Qwen2-57B-A14B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Radeon PRO V710
28 GB · Q3_K_M · 32.1 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
242 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Qwen2-57B-A14B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
93 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
242
tok/s
145–387 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
242
tok/s
145–387 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
193
tok/s
116–309 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
193
tok/s
116–309 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
155
tok/s
93–247 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
148
tok/s
89–237 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
148
tok/s
89–237 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
142
tok/s
85–227 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
139
tok/s
83–222 · low confidence |
DRIVE A100 PROD NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 27.9 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
139
tok/s
83–222 · low confidence |
GRID A100A NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 27.9 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
133
tok/s
80–213 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,790 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 27.9 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
133
tok/s
80–213 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 D NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,790 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 27.9 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
126
tok/s
75–201 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
126
tok/s
75–201 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
126
tok/s
75–201 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
119
tok/s
72–191 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
109
tok/s
65–174 · low confidence |
A100 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Jun 2020 | 31.3 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
109
tok/s
65–174 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | May 2020 | 31.3 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
109
tok/s
65–174 · low confidence |
A800 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Nov 2022 | 31.3 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
102
tok/s
61–163 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
102
tok/s
61–163 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
102
tok/s
61–163 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
102
tok/s
61–163 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
102
tok/s
61–163 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
101
tok/s
61–162 · low confidence |
GRID A100B NVIDIA | 48 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 37.9 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Alibaba
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- China
- Published
- 7 June 2024
- Authors
- An Yang, Baosong Yang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chang Zhou, Chengpeng Li, Chengyuan Li, Dayiheng Liu, Fei Huang, Guanting Dong, Haoran Wei, Huan Lin, Jialong Tang, Jialin Wang, Jian Yang, Jianhong Tu, Jianwei Zhang, Jianxin Ma, Jianxin Yang, Jin Xu, Jingren Zhou, Jinze Bai, Jinzheng He, Junyang Lin, Kai Dang, Keming Lu, Keqin Chen, Kexin Yang, Mei Li, Mingfeng Xue, Na Ni, Pei Zhang, Peng W…
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Chat, Language modeling/generation, Question answering
- Approach
- Self-supervised learning
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 57B
- Training data
- tokens
57B parameters (table 1)
"All models were pre-trained on a high-quality, large-scale dataset comprising over 7 trillion tokens, covering a wide range of domains and languages." 57B-A14B model was trained with a 4.5T subset of the 7T overall dataset. (table 1)
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 3.8 × 10²³ FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting
"For MoE models, 57B-A14B denotes that the model has 57B parameters in total and for each token 14B parameters are active" (page 5) C ~= 6 FLOP * 14e9 * 4.5e12 = 3.78e23
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- Qwen
Apache 2.0
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Likely above 10²³ FLOP
- Yes
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Hello Qwen2
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Qwen2-57B-A14B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 242 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 242 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 193 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 193 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 155 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 148 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 148 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 142 tok/s
- 09 DRIVE A100 PROD 32 GB · 1,870 GB/s · IQ4_XS 139 tok/s
- 10 GRID A100A 32 GB · 1,870 GB/s · IQ4_XS 139 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Qwen2-57B-A14B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Radeon PRO V710 28 GB · needs 24.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 32.1 tok/s
- 02 Radeon AI PRO 9600D 32 GB · needs 27.9 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 33.4 tok/s
- 03 Radeon AI PRO R9700S 32 GB · needs 27.9 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 37.4 tok/s
- 04 Radeon AI PRO R9700 32 GB · needs 27.9 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 37.4 tok/s
- 05 RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell 32 GB · needs 27.9 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 66.6 tok/s
- 06 GeForce RTX 5090 32 GB · needs 27.9 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 133 tok/s
- 07 GeForce RTX 5090 D 32 GB · needs 27.9 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 133 tok/s
- 08 RTX 5000 Ada Generation 32 GB · needs 27.9 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 42.8 tok/s
- 09 Radeon PRO W7800 32 GB · needs 27.9 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 33.4 tok/s
- 10 Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB 32 GB · needs 27.9 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 15.2 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What you need to run it
Minimum card
Radeon PRO V710
Memory needed
24.6 GB
Fastest
242 tok/s
Qwen2-57B-A14B reaches a parameter count of 57B. That lands in the range a serious desktop card can handle once the weights are compressed. The number of cards we track that can run it: 93.
The least hardware that works is Radeon PRO V710, with a memory capacity of 28 GB, running it at a compression of Q3_K_M and producing around 32.1 tokens per second.
Top of the range is B200, generating roughly 242 tokens per second on the strength of a memory bandwidth of 8,000 GB/s.
About this model
Qwen2-57B-A14B was published by Alibaba, in the country recorded as China, during June 2024. It comes out of an organisation categorised as industry.
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as performing the task of chat, Language modeling/generation, Question answering.
The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached. On Hugging Face it is published under the organisation Qwen.
How fast it runs, and why
Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range sits at 61.7 tokens per second. Producing text faster than most people read it: 90 of them.
This is a mixture-of-experts model, which routes each token through only part of itself. It therefore generates far faster than its total size suggests — while still needing every parameter resident in memory, so it is quick without being cheap to hold.
Because the architecture is recorded, the memory column is derived rather than estimated.
Training and provenance
The training run consumed about 3.8 × 10²³ FLOP. That figure measures what producing the model cost, and has no bearing on how fast it answers.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Qwen2-57B-A14B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Check what it needs before anything else
Every card here has been checked against Qwen2-57B-A14B, needing around 24.6 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect, because at long context a card that handles short questions easily can be dropped by Qwen2-57B-A14B.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
Compression is what makes a model fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy, reaching a compression of Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a minimum quality drops the cards that only manage it by squeezing further than you would want, and holds the comparison at one level.
-
04
Compare tokens per second, not specifications
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for Qwen2-57B-A14B. It will not match a gaming ordering, because generation is bound by memory bandwidth. The card topping the list is B200, at 242 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
Tight means it loads and works with no room to raise the context later, in the case of Qwen2-57B-A14B. Comfortable means you can grow the context later. That difference matters more than a few tokens per second, so buy for comfortable if you expect to.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. A card is usually bought for more than one model, so it is worth a look before buying for Qwen2-57B-A14B.
Answers
Qwen2-57B-A14B — common questions
Qwen2-57B-A14B— where can I download it?
Its weights are published on Hugging Face, under the organisation Qwen. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
Qwen2-57B-A14B— how much compute was used to train it?
Training consumed around 3.8 × 10²³ FLOP. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Qwen2-57B-A14B— can I run it if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part held in system memory drags the whole thing down. The nearest miss we calculate falls short by 9.7 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is resident on the card.
Qwen2-57B-A14B— would two GPUs run it faster?
A second card roughly doubles the memory available but not the generation rate. The number already able to run it alone: 93. So a second card is rarely the answer here.
Qwen2-57B-A14B— why does the quantisation differ between cards?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. The number of compression levels used across the cards that run it: 6. Bigger cards get the more accurate version, and the quality floor above pins the comparison to one level.
Qwen2-57B-A14B— how accurate are these speed estimates?
They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range. One example: 145–387 tok/s on B200. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
Qwen2-57B-A14B— what GPU do I need to run it?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds it is Radeon PRO V710, with a memory capacity of 28 GB. It runs the model at a compression of Q3_K_M using about 24.6 GB, and produces roughly 32.1 tokens per second. The number of cards able to run it in total: 93.
Qwen2-57B-A14B— how fast is it on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is B200, at about 242 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and the number of cards clearing that: 90.
Qwen2-57B-A14B— how much VRAM does it need?
It needs about 24.6 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Qwen2-57B-A14B— is it open source?
Its weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
Qwen2-57B-A14B— how many parameters does it have?
It has a parameter count of 57B. 57B parameters (table 1). That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Qwen2-57B-A14B— who created it?
It was published by Alibaba, based in China, an organisation categorised as industry.
Qwen2-57B-A14B— when was it released?
It was published in June 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
Qwen2-57B-A14B— what is it used for?
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as handling the task of chat, Language modeling/generation, Question answering. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.