Qwen2-57B-A14B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
Smallest card that fits
Radeon PRO V710
28 GB · Q3_K_M · 32.1 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
242 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Qwen2-57B-A14B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
93 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
242
tok/s
145–387 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
242
tok/s
145–387 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
193
tok/s
116–309 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
193
tok/s
116–309 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
155
tok/s
93–247 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
148
tok/s
89–237 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
148
tok/s
89–237 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
142
tok/s
85–227 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
139
tok/s
83–222 · low confidence |
DRIVE A100 PROD NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 27.9 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
139
tok/s
83–222 · low confidence |
GRID A100A NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 27.9 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
133
tok/s
80–213 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,790 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 27.9 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
133
tok/s
80–213 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 D NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,790 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 27.9 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
126
tok/s
75–201 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
126
tok/s
75–201 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
126
tok/s
75–201 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
119
tok/s
72–191 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
109
tok/s
65–174 · low confidence |
A100 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Jun 2020 | 31.3 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
109
tok/s
65–174 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | May 2020 | 31.3 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
109
tok/s
65–174 · low confidence |
A800 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Nov 2022 | 31.3 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
102
tok/s
61–163 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
102
tok/s
61–163 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
102
tok/s
61–163 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
102
tok/s
61–163 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
102
tok/s
61–163 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 57.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
101
tok/s
61–162 · low confidence |
GRID A100B NVIDIA | 48 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 37.9 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Alibaba
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- China
- Published
- 7 June 2024
- Authors
- An Yang, Baosong Yang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chang Zhou, Chengpeng Li, Chengyuan Li, Dayiheng Liu, Fei Huang, Guanting Dong, Haoran Wei, Huan Lin, Jialong Tang, Jialin Wang, Jian Yang, Jianhong Tu, Jianwei Zhang, Jianxin Ma, Jianxin Yang, Jin Xu, Jingren Zhou, Jinze Bai, Jinzheng He, Junyang Lin, Kai Dang, Keming Lu, Keqin Chen, Kexin Yang, Mei Li, Mingfeng Xue, Na Ni, Pei Zhang, Peng W…
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Chat, Language modeling/generation, Question answering
- Approach
- Self-supervised learning
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 57B
- Training data
- tokens
57B parameters (table 1)
"All models were pre-trained on a high-quality, large-scale dataset comprising over 7 trillion tokens, covering a wide range of domains and languages." 57B-A14B model was trained with a 4.5T subset of the 7T overall dataset. (table 1)
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 3.8 × 10²³ FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting
"For MoE models, 57B-A14B denotes that the model has 57B parameters in total and for each token 14B parameters are active" (page 5) C ~= 6 FLOP * 14e9 * 4.5e12 = 3.78e23
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- Qwen
Apache 2.0
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Likely above 10²³ FLOP
- Yes
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Hello Qwen2
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs for Qwen2-57B-A14B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 242 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 242 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 193 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 193 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 155 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 148 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 148 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 142 tok/s
- 09 DRIVE A100 PROD 32 GB · 1,870 GB/s · IQ4_XS 139 tok/s
- 10 GRID A100A 32 GB · 1,870 GB/s · IQ4_XS 139 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Qwen2-57B-A14B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Radeon PRO V710 28 GB · needs 24.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 32.1 tok/s
- 02 Radeon AI PRO 9600D 32 GB · needs 27.9 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 33.4 tok/s
- 03 Radeon AI PRO R9700S 32 GB · needs 27.9 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 37.4 tok/s
- 04 Radeon AI PRO R9700 32 GB · needs 27.9 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 37.4 tok/s
- 05 RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell 32 GB · needs 27.9 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 66.6 tok/s
- 06 GeForce RTX 5090 32 GB · needs 27.9 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 133 tok/s
- 07 GeForce RTX 5090 D 32 GB · needs 27.9 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 133 tok/s
- 08 RTX 5000 Ada Generation 32 GB · needs 27.9 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 42.8 tok/s
- 09 Radeon PRO W7800 32 GB · needs 27.9 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 33.4 tok/s
- 10 Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB 32 GB · needs 27.9 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 15.2 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What you need to run it
Minimum card
Radeon PRO V710
Memory needed
24.6 GB
Fastest
242 tok/s
With 57B parameters, Qwen2-57B-A14B lands in the range a serious desktop card can handle once the weights are compressed. 93 of the cards we track can run it.
The least hardware that works is a Radeon PRO V710. Its 28 GB is enough at Q3_K_M compression, giving roughly 32.1 tokens per second.
Top of the range is the B200, at roughly 242 tokens per second thanks to 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth.
About this model
Qwen2-57B-A14B was published by Alibaba, in China, in June 2024. It comes out of industry.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing chat, Language modeling/generation, Question answering.
The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached. It is published under the Qwen organisation on Hugging Face.
How fast it runs, and why
Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range is about 61.7 tokens per second, and 90 of them clear the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed.
This is a mixture-of-experts model, which routes each token through only part of itself. It therefore generates far faster than its total size suggests — while still needing every parameter resident in memory, so it is quick without being cheap to hold.
Because the architecture is recorded, the memory column is derived rather than estimated.
Training and provenance
The training run consumed about 3.8 × 10²³ FLOP. That figure describes the cost of creating it and has no bearing on how quickly it generates text.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Qwen2-57B-A14B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Check what it needs before anything else
Every card here has been checked against Qwen2-57B-A14B — around 24.6 GB at Q3_K_M. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect: at long context Qwen2-57B-A14B can slip off a card that handles short questions easily.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
Compression is what makes Qwen2-57B-A14B fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. A minimum quality removes the ones that go too far.
-
04
Compare tokens per second, not specifications
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for Qwen2-57B-A14B. It will not match a gaming ordering — generation is bound by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 242 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
Tight means Qwen2-57B-A14B loads and works, with no room to raise the context later. Comfortable means you can. The difference matters more than a few tokens per second.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. Worth a look before buying for Qwen2-57B-A14B alone — a card is usually bought for more than one model.
Answers
Qwen2-57B-A14B — common questions
Where can I download Qwen2-57B-A14B?
Its weights are published under the Qwen organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
How much compute was used to train Qwen2-57B-A14B?
Around 3.8 × 10²³ FLOP. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run Qwen2-57B-A14B if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part in system memory drags the whole thing down — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 9.7 GB. Our figures for Qwen2-57B-A14B assume it is fully resident.
Would two GPUs run Qwen2-57B-A14B faster?
A second card roughly doubles the memory available but not the generation rate. With 93 cards already able to run Qwen2-57B-A14B alone, the case for pairing is weak.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Qwen2-57B-A14B?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. Across the cards that run Qwen2-57B-A14B, 6 compression levels are used; the floor control above pins it to one.
How accurate are these Qwen2-57B-A14B speed estimates?
They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range — 145–387 tok/s on the B200, for instance. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
What GPU do I need to run Qwen2-57B-A14B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Qwen2-57B-A14B is the Radeon PRO V710, with 28 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 24.6 GB, and produces roughly 32.1 tokens per second. 93 cards in total can run it.
How fast is Qwen2-57B-A14B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 242 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 90 of the cards that can run Qwen2-57B-A14B clear that.
How much VRAM does Qwen2-57B-A14B need?
About 24.6 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Is Qwen2-57B-A14B open source?
Its weights are published, so Qwen2-57B-A14B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does Qwen2-57B-A14B have?
Qwen2-57B-A14B has 57B parameters. 57B parameters (table 1). That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created Qwen2-57B-A14B?
Qwen2-57B-A14B was published by Alibaba, based in China, categorised as industry.
When was Qwen2-57B-A14B released?
Qwen2-57B-A14B was published in June 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is Qwen2-57B-A14B used for?
Qwen2-57B-A14B works in Language, and is recorded as handling chat, Language modeling/generation, Question answering. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.