Mixtral 8x7B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
Smallest card that fits
Tesla M40 24 GB
24 GB · Q3_K_M · 21.7 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
263 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Mixtral 8x7B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
126 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
263
tok/s
158–420 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 48.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
263
tok/s
158–420 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 48.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
210
tok/s
126–336 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 48.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
210
tok/s
126–336 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 48.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
168
tok/s
101–268 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 48.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
161
tok/s
96–257 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 48.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
161
tok/s
96–257 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 48.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
154
tok/s
92–246 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 48.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
142
tok/s
85–227 · low confidence |
DRIVE A100 PROD NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 26.4 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
142
tok/s
85–227 · low confidence |
GRID A100A NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 26.4 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
136
tok/s
82–218 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 48.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
136
tok/s
82–218 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 48.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
136
tok/s
82–218 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 48.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
136
tok/s
81–217 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,790 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 26.4 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
136
tok/s
81–217 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 D NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,790 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 26.4 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
129
tok/s
78–207 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 48.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
119
tok/s
71–190 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 NVIDIA | 24 GB | 1,340 GB/s | Aug 2025 | 21.0 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
110
tok/s
66–177 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 48.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
110
tok/s
66–177 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 48.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
110
tok/s
66–177 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 48.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
110
tok/s
66–177 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 48.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
110
tok/s
66–177 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 48.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
108
tok/s
65–173 · low confidence |
A30X NVIDIA | 24 GB | 1,220 GB/s | Apr 2021 | 21.0 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
91.5
tok/s
55–146 · low confidence |
A100 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Jun 2020 | 31.8 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
91.5
tok/s
55–146 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | May 2020 | 31.8 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Mistral AI
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- France
- Published
- 11 December 2023
- Authors
- Albert Jiang, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Arthur Mensch, Blanche Savary, Chris Bamford, Devendra Singh Chaplot, Diego de las Casas, Emma Bou Hanna, Florian Bressand, Gianna Lengyel, Guillaume Bour, Guillaume Lample, Lélio Renard Lavaud, Louis Ternon, Lucile Saulnier, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Pierre Stock, Teven Le Scao, Théophile Gervet, Thibaut Lavril, Thomas Wang, Timothée Lacroix, William El Sayed.
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning, Translation
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 46.7B
- Training data
- tokens
46.7B *sparse* params. 12.9B params used on average: "Concretely, Mixtral has 46.7B total parameters but only uses 12.9B parameters per token. It, therefore, processes input and generates output at the same speed and for the same cost as a 12.9B model."
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 7.7 × 10²³ FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting
Assuming the model was trained on ~1-10 trillions of tokens (same OOM as the models from the comparison in Figure 1. Llama 2 was trained on 2T tokens) + Mistral Small 3 was trained on 8T of tokens, we can estimate training compute with "speculative" confidence: 6 FLOP / token / parameter * 12.9 * 10^9 active parameters * 10*10^12 tokens [speculatively] = 7.74e+23 FLOP
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- mistralai
Apache 2.0
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Likely above 10²³ FLOP
- Yes
- Why it is tracked
- Significant use
- Record confidence
- Speculative
Frequently downloaded: https://huggingface.co/mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1 Probably the best OS model by a big margin at time of release, e.g. #7 on Chatbot Arena, above Gemini Pro and Claude 2.1: https://huggingface.co/spaces/lmsys/chatbot-arena-leaderboard
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Mixtral of experts: A high quality Sparse Mixture-of-Experts.
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs for Mixtral 8x7B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 263 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 263 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 210 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 210 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 168 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 161 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 161 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 154 tok/s
- 09 DRIVE A100 PROD 32 GB · 1,870 GB/s · Q4_K_M 142 tok/s
- 10 GRID A100A 32 GB · 1,870 GB/s · Q4_K_M 142 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Mixtral 8x7B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Arc Pro B60 24 GB · needs 21.0 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 26.3 tok/s
- 02 GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 24 GB · needs 21.0 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 119 tok/s
- 03 RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 24 GB · needs 21.0 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 38.3 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile 24 GB · needs 21.0 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 79.4 tok/s
- 05 RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell 24 GB · needs 21.0 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 59.5 tok/s
- 06 GeForce RTX 4090 D 24 GB · needs 21.0 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 89.5 tok/s
- 07 RTX 4500 Ada Generation 24 GB · needs 21.0 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 38.3 tok/s
- 08 L4 24 GB · needs 21.0 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 26.6 tok/s
- 09 Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24 GB · needs 21.0 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 66.3 tok/s
- 10 L40 CNX 24 GB · needs 21.0 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 76.5 tok/s
What the numbers mean
The hardware side
Minimum card
Tesla M40 24 GB
Memory needed
21.0 GB
Fastest
263 tok/s
With 46.7B parameters, Mixtral 8x7B lands in the range a serious desktop card can handle once the weights are compressed. 126 of the cards we track can run it.
At the low end, a Tesla M40 24 GB handles it — 24 GB, at Q3_K_M, for about 21.7 tokens per second.
A B200 is the fastest we calculate for it: about 263 tokens per second, from 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
Where it came from
Mixtral 8x7B was published by Mistral AI, in France, in December 2023. The organisation is categorised as industry.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling/generation, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning, Translation.
The weights being open is what puts this page in the calculator rather than only in the catalogue: it is a model you can actually hold. It is published under the mistralai organisation on Hugging Face.
Understanding the speeds
The median result is around 65.8 tokens per second; 122 cards produce text faster than most people read it.
Because it routes each token through a subset of its weights, it produces text at the pace of a much smaller model. The catch is memory: all of it still has to fit, so the speed is a bonus rather than a discount on hardware.
Its attention layout is on file, so the memory figures are computed exactly rather than approximated.
What went into building it
Training it took roughly 7.7 × 10²³ FLOP of computation — a measure of what producing the model cost, not of how fast it answers.
The reason it appears in this catalogue at all is significant use.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Mixtral 8x7B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Read the memory figure first
The table lists every card that can hold Mixtral 8x7B — around 21.0 GB at Q3_K_M. That figure, not the card's headline performance, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Match the context to your actual use
Longer conversations cost memory on top of what the weights need. Move the slider to your real working length before trusting any row for Mixtral 8x7B.
-
03
Decide how much compression you will accept
The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy of Mixtral 8x7B — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Set a floor to hold the comparison at one level.
-
04
Sort by speed
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for Mixtral 8x7B. It will not match a gaming ordering — generation is bound by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 263 tok/s.
-
05
Look at the headroom, not just the fit
The fit column separates cards that just manage Mixtral 8x7B from those with room to spare. Buy for the second if the context might grow.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once Mixtral 8x7B is settled.
Answers
Mixtral 8x7B — common questions
Is Mixtral 8x7B open source?
Its weights are published, so Mixtral 8x7B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does Mixtral 8x7B have?
Mixtral 8x7B has 46.7B parameters. 46.7B *sparse* params. 12.9B params used on average: "Concretely, Mixtral has 46.7B total parameters but only uses 12.9B parameters per token. It, therefore, processes input and generates output at the same speed and for the same cost as a 12.9B model.". That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created Mixtral 8x7B?
Mixtral 8x7B was published by Mistral AI, based in France, categorised as industry.
When was Mixtral 8x7B released?
Mixtral 8x7B was published in December 2023. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is Mixtral 8x7B used for?
Mixtral 8x7B works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling/generation, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning, Translation. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.
Where can I download Mixtral 8x7B?
Its weights are published under the mistralai organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
How much compute was used to train Mixtral 8x7B?
Around 7.7 × 10²³ FLOP. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run Mixtral 8x7B if it does not fit in my GPU?
Partly. Layers that do not fit sit in system memory and run at a fraction of the speed, so a mostly-offloaded Mixtral 8x7B is rarely worth using — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 8.4 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is on the card.
Would two GPUs run Mixtral 8x7B faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed. That matters for Mixtral 8x7B only if one card cannot hold it — 126 can, so a second adds little.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Mixtral 8x7B?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard Mixtral 8x7B has to be squeezed — 6 distinct levels appear in the table above. Set a minimum quality to compare at one.
How accurate are these Mixtral 8x7B speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 158–420 tok/s on the B200 rather than a single number.
What GPU do I need to run Mixtral 8x7B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Mixtral 8x7B is the Tesla M40 24 GB, with 24 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 21.0 GB, and produces roughly 21.7 tokens per second. 126 cards in total can run it.
How fast is Mixtral 8x7B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 263 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 122 of the cards that can run Mixtral 8x7B clear that.
How much VRAM does Mixtral 8x7B need?
About 21.0 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run Mixtral 8x7B on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q3_K_M, using about 21.0 GB and generating roughly 119 tokens per second — a tight fit.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.