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 12.3 tok/s
- 08 L4 24 GB · needs 20.3 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 8.6 tok/s
- 09 Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24 GB · needs 20.3 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 21.3 tok/s
- 10 L40 CNX 24 GB · needs 20.3 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 24.6 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What you need to run it
Minimum card
Tesla M40 24 GB
Memory needed
20.3 GB
Fastest
84.5 tok/s
With 40.1B parameters, InternVL2-40B lands in the range a serious desktop card can handle once the weights are compressed. 126 of the cards we track can run it.
The least hardware that works is a Tesla M40 24 GB. Its 24 GB is enough at Q3_K_M compression, giving roughly 7.0 tokens per second.
The quickest result comes from a B200 at around 84.5 tokens per second — its 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth is what buys that.
Background
InternVL2-40B was published by Shanghai AI Lab, in China, in July 2024. It comes out of academia.
It works in Multimodal, Language, Vision, Video, and is recorded as doing visual question answering, Language modeling/generation, Question answering, Video description, Character recognition (OCR).
It builds on Nous-Hermes-2-Yi-34B,InternViT-6B, which is why it shares that model's general shape and size.
Published weights mean the model runs on your machine rather than someone else's, which is what makes the hardware question below answerable at all. It is published under the OpenGVLab organisation on Hugging Face.
Reading the throughput figures
Half the cards that hold it manage more than 21.2 tokens per second, and 106 exceed reading speed outright.
Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.
Without the attention layout on record, the memory column is an approximation. It is close enough to choose hardware by, and least reliable at long context.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for InternVL2-40B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Read the memory figure first
Every card here has been checked against InternVL2-40B — around 20.3 GB at Q3_K_M. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Match the context to your actual use
Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason InternVL2-40B stops fitting a card that seemed fine.
-
03
Decide how much compression you will accept
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a floor drops the cards that only manage InternVL2-40B by squeezing it further than you would want.
-
04
Compare tokens per second, not specifications
The speed ordering for InternVL2-40B is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 84.5 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
Tight means InternVL2-40B loads and works, with no room to raise the context later. Comfortable means you can. The difference matters more than a few tokens per second.
-
06
See what else that card runs
Each card page repeats this sweep for every model we hold. It answers what else the hardware is good for, beyond InternVL2-40B.
Answers
InternVL2-40B — common questions
Can I run InternVL2-40B if it does not fit in my GPU?
Partly. Layers that do not fit sit in system memory and run at a fraction of the speed, so a mostly-offloaded InternVL2-40B is rarely worth using — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 7.0 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is on the card.
Would two GPUs run InternVL2-40B faster?
A second card roughly doubles the memory available but not the generation rate. With 126 cards already able to run InternVL2-40B alone, the case for pairing is weak.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for InternVL2-40B?
Each card is shown running the least-compressed copy it can hold, and InternVL2-40B appears at 4 different compression levels across the cards that fit it. Bigger cards get the more accurate version.
How accurate are these InternVL2-40B speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 51–135 tok/s on the B200 rather than a single number.
What GPU do I need to run InternVL2-40B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds InternVL2-40B is the Tesla M40 24 GB, with 24 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 20.3 GB, and produces roughly 7.0 tokens per second. 126 cards in total can run it.
How fast is InternVL2-40B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 84.5 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 106 of the cards that can run InternVL2-40B clear that.
How much VRAM does InternVL2-40B need?
About 20.3 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run InternVL2-40B on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q3_K_M, using about 20.3 GB and generating roughly 38.2 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Is InternVL2-40B open source?
Its weights are published, so InternVL2-40B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does InternVL2-40B have?
InternVL2-40B has 40.1B parameters. 40.1B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created InternVL2-40B?
InternVL2-40B was published by Shanghai AI Lab, based in China, categorised as academia.
When was InternVL2-40B released?
InternVL2-40B was published in July 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is InternVL2-40B used for?
InternVL2-40B works in Multimodal, Language, Vision, Video, and is recorded as handling visual question answering, Language modeling/generation, Question answering, Video description, Character recognition (OCR). A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.
Where can I download InternVL2-40B?
Its weights are published under the OpenGVLab organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.