OpenThaiGPT v1.0.0 (7B) TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Tesla K20c
5 GB · IQ4_XS · 27.0 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
498 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run OpenThaiGPT v1.0.0 (7B)?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
589 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
498
tok/s
299–796 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 8.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
498
tok/s
299–796 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 8.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
397
tok/s
238–636 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 8.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
397
tok/s
238–636 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 8.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
318
tok/s
191–508 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 8.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
304
tok/s
182–487 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 8.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
304
tok/s
182–487 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 8.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
291
tok/s
175–466 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 8.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
258
tok/s
155–413 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 8.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
258
tok/s
155–413 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 8.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
258
tok/s
155–413 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 8.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
245
tok/s
147–392 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 8.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
209
tok/s
125–334 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 8.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
209
tok/s
125–334 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 8.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
209
tok/s
125–334 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 8.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
209
tok/s
125–334 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 8.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
209
tok/s
125–334 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 8.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
159
tok/s
95–255 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 8.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
159
tok/s
95–255 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 8.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
135
tok/s
81–215 · low confidence |
CMP 170HX 8 GB NVIDIA | 8 GB | 1,490 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 6.4 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
133
tok/s
80–212 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 8.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
130
tok/s
78–208 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 8.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
127
tok/s
76–203 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 8.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
127
tok/s
76–203 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 8.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
127
tok/s
76–203 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 8.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Mahidol University,AI Entrepreneurs Association of Thailand
- Organisation type
- Academia
- Country
- Thailand
- Published
- 8 April 2024
- Authors
- Kobkrit Viriyayudhakorn, Sumeth Yuenyong, Thaweewat Rugsujarit, Jillaphat Jaroenkantasima, Norapat Buppodom, Koravich Sangkaew, Peerawat Rojratchadakorn, Surapon Nonesung, Chanon Utupon, Sadhis Wongprayoon, Nucharee Thongthungwong, Chawakorn Phiantham, Patteera Triamamornwooth. Nattarika Juntarapaoraya, Kriangkrai Saetan, Pitikorn Khlaisamniang
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Chat, Language modeling/generation, Question answering, Retrieval-augmented generation
- Base model
- Llama 2-7B
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 6.8B
- Training data
- tokens
https://huggingface.co/openthaigpt/openthaigpt-1.0.0-7b-chat
"Pretrained upon a foundation of more than 65 billion Thai language words" (https://huggingface.co/openthaigpt/openthaigpt-1.0.0-13b-chat). Since this is a text generation model, the dataset size is measured in number of words (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XWLyMzcVfDv4eFQX3yPgM8MZ3_Q1phtIFz9GKv4_KaM/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.ieihc08p8dn0).
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 2.7 × 10²¹ FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting
- Fine-tuning compute
- 4.1 × 10¹⁶ FLOP
"Pretrained upon a foundation of more than 65 billion Thai language words and meticulously fine-tuned with over 1 million Thai instruction examples". The model has 6.81B parameters (https://huggingface.co/openthaigpt/openthaigpt-1.0.0-7b-chat). Every Asian language in https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XWLyMzcVfDv4eFQX3yPgM8MZ3_Q1phtIFz9GKv4_KaM/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.ieihc08p8dn0 has a word per token ratio of 1, so I will assume the same for Thai. Since Llama has dense architecture, assuming …
"Pretrained upon a foundation of more than 65 billion Thai language words and meticulously fine-tuned with over 1 million Thai instruction examples". The model has 6.81B parameters (https://huggingface.co/openthaigpt/openthaigpt-1.0.0-7b-chat). Since Llama has dense architecture, assuming fine-tuning was done for 1 epoch, the 6ND approximation yields Fine-tuning compute = # of active parameters / forward pass * # of examples * 6 FLOPS / token ~= 6.81e9 parameters * 1e6 examples * 6 FLOPS / toke…
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- openthaigpt
llama2 license https://huggingface.co/openthaigpt/openthaigpt-1.0.0-7b-chat
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- OpenThaiGPT 7b 1.0.0
- Last updated
- 11 February 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run OpenThaiGPT v1.0.0 (7B)
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 498 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 498 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 397 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 397 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 318 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 304 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 304 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 291 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 258 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 258 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run OpenThaiGPT v1.0.0 (7B)
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Quadro P2200 5 GB · needs 4.4 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 26.0 tok/s
- 02 P102-100 5 GB · needs 4.4 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 57.2 tok/s
- 03 GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB 5 GB · needs 4.4 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 20.8 tok/s
- 04 Quadro P2000 5 GB · needs 4.4 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 18.2 tok/s
- 05 Tesla K20s 5 GB · needs 4.4 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 27.0 tok/s
- 06 Tesla K20m 5 GB · needs 4.4 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 27.0 tok/s
- 07 Tesla K20c 5 GB · needs 4.4 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 27.0 tok/s
- 08 RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation 6 GB · needs 4.8 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 27.6 tok/s
- 09 GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 6 GB · needs 4.8 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 24.1 tok/s
- 10 Arc A380M 6 GB · needs 4.8 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 17.4 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What it takes to run this model
Minimum card
Tesla K20c
Memory needed
4.4 GB
Fastest
498 tok/s
OpenThaiGPT v1.0.0 (7B) reaches a parameter count of 6.8B. That is small enough that hardware is rarely the obstacle, including on cards several years old. The number of cards we track that can run it: 589.
The smallest card that holds it is Tesla K20c, with a memory capacity of 5 GB, running it at a compression of IQ4_XS and producing around 27.0 tokens per second.
The fastest we calculate for it is B200, generating roughly 498 tokens per second on the strength of a memory bandwidth of 8,000 GB/s.
What this model is
OpenThaiGPT v1.0.0 (7B) was published by Mahidol University,AI Entrepreneurs Association of Thailand, in the country recorded as Thailand, during April 2024. The category the publisher falls under is academia.
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as performing the task of chat, Language modeling/generation, Question answering, Retrieval-augmented generation.
It builds on Llama 2-7B. That is the usual way a specialised model is produced.
Published weights mean the model runs on your machine rather than someone else's, which is what makes the hardware question below answerable at all. On Hugging Face it is published under the organisation openthaigpt.
What decides the speed
Half the cards that hold it manage more than 26.9 tokens per second. Producing text faster than most people read it: 562 of them.
It is a dense model, so every parameter is read for every token produced. That makes speed track memory bandwidth almost exactly — a card with twice the bandwidth generates roughly twice as fast.
Its internal architecture is not on file, so memory is approximated from the parameter count and marked accordingly. Expect the real figure to differ, more so at long context.
How it was trained
Producing it required arithmetic totalling around 2.7 × 10²¹ FLOP. That figure measures what producing the model cost, and has no bearing on how fast it answers.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for OpenThaiGPT v1.0.0 (7B)
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Check what it needs before anything else
Every card here has been checked against OpenThaiGPT v1.0.0 (7B), needing around 4.4 GB at a compression of IQ4_XS. No amount of processing power compensates for a card that cannot hold it.
-
02
Decide how long your conversations run
Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason a card that seemed fine stops fitting OpenThaiGPT v1.0.0 (7B).
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold, reaching a compression of IQ4_XS on the smallest card that fits. Setting a minimum quality drops the cards that only manage it by squeezing further than you would want, and holds the comparison at one level.
-
04
Sort by speed
The speed ordering is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, for OpenThaiGPT v1.0.0 (7B). It will not match a gaming ordering, because generation is bound by memory bandwidth. The card topping the list is B200, at 498 tok/s.
-
05
Check the fit verdict before buying
A tight fit runs, but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation, in the case of OpenThaiGPT v1.0.0 (7B). Comfortable means you can grow the context later. That difference matters more than a few tokens per second, so buy for comfortable if you expect to.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. A card is usually bought for more than one model, so it is worth a look before buying for OpenThaiGPT v1.0.0 (7B).
Answers
OpenThaiGPT v1.0.0 (7B) — common questions
OpenThaiGPT v1.0.0 (7B)— what is it used for?
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as handling the task of chat, Language modeling/generation, Question answering, Retrieval-augmented generation. A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.
OpenThaiGPT v1.0.0 (7B)— where can I download it?
Its weights are published on Hugging Face, under the organisation openthaigpt. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
OpenThaiGPT v1.0.0 (7B)— how much compute was used to train it?
Training consumed around 2.7 × 10²¹ FLOP. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
OpenThaiGPT v1.0.0 (7B)— can I run it if it does not fit in my GPU?
It can be split between the card and system memory, but it generates painfully slowly that way. The nearest miss we calculate falls short by 1.2 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is resident on the card.
OpenThaiGPT v1.0.0 (7B)— would two GPUs run it faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed, which matters only if one card cannot hold it. The number that can: 589. So a second card is rarely the answer here.
OpenThaiGPT v1.0.0 (7B)— why does the quantisation differ between cards?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard it has to be squeezed. The number of distinct levels in the table above: 4. Bigger cards get the more accurate version, and the quality floor above pins the comparison to one level.
OpenThaiGPT v1.0.0 (7B)— how accurate are these speed estimates?
These are estimates with real error bars, and any of them could reasonably land anywhere in its published range depending on which runtime you use. The fastest result here: 299–796 tok/s on B200. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
OpenThaiGPT v1.0.0 (7B)— what GPU do I need to run it?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds it is Tesla K20c, with a memory capacity of 5 GB. It runs the model at a compression of IQ4_XS using about 4.4 GB, and produces roughly 27.0 tokens per second. The number of cards able to run it in total: 589.
OpenThaiGPT v1.0.0 (7B)— how fast is it on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is B200, at about 498 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and the number of cards clearing that: 562.
OpenThaiGPT v1.0.0 (7B)— how much VRAM does it need?
It needs about 4.4 GB at a compression of IQ4_XS, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
OpenThaiGPT v1.0.0 (7B)— can I run it on a GPU holding 8 GB?
Yes. The card CMP 170HX 8 GB, holding 8 GB, runs it at a compression of Q6_K, using about 6.4 GB and generating roughly 135 tokens per second. The fit is tight.
OpenThaiGPT v1.0.0 (7B)— can I run it on a GPU holding 12 GB?
Yes. The card GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, holding 12 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 8.0 GB and generating roughly 56.7 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.
OpenThaiGPT v1.0.0 (7B)— can I run it on a GPU holding 16 GB?
Yes. The card Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, holding 16 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 8.0 GB and generating roughly 70.3 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.
OpenThaiGPT v1.0.0 (7B)— can I run it on a GPU holding 24 GB?
Yes. The card GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, holding 24 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 8.0 GB and generating roughly 83.3 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.
OpenThaiGPT v1.0.0 (7B)— is it open source?
Its weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
OpenThaiGPT v1.0.0 (7B)— how many parameters does it have?
It has a parameter count of 6.8B. https://huggingface.co/openthaigpt/openthaigpt-1.0.0-7b-chat. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
OpenThaiGPT v1.0.0 (7B)— who created it?
It was published by Mahidol University,AI Entrepreneurs Association of Thailand, based in Thailand, an organisation categorised as academia.
OpenThaiGPT v1.0.0 (7B)— when was it released?
It was published in April 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.