Gemma 7B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
P102-101
10 GB · Q4_K_M · 31.2 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
397 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Gemma 7B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
306 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
397
tok/s
337–476 |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
397
tok/s
337–476 |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
317
tok/s
190–507 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
317
tok/s
190–507 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
253
tok/s
152–405 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
243
tok/s
206–291 |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
243
tok/s
206–291 |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
232
tok/s
139–371 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
206
tok/s
124–330 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
206
tok/s
124–330 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
206
tok/s
124–330 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
195
tok/s
166–235 |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
179
tok/s
152–214 |
CMP 170HX 10 GB NVIDIA | 10 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 8.8 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
167
tok/s
142–200 |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
167
tok/s
142–200 |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
167
tok/s
142–200 |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
167
tok/s
142–200 |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
167
tok/s
142–200 |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
127
tok/s
76–203 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
127
tok/s
76–203 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
106
tok/s
63–169 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
104
tok/s
62–166 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
101
tok/s
86–121 |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
101
tok/s
86–121 |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
101
tok/s
86–121 |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 12.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Google DeepMind
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 21 February 2024
- Authors
- Gemma Team, Google DeepMind
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Chat, Code generation, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 8.5B
- Training data
- 6,000,000,000,000 tokens
Table 2, sum of embedding and non-embedding parameters
"Gemma 2B and 7B are trained on 2T and 6T tokens respectively of primarily-English data from web documents, mathematics, and code." Not explicitly stated that this doesn't involve multiple epochs, but I expect it does not.
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 3.1 × 10²³ FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting,Hardware
6ND aproximation 6*8.54B*6T = 3.07e23 "Gemma 2B and 7B are trained on 2T and 6T tokens respectively of primarily-English data from web documents, mathematics, and code." As confirmation: "We estimate the carbon emissions from pretraining the Gemma models to be ∼ 131 𝑡𝐶𝑂2𝑒𝑞. " U.S. avg CO2 per kWh is ~0.87lbs 131 tCO2 * 2000 lb/t * (1 kWh/0.87lb) = 3.01e5 kWh Per SemiAnalysis TPU v5e uses ~ 5x less power than H100, so ~140 W TDP 3.01e5 kWh * 1000 W/kW * 1 TPUv5e/140 W = 2.15e6 TPUv5e-hours …
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- Google TPU v5e
- Chips used
- 4,096
- Power draw
- 1.8 MW
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Training code
- Unreleased
https://ai.google.dev/gemma/terms no illegal use or abuse
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Likely above 10²³ FLOP
- Yes
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technology
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Gemma 7B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 397 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 397 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 317 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 317 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 253 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 243 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 243 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 232 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 206 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 206 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Gemma 7B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Arc B570 10 GB · needs 8.8 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 28.3 tok/s
- 02 Xbox Series X 6nm GPU 10 GB · needs 8.8 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 50.0 tok/s
- 03 Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB 10 GB · needs 8.8 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 28.6 tok/s
- 04 CMP 170HX 10 GB 10 GB · needs 8.8 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 179 tok/s
- 05 CMP 90HX 10 GB · needs 8.8 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 87.1 tok/s
- 06 CMP 50HX 10 GB · needs 8.8 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 64.1 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6700 10 GB · needs 8.8 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 28.6 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6700M 10 GB · needs 8.8 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 28.6 tok/s
- 09 Xbox Series X GPU 10 GB · needs 8.8 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 50.0 tok/s
- 10 GeForce RTX 3080 10 GB · needs 8.8 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 87.1 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What you need to run it
Minimum card
P102-101
Memory needed
8.8 GB
Fastest
397 tok/s
Gemma 7B is small enough at 8.5B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 306 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
The least hardware that works is a P102-101. Its 10 GB is enough at Q4_K_M compression, giving roughly 31.2 tokens per second.
At the other end, a B200 generates roughly 397 tokens per second on it, on the strength of 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
What this model is
Gemma 7B was published by Google DeepMind, in United States of America, in February 2024. It comes out of industry.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling/generation, Chat, Code generation, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning.
Because its weights were released, nothing about running it depends on a provider staying available — it is yours once downloaded.
What decides the speed
Half the cards that hold it manage more than 30.4 tokens per second, and 282 exceed reading speed outright.
Being dense, it reads all of itself per token, which is why the ordering by speed below follows the ordering by memory bandwidth so closely.
Its attention layout is on file, so the memory figures are computed exactly rather than approximated.
Training and provenance
Training it took roughly 3.1 × 10²³ FLOP of computation, on Google TPU v5e — a measure of what producing the model cost, not of how fast it answers.
Around 6,000,000,000,000 tokens went into training it.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Gemma 7B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start from the memory column
Look at what Gemma 7B actually needs — around 8.8 GB at Q4_K_M. No amount of processing power compensates for a card that cannot hold it.
-
02
Match the context to your actual use
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect: at long context Gemma 7B can slip off a card that handles short questions easily.
-
03
Set a quality floor
Compression is what makes Gemma 7B fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy — Q4_K_M on the smallest card that fits. A minimum quality removes the ones that go too far.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for Gemma 7B. It will not match a gaming ordering — generation is bound by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 397 tok/s.
-
05
Check the fit verdict before buying
The fit column separates cards that just manage Gemma 7B from those with room to spare. Buy for the second if the context might grow.
-
06
See what else that card runs
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. Worth a look before buying for Gemma 7B alone — a card is usually bought for more than one model.
Answers
Gemma 7B — common questions
When was Gemma 7B released?
Gemma 7B was published in February 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is Gemma 7B used for?
Gemma 7B works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling/generation, Chat, Code generation, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning. A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.
Where can I download Gemma 7B?
The weights for Gemma 7B are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
How much compute was used to train Gemma 7B?
Around 3.1 × 10²³ FLOP, on Google TPU v5e. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run Gemma 7B if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part in system memory drags the whole thing down — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 1.6 GB. Our figures for Gemma 7B assume it is fully resident.
Would two GPUs run Gemma 7B faster?
Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. Since 306 of the cards we track already hold Gemma 7B on their own, a second card is rarely the answer here.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Gemma 7B?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard Gemma 7B has to be squeezed — 3 distinct levels appear in the table above. Set a minimum quality to compare at one.
How accurate are these Gemma 7B speed estimates?
These are estimates with real error bars. The fastest result here, 337–476 tok/s on the B200, could reasonably land anywhere in its published range depending on which runtime you use.
What GPU do I need to run Gemma 7B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Gemma 7B is the P102-101, with 10 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q4_K_M using about 8.8 GB, and produces roughly 31.2 tokens per second. 306 cards in total can run it.
How fast is Gemma 7B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 397 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 282 of the cards that can run Gemma 7B clear that.
How much VRAM does Gemma 7B need?
About 8.8 GB at Q4_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run Gemma 7B on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q5_K_M, using about 9.8 GB and generating roughly 80.8 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run Gemma 7B on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 12.8 GB and generating roughly 56.1 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run Gemma 7B on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 12.8 GB and generating roughly 66.5 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is Gemma 7B open source?
Its weights are published, so Gemma 7B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does Gemma 7B have?
Gemma 7B has 8.5B parameters. Table 2, sum of embedding and non-embedding parameters. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created Gemma 7B?
Gemma 7B was published by Google DeepMind, based in United States of America, categorised as industry.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.