Calculate the TPS of the CMP 170HX 10 GB on local AI models
Every model in our catalogue assessed against this card at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from this card's memory bandwidth and the size of each model once compressed.
Calculated for this card
721 models in our catalogue altogether
Largest model it holds
Ling-lite-1.5 ("Bailing")
16.8B · Q3_K_M · 106 tok/s
Fastest model
Gemma 3 QAT 1B
661 tok/s · 1B
Which AI models can run on a CMP 170HX 10 GB?
Set the inputs, read the answer
More context means more memory for the conversation cache. Speed is for a fresh conversation and does not change with this setting.
Hides models that would only fit by being compressed below this point.
396 models match
Calculating| Quantisation | Fit | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
661
tok/s
562–793 |
Gemma 3 1B | 1B | Mar 2025 | 1.8 GB | 33k tokens | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
661
tok/s
562–793 |
Gemma 3 QAT 1B | 1B | Apr 2025 | 1.8 GB | 33k tokens | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
661
tok/s
396–1,057 · low confidence |
HGRN 1B (WT 103) ≈ | 1B | Nov 2023 | 1.8 GB | 131k tokens ? | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
661
tok/s
396–1,057 · low confidence |
LLama 3..2 Typhoon 2 1B ≈ | 1B | Dec 2024 | 1.8 GB | 131k tokens ? | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
661
tok/s
396–1,057 · low confidence |
OLMo-1B ≈ | 1B | Feb 2024 | 1.8 GB | 131k tokens ? | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
661
tok/s
396–1,057 · low confidence |
Pythia-1b ≈ | 1B | Apr 2023 | 1.8 GB | 131k tokens ? | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
619
tok/s
371–990 · low confidence |
DeepSeekMoE-16B | 16B | Jan 2024 | 8.1 GB | 4k tokens | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
612
tok/s
367–979 · low confidence |
OpenELM-1.1B ≈ | 1.1B | May 2024 | 1.9 GB | 131k tokens ? | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
601
tok/s
360–961 · low confidence |
DeciCoder-1B ≈ | 1.1B | Aug 2023 | 1.9 GB | 131k tokens ? | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
601
tok/s
360–961 · low confidence |
SantaCoder ≈ | 1.1B | Jan 2023 | 1.9 GB | 131k tokens ? | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
601
tok/s
360–961 · low confidence |
TinyLlama-1.1B (1T token checkpoint) ≈ | 1.1B | Oct 2023 | 1.9 GB | 131k tokens ? | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
601
tok/s
360–961 · low confidence |
TinyLlama-1.1B (3T token checkpoint) ≈ | 1.1B | Oct 2023 | 1.9 GB | 131k tokens ? | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
551
tok/s
330–881 · low confidence |
EXAONE 4.0 (1.2B) ≈ | 1.2B | Jul 2025 | 2.0 GB | 131k tokens ? | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
551
tok/s
330–881 · low confidence |
LFM2-1.2B ≈ | 1.2B | Jul 2025 | 2.0 GB | 131k tokens ? | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
551
tok/s
330–881 · low confidence |
MinerU2.5 ≈ | 1.2B | Sep 2025 | 2.0 GB | 131k tokens ? | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
551
tok/s
330–881 · low confidence |
Pleias 1.0 1.2B ≈ | 1.2B | Dec 2024 | 2.0 GB | 131k tokens ? | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
551
tok/s
330–881 · low confidence |
Pleias-RAG-1B ≈ | 1.2B | Apr 2025 | 2.0 GB | 131k tokens ? | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
537
tok/s
457–645 |
Llama 3.2 1B | 1.2B | Sep 2024 | 2.2 GB | 131k tokens | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
530
tok/s
318–847 · low confidence |
MiniCPM-1.2B ≈ | 1.2B | Jun 2024 | 2.0 GB | 131k tokens ? | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
508
tok/s
305–813 · low confidence |
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B ≈ | 1.3B | Jan 2024 | 2.1 GB | 131k tokens ? | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
508
tok/s
305–813 · low confidence |
DeepSeek-VL-1.3B ≈ | 1.3B | Mar 2024 | 2.1 GB | 131k tokens ? | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
508
tok/s
305–813 · low confidence |
DigiRL ≈ | 1.3B | Jun 2024 | 2.1 GB | 131k tokens ? | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
508
tok/s
305–813 · low confidence |
GLA Transformer 1.3B ≈ | 1.3B | Aug 2024 | 2.1 GB | 131k tokens ? | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
508
tok/s
305–813 · low confidence |
Janus 1.3B ≈ | 1.3B | Oct 2024 | 2.1 GB | 131k tokens ? | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
508
tok/s
305–813 · low confidence |
Kosmos-2.5 ≈ | 1.3B | Aug 2024 | 2.1 GB | 131k tokens ? | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
CMP 170HX 10 GB full specification
Everything on record for this board, ordered by how much it bears on running a language model rather than by how a spec sheet would list it. Memory comes first because it decides the outcome; the rest is context.
Memory
The two specifications that decide what this card can run and how quickly. Capacity sets which models fit; bandwidth sets how many tokens per second they produce once they do.
- Memory size
- 10 GB
- Memory bandwidth
- 1,560 GB/s
- Memory type
- HBM2e
- Memory bus width
- 5,120 bit
- Memory clock
- 1.22 GHz
The chip
Which processor is on the board and how it was manufactured. A smaller process size generally means more performance for the same power.
- Graphics processor
- GA100
- Architecture
- Ampere
- Generation
- Mining GPUs
- Foundry
- TSMC
- Process size
- 7 nm
- Transistors
- 54.2 billion
- Transistor density
- 65,600 K/mm²
- Die size
- 826 mm²
- Package
- BGA-2743
- Released
- 1 September 2021
Clock speeds
How fast the processor runs. Worth far less here than on a gaming benchmark: generating text is limited by memory bandwidth, so a higher clock barely moves the result.
- Base clock
- 1.14 GHz
- Boost clock
- 1.41 GHz
Processing units
What the chip contains. These drive graphics performance and matter mainly for processing a long prompt rather than for producing the answer.
- Shading units
- 4,480
- Texture mapping units
- 280
- Render output units
- 128
- Streaming multiprocessors
- 70
- Tensor cores
- 280
- L1 cache
- 192 KB
- L2 cache
- 10 MB
Theoretical performance
Peak arithmetic rates published for the board. These are ceilings that no real workload reaches, and generating text reaches a small fraction of them because it is limited by memory rather than arithmetic.
- Half precision (FP16)
- 50.5 TFLOPS
- Single precision (FP32)
- 12.6 TFLOPS
- Double precision (FP64)
- 6.3 TFLOPS
- Pixel rate
- 181 GPixel/s
- Texture rate
- 395 GTexel/s
The board
What it takes to physically install and power the card — the practical constraints that decide whether it fits the machine you already own.
- Power draw (TDP)
- 250 W
- Suggested power supply
- 600 W
- Power connectors
- 2x 8-pin
- Bus interface
- PCIe 1.0 x4
- Slot width
- IGP
Software support
Which graphics and compute interfaces the card supports. CUDA compute capability is the one that bears on inference: below 7.0 there are no tensor cores, and modern inference software falls back to slower code paths.
- CUDA compute capability
- 8.0
- OpenCL
- 3.0
Listings
Where to buy a CMP 170HX 10 GB
No vendor is currently listing this card. Listings come from vendors who publish them here directly — browse the vendor directory to see who is selling what.
What the numbers mean
Memory: the specification that decides everything
Memory
10 GB
Bandwidth
1,560 GB/s
Largest model
Ling-lite-1.5 ("Bailing")
CMP 170HX 10 GB carries only 10 GB of HBM2e. That limits it to the smaller end of the catalogue, and a model has to fit entirely inside before it generates anything at all. A runtime actually gets about 9 GB.
Memory bandwidth reaches 1,560 GB/s across a bus of 5,120 bits. Generating a token means reading every weight once, so that figure sets the pace more than any other number here, and at this level text arrives faster than most people read.
The figure is the bus width multiplied by a memory clock of 1.22 GHz. Both halves matter, and neither is visible in a gaming benchmark.
Put together, the largest model that fits is Ling-lite-1.5 ("Bailing"), 16.8B, compressed to Q3_K_M and generating around 106 tokens per second.
The chip and how it was built
CMP 170HX 10 GB is built on the graphics processor GA100, using the architecture Ampere from NVIDIA, as part of the generation Mining GPUs.
The chip is manufactured by TSMC, on a process of 7 nm, with a die measuring 826 mm², holding 54.2 billion transistors. A smaller process generally means more performance for the same power, though for language models it matters far less than the memory subsystem.
It was released in September 2021, roughly 5.0334724402305 years ago. Inference software support tends to follow hardware by a year or two, so a card of this age generally has mature, well-optimised code paths available to it.
Compute throughput, and why it matters less than it looks
FP16
50.5 TFLOPS
FP64
6.3 TFLOPS
Tensor cores
280
On paper CMP 170HX 10 GB reaches 50.5 TFLOPS at half precision, and 12.6 TFLOPS at single precision. These are peak figures no real workload sustains, and generating text reaches only a small fraction of them — decoding is limited by memory rather than arithmetic, which is why a card can look enormously powerful here and still produce tokens at an ordinary rate.
Double-precision throughput reaches 6.3 TFLOPS. It has no bearing on running a language model — no inference runtime uses it — but it separates datacentre parts from consumer ones, since the latter deliberately restrict it.
The card carries 280 tensor cores across 70 streaming multiprocessors. These accelerate the matrix arithmetic at the heart of a transformer, and they are what make prompt processing — reading a long document before answering — dramatically faster than it would otherwise be.
Clocks run from a base of 1.14 GHz to a boost of 1.41 GHz. Worth far less here than on a gaming benchmark: raising the clock speeds up the arithmetic, and the arithmetic is not what generation is waiting on.
Cache and processing units
CMP 170HX 10 GB has an L1 cache of 192 KB, backed by an L2 cache of 10 MB. Cache absorbs a share of the memory traffic that would otherwise hit the main bus, which is the one place on this page where a number other than bandwidth quietly affects generation speed — a large L2 lets more of the working set stay close to the cores.
There are 4,480 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, and 128 render output units. These drive graphics workloads and contribute to prompt processing, but they sit idle for much of the time a model spends generating a reply.
Power, size and installation
Power draw
250 W
CMP 170HX 10 GB is rated at 250 W, and the suggested system power supply is 600 W. Running a language model keeps a card busy in bursts rather than continuously — it draws hard while generating and idles between requests — so sustained draw over a working day is usually well below the rated figure.
The board occupies igp, and needs 2x 8-pin. Worth checking against the case and power supply already in the machine, since the largest cards need considerably more of both than a typical desktop provides.
It connects over PCIe 1.0 x4. The interface governs how quickly a model is loaded from disk into the card, not how fast it runs once there, so a narrower link costs a few seconds at startup and nothing thereafter.
The extremes
The largest AI models that run on a CMP 170HX 10 GB
The biggest open-weight models that fit on this card, newest first. Each is shown at the best compression the card can hold.
The fastest AI models on a CMP 170HX 10 GB
Where this card produces tokens quickest. Smaller models dominate here, because generating each token means reading the whole model out of memory once.
Step by step
How to work out the tokens per second of a CMP 170HX 10 GB
You do not have to calculate anything by hand — the gputps.com calculator on this page has already worked it out for every model this card can hold. Reading off the answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start with the model, not the specification
The table lists 396 models this card can run. Search by name, or by size — typing 27b matches on the parameter count even when the name never states it.
-
02
Set the context length you will actually use
Longer conversations cost memory on top of the weights. Against 10 GB that is frequently the difference between a model fitting and not.
-
03
Pin the comparison to one quality level
Compression is what lets bigger models fit. The quality control drops any model that needs more of it than you are willing to give.
-
04
Look at the range, not just the number
Each speed is an estimate for a single conversation, with a range beneath it. The top end here is 661 tok/s on Gemma 3 QAT 1B. The same card and model vary by thirty to fifty per cent between inference runtimes.
-
05
Check the memory column before committing
Tight means it works today; comfortable means it still works when the conversation grows. Compare what each model needs against an available 10 GB.
-
06
Check the same model from the other side
Following a model through to its own page lists all the hardware that can run it, so you can see how it compares against CMP 170HX 10 GB.
Answers
CMP 170HX 10 GB — common questions
CMP 170HX 10 GB— how much power does it use?
Rated board power is 250 W, and the suggested system power supply is 600 W. Generating text draws hard in bursts and idles between requests, so average consumption over a working session is normally well below the rated figure.
CMP 170HX 10 GB— how much cache does it have?
The L1 cache is 192 KB, and the L2 cache is 10 MB. Cache absorbs part of the memory traffic that would otherwise reach the main bus, so a larger L2 gives a modest lift to generation speed beyond what bandwidth alone predicts.
CMP 170HX 10 GB— what are its TFLOPS?
It is rated at 50.5 TFLOPS at half precision and 12.6 TFLOPS at single precision. These are peak arithmetic ceilings rather than achievable rates, and text generation reaches only a small fraction of them because it is limited by memory bandwidth instead.
CMP 170HX 10 GB— how many tensor cores does it have?
It has 280 tensor cores across 70 streaming multiprocessors. They accelerate the matrix arithmetic a transformer is built from, which mainly speeds up processing a long prompt rather than producing the reply.
CMP 170HX 10 GB— does it support CUDA?
Yes. It reports CUDA compute capability 8.0. Capability 7.0 and above has tensor cores, which modern inference software uses; below that it falls back to slower code paths for quantised models.
CMP 170HX 10 GB— what bus interface does it use?
It uses PCIe 1.0 x4. This governs how fast a model is loaded onto the card rather than how fast it runs once loaded, so it costs a few seconds at startup and nothing during generation.
CMP 170HX 10 GB— is it good for running local AI models?
Its memory limits it to smaller models and its bandwidth is high enough to generate text faster than most people read. In total it runs 396 of the models we track. Whether that is enough depends entirely on which model you want — the table above answers that directly.
CMP 170HX 10 GB— can it run a model that does not fit in its memory?
Offloading past the card's 10 GB drags the whole thing down, and none of the figures on this page assume it.
Would two CMP 170HX 10 GB cards be twice as fast?
Capacity adds, throughput does not. Two of them give you 20 GB which lets you hold models neither could hold alone, but generation does not split that way. These figures describe one card.
CMP 170HX 10 GB— which AI models can it run?
396 of the 721 open-weight language models we track fit on this card and can be run locally. The table on this page lists every one, with the memory it needs, the quantisation it runs at and an estimated generation speed.
CMP 170HX 10 GB— what is the largest AI model it can run?
The largest model in our catalogue that fits is Ling-lite-1.5 ("Bailing") at 16.8B parameters, compressed to Q3_K_M. It generates roughly 106 tokens per second and needs about 8.9 GB of the card's memory.
CMP 170HX 10 GB— how many tokens per second does it produce?
It depends on the model. The fastest model we track here is Gemma 3 QAT 1B at about 661 tokens per second, while larger models run proportionally slower because each token requires reading the whole model out of memory once. Speeds are estimates for a single conversation at a time.
CMP 170HX 10 GB— can it run 7B models?
Yes. For example it runs DeepSeek Coder 6.7B at Q4_K_M, using about 8.3 GB of memory and generating around 228 tokens per second.
CMP 170HX 10 GB— can it run 13B models?
Yes. For example it runs DeepSeekMoE-16B at Q3_K_M, using about 8.1 GB of memory and generating around 619 tokens per second.
CMP 170HX 10 GB— how much memory does it have?
This card has 10 GB of HBM2e. Around a tenth is reserved by the inference runtime and the driver, leaving roughly 9 GB available for a model and its conversation.
CMP 170HX 10 GB— what is its memory bandwidth?
Memory bandwidth reaches 1,560 GB/s across a bus of 5,120 bits. This is the single best predictor of how fast it generates text, because producing each token means reading the entire model out of memory once.
CMP 170HX 10 GB— what type of memory does it use?
It uses HBM2e clocked at 1.22 GHz. HBM types are found on datacentre accelerators and carry far more bandwidth than the GDDR used on desktop cards, which is why they generate tokens considerably faster at the same capacity.
CMP 170HX 10 GB— who makes it?
This is a product of NVIDIA, with the chip manufactured by TSMC, on a process of 7 nm.
CMP 170HX 10 GB— when was it released?
It was released in September 2021.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the hardware. If you already know which model you want and need to know what it takes to run it, start from the model instead.