LLaMA-13B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
P102-101
10 GB · IQ4_XS · 21.8 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
261 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run LLaMA-13B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
306 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
261
tok/s
222–313 |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 15.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
261
tok/s
222–313 |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 15.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
208
tok/s
125–333 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 15.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
208
tok/s
125–333 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 15.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
166
tok/s
100–266 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 15.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
159
tok/s
135–191 |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 15.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
159
tok/s
135–191 |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 15.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
152
tok/s
91–244 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 15.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
135
tok/s
81–217 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 15.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
135
tok/s
81–217 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 15.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
135
tok/s
81–217 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 15.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
128
tok/s
109–154 |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 15.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
125
tok/s
106–150 |
CMP 170HX 10 GB NVIDIA | 10 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 8.6 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
109
tok/s
93–131 |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 15.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
109
tok/s
93–131 |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 15.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
109
tok/s
93–131 |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 15.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
109
tok/s
93–131 |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 15.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
109
tok/s
93–131 |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 15.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
83.4
tok/s
50–133 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 15.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
83.4
tok/s
50–133 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 15.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
69.5
tok/s
42–111 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 15.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
68.6
tok/s
58–82 |
GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB NVIDIA | 12 GB | 912 GB/s | Jan 2022 | 9.3 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
68.6
tok/s
58–82 |
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti NVIDIA | 12 GB | 912 GB/s | May 2021 | 9.3 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
68.0
tok/s
41–109 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 15.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
66.5
tok/s
56–80 |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 15.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Meta AI
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 27 February 2023
- Authors
- Hugo Touvron, Thibaut Lavril, Gautier Izacard, Xavier Martinet, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Timothée Lacroix, Baptiste Rozière, Naman Goyal, Eric Hambro, Faisal Azhar, Aurelien Rodriguez, Armand Joulin, Edouard Grave, Guillaume Lample
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling, Code generation
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 13B
- Training data
- 1,000,000,000,000 tokens
- Epochs
- 1
- Batch size
- 4,000,000
13.0B
Table 2
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 7.8 × 10²² FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting
1T tokens * 13B parameters * 6 FLOP/token/parameter = 7.8e22 from paper, Llama-13B took 135,168 GPU hours using A100s 312 trillion * 135,168 * 3600 = 1.518e23 FLOPs at full utilization This implies that the actual utilization was: MFU = 7.8e22/1.518e23 = 0.514
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA A100
- Hardware utilisation
- MFU 51.4%
- Compute cost
- $61,301
1T tokens * 13B parameters * 6 FLOP/token/parameter = 7.8e22 from paper, Llama-13B took 135,168 GPU hours using A100s 312 trillion * 135,168 * 3600 = 1.518e23 FLOPs at full utilization This implies that the actual utilization was: MFU = 7.8e22/1.518e23 = 0.514
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (non-commercial)
- Training code
- Unreleased
non-commercial license: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfqNECQnMkycAp2jP4Z9TFX0cGR4uf7b_fBxjY_OjhJILlKGA/viewform
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Why it is tracked
- Highly cited
- Record confidence
- Confident
- Citations
- 19,926
- Benchmark data
- LLaMA-13B
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models
- Last updated
- 25 May 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run LLaMA-13B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 261 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 261 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 208 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 208 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 166 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 159 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 159 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 152 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 135 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 135 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run LLaMA-13B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Arc B570 10 GB · needs 8.6 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 19.8 tok/s
- 02 Xbox Series X 6nm GPU 10 GB · needs 8.6 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 34.9 tok/s
- 03 Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB 10 GB · needs 8.6 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 20.0 tok/s
- 04 CMP 170HX 10 GB 10 GB · needs 8.6 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 125 tok/s
- 05 CMP 90HX 10 GB · needs 8.6 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 60.8 tok/s
- 06 CMP 50HX 10 GB · needs 8.6 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 44.8 tok/s
- 07 Radeon RX 6700 10 GB · needs 8.6 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 20.0 tok/s
- 08 Radeon RX 6700M 10 GB · needs 8.6 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 20.0 tok/s
- 09 Xbox Series X GPU 10 GB · needs 8.6 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 34.9 tok/s
- 10 GeForce RTX 3080 10 GB · needs 8.6 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 60.8 tok/s
What the numbers mean
The hardware side
Minimum card
P102-101
Memory needed
8.6 GB
Fastest
261 tok/s
LLaMA-13B is small enough at 13B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 306 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
At the low end, a P102-101 handles it — 10 GB, at IQ4_XS, for about 21.8 tokens per second.
A B200 is the fastest we calculate for it: about 261 tokens per second, from 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
About this model
LLaMA-13B was published by Meta AI, in United States of America, in February 2023. It comes out of industry.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling, Code generation.
Published weights mean the model runs on your machine rather than someone else's, which is what makes the hardware question below answerable at all.
How fast it runs, and why
Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range is about 24.3 tokens per second, and 269 of them clear the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed.
It is a dense model, so every parameter is read for every token produced. That makes speed track memory bandwidth almost exactly — a card with twice the bandwidth generates roughly twice as fast.
Its attention layout is on file, so the memory figures are computed exactly rather than approximated.
Training and provenance
Training it took roughly 7.8 × 10²² FLOP of computation, on NVIDIA A100 — a measure of what producing the model cost, not of how fast it answers.
Around 1,000,000,000,000 tokens went into training it.
The reason it appears in this catalogue at all is highly cited.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for LLaMA-13B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Read the memory figure first
Every card here has been checked against LLaMA-13B — around 8.6 GB at IQ4_XS. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason LLaMA-13B stops fitting a card that seemed fine.
-
03
Set a quality floor
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold — IQ4_XS on the smallest card that fits. Setting a floor drops the cards that only manage LLaMA-13B by squeezing it further than you would want.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for LLaMA-13B. It will not match a gaming ordering — generation is bound by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 261 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
Tight means LLaMA-13B loads and works, with no room to raise the context later. Comfortable means you can. The difference matters more than a few tokens per second.
-
06
See what else that card runs
Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once LLaMA-13B is settled.
Answers
LLaMA-13B — common questions
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for LLaMA-13B?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard LLaMA-13B has to be squeezed — 4 distinct levels appear in the table above. Set a minimum quality to compare at one.
How accurate are these LLaMA-13B speed estimates?
They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range — 222–313 tok/s on the B200, for instance. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
What GPU do I need to run LLaMA-13B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds LLaMA-13B is the P102-101, with 10 GB of memory. It runs the model at IQ4_XS using about 8.6 GB, and produces roughly 21.8 tokens per second. 306 cards in total can run it.
How fast is LLaMA-13B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 261 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 269 of the cards that can run LLaMA-13B clear that.
How much VRAM does LLaMA-13B need?
About 8.6 GB at IQ4_XS compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run LLaMA-13B on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q4_K_M, using about 9.3 GB and generating roughly 68.6 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run LLaMA-13B on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q6_K, using about 12.3 GB and generating roughly 53.5 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run LLaMA-13B on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 15.4 GB and generating roughly 43.7 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is LLaMA-13B open source?
Its weights are published, so LLaMA-13B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does LLaMA-13B have?
LLaMA-13B has 13B parameters. 13.0B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created LLaMA-13B?
LLaMA-13B was published by Meta AI, based in United States of America, categorised as industry.
When was LLaMA-13B released?
LLaMA-13B was published in February 2023. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is LLaMA-13B used for?
LLaMA-13B works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling, Code generation. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.
Where can I download LLaMA-13B?
The weights for LLaMA-13B are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
How much compute was used to train LLaMA-13B?
Around 7.8 × 10²² FLOP, on NVIDIA A100. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run LLaMA-13B if it does not fit in my GPU?
Partly. Layers that do not fit sit in system memory and run at a fraction of the speed, so a mostly-offloaded LLaMA-13B is rarely worth using — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 2.1 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is on the card.
Would two GPUs run LLaMA-13B faster?
A second card roughly doubles the memory available but not the generation rate. With 306 cards already able to run LLaMA-13B alone, the case for pairing is weak.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.