Nanbeige-16B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
Smallest card that fits
P102-101
10 GB · Q3_K_M · 19.5 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
212 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Nanbeige-16B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
306 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
212
tok/s
127–339 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 17.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
212
tok/s
127–339 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 17.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
169
tok/s
101–271 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 17.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
169
tok/s
101–271 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 17.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
135
tok/s
81–216 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 17.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
129
tok/s
78–207 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 17.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
129
tok/s
78–207 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 17.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
124
tok/s
74–198 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 17.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
111
tok/s
67–178 · low confidence |
CMP 170HX 10 GB NVIDIA | 10 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 8.5 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
110
tok/s
66–176 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 17.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
110
tok/s
66–176 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 17.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
110
tok/s
66–176 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 17.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
104
tok/s
63–167 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 17.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
88.9
tok/s
53–142 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 17.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
88.9
tok/s
53–142 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 17.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
88.9
tok/s
53–142 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 17.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
88.9
tok/s
53–142 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 17.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
88.9
tok/s
53–142 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 17.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
67.7
tok/s
41–108 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 17.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
67.7
tok/s
41–108 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 17.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
56.4
tok/s
34–90 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 17.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
55.8
tok/s
33–89 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB NVIDIA | 12 GB | 912 GB/s | Jan 2022 | 10.4 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
55.8
tok/s
33–89 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti NVIDIA | 12 GB | 912 GB/s | May 2021 | 10.4 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
55.2
tok/s
33–88 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 17.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
54.3
tok/s
33–87 · low confidence |
CMP 90HX NVIDIA | 10 GB | 760 GB/s | Jul 2021 | 8.5 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Nanbeige LLM Lab
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- China
- Published
- 1 November 2023
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Chat, Language modeling/generation, Code generation, Question answering
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 16B
- Training data
- 2,500,000,000,000 tokens
16 billion
"It uses 2.5T Tokens for pre-training"
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 2.4 × 10²³ FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting
"It uses 2.5T Tokens for pre-training". I think that's the number of tokens the model was trained on, not the dataset size, but I'm not sure. 16 billion * 2.5 trillion * 6 = 2.4e23
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Open source
Apache 2.0 training code: https://github.com/Nanbeige/Nanbeige/blob/main/scripts/train.sh
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Likely above 10²³ FLOP
- Yes
- Record confidence
- Likely
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs for Nanbeige-16B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 212 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 212 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 169 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 169 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 135 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 129 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 129 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 124 tok/s
- 09 CMP 170HX 10 GB 10 GB · 1,560 GB/s · Q3_K_M 111 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 110 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Nanbeige-16B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Arc B570 10 GB · needs 8.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 17.6 tok/s
- 02 Xbox Series X 6nm GPU 10 GB · needs 8.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 31.2 tok/s
- 03 Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB 10 GB · needs 8.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 17.8 tok/s
- 04 CMP 170HX 10 GB 10 GB · needs 8.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 111 tok/s
- 05 CMP 90HX 10 GB · needs 8.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 54.3 tok/s
- 06 CMP 50HX 10 GB · needs 8.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 40.0 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6700 10 GB · needs 8.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 17.8 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6700M 10 GB · needs 8.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 17.8 tok/s
- 09 Xbox Series X GPU 10 GB · needs 8.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 31.2 tok/s
- 10 GeForce RTX 3080 10 GB · needs 8.5 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 54.3 tok/s
What the numbers mean
The hardware side
Minimum card
P102-101
Memory needed
8.5 GB
Fastest
212 tok/s
Nanbeige-16B is small enough at 16B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 306 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
At the low end, a P102-101 handles it — 10 GB, at Q3_K_M, for about 19.5 tokens per second.
Top of the range is the B200, at roughly 212 tokens per second thanks to 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth.
About this model
Nanbeige-16B was published by Nanbeige LLM Lab, in China, in November 2023. industry is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing chat, Language modeling/generation, Code generation, Question answering.
Because its weights were released, nothing about running it depends on a provider staying available — it is yours once downloaded.
How fast it runs, and why
Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range is about 19.8 tokens per second, and 259 of them clear the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed.
Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.
Its internal architecture is not on file, so memory is approximated from the parameter count and marked accordingly. Expect the real figure to differ, more so at long context.
What went into building it
The training run consumed about 2.4 × 10²³ FLOP. That figure describes the cost of creating it and has no bearing on how quickly it generates text.
The training set ran to roughly 2,500,000,000,000 tokens.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Nanbeige-16B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start from the memory column
The table lists every card that can hold Nanbeige-16B — around 8.5 GB at Q3_K_M. That figure, not the card's headline performance, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Match the context to your actual use
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect: at long context Nanbeige-16B can slip off a card that handles short questions easily.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a floor drops the cards that only manage Nanbeige-16B by squeezing it further than you would want.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
The speed ordering for Nanbeige-16B is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 212 tok/s.
-
05
Check the fit verdict before buying
Tight means Nanbeige-16B loads and works, with no room to raise the context later. Comfortable means you can. The difference matters more than a few tokens per second.
-
06
Check the card from the other side
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. Worth a look before buying for Nanbeige-16B alone — a card is usually bought for more than one model.
Answers
Nanbeige-16B — common questions
When was Nanbeige-16B released?
Nanbeige-16B was published in November 2023. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is Nanbeige-16B used for?
Nanbeige-16B works in Language, and is recorded as handling chat, Language modeling/generation, Code generation, Question answering. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.
Where can I download Nanbeige-16B?
The weights for Nanbeige-16B are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
How much compute was used to train Nanbeige-16B?
Around 2.4 × 10²³ FLOP. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run Nanbeige-16B if it does not fit in my GPU?
It can be split between the card and system memory, but Nanbeige-16B generates painfully slowly that way — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 3.2 GB. Nothing on this page assumes offloading.
Would two GPUs run Nanbeige-16B faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed. That matters for Nanbeige-16B only if one card cannot hold it — 306 can, so a second adds little.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Nanbeige-16B?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard Nanbeige-16B has to be squeezed — 5 distinct levels appear in the table above. Set a minimum quality to compare at one.
How accurate are these Nanbeige-16B speed estimates?
They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range — 127–339 tok/s on the B200, for instance. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
What GPU do I need to run Nanbeige-16B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Nanbeige-16B is the P102-101, with 10 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 8.5 GB, and produces roughly 19.5 tokens per second. 306 cards in total can run it.
How fast is Nanbeige-16B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 212 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 259 of the cards that can run Nanbeige-16B clear that.
How much VRAM does Nanbeige-16B need?
About 8.5 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run Nanbeige-16B on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q4_K_M, using about 10.4 GB and generating roughly 55.8 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run Nanbeige-16B on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q6_K, using about 14.1 GB and generating roughly 43.5 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run Nanbeige-16B on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 17.8 GB and generating roughly 35.5 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is Nanbeige-16B open source?
Its weights are published, so Nanbeige-16B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does Nanbeige-16B have?
Nanbeige-16B has 16B parameters. 16 billion. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created Nanbeige-16B?
Nanbeige-16B was published by Nanbeige LLM Lab, based in China, categorised as industry.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.