Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Xeon Phi 7120P
16 GB · Q3_K_M · 48.4 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
627 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
241 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
627
tok/s
376–1,004 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 31.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
627
tok/s
376–1,004 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 31.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
501
tok/s
301–802 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 31.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
501
tok/s
301–802 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 31.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
401
tok/s
240–641 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 31.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
384
tok/s
230–614 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 31.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
384
tok/s
230–614 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 31.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
367
tok/s
220–587 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 31.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
326
tok/s
195–521 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 31.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
326
tok/s
195–521 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 31.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
326
tok/s
195–521 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 31.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
309
tok/s
185–494 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 31.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
264
tok/s
158–422 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 31.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
264
tok/s
158–422 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 31.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
264
tok/s
158–422 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 31.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
264
tok/s
158–422 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 31.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
264
tok/s
158–422 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 31.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
239
tok/s
143–383 · low confidence |
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB NVIDIA | 16 GB | 1,130 GB/s | Nov 2019 | 13.7 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
213
tok/s
128–341 · low confidence |
DRIVE A100 PROD NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 24.2 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
213
tok/s
128–341 · low confidence |
GRID A100A NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 24.2 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
204
tok/s
122–326 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,790 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 24.2 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
204
tok/s
122–326 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 D NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,790 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 24.2 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
203
tok/s
122–325 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5080 NVIDIA | 16 GB | 960 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 13.7 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
201
tok/s
120–321 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 31.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
201
tok/s
120–321 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 31.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Alibaba
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- China
- Published
- 31 July 2025
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Code generation, Language modeling/generation
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 30B
- Training data
- tokens
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 627 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 627 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 501 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 501 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 401 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 384 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 384 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 367 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 326 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 326 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU 16 GB · needs 13.7 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 42.3 tok/s
- 02 Radeon RX 7700 16 GB · needs 13.7 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 103 tok/s
- 03 Arc Pro B50 16 GB · needs 13.7 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 30.8 tok/s
- 04 RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB · needs 13.7 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 61.0 tok/s
- 05 Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU 16 GB · needs 13.7 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 21.1 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB 16 GB · needs 13.7 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 53.2 tok/s
- 07 GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB 16 GB · needs 13.7 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 94.8 tok/s
- 08 GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile 16 GB · needs 13.7 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 190 tok/s
- 09 Radeon RX 9070 16 GB · needs 13.7 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 106 tok/s
- 10 Radeon RX 9070 XT 16 GB · needs 13.7 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 106 tok/s
What the numbers mean
The hardware side
Minimum card
Xeon Phi 7120P
Memory needed
13.7 GB
Fastest
627 tok/s
Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B reaches a parameter count of 30B. That lands in the range a serious desktop card can handle once the weights are compressed. The number of cards we track that can run it: 241.
At the low end it is handled by Xeon Phi 7120P, with a memory capacity of 16 GB, running it at a compression of Q3_K_M and producing around 48.4 tokens per second.
At the other end sits B200, generating roughly 627 tokens per second on the strength of a memory bandwidth of 8,000 GB/s.
About this model
Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B was published by Alibaba, in the country recorded as China, during July 2025. The publishing organisation is categorised as industry.
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as performing the task of code generation, Language modeling/generation.
The weights being open is what puts this page in the calculator rather than only in the catalogue: it is a model you can actually hold.
How fast it runs, and why
Half the cards that hold it manage more than 95.1 tokens per second. Clearing the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed: 239 of them.
This is a mixture-of-experts model, which routes each token through only part of itself. It therefore generates far faster than its total size suggests — while still needing every parameter resident in memory, so it is quick without being cheap to hold.
Memory here is estimated from size rather than computed from the architecture, which is not recorded for this model — the numbers are indicative rather than exact.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start from the memory column
Start from what it actually needs, which is the requirement of Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B, needing around 13.7 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M. That figure, not the headline performance of a card, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Match the context to your actual use
Longer conversations cost memory on top of what the weights need. Move the slider to your real working length before trusting any row for Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B.
-
03
Set a quality floor
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold, reaching a compression of Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a minimum quality drops the cards that only manage it by squeezing further than you would want, and holds the comparison at one level.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
Ranking by tokens per second follows memory bandwidth rather than core counts, for Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B. It will not match a gaming ordering, because generation is bound by memory bandwidth. The card topping the list is B200, at 627 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
Tight means it loads and works with no room to raise the context later, in the case of Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B. Comfortable means you can grow the context later. That difference matters more than a few tokens per second, so buy for comfortable if you expect to.
-
06
See what else that card runs
Each card page repeats this sweep for every model we hold, answering what else the hardware is good for beyond Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B.
Answers
Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B — common questions
Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B— can I run it on a GPU holding 24 GB?
Yes. The card GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, holding 24 GB, runs it at a compression of Q5_K_M, using about 20.7 GB and generating roughly 188 tokens per second. The fit is tight.
Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B— is it open source?
Its weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B— how many parameters does it have?
It has a parameter count of 30B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B— who created it?
It was published by Alibaba, based in China, an organisation categorised as industry.
Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B— when was it released?
It was published in July 2025.
Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B— what is it used for?
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as handling the task of code generation, Language modeling/generation. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.
Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B— where can I download it?
The weights are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B— can I run it if it does not fit in my GPU?
It can be split between the card and system memory, but it generates painfully slowly that way. The nearest miss we calculate falls short by 6.4 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is resident on the card.
Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B— would two GPUs run it faster?
A second card roughly doubles the memory available but not the generation rate. The number already able to run it alone: 241. So a second card is rarely the answer here.
Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B— why does the quantisation differ between cards?
Each card is shown running the least-compressed copy it can hold. The number of distinct compression levels across the cards that fit it: 5. Bigger cards get the more accurate version, and the quality floor above pins the comparison to one level.
Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B— how accurate are these speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked, which is why each is published as a range rather than a single number. One example: 376–1,004 tok/s on B200. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B— what GPU do I need to run it?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds it is Xeon Phi 7120P, with a memory capacity of 16 GB. It runs the model at a compression of Q3_K_M using about 13.7 GB, and produces roughly 48.4 tokens per second. The number of cards able to run it in total: 241.
Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B— how fast is it on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is B200, at about 627 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and the number of cards clearing that: 239.
Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B— how much VRAM does it need?
It needs about 13.7 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B— can I run it on a GPU holding 16 GB?
Yes. The card Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, holding 16 GB, runs it at a compression of Q3_K_M, using about 13.7 GB and generating roughly 239 tokens per second. The fit is tight.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.