SEA-LION V1 7B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Tesla K20c
5 GB · Q3_K_M · 28.9 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
484 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run SEA-LION V1 7B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
589 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
484
tok/s
290–774 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
484
tok/s
290–774 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
387
tok/s
232–618 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
387
tok/s
232–618 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
309
tok/s
185–495 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
296
tok/s
178–473 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
296
tok/s
178–473 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
283
tok/s
170–453 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
251
tok/s
151–402 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
251
tok/s
151–402 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
251
tok/s
151–402 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
238
tok/s
143–381 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
203
tok/s
122–325 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
203
tok/s
122–325 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
203
tok/s
122–325 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
203
tok/s
122–325 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
203
tok/s
122–325 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
155
tok/s
93–248 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
155
tok/s
93–248 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
131
tok/s
79–210 · low confidence |
CMP 170HX 8 GB NVIDIA | 8 GB | 1,490 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 6.6 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
129
tok/s
77–206 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
126
tok/s
76–202 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
123
tok/s
74–197 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
123
tok/s
74–197 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
123
tok/s
74–197 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- AI Singapore
- Organisation type
- Government
- Country
- Singapore
- Published
- 1 December 2023
- Authors
- Lam Wen Zhi Clarence, Leong Wei Qi, Li Yier, Liu Bing Jie Darius, Lovenia Holy, Montalan Jann Railey, Ng Boon Cheong Raymond, Ngui Jian Gang, Nguyen Thanh Ngan, Ong Tat-Wee David, Rengarajan Hamsawardhini, Susanto Yosephine, Tai Ngee Chia, Tan Choon Meng, Teo Jin Howe, Teo Eng Sipp Leslie, Teo Wei Yi, Tjhi William, Yeo Yeow Tong, Yong Xianbin
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Question answering, Chat, Language modeling/generation
- Approach
- Self-supervised learning
- Numerical format
- BF16
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 7B
- Training data
- 980,000,000,000 tokens
"SEA-LION was trained on 980B tokens"
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 4.3 × 10²² FLOP
- How it was established
- Hardware,Operation counting
6 FLOP / parameter / token * 7B parameters * 980B tokens = 4.116e+22 FLOP 312000000000000 FLOP / GPU / sec * 256 GPUs * 22 days * 24 hours / day * 3600 sec / hour * 0.3 [assumed utilization] = 4.5546209e+22 FLOP sqrt(4.116e+22*4.5546209e+22) = 4.3297598e+22 FLOP
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB
- Chips used
- 256
- Wall-clock time
- 528 hours (22 days)
- Power draw
- 203.0 kW
22 days
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Open source
- Hugging Face
- aisingapore
MIT license https://huggingface.co/aisingapore/SEA-LION-v1-7B https://github.com/aisingapore/sealion
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- SEA-LION V1
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run SEA-LION V1 7B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 484 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 484 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 387 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 387 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 309 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 296 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 296 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 283 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 251 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 251 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run SEA-LION V1 7B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Quadro P2200 5 GB · needs 4.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 27.8 tok/s
- 02 P102-100 5 GB · needs 4.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 61.1 tok/s
- 03 GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB 5 GB · needs 4.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 22.2 tok/s
- 04 Quadro P2000 5 GB · needs 4.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 19.5 tok/s
- 05 Tesla K20s 5 GB · needs 4.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 28.9 tok/s
- 06 Tesla K20m 5 GB · needs 4.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 28.9 tok/s
- 07 Tesla K20c 5 GB · needs 4.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 28.9 tok/s
- 08 RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation 6 GB · needs 4.9 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 26.8 tok/s
- 09 GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 6 GB · needs 4.9 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 23.5 tok/s
- 10 Arc A380M 6 GB · needs 4.9 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 16.9 tok/s
What the numbers mean
Hardware requirements in practice
Minimum card
Tesla K20c
Memory needed
4.1 GB
Fastest
484 tok/s
SEA-LION V1 7B is small enough at 7B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 589 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
The entry point is the Tesla K20c: 5 GB of memory, Q3_K_M compression, roughly 28.9 tokens per second.
At the other end, a B200 generates roughly 484 tokens per second on it, on the strength of 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
Where it came from
SEA-LION V1 7B was published by AI Singapore, in Singapore, in December 2023. government is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing question answering, Chat, Language modeling/generation.
The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached. It is published under the aisingapore organisation on Hugging Face.
Understanding the speeds
The median result is around 26.1 tokens per second; 559 cards produce text faster than most people read it.
Being dense, it reads all of itself per token, which is why the ordering by speed below follows the ordering by memory bandwidth so closely.
Its internal architecture is not on file, so memory is approximated from the parameter count and marked accordingly. Expect the real figure to differ, more so at long context.
Training and provenance
Training it took roughly 4.3 × 10²² FLOP of computation, on NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB — a measure of what producing the model cost, not of how fast it answers.
Around 980,000,000,000 tokens went into training it.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for SEA-LION V1 7B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Read the memory figure first
Look at what SEA-LION V1 7B actually needs — around 4.1 GB at Q3_K_M. No amount of processing power compensates for a card that cannot hold it.
-
02
Decide how long your conversations run
Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason SEA-LION V1 7B stops fitting a card that seemed fine.
-
03
Decide how much compression you will accept
The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy of SEA-LION V1 7B — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Set a floor to hold the comparison at one level.
-
04
Compare tokens per second, not specifications
The speed ordering for SEA-LION V1 7B is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 484 tok/s.
-
05
Look at the headroom, not just the fit
A tight fit runs SEA-LION V1 7B but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation; comfortable has headroom. If you expect to grow the context, buy for comfortable.
-
06
See what else that card runs
Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once SEA-LION V1 7B is settled.
Answers
SEA-LION V1 7B — common questions
Can I run SEA-LION V1 7B on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q6_K, using about 6.6 GB and generating roughly 131 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run SEA-LION V1 7B on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 8.2 GB and generating roughly 55.2 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run SEA-LION V1 7B on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 8.2 GB and generating roughly 68.4 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run SEA-LION V1 7B on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 8.2 GB and generating roughly 81.1 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is SEA-LION V1 7B open source?
Its weights are published, so SEA-LION V1 7B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does SEA-LION V1 7B have?
SEA-LION V1 7B has 7B parameters. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created SEA-LION V1 7B?
SEA-LION V1 7B was published by AI Singapore, based in Singapore, categorised as government.
When was SEA-LION V1 7B released?
SEA-LION V1 7B was published in December 2023. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is SEA-LION V1 7B used for?
SEA-LION V1 7B works in Language, and is recorded as handling question answering, Chat, Language modeling/generation. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.
Where can I download SEA-LION V1 7B?
Its weights are published under the aisingapore organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
How much compute was used to train SEA-LION V1 7B?
Around 4.3 × 10²² FLOP, on NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run SEA-LION V1 7B if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part in system memory drags the whole thing down — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 1.3 GB. Our figures for SEA-LION V1 7B assume it is fully resident.
Would two GPUs run SEA-LION V1 7B faster?
A second card roughly doubles the memory available but not the generation rate. With 589 cards already able to run SEA-LION V1 7B alone, the case for pairing is weak.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for SEA-LION V1 7B?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard SEA-LION V1 7B has to be squeezed — 4 distinct levels appear in the table above. Set a minimum quality to compare at one.
How accurate are these SEA-LION V1 7B speed estimates?
They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range — 290–774 tok/s on the B200, for instance. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
What GPU do I need to run SEA-LION V1 7B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds SEA-LION V1 7B is the Tesla K20c, with 5 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 4.1 GB, and produces roughly 28.9 tokens per second. 589 cards in total can run it.
How fast is SEA-LION V1 7B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 484 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 559 of the cards that can run SEA-LION V1 7B clear that.
How much VRAM does SEA-LION V1 7B need?
About 4.1 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.