Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
P102-101
10 GB · Q4_K_M · 31.2 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
397 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
306 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
397
tok/s
337–476 |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
397
tok/s
337–476 |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
317
tok/s
190–507 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
317
tok/s
190–507 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
253
tok/s
152–405 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
243
tok/s
206–291 |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
243
tok/s
206–291 |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
232
tok/s
139–371 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
206
tok/s
124–330 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
206
tok/s
124–330 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
206
tok/s
124–330 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
195
tok/s
166–234 |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
179
tok/s
152–214 |
CMP 170HX 10 GB NVIDIA | 10 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 8.8 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
167
tok/s
142–200 |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
167
tok/s
142–200 |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
167
tok/s
142–200 |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
167
tok/s
142–200 |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
167
tok/s
142–200 |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
127
tok/s
76–203 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
127
tok/s
76–203 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
106
tok/s
63–169 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
103
tok/s
62–166 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
101
tok/s
86–121 |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
101
tok/s
86–121 |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
101
tok/s
86–121 |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 24 February 2024
- Authors
- Gemma Team, Thomas Mesnard, Cassidy Hardin, Robert Dadashi, Surya Bhupatiraju, Laurent Sifre, Morgane Rivière, Mihir Sanjay Kale, Juliette Love, Pouya Tafti, Léonard Hussenot and et al.
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Question answering
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 8.5B
- Training data
- 6,000,000,000,000 tokens
Safetensors Model size 8.54B params
"These models were trained on a dataset of text data that includes a wide variety of sources, totaling 6 trillion tokens. "
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 3.1 × 10²³ FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting
6ND = 6*6000000000000*8540000000=3.0744e+23
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- Google TPU v5e
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Training code
- Unreleased
https://huggingface.co/google/gemma-1.1-7b-it "This repository is publicly accessible, but you have to accept the conditions to access its files and content."
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Likely above 10²³ FLOP
- Yes
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 397 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 397 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 317 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 317 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 253 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 243 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 243 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 232 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 206 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 206 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Arc B570 10 GB · needs 8.8 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 28.3 tok/s
- 02 Xbox Series X 6nm GPU 10 GB · needs 8.8 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 50.0 tok/s
- 03 Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB 10 GB · needs 8.8 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 28.6 tok/s
- 04 CMP 170HX 10 GB 10 GB · needs 8.8 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 179 tok/s
- 05 CMP 90HX 10 GB · needs 8.8 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 87.1 tok/s
- 06 CMP 50HX 10 GB · needs 8.8 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 64.1 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6700 10 GB · needs 8.8 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 28.6 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6700M 10 GB · needs 8.8 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 28.6 tok/s
- 09 Xbox Series X GPU 10 GB · needs 8.8 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 50.0 tok/s
- 10 GeForce RTX 3080 10 GB · needs 8.8 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 87.1 tok/s
What the numbers mean
Hardware requirements in practice
Minimum card
P102-101
Memory needed
8.8 GB
Fastest
397 tok/s
Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct is small enough at 8.5B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 306 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
The entry point is the P102-101: 10 GB of memory, Q4_K_M compression, roughly 31.2 tokens per second.
The quickest result comes from a B200 at around 397 tokens per second — its 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth is what buys that.
Background
Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct was published by Google, in United States of America, in February 2024. The organisation is categorised as industry.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling/generation, Question answering.
The weights being open is what puts this page in the calculator rather than only in the catalogue: it is a model you can actually hold.
Reading the throughput figures
Half the cards that hold it manage more than 30.4 tokens per second, and 282 exceed reading speed outright.
Being dense, it reads all of itself per token, which is why the ordering by speed below follows the ordering by memory bandwidth so closely.
Because the architecture is recorded, the memory column is derived rather than estimated.
How it was trained
Producing it required around 3.1 × 10²³ FLOP of arithmetic, on Google TPU v5e, which is a statement about the training budget rather than about inference.
Around 6,000,000,000,000 tokens went into training it.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Check what it needs before anything else
Every card here has been checked against Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct — around 8.8 GB at Q4_K_M. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect: at long context Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct can slip off a card that handles short questions easily.
-
03
Decide how much compression you will accept
Compression is what makes Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy — Q4_K_M on the smallest card that fits. A minimum quality removes the ones that go too far.
-
04
Compare tokens per second, not specifications
Ranking by tokens per second for Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct follows memory bandwidth, not core counts, which is why the B200 tops it at 397 tok/s.
-
05
Check the fit verdict before buying
A tight fit runs Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation; comfortable has headroom. If you expect to grow the context, buy for comfortable.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. Worth a look before buying for Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct alone — a card is usually bought for more than one model.
Answers
Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct — common questions
How many parameters does Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct have?
Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct has 8.5B parameters. Safetensors Model size 8.54B params. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct?
Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct was published by Google, based in United States of America, categorised as industry.
When was Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct released?
Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct was published in February 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct used for?
Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling/generation, Question answering. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.
Where can I download Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct?
The weights for Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
How much compute was used to train Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct?
Around 3.1 × 10²³ FLOP, on Google TPU v5e. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part in system memory drags the whole thing down — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 1.6 GB. Our figures for Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct assume it is fully resident.
Would two GPUs run Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed. That matters for Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct only if one card cannot hold it — 306 can, so a second adds little.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct has to be squeezed — 3 distinct levels appear in the table above. Set a minimum quality to compare at one.
How accurate are these Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 337–476 tok/s on the B200 rather than a single number.
What GPU do I need to run Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct is the P102-101, with 10 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q4_K_M using about 8.8 GB, and produces roughly 31.2 tokens per second. 306 cards in total can run it.
How fast is Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 397 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 282 of the cards that can run Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct clear that.
How much VRAM does Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct need?
About 8.8 GB at Q4_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q5_K_M, using about 9.8 GB and generating roughly 80.8 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 12.8 GB and generating roughly 56.0 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 12.8 GB and generating roughly 66.5 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct open source?
Its weights are published, so Gemma 1.1 7B Instruct can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.