XGLM-7.5B TPS calculator

Open weights Meta AI,Facebook AI Research 7.5B parameters December 2021

Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.

Calculated for this model

589 cards that can run it

818 cards we hold specifications for

Smallest card that fits

Tesla K20c

5 GB · Q3_K_M · 26.9 tok/s

Fastest card

B200

452 tok/s · 180 GB

Which GPUs can run XGLM-7.5B?

Set the inputs, read the answer

Context length tokens

A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.

Minimum quality

Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.

Search cards

Card memory

Also show cards that cannot run it

589 cards match

Calculating

					Needs	Quantisation	Fit
452 tok/s 271–723 · low confidence	B200 NVIDIA	180 GB	8,000 GB/s	Jan 2024	8.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
452 tok/s 271–723 · low confidence	B300 NVIDIA	288 GB	8,000 GB/s	Sep 2025	8.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
361 tok/s 216–577 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD	288 GB	8,190 GB/s	Jan 2025	8.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
361 tok/s 216–577 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD	288 GB	8,190 GB/s	Jan 2025	8.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
289 tok/s 173–462 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD	128 GB	6,550 GB/s	Jan 2023	8.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
276 tok/s 166–442 · low confidence	H200 NVL NVIDIA	141 GB	4,890 GB/s	Nov 2024	8.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
276 tok/s 166–442 · low confidence	H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA	141 GB	4,890 GB/s	Nov 2024	8.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
264 tok/s 159–423 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD	256 GB	6,000 GB/s	Oct 2024	8.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
235 tok/s 141–375 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD	128 GB	5,325 GB/s	Dec 2023	8.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
235 tok/s 141–375 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD	192 GB	5,325 GB/s	Dec 2023	8.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
235 tok/s 141–375 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD	192 GB	5,325 GB/s	Dec 2023	8.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
222 tok/s 134–356 · low confidence	H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA	94 GB	3,940 GB/s	Mar 2023	8.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
190 tok/s 114–304 · low confidence	H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA	96 GB	3,360 GB/s	Mar 2023	8.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
190 tok/s 114–304 · low confidence	H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA	80 GB	3,360 GB/s	Oct 2022	8.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
190 tok/s 114–304 · low confidence	H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA	94 GB	3,360 GB/s	Mar 2023	8.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
190 tok/s 114–304 · low confidence	H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA	96 GB	3,360 GB/s	Mar 2023	8.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
190 tok/s 114–304 · low confidence	H800 SXM5 NVIDIA	80 GB	3,360 GB/s	Mar 2023	8.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
144 tok/s 87–231 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD	128 GB	3,280 GB/s	Nov 2021	8.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
144 tok/s 87–231 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD	128 GB	3,280 GB/s	Nov 2021	8.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
122 tok/s 73–196 · low confidence	CMP 170HX 8 GB NVIDIA	8 GB	1,490 GB/s	Sep 2021	7.0 GB	Q6_K	Tight
120 tok/s 72–193 · low confidence	Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel	128 GB	3,280 GB/s	Jan 2023	8.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
118 tok/s 71–189 · low confidence	Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel	128 GB	3,210 GB/s	Jan 2023	8.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
115 tok/s 69–184 · low confidence	A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA	80 GB	2,040 GB/s	Nov 2020	8.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
115 tok/s 69–184 · low confidence	A100X NVIDIA	80 GB	2,040 GB/s	Jun 2021	8.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
115 tok/s 69–184 · low confidence	A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA	80 GB	2,040 GB/s	Aug 2022	8.7 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable

Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.

On record

Full specification

Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.

Origin

Who built this model, where, and when it was published.

Organisation: Meta AI,Facebook AI Research
Organisation type: Industry,Industry
Country: United States of America, France
Published: 20 December 2021
Authors: Xi Victoria Lin, Todor Mihaylov, Mikel Artetxe, Tianlu Wang, Shuohui Chen, Daniel Simig, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Shruti Bhosale, Jingfei Du, Ramakanth Pasunuru, Sam Shleifer, Punit Singh Koura, Vishrav Chaudhary, Brian O'Horo, Jeff Wang, Luke Zettlemoyer, Zornitsa Kozareva, Mona Diab, Veselin Stoyanov, Xian Li

What it does

The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.

Domain: Language
Task: Translation, Question answering, Language modeling/generation
Approach: Self-supervised learning

Size

How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.

Parameters: 7.5B
Training data: 500,000,000,000 tokens
Epochs: 1
Batch size: 4,000,000

Training compute

The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.

Training compute: 2.3 × 10²² FLOP
How it was established: Operation counting,Hardware

The training run

What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.

Training hardware: NVIDIA A100
Chips used: 256
Chip-hours: 129,024
Wall-clock time: 504 hours (21 days)
Power draw: 206.3 kW
Compute cost: $104,152

Availability

Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.

Weights: Open — downloadable
Model access: Open weights (non-commercial)
Training code: Unreleased

How it is classified

Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.

Why it is tracked: SOTA improvement
Record confidence: Confident
Citations: 381

Sources

Where this record came from and when it was last checked.

Reference: Few-shot Learning with Multilingual Language Models
Last updated: 25 May 2026

The extremes

The ten fastest GPUs that run XGLM-7.5B

Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.

The smallest GPUs that still run XGLM-7.5B

The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.

What the numbers mean

What it takes to run this model

Minimum card

Tesla K20c

Memory needed

4.4 GB

Fastest

452 tok/s

XGLM-7.5B is small enough at 7.5B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 589 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.

The smallest card that holds it is the Tesla K20c with 5 GB, running it at Q3_K_M and producing around 26.9 tokens per second.

Top of the range is the B200, at roughly 452 tokens per second thanks to 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth.

Background

XGLM-7.5B was published by Meta AI,Facebook AI Research, in United States of America, in December 2021. The organisation is categorised as industry,Industry.

It works in Language, and is recorded as doing translation, Question answering, Language modeling/generation.

Published weights mean the model runs on your machine rather than someone else's, which is what makes the hardware question below answerable at all.

Reading the throughput figures

Half the cards that hold it manage more than 24.4 tokens per second, and 557 exceed reading speed outright.

It is a dense model, so every parameter is read for every token produced. That makes speed track memory bandwidth almost exactly — a card with twice the bandwidth generates roughly twice as fast.

Memory here is estimated from size rather than computed from the architecture, which is not recorded for this model — the numbers are indicative rather than exact.

Training and provenance

Producing it required around 2.3 × 10²² FLOP of arithmetic, on NVIDIA A100, which is a statement about the training budget rather than about inference.

It was trained on about 500,000,000,000 tokens of text.

It is tracked in the underlying dataset for one reason in particular: sOTA improvement.

Step by step

How to choose a GPU for XGLM-7.5B

The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.

01

Read the memory figure first

The table lists every card that can hold XGLM-7.5B — around 4.4 GB at Q3_K_M. That figure, not the card's headline performance, is what decides whether it runs.
02

Decide how long your conversations run

The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect: at long context XGLM-7.5B can slip off a card that handles short questions easily.
03

Choose how far you will compress it

Compression is what makes XGLM-7.5B fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. A minimum quality removes the ones that go too far.
04

Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet

Ranking by tokens per second for XGLM-7.5B follows memory bandwidth, not core counts, which is why the B200 tops it at 452 tok/s.
05

Read the fit column last

A tight fit runs XGLM-7.5B but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation; comfortable has headroom. If you expect to grow the context, buy for comfortable.
06

See what else that card runs

Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once XGLM-7.5B is settled.

Answers

XGLM-7.5B — common questions

Who created XGLM-7.5B?

XGLM-7.5B was published by Meta AI,Facebook AI Research, based in United States of America, categorised as industry,Industry.

When was XGLM-7.5B released?

XGLM-7.5B was published in December 2021. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.

What is XGLM-7.5B used for?

XGLM-7.5B works in Language, and is recorded as handling translation, Question answering, Language modeling/generation. A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.

Where can I download XGLM-7.5B?

The weights for XGLM-7.5B are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.

How much compute was used to train XGLM-7.5B?

Around 2.3 × 10²² FLOP, on NVIDIA A100. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.

Can I run XGLM-7.5B if it does not fit in my GPU?

It can be split between the card and system memory, but XGLM-7.5B generates painfully slowly that way — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 1.6 GB. Nothing on this page assumes offloading.

Would two GPUs run XGLM-7.5B faster?

A second card roughly doubles the memory available but not the generation rate. With 589 cards already able to run XGLM-7.5B alone, the case for pairing is weak.

Why does the quantisation differ between cards for XGLM-7.5B?

A larger card holds a more accurate copy. Across the cards that run XGLM-7.5B, 4 compression levels are used; the floor control above pins it to one.

How accurate are these XGLM-7.5B speed estimates?

These are estimates with real error bars. The fastest result here, 271–723 tok/s on the B200, could reasonably land anywhere in its published range depending on which runtime you use.

What GPU do I need to run XGLM-7.5B?

The smallest card in our catalogue that holds XGLM-7.5B is the Tesla K20c, with 5 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 4.4 GB, and produces roughly 26.9 tokens per second. 589 cards in total can run it.

How fast is XGLM-7.5B on a GPU?

It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 452 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 557 of the cards that can run XGLM-7.5B clear that.

How much VRAM does XGLM-7.5B need?

About 4.4 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.

Can I run XGLM-7.5B on a 8 GB GPU?

Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q6_K, using about 7.0 GB and generating roughly 122 tokens per second — a tight fit.

Can I run XGLM-7.5B on a 12 GB GPU?

Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 8.7 GB and generating roughly 51.5 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.

Can I run XGLM-7.5B on a 16 GB GPU?

Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 8.7 GB and generating roughly 63.8 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.

Can I run XGLM-7.5B on a 24 GB GPU?

Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 8.7 GB and generating roughly 75.7 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.

Is XGLM-7.5B open source?

Its weights are published, so XGLM-7.5B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.

How many parameters does XGLM-7.5B have?

XGLM-7.5B has 7.5B parameters. "Our largest model with 7.5 billion parameters sets new state of the art". That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.

Source

Original publication

Record last updated 25 May 2026

The other direction

Looking at it from the other side?

This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.

All AI models