OpenOmni TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Tesla K20c
5 GB · Q3_K_M · 28.9 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
484 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run OpenOmni?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
589 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
484
tok/s
290–774 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
484
tok/s
290–774 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
387
tok/s
232–618 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
387
tok/s
232–618 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
309
tok/s
185–495 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
296
tok/s
178–473 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
296
tok/s
178–473 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
283
tok/s
170–453 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
251
tok/s
151–402 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
251
tok/s
151–402 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
251
tok/s
151–402 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
238
tok/s
143–381 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
203
tok/s
122–325 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
203
tok/s
122–325 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
203
tok/s
122–325 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
203
tok/s
122–325 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
203
tok/s
122–325 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
155
tok/s
93–248 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
155
tok/s
93–248 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
131
tok/s
79–210 · low confidence |
CMP 170HX 8 GB NVIDIA | 8 GB | 1,490 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 6.6 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
129
tok/s
77–206 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
126
tok/s
76–202 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
123
tok/s
74–197 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
123
tok/s
74–197 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
123
tok/s
74–197 · low confidence |
A800 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Aug 2022 | 8.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Chinese Academy of Sciences,Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,National University of Singapore,University of Science and Technology of China (USTC)
- Organisation type
- Academia,Academia,Academia,Academia
- Country
- China, Singapore
- Published
- 24 May 2025
- Authors
- Run Luo, Ting-En Lin, Haonan Zhang, Yuchuan Wu, Xiong Liu, Min Yang, Yongbin Li, Longze Chen, Jiaming Li, Lei Zhang, Yangyi Chen, Xiaobo Xia, Hamid Alinejad-Rokny, Fei Huang
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Multimodal, Language, Vision, Speech
- Task
- Speech-to-text, Speech recognition (ASR), Image captioning, Visual question answering, Language modeling/generation, Question answering, Text-to-speech (TTS), Speech synthesis
- Base model
- Qwen2.5 Instruct (7B),CLIP (ViT L/14@336px),Whisper v3
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 7B
- Training data
- tokens
7B "We design the architecture following LLaVA series [17, 18], where the omnimodal large language model consists of four key components: an LLM (Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct [2]) for next token prediction, an image encoder (CLIP-ViT-L [74]) for extracting visual features, a speech encoder (Whisper-large-v3 [75]) for extracting audio features and a streaming speech decoder (Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct [2]) for generating vivid speech in real-time."
Compared to VITA [27], the leading fully open-source OLLM, which employs a 7×8B language model trained on 5M samples, OpenOmni attains superior results with a smaller model size (7B vs. 7×8B) and 3× fewer training samples (1.6M vs. 5M)
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- How it was established
- Hardware
- Fine-tuning compute
- 2.2 × 10²⁰ FLOP
312000000000000 FLOP / GPU / sec * 664 GPU-hours [see training time notes] * 3600 sec / hour * 0.3 [assumed utilization] = 2.2374144e+20 FLOP (negligble comparing to ~1*10^24 total FLOP for all base models pretraining
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA A100
- Chips used
- 8
- Chip-hours
- 664
- Power draw
- 6.3 kW
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Open (non-commercial)
- Hugging Face
- Tongyi-ConvAI
unclear license https://github.com/RainBowLuoCS/OpenOmni Apache 2.0 https://huggingface.co/Tongyi-ConvAI/OpenOmni
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- OpenOmni: Advancing Open-Source Omnimodal Large Language Models with Progressive Multimodal Alignment and Real-Time Self-Aware Emotional Speech Synthesis
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run OpenOmni
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 484 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 484 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 387 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 387 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 309 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 296 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 296 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 283 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 251 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 251 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run OpenOmni
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Quadro P2200 5 GB · needs 4.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 27.8 tok/s
- 02 P102-100 5 GB · needs 4.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 61.1 tok/s
- 03 GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB 5 GB · needs 4.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 22.2 tok/s
- 04 Quadro P2000 5 GB · needs 4.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 19.5 tok/s
- 05 Tesla K20s 5 GB · needs 4.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 28.9 tok/s
- 06 Tesla K20m 5 GB · needs 4.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 28.9 tok/s
- 07 Tesla K20c 5 GB · needs 4.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 28.9 tok/s
- 08 RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation 6 GB · needs 4.9 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 26.8 tok/s
- 09 GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 6 GB · needs 4.9 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 23.5 tok/s
- 10 Arc A380M 6 GB · needs 4.9 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 16.9 tok/s
What the numbers mean
Hardware requirements in practice
Minimum card
Tesla K20c
Memory needed
4.1 GB
Fastest
484 tok/s
OpenOmni is small enough at 7B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 589 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
The entry point is the Tesla K20c: 5 GB of memory, Q3_K_M compression, roughly 28.9 tokens per second.
A B200 is the fastest we calculate for it: about 484 tokens per second, from 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
About this model
OpenOmni was published by Chinese Academy of Sciences,Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,National University of Singapore,University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), in China, in May 2025. academia,Academia,Academia,Academia is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Multimodal, Language, Vision, Speech, and is recorded as doing speech-to-text, Speech recognition (ASR), Image captioning, Visual question answering, Language modeling/generation, Question answering, Text-to-speech (TTS), Speech synthesis.
It is derived from Qwen2.5 Instruct (7B),CLIP (ViT L/14@336px),Whisper v3 rather than trained from scratch, which is the usual way a specialised model is produced.
Published weights mean the model runs on your machine rather than someone else's, which is what makes the hardware question below answerable at all. It is published under the Tongyi-ConvAI organisation on Hugging Face.
How fast it runs, and why
Half the cards that hold it manage more than 26.1 tokens per second, and 559 exceed reading speed outright.
Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.
Its internal architecture is not on file, so memory is approximated from the parameter count and marked accordingly. Expect the real figure to differ, more so at long context.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for OpenOmni
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Read the memory figure first
The table lists every card that can hold OpenOmni — around 4.1 GB at Q3_K_M. That figure, not the card's headline performance, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Decide how long your conversations run
Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason OpenOmni stops fitting a card that seemed fine.
-
03
Set a quality floor
Compression is what makes OpenOmni fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. A minimum quality removes the ones that go too far.
-
04
Compare tokens per second, not specifications
Ranking by tokens per second for OpenOmni follows memory bandwidth, not core counts, which is why the B200 tops it at 484 tok/s.
-
05
Check the fit verdict before buying
A tight fit runs OpenOmni but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation; comfortable has headroom. If you expect to grow the context, buy for comfortable.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Each card page repeats this sweep for every model we hold. It answers what else the hardware is good for, beyond OpenOmni.
Answers
OpenOmni — common questions
Can I run OpenOmni on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 8.2 GB and generating roughly 55.2 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run OpenOmni on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 8.2 GB and generating roughly 68.4 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run OpenOmni on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 8.2 GB and generating roughly 81.1 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is OpenOmni open source?
Its weights are published, so OpenOmni can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does OpenOmni have?
OpenOmni has 7B parameters. 7B "We design the architecture following LLaVA series [17, 18], where the omnimodal large language model consists of four key components: an LLM (Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct [2]) for next token prediction, an image encoder (CLIP-ViT-L [74]) for extracting visual features, a speech encoder (Whisper-large-v3 [75]) for extracting audio features and a streaming speech decoder (Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct [2]) for generating vivid speech in real-time.". That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created OpenOmni?
OpenOmni was published by Chinese Academy of Sciences,Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,National University of Singapore,University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), based in China, categorised as academia,Academia,Academia,Academia.
When was OpenOmni released?
OpenOmni was published in May 2025.
What is OpenOmni used for?
OpenOmni works in Multimodal, Language, Vision, Speech, and is recorded as handling speech-to-text, Speech recognition (ASR), Image captioning, Visual question answering, Language modeling/generation, Question answering, Text-to-speech (TTS), Speech synthesis. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.
Where can I download OpenOmni?
Its weights are published under the Tongyi-ConvAI organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
Can I run OpenOmni if it does not fit in my GPU?
Partly. Layers that do not fit sit in system memory and run at a fraction of the speed, so a mostly-offloaded OpenOmni is rarely worth using — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 1.3 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is on the card.
Would two GPUs run OpenOmni faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed. That matters for OpenOmni only if one card cannot hold it — 589 can, so a second adds little.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for OpenOmni?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. Across the cards that run OpenOmni, 4 compression levels are used; the floor control above pins it to one.
How accurate are these OpenOmni speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 290–774 tok/s on the B200 rather than a single number.
What GPU do I need to run OpenOmni?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds OpenOmni is the Tesla K20c, with 5 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 4.1 GB, and produces roughly 28.9 tokens per second. 589 cards in total can run it.
How fast is OpenOmni on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 484 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 559 of the cards that can run OpenOmni clear that.
How much VRAM does OpenOmni need?
About 4.1 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run OpenOmni on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q6_K, using about 6.6 GB and generating roughly 131 tokens per second — a tight fit.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.