nekomata-14b TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
P102-101
10 GB · IQ4_XS · 19.9 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
239 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run nekomata-14b?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
306 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
239
tok/s
143–382 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 15.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
239
tok/s
143–382 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 15.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
191
tok/s
114–305 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 15.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
191
tok/s
114–305 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 15.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
152
tok/s
91–244 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 15.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
146
tok/s
88–233 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 15.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
146
tok/s
88–233 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 15.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
140
tok/s
84–223 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 15.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
124
tok/s
74–198 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 15.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
124
tok/s
74–198 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 15.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
124
tok/s
74–198 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 15.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
118
tok/s
71–188 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 15.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
114
tok/s
69–183 · low confidence |
CMP 170HX 10 GB NVIDIA | 10 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 8.5 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
100
tok/s
60–160 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 15.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
100
tok/s
60–160 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 15.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
100
tok/s
60–160 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 15.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
100
tok/s
60–160 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 15.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
100
tok/s
60–160 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 15.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
76.3
tok/s
46–122 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 15.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
76.3
tok/s
46–122 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 15.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
63.6
tok/s
38–102 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 15.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
62.8
tok/s
38–101 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB NVIDIA | 12 GB | 912 GB/s | Jan 2022 | 9.3 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
62.8
tok/s
38–101 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti NVIDIA | 12 GB | 912 GB/s | May 2021 | 9.3 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
62.2
tok/s
37–100 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 15.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
60.9
tok/s
37–97 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 15.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- rinna
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- Japan
- Published
- 21 December 2023
- Authors
- Tianyu Zhao, Akio Kaga, Kei Sawada
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language generation
- Base model
- Qwen-14B
- Numerical format
- BF16
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 14.2B
- Training data
- 66,000,000,000 tokens
Source: https://huggingface.co/rinna/nekomata-14b
The 66B tokens on which the model was pre-trained came from a mixture of Japanese and English datasets. The authors didn’t state the Japanese-to-English ratio of these tokens, so I decided to estimate the maximum size of the dataset. Since the model is a predictive language model, the dataset size is measured in number of words (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XWLyMzcVfDv4eFQX3yPgM8MZ3_Q1phtIFz9GKv4_KaM/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.or67a8q9faep). According to the source cited above, for text gene…
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 2.6 × 10²³ FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting
Begins from Qwen-14B (2.5e23 FLOP). They continue pretraining on a mix of Japanese and English text for 66B tokens. (assuming 1 epoch, and using the C=6ND approximation) = # of active parameters / forward pass * # of tokens * 6 FLOPs / token ~= 14.2e9 active parameters * 66e9 tokens * 6 FLOPs / token ~= 5623.2e18 FLOPs ~= 5.62e21 FLOPs In total, 2.5562e23
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- Amazon Trainium1
- Chips used
- 256
- Wall-clock time
- 168 hours (7 days)
- Hardware utilisation
- MFU 17.1%
The pre-training job was completed within a timeframe of approximately 7 days (source: https://huggingface.co/rinna/nekomata-14b).
According to the developer, the model “was trained on 16 nodes of Amazon EC2 trn1.32xlarge instance” (https://huggingface.co/rinna/nekomata-14b). An Amazon EC2 trn1.32xlarge instance can provide up to 3.4 petaflops of FP16/BF16 compute power and is powered by up to 16 AWS Trainium chips (https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/amazon-ec2-trn1-instances-for-high-performance-model-training-are-now-available/). Therefore, Training compute = utilization rate * peak FLOPS / hardware * # of hardware * train…
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- rinna
Tongyi Qianwen license: requires separate license if >100M MAUs https://huggingface.co/rinna/nekomata-14b
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Why it is tracked
- SOTA improvement
- Record confidence
- Confident
- Citations
- 35
Nekomata-14b was released on December 21, 2023. According to rinna, on that date, the model was the best-performing one on the JSQuAD (2-shot) dataset, with an F1 score of 94.21, when evaluated using template v0.2 of Stability-AI/lm-evaluation-harness. When evaluated using template v0.3 on that same date, nekomata-14b was the best-performing model on the JCommonsenseQA (3-shot) dataset (with an accuracy of 92.23%), the MARC-ja (0-shot) dataset (with a balanced accuracy of 92.31%), and the jaqket…
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- rinna/nekomata-14b
- Last updated
- 25 May 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run nekomata-14b
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 239 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 239 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 191 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 191 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 152 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 146 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 146 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 140 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 124 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 124 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run nekomata-14b
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Arc B570 10 GB · needs 8.5 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 18.1 tok/s
- 02 Xbox Series X 6nm GPU 10 GB · needs 8.5 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 32.0 tok/s
- 03 Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB 10 GB · needs 8.5 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 18.3 tok/s
- 04 CMP 170HX 10 GB 10 GB · needs 8.5 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 114 tok/s
- 05 CMP 90HX 10 GB · needs 8.5 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 55.7 tok/s
- 06 CMP 50HX 10 GB · needs 8.5 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 41.0 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6700 10 GB · needs 8.5 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 18.3 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6700M 10 GB · needs 8.5 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 18.3 tok/s
- 09 Xbox Series X GPU 10 GB · needs 8.5 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 32.0 tok/s
- 10 GeForce RTX 3080 10 GB · needs 8.5 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 55.7 tok/s
What the numbers mean
Hardware requirements in practice
Minimum card
P102-101
Memory needed
8.5 GB
Fastest
239 tok/s
nekomata-14b is small enough at 14.2B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 306 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
The entry point is the P102-101: 10 GB of memory, IQ4_XS compression, roughly 19.9 tokens per second.
Top of the range is the B200, at roughly 239 tokens per second thanks to 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth.
Background
nekomata-14b was published by rinna, in Japan, in December 2023. The organisation is categorised as industry.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language generation.
It builds on Qwen-14B, which is why it shares that model's general shape and size.
The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached. It is published under the rinna organisation on Hugging Face.
Reading the throughput figures
The median result is around 22.3 tokens per second; 266 cards produce text faster than most people read it.
It is a dense model, so every parameter is read for every token produced. That makes speed track memory bandwidth almost exactly — a card with twice the bandwidth generates roughly twice as fast.
Memory here is estimated from size rather than computed from the architecture, which is not recorded for this model — the numbers are indicative rather than exact.
Training and provenance
Producing it required around 2.6 × 10²³ FLOP of arithmetic, on Amazon Trainium1, which is a statement about the training budget rather than about inference.
Around 66,000,000,000 tokens went into training it.
The reason it appears in this catalogue at all is sOTA improvement.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for nekomata-14b
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Check what it needs before anything else
Look at what nekomata-14b actually needs — around 8.5 GB at IQ4_XS. No amount of processing power compensates for a card that cannot hold it.
-
02
Match the context to your actual use
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect: at long context nekomata-14b can slip off a card that handles short questions easily.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold — IQ4_XS on the smallest card that fits. Setting a floor drops the cards that only manage nekomata-14b by squeezing it further than you would want.
-
04
Sort by speed
Ranking by tokens per second for nekomata-14b follows memory bandwidth, not core counts, which is why the B200 tops it at 239 tok/s.
-
05
Check the fit verdict before buying
The fit column separates cards that just manage nekomata-14b from those with room to spare. Buy for the second if the context might grow.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. Worth a look before buying for nekomata-14b alone — a card is usually bought for more than one model.
Answers
nekomata-14b — common questions
Would two GPUs run nekomata-14b faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed. That matters for nekomata-14b only if one card cannot hold it — 306 can, so a second adds little.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for nekomata-14b?
Each card is shown running the least-compressed copy it can hold, and nekomata-14b appears at 4 different compression levels across the cards that fit it. Bigger cards get the more accurate version.
How accurate are these nekomata-14b speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 143–382 tok/s on the B200 rather than a single number.
What GPU do I need to run nekomata-14b?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds nekomata-14b is the P102-101, with 10 GB of memory. It runs the model at IQ4_XS using about 8.5 GB, and produces roughly 19.9 tokens per second. 306 cards in total can run it.
How fast is nekomata-14b on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 239 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 266 of the cards that can run nekomata-14b clear that.
How much VRAM does nekomata-14b need?
About 8.5 GB at IQ4_XS compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run nekomata-14b on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q4_K_M, using about 9.3 GB and generating roughly 62.8 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run nekomata-14b on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q6_K, using about 12.6 GB and generating roughly 49.0 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run nekomata-14b on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 15.9 GB and generating roughly 40.0 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is nekomata-14b open source?
Its weights are published, so nekomata-14b can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does nekomata-14b have?
nekomata-14b has 14.2B parameters. Source: https://huggingface.co/rinna/nekomata-14b. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created nekomata-14b?
nekomata-14b was published by rinna, based in Japan, categorised as industry.
When was nekomata-14b released?
nekomata-14b was published in December 2023. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is nekomata-14b used for?
nekomata-14b works in Language, and is recorded as handling language generation. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.
Where can I download nekomata-14b?
Its weights are published under the rinna organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
How much compute was used to train nekomata-14b?
Around 2.6 × 10²³ FLOP, on Amazon Trainium1. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run nekomata-14b if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part in system memory drags the whole thing down — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 2.1 GB. Our figures for nekomata-14b assume it is fully resident.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.