WizardLM-2 7B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Tesla K20c
5 GB · Q3_K_M · 28.9 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
484 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run WizardLM-2 7B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
589 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
484
tok/s
290–774 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
484
tok/s
290–774 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
387
tok/s
232–618 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
387
tok/s
232–618 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
309
tok/s
185–495 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
296
tok/s
178–473 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
296
tok/s
178–473 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
283
tok/s
170–453 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
251
tok/s
151–402 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
251
tok/s
151–402 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
251
tok/s
151–402 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
238
tok/s
143–381 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
203
tok/s
122–325 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
203
tok/s
122–325 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
203
tok/s
122–325 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
203
tok/s
122–325 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
203
tok/s
122–325 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
155
tok/s
93–248 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
155
tok/s
93–248 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
131
tok/s
79–210 · low confidence |
CMP 170HX 8 GB NVIDIA | 8 GB | 1,490 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 6.6 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
129
tok/s
77–206 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
126
tok/s
76–202 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
123
tok/s
74–197 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
123
tok/s
74–197 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
123
tok/s
74–197 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Microsoft
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 15 April 2024
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Question answering
- Base model
- Mistral 7B
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 7B
- Training data
- tokens
7b
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- dreamgen
The License of WizardLM-2 8x22B and WizardLM-2 7B is Apache2.0. https://huggingface.co/dreamgen/WizardLM-2-7B
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run WizardLM-2 7B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 484 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 484 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 387 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 387 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 309 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 296 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 296 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 283 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 251 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 251 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run WizardLM-2 7B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Quadro P2200 5 GB · needs 4.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 27.8 tok/s
- 02 P102-100 5 GB · needs 4.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 61.1 tok/s
- 03 GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB 5 GB · needs 4.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 22.2 tok/s
- 04 Quadro P2000 5 GB · needs 4.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 19.5 tok/s
- 05 Tesla K20s 5 GB · needs 4.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 28.9 tok/s
- 06 Tesla K20m 5 GB · needs 4.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 28.9 tok/s
- 07 Tesla K20c 5 GB · needs 4.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 28.9 tok/s
- 08 RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation 6 GB · needs 4.9 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 26.8 tok/s
- 09 GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 6 GB · needs 4.9 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 23.5 tok/s
- 10 Arc A380M 6 GB · needs 4.9 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 16.9 tok/s
What the numbers mean
The hardware side
Minimum card
Tesla K20c
Memory needed
4.1 GB
Fastest
484 tok/s
WizardLM-2 7B is small enough at 7B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 589 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
At the low end, a Tesla K20c handles it — 5 GB, at Q3_K_M, for about 28.9 tokens per second.
At the other end, a B200 generates roughly 484 tokens per second on it, on the strength of 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
Background
WizardLM-2 7B was published by Microsoft, in United States of America, in April 2024. It comes out of industry.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling/generation, Question answering.
Its starting point was Mistral 7B — most models at this scale are adapted from an existing base rather than built from nothing.
The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached. It is published under the dreamgen organisation on Hugging Face.
Reading the throughput figures
Half the cards that hold it manage more than 26.1 tokens per second, and 559 exceed reading speed outright.
Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.
Memory here is estimated from size rather than computed from the architecture, which is not recorded for this model — the numbers are indicative rather than exact.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for WizardLM-2 7B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Check what it needs before anything else
Look at what WizardLM-2 7B actually needs — around 4.1 GB at Q3_K_M. No amount of processing power compensates for a card that cannot hold it.
-
02
Decide how long your conversations run
Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason WizardLM-2 7B stops fitting a card that seemed fine.
-
03
Decide how much compression you will accept
The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy of WizardLM-2 7B — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Set a floor to hold the comparison at one level.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
Ranking by tokens per second for WizardLM-2 7B follows memory bandwidth, not core counts, which is why the B200 tops it at 484 tok/s.
-
05
Check the fit verdict before buying
A tight fit runs WizardLM-2 7B but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation; comfortable has headroom. If you expect to grow the context, buy for comfortable.
-
06
Check the card from the other side
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. Worth a look before buying for WizardLM-2 7B alone — a card is usually bought for more than one model.
Answers
WizardLM-2 7B — common questions
How much VRAM does WizardLM-2 7B need?
About 4.1 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run WizardLM-2 7B on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q6_K, using about 6.6 GB and generating roughly 131 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run WizardLM-2 7B on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 8.2 GB and generating roughly 55.2 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run WizardLM-2 7B on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 8.2 GB and generating roughly 68.4 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run WizardLM-2 7B on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 8.2 GB and generating roughly 81.1 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is WizardLM-2 7B open source?
Its weights are published, so WizardLM-2 7B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does WizardLM-2 7B have?
WizardLM-2 7B has 7B parameters. 7b. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created WizardLM-2 7B?
WizardLM-2 7B was published by Microsoft, based in United States of America, categorised as industry.
When was WizardLM-2 7B released?
WizardLM-2 7B was published in April 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is WizardLM-2 7B used for?
WizardLM-2 7B works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling/generation, Question answering. A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.
Where can I download WizardLM-2 7B?
Its weights are published under the dreamgen organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
Can I run WizardLM-2 7B if it does not fit in my GPU?
Partly. Layers that do not fit sit in system memory and run at a fraction of the speed, so a mostly-offloaded WizardLM-2 7B is rarely worth using — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 1.3 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is on the card.
Would two GPUs run WizardLM-2 7B faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed. That matters for WizardLM-2 7B only if one card cannot hold it — 589 can, so a second adds little.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for WizardLM-2 7B?
Each card is shown running the least-compressed copy it can hold, and WizardLM-2 7B appears at 4 different compression levels across the cards that fit it. Bigger cards get the more accurate version.
How accurate are these WizardLM-2 7B speed estimates?
These are estimates with real error bars. The fastest result here, 290–774 tok/s on the B200, could reasonably land anywhere in its published range depending on which runtime you use.
What GPU do I need to run WizardLM-2 7B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds WizardLM-2 7B is the Tesla K20c, with 5 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 4.1 GB, and produces roughly 28.9 tokens per second. 589 cards in total can run it.
How fast is WizardLM-2 7B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 484 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 559 of the cards that can run WizardLM-2 7B clear that.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.