Mixtral 8x7B TPS calculator

Open weights Mistral AI 46.7B parameters December 2023

Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.

Calculated for this model

126 of 818 cards that can run it

Smallest card that fits

Tesla M40 24 GB

24 GB · Q3_K_M · 21.7 tok/s

Fastest card

B200

263 tok/s · 180 GB

Which GPUs can run Mixtral 8x7B?

Set the inputs, read the answer

A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.

Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.

126 cards match

Calculating
Needs Quantisation Fit
263 tok/s

158–420 · low confidence

B200 NVIDIA 180 GB 8,000 GB/s Jan 2024 48.2 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
263 tok/s

158–420 · low confidence

B300 NVIDIA 288 GB 8,000 GB/s Sep 2025 48.2 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
210 tok/s

126–336 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD 288 GB 8,190 GB/s Jan 2025 48.2 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
210 tok/s

126–336 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD 288 GB 8,190 GB/s Jan 2025 48.2 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
168 tok/s

101–268 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD 128 GB 6,550 GB/s Jan 2023 48.2 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
161 tok/s

96–257 · low confidence

H200 NVL NVIDIA 141 GB 4,890 GB/s Nov 2024 48.2 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
161 tok/s

96–257 · low confidence

H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA 141 GB 4,890 GB/s Nov 2024 48.2 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
154 tok/s

92–246 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD 256 GB 6,000 GB/s Oct 2024 48.2 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
142 tok/s

85–227 · low confidence

DRIVE A100 PROD NVIDIA 32 GB 1,870 GB/s May 2020 26.4 GB Q4_K_M Tight
142 tok/s

85–227 · low confidence

GRID A100A NVIDIA 32 GB 1,870 GB/s May 2020 26.4 GB Q4_K_M Tight
136 tok/s

82–218 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD 128 GB 5,325 GB/s Dec 2023 48.2 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
136 tok/s

82–218 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD 192 GB 5,325 GB/s Dec 2023 48.2 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
136 tok/s

82–218 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD 192 GB 5,325 GB/s Dec 2023 48.2 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
136 tok/s

81–217 · low confidence

GeForce RTX 5090 NVIDIA 32 GB 1,790 GB/s Jan 2025 26.4 GB Q4_K_M Tight
136 tok/s

81–217 · low confidence

GeForce RTX 5090 D NVIDIA 32 GB 1,790 GB/s Jan 2025 26.4 GB Q4_K_M Tight
129 tok/s

78–207 · low confidence

H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA 94 GB 3,940 GB/s Mar 2023 48.2 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
119 tok/s

71–190 · low confidence

GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 NVIDIA 24 GB 1,340 GB/s Aug 2025 21.0 GB Q3_K_M Tight
110 tok/s

66–177 · low confidence

H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA 96 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 48.2 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
110 tok/s

66–177 · low confidence

H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA 80 GB 3,360 GB/s Oct 2022 48.2 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
110 tok/s

66–177 · low confidence

H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA 94 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 48.2 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
110 tok/s

66–177 · low confidence

H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA 96 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 48.2 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
110 tok/s

66–177 · low confidence

H800 SXM5 NVIDIA 80 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 48.2 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
108 tok/s

65–173 · low confidence

A30X NVIDIA 24 GB 1,220 GB/s Apr 2021 21.0 GB Q3_K_M Tight
91.5 tok/s

55–146 · low confidence

A100 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA 40 GB 1,560 GB/s Jun 2020 31.8 GB Q5_K_M Tight
91.5 tok/s

55–146 · low confidence

A100 SXM4 40 GB NVIDIA 40 GB 1,560 GB/s May 2020 31.8 GB Q5_K_M Tight

Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.

On record

Full specification

Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.

Origin

Who built this model, where, and when it was published.

Organisation
Mistral AI
Organisation type
Industry
Country
France
Published
11 December 2023
Authors
Albert Jiang, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Arthur Mensch, Blanche Savary, Chris Bamford, Devendra Singh Chaplot, Diego de las Casas, Emma Bou Hanna, Florian Bressand, Gianna Lengyel, Guillaume Bour, Guillaume Lample, Lélio Renard Lavaud, Louis Ternon, Lucile Saulnier, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Pierre Stock, Teven Le Scao, Théophile Gervet, Thibaut Lavril, Thomas Wang, Timothée Lacroix, William El Sayed.

What it does

The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.

Domain
Language
Task
Language modeling/generation, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning, Translation

Size

How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.

Parameters
46.7B

46.7B *sparse* params. 12.9B params used on average: "Concretely, Mixtral has 46.7B total parameters but only uses 12.9B parameters per token. It, therefore, processes input and generates output at the same speed and for the same cost as a 12.9B model."

Training data
tokens

Training compute

The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.

Training compute
7.7 × 10²³ FLOP

Assuming the model was trained on ~1-10 trillions of tokens (same OOM as the models from the comparison in Figure 1. Llama 2 was trained on 2T tokens) + Mistral Small 3 was trained on 8T of tokens, we can estimate training compute with "speculative" confidence: 6 FLOP / token / parameter * 12.9 * 10^9 active parameters * 10*10^12 tokens [speculatively] = 7.74e+23 FLOP

How it was established
Operation counting

Availability

Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.

Weights
Open — downloadable
Model access
Open weights (unrestricted)
Training code
Unreleased

Apache 2.0

Hugging Face
mistralai

How it is classified

Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.

Likely above 10²³ FLOP
Yes
Why it is tracked
Significant use

Frequently downloaded: https://huggingface.co/mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1 Probably the best OS model by a big margin at time of release, e.g. #7 on Chatbot Arena, above Gemini Pro and Claude 2.1: https://huggingface.co/spaces/lmsys/chatbot-arena-leaderboard

Record confidence
Speculative

Sources

Where this record came from and when it was last checked.

Reference
Mixtral of experts: A high quality Sparse Mixture-of-Experts.
Last updated
28 November 2025

The extremes

What the numbers mean

The hardware side

Minimum card

Tesla M40 24 GB

Memory needed

21.0 GB

Fastest

263 tok/s

With 46.7B parameters, Mixtral 8x7B lands in the range a serious desktop card can handle once the weights are compressed. 126 of the cards we track can run it.

At the low end, a Tesla M40 24 GB handles it — 24 GB, at Q3_K_M, for about 21.7 tokens per second.

A B200 is the fastest we calculate for it: about 263 tokens per second, from 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Where it came from

Mixtral 8x7B was published by Mistral AI, in France, in December 2023. The organisation is categorised as industry.

It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling/generation, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning, Translation.

The weights being open is what puts this page in the calculator rather than only in the catalogue: it is a model you can actually hold. It is published under the mistralai organisation on Hugging Face.

Understanding the speeds

The median result is around 65.8 tokens per second; 122 cards produce text faster than most people read it.

Because it routes each token through a subset of its weights, it produces text at the pace of a much smaller model. The catch is memory: all of it still has to fit, so the speed is a bonus rather than a discount on hardware.

Its attention layout is on file, so the memory figures are computed exactly rather than approximated.

What went into building it

Training it took roughly 7.7 × 10²³ FLOP of computation — a measure of what producing the model cost, not of how fast it answers.

The reason it appears in this catalogue at all is significant use.

Step by step

How to choose a GPU for Mixtral 8x7B

The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.

  1. 01

    Read the memory figure first

    The table lists every card that can hold Mixtral 8x7B — around 21.0 GB at Q3_K_M. That figure, not the card's headline performance, is what decides whether it runs.

  2. 02

    Match the context to your actual use

    Longer conversations cost memory on top of what the weights need. Move the slider to your real working length before trusting any row for Mixtral 8x7B.

  3. 03

    Decide how much compression you will accept

    The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy of Mixtral 8x7B — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Set a floor to hold the comparison at one level.

  4. 04

    Sort by speed

    Sort by speed to see how cards rank for Mixtral 8x7B. It will not match a gaming ordering — generation is bound by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 263 tok/s.

  5. 05

    Look at the headroom, not just the fit

    The fit column separates cards that just manage Mixtral 8x7B from those with room to spare. Buy for the second if the context might grow.

  6. 06

    Open the card you have settled on

    Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once Mixtral 8x7B is settled.

Answers

Mixtral 8x7B — common questions

01

Is Mixtral 8x7B open source?

Its weights are published, so Mixtral 8x7B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.

02

How many parameters does Mixtral 8x7B have?

Mixtral 8x7B has 46.7B parameters. 46.7B *sparse* params. 12.9B params used on average: "Concretely, Mixtral has 46.7B total parameters but only uses 12.9B parameters per token. It, therefore, processes input and generates output at the same speed and for the same cost as a 12.9B model.". That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.

03

Who created Mixtral 8x7B?

Mixtral 8x7B was published by Mistral AI, based in France, categorised as industry.

04

When was Mixtral 8x7B released?

Mixtral 8x7B was published in December 2023. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.

05

What is Mixtral 8x7B used for?

Mixtral 8x7B works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling/generation, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning, Translation. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.

06

Where can I download Mixtral 8x7B?

Its weights are published under the mistralai organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.

07

How much compute was used to train Mixtral 8x7B?

Around 7.7 × 10²³ FLOP. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.

08

Can I run Mixtral 8x7B if it does not fit in my GPU?

Partly. Layers that do not fit sit in system memory and run at a fraction of the speed, so a mostly-offloaded Mixtral 8x7B is rarely worth using — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 8.4 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is on the card.

09

Would two GPUs run Mixtral 8x7B faster?

Two cards buy memory rather than speed. That matters for Mixtral 8x7B only if one card cannot hold it — 126 can, so a second adds little.

10

Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Mixtral 8x7B?

Because capacity varies, so does how hard Mixtral 8x7B has to be squeezed — 6 distinct levels appear in the table above. Set a minimum quality to compare at one.

11

How accurate are these Mixtral 8x7B speed estimates?

Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 158–420 tok/s on the B200 rather than a single number.

12

What GPU do I need to run Mixtral 8x7B?

The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Mixtral 8x7B is the Tesla M40 24 GB, with 24 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 21.0 GB, and produces roughly 21.7 tokens per second. 126 cards in total can run it.

13

How fast is Mixtral 8x7B on a GPU?

It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 263 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 122 of the cards that can run Mixtral 8x7B clear that.

14

How much VRAM does Mixtral 8x7B need?

About 21.0 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.

15

Can I run Mixtral 8x7B on a 24 GB GPU?

Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q3_K_M, using about 21.0 GB and generating roughly 119 tokens per second — a tight fit.

Source

Original publication

Record last updated 28 November 2025

The other direction

Looking at it from the other side?

This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.