LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Quadro 6000
6 GB · IQ4_XS · 18.1 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
484 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned)?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
582 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
484
tok/s
411–581 |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 8.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
484
tok/s
411–581 |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 8.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
387
tok/s
232–618 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 8.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
387
tok/s
232–618 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 8.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
309
tok/s
185–495 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 8.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
296
tok/s
251–355 |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 8.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
296
tok/s
251–355 |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 8.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
283
tok/s
170–453 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 8.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
251
tok/s
151–402 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 8.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
251
tok/s
151–402 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 8.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
251
tok/s
151–402 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 8.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
238
tok/s
203–286 |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 8.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
203
tok/s
173–244 |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 8.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
203
tok/s
173–244 |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 8.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
203
tok/s
173–244 |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 8.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
203
tok/s
173–244 |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 8.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
203
tok/s
173–244 |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 8.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
155
tok/s
93–248 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 8.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
155
tok/s
93–248 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 8.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
131
tok/s
111–157 |
CMP 170HX 8 GB NVIDIA | 8 GB | 1,490 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 7.1 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
129
tok/s
77–206 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 8.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
126
tok/s
76–202 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 8.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
123
tok/s
105–148 |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 8.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
123
tok/s
105–148 |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 8.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
123
tok/s
105–148 |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 8.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Zhejiang University (ZJU)
- Organisation type
- Academia
- Country
- China
- Published
- 2 October 2023
- Authors
- Yin Fang, Xiaozhuan Liang, Ningyu Zhang, Kangwei Liu, Rui Huang, Zhuo Chen, Xiaohui Fan, Huajun Chen
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language, Biology
- Task
- Protein folding prediction, Protein generation, Other Biological Modeling, Protein or nucleotide language model (pLM/nLM), Protein question answering
- Base model
- LLaMA-7B
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 7B
- Training data
- 5,068,266,667 tokens
In the name
Data estimate summary: * Instructions: 2,043,587 * Tokens per instruction: 100 * Total = 2,043,587 × 100 = 2.04e8 tokens
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 2.8 × 10²² FLOP
- How it was established
- Hardware,Operation counting
Estimate 1: 1T tokens * 6.7B parameters * 6 FLOP/token/parameter = 4e22 FLOP from paper, Llama-7B took 82,432 GPU hours using A100s Estimate 2: 312 trillion FLOP/s * (82,432 * 3600) s * 0.3 = 2.78e22 FLOP
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Unreleased
MIT. includes data https://github.com/zjunlp/Mol-Instructions
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
- Citations
- 145
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Mol-Instructions: A Large-Scale Biomolecular Instruction Dataset for Large Language Models
- Last updated
- 25 May 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned)
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 484 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 484 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 387 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 387 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 309 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 296 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 296 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 283 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 251 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 251 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned)
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation 6 GB · needs 5.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 28.5 tok/s
- 02 GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 6 GB · needs 5.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 25.0 tok/s
- 03 Arc A380M 6 GB · needs 5.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 18.0 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q 6 GB · needs 5.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 28.5 tok/s
- 05 GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile 6 GB · needs 5.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 28.5 tok/s
- 06 Data Center GPU Flex 140 6 GB · needs 5.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 18.0 tok/s
- 07 Arc Pro A40 6 GB · needs 5.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 18.5 tok/s
- 08 Arc Pro A50 6 GB · needs 5.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 18.5 tok/s
- 09 GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB 6 GB · needs 5.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 19.6 tok/s
- 10 GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB 6 GB · needs 5.1 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 25.0 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What it takes to run this model
Minimum card
Quadro 6000
Memory needed
5.1 GB
Fastest
484 tok/s
LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) is small enough at 7B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 582 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
The smallest card that holds it is the Quadro 6000 with 6 GB, running it at IQ4_XS and producing around 18.1 tokens per second.
A B200 is the fastest we calculate for it: about 484 tokens per second, from 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
What this model is
LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) was published by Zhejiang University (ZJU), in China, in October 2023. The organisation is categorised as academia.
It works in Language, Biology, and is recorded as doing protein folding prediction, Protein generation, Other Biological Modeling, Protein or nucleotide language model (pLM/nLM), Protein question answering.
It is derived from LLaMA-7B rather than trained from scratch, which is the usual way a specialised model is produced.
The weights being open is what puts this page in the calculator rather than only in the catalogue: it is a model you can actually hold.
What decides the speed
Half the cards that hold it manage more than 26.1 tokens per second, and 552 exceed reading speed outright.
Being dense, it reads all of itself per token, which is why the ordering by speed below follows the ordering by memory bandwidth so closely.
Because the architecture is recorded, the memory column is derived rather than estimated.
How it was trained
Training it took roughly 2.8 × 10²² FLOP of computation — a measure of what producing the model cost, not of how fast it answers.
The training set ran to roughly 5,068,266,667 tokens.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned)
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start from the memory column
Look at what LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) actually needs — around 5.1 GB at IQ4_XS. No amount of processing power compensates for a card that cannot hold it.
-
02
Match the context to your actual use
Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) stops fitting a card that seemed fine.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
Compression is what makes LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy — IQ4_XS on the smallest card that fits. A minimum quality removes the ones that go too far.
-
04
Sort by speed
Ranking by tokens per second for LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) follows memory bandwidth, not core counts, which is why the B200 tops it at 484 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
Tight means LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) loads and works, with no room to raise the context later. Comfortable means you can. The difference matters more than a few tokens per second.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Each card page repeats this sweep for every model we hold. It answers what else the hardware is good for, beyond LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned).
Answers
LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) — common questions
How fast is LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 484 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 552 of the cards that can run LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) clear that.
How much VRAM does LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) need?
About 5.1 GB at IQ4_XS compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q6_K, using about 7.1 GB and generating roughly 131 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 8.8 GB and generating roughly 55.2 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 8.8 GB and generating roughly 68.4 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 8.8 GB and generating roughly 81.1 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) open source?
Its weights are published, so LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) have?
LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) has 7B parameters. In the name. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned)?
LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) was published by Zhejiang University (ZJU), based in China, categorised as academia.
When was LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) released?
LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) was published in October 2023. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) used for?
LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) works in Language, Biology, and is recorded as handling protein folding prediction, Protein generation, Other Biological Modeling, Protein or nucleotide language model (pLM/nLM), Protein question answering. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.
Where can I download LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned)?
The weights for LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
How much compute was used to train LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned)?
Around 2.8 × 10²² FLOP. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part in system memory drags the whole thing down — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 1.0 GB. Our figures for LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) assume it is fully resident.
Would two GPUs run LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) faster?
Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. Since 582 of the cards we track already hold LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) on their own, a second card is rarely the answer here.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned)?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. Across the cards that run LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned), 3 compression levels are used; the floor control above pins it to one.
How accurate are these LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 411–581 tok/s on the B200 rather than a single number.
What GPU do I need to run LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned)?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds LLaMA-7B (protein-oriented instruction-tuned) is the Quadro 6000, with 6 GB of memory. It runs the model at IQ4_XS using about 5.1 GB, and produces roughly 18.1 tokens per second. 582 cards in total can run it.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.