Emu1 (BAAI) TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
P102-101
10 GB · IQ4_XS · 20.2 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
242 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Emu1 (BAAI)?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
306 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
242
tok/s
145–387 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 15.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
242
tok/s
145–387 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 15.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
193
tok/s
116–309 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 15.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
193
tok/s
116–309 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 15.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
155
tok/s
93–247 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 15.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
148
tok/s
89–237 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 15.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
148
tok/s
89–237 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 15.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
142
tok/s
85–227 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 15.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
126
tok/s
75–201 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 15.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
126
tok/s
75–201 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 15.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
126
tok/s
75–201 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 15.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
119
tok/s
72–191 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 15.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
116
tok/s
70–185 · low confidence |
CMP 170HX 10 GB NVIDIA | 10 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 8.4 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
102
tok/s
61–163 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 15.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
102
tok/s
61–163 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 15.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
102
tok/s
61–163 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 15.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
102
tok/s
61–163 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 15.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
102
tok/s
61–163 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 15.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
77.4
tok/s
46–124 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 15.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
77.4
tok/s
46–124 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 15.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
64.5
tok/s
39–103 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 15.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
63.1
tok/s
38–101 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 15.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
61.7
tok/s
37–99 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 15.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
61.7
tok/s
37–99 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 15.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
61.7
tok/s
37–99 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 15.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence / BAAI,Tsinghua University,Peking University
- Organisation type
- Academia,Academia,Academia
- Country
- China
- Published
- 11 July 2023
- Authors
- Quan Sun, Qiying Yu, Yufeng Cui, Fan Zhang, Xiaosong Zhang, Yueze Wang, Hongcheng Gao, Jingjing Liu, Tiejun Huang, Xinlong Wang
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Vision, Multimodal, Language
- Task
- Image generation, Text autocompletion, Text-to-image, Visual question answering, Image captioning, Language modeling/generation
- Base model
- Stable Diffusion (LDM-KL-8-G),EVA-01,LLaMA-13B
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 14B
- Training data
- tokens
"The total number of parameters of Emu is 14B and is trained end-to-end." " We leverage pretrained EVA-CLIP (Sun et al., 2023), LLaMA (Touvron et al., 2023) and Stable Diffusion (Rombach et al., 2022) to initialize the Visual Encoder, the Multimodal Modeling LLM and the Visual Decoder, respectively."
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 2.7 × 10²¹ FLOP
- How it was established
- Hardware
"We train the model on 128 NVIDIA 80G-A100 GPUs for 10k steps with around 82M samples (150B tokens in total), and the pretraining takes approximately 2 days." https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=128*312+TFLOPS+*+2+days+*+0.4
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB
- Chips used
- 128
- Chip-hours
- 6,144
- Wall-clock time
- 48 hours
- Power draw
- 101.8 kW
"We train the model on 128 NVIDIA 80G-A100 GPUs for 10k steps with around 82M samples (150B tokens in total), and the pretraining takes approximately 2 days."
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (non-commercial)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- BAAI
Apache 2.0 https://github.com/baaivision/Emu/tree/main/Emu1 Llama license (mentioned in github repo) https://huggingface.co/BAAI/Emu2 training code release is still in their todo list
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Generative Pretraining in Multimodality
- Last updated
- 11 February 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Emu1 (BAAI)
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 242 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 242 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 193 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 193 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 155 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 148 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 148 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 142 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 126 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 126 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Emu1 (BAAI)
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Arc B570 10 GB · needs 8.4 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 18.4 tok/s
- 02 Xbox Series X 6nm GPU 10 GB · needs 8.4 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 32.5 tok/s
- 03 Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB 10 GB · needs 8.4 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 18.5 tok/s
- 04 CMP 170HX 10 GB 10 GB · needs 8.4 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 116 tok/s
- 05 CMP 90HX 10 GB · needs 8.4 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 56.5 tok/s
- 06 CMP 50HX 10 GB · needs 8.4 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 41.6 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6700 10 GB · needs 8.4 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 18.5 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6700M 10 GB · needs 8.4 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 18.5 tok/s
- 09 Xbox Series X GPU 10 GB · needs 8.4 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 32.5 tok/s
- 10 GeForce RTX 3080 10 GB · needs 8.4 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 56.5 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What it takes to run this model
Minimum card
P102-101
Memory needed
8.4 GB
Fastest
242 tok/s
Emu1 (BAAI) reaches a parameter count of 14B. That is small enough that hardware is rarely the obstacle, including on cards several years old. The number of cards we track that can run it: 306.
The smallest card that holds it is P102-101, with a memory capacity of 10 GB, running it at a compression of IQ4_XS and producing around 20.2 tokens per second.
At the other end sits B200, generating roughly 242 tokens per second on the strength of a memory bandwidth of 8,000 GB/s.
What this model is
Emu1 (BAAI) was published by Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence / BAAI,Tsinghua University,Peking University, in the country recorded as China, during July 2023. The publishing organisation is categorised as academia,Academia,Academia.
It works in the domain of Vision, Multimodal, Language, and is recorded as performing the task of image generation, Text autocompletion, Text-to-image, Visual question answering, Image captioning, Language modeling/generation.
It builds on Stable Diffusion (LDM-KL-8-G),EVA-01,LLaMA-13B. That is the usual way a specialised model is produced.
Because its weights were released, nothing about running it depends on a provider staying available — it is yours once downloaded. On Hugging Face it is published under the organisation BAAI.
What decides the speed
Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range sits at 20.4 tokens per second. Producing text faster than most people read it: 268 of them.
It is a dense model, so every parameter is read for every token produced. That makes speed track memory bandwidth almost exactly — a card with twice the bandwidth generates roughly twice as fast.
Memory here is estimated from size rather than computed from the architecture, which is not recorded for this model — the numbers are indicative rather than exact.
How it was trained
Producing it required arithmetic totalling around 2.7 × 10²¹ FLOP, on hardware recorded as NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB. That figure measures what producing the model cost, and has no bearing on how fast it answers.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Emu1 (BAAI)
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start from the memory column
The table lists every card able to hold Emu1 (BAAI), needing around 8.4 GB at a compression of IQ4_XS. No amount of processing power compensates for a card that cannot hold it.
-
02
Decide how long your conversations run
Longer conversations cost memory on top of what the weights need. Move the slider to your real working length before trusting any row for Emu1 (BAAI).
-
03
Set a quality floor
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold, reaching a compression of IQ4_XS on the smallest card that fits. Setting a minimum quality drops the cards that only manage it by squeezing further than you would want, and holds the comparison at one level.
-
04
Sort by speed
Ranking by tokens per second follows memory bandwidth rather than core counts, for Emu1 (BAAI). It will not match a gaming ordering, because generation is bound by memory bandwidth. The card topping the list is B200, at 242 tok/s.
-
05
Check the fit verdict before buying
Tight means it loads and works with no room to raise the context later, in the case of Emu1 (BAAI). Comfortable means you can grow the context later. That difference matters more than a few tokens per second, so buy for comfortable if you expect to.
-
06
Check the card from the other side
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. A card is usually bought for more than one model, so it is worth a look before buying for Emu1 (BAAI).
Answers
Emu1 (BAAI) — common questions
Emu1 (BAAI)— can I run it on a GPU holding 24 GB?
Yes. The card GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, holding 24 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 15.7 GB and generating roughly 40.5 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.
Emu1 (BAAI)— is it open source?
Its weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
Emu1 (BAAI)— how many parameters does it have?
It has a parameter count of 14B. "The total number of parameters of Emu is 14B and is trained end-to-end." " We leverage pretrained EVA-CLIP (Sun et al., 2023), LLaMA (Touvron et al., 2023) and Stable Diffusion (Rombach et al., 2022) to initialize the Visual Encoder, the Multimodal Modeling LLM and the Visual Decoder, respectively.". That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Emu1 (BAAI)— who created it?
It was published by Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence / BAAI,Tsinghua University,Peking University, based in China, an organisation categorised as academia,Academia,Academia.
Emu1 (BAAI)— when was it released?
It was published in July 2023. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
Emu1 (BAAI)— what is it used for?
It works in the domain of Vision, Multimodal, Language, and is recorded as handling the task of image generation, Text autocompletion, Text-to-image, Visual question answering, Image captioning, Language modeling/generation. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.
Emu1 (BAAI)— where can I download it?
Its weights are published on Hugging Face, under the organisation BAAI. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
Emu1 (BAAI)— how much compute was used to train it?
Training consumed around 2.7 × 10²¹ FLOP, on hardware recorded as NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Emu1 (BAAI)— can I run it if it does not fit in my GPU?
Partly. Layers that do not fit sit in system memory and run at a fraction of the speed, so a mostly-offloaded model is rarely worth using. The nearest miss we calculate falls short by 2.0 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is resident on the card.
Emu1 (BAAI)— would two GPUs run it faster?
Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. The number of cards already holding it on their own: 306. So a second card is rarely the answer here.
Emu1 (BAAI)— why does the quantisation differ between cards?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. The number of compression levels used across the cards that run it: 5. Bigger cards get the more accurate version, and the quality floor above pins the comparison to one level.
Emu1 (BAAI)— how accurate are these speed estimates?
These are estimates with real error bars, and any of them could reasonably land anywhere in its published range depending on which runtime you use. The fastest result here: 145–387 tok/s on B200. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
Emu1 (BAAI)— what GPU do I need to run it?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds it is P102-101, with a memory capacity of 10 GB. It runs the model at a compression of IQ4_XS using about 8.4 GB, and produces roughly 20.2 tokens per second. The number of cards able to run it in total: 306.
Emu1 (BAAI)— how fast is it on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is B200, at about 242 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and the number of cards clearing that: 268.
Emu1 (BAAI)— how much VRAM does it need?
It needs about 8.4 GB at a compression of IQ4_XS, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Emu1 (BAAI)— can I run it on a GPU holding 12 GB?
Yes. The card GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, holding 12 GB, runs it at a compression of Q5_K_M, using about 10.8 GB and generating roughly 49.3 tokens per second. The fit is tight.
Emu1 (BAAI)— can I run it on a GPU holding 16 GB?
Yes. The card Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, holding 16 GB, runs it at a compression of Q6_K, using about 12.4 GB and generating roughly 49.7 tokens per second. The fit is tight.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.