Bonsai 27B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Xeon Phi 7120P
16 GB · Q3_K_M · 9.7 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
125 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Bonsai 27B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
241 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
125
tok/s
75–201 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 29.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
125
tok/s
75–201 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 29.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
100
tok/s
60–160 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 29.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
100
tok/s
60–160 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 29.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
80.1
tok/s
48–128 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 29.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
76.7
tok/s
46–123 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 29.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
76.7
tok/s
46–123 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 29.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
73.4
tok/s
44–117 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 29.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
65.2
tok/s
39–104 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 29.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
65.2
tok/s
39–104 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 29.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
65.2
tok/s
39–104 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 29.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
61.8
tok/s
37–99 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 29.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
52.7
tok/s
32–84 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 29.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
52.7
tok/s
32–84 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 29.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
52.7
tok/s
32–84 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 29.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
52.7
tok/s
32–84 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 29.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
52.7
tok/s
32–84 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 29.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
47.8
tok/s
29–77 · low confidence |
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB NVIDIA | 16 GB | 1,130 GB/s | Nov 2019 | 13.9 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
42.6
tok/s
26–68 · low confidence |
DRIVE A100 PROD NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 23.3 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
42.6
tok/s
26–68 · low confidence |
GRID A100A NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 23.3 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
40.8
tok/s
24–65 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,790 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 23.3 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
40.8
tok/s
24–65 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 D NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,790 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 23.3 GB | Q6_K | Comfortable |
|
40.6
tok/s
24–65 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5080 NVIDIA | 16 GB | 960 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 13.9 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
40.1
tok/s
24–64 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 29.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
40.1
tok/s
24–64 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 29.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- PrismML
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 14 July 2026
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 27B
- Training data
- tokens
1-bit/ternary Qwen3.6 27B variant
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Bonsai 27B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 125 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 125 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 100 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 100 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 80.1 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 76.7 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 76.7 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 73.4 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 65.2 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 65.2 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Bonsai 27B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU 16 GB · needs 13.9 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 8.5 tok/s
- 02 Radeon RX 7700 16 GB · needs 13.9 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 20.5 tok/s
- 03 Arc Pro B50 16 GB · needs 13.9 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 6.2 tok/s
- 04 RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell 16 GB · needs 13.9 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 12.2 tok/s
- 05 Ryzen Z2 Extreme GPU 16 GB · needs 13.9 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 4.2 tok/s
- 06 Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB 16 GB · needs 13.9 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 10.6 tok/s
- 07 GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB 16 GB · needs 13.9 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 19.0 tok/s
- 08 GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile 16 GB · needs 13.9 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 37.9 tok/s
- 09 Radeon RX 9070 16 GB · needs 13.9 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 21.3 tok/s
- 10 Radeon RX 9070 XT 16 GB · needs 13.9 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 21.3 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What it takes to run this model
Minimum card
Xeon Phi 7120P
Memory needed
13.9 GB
Fastest
125 tok/s
Bonsai 27B reaches a parameter count of 27B. That lands in the range a serious desktop card can handle once the weights are compressed. The number of cards we track that can run it: 241.
The smallest card that holds it is Xeon Phi 7120P, with a memory capacity of 16 GB, running it at a compression of Q3_K_M and producing around 9.7 tokens per second.
The quickest result comes from B200, generating roughly 125 tokens per second on the strength of a memory bandwidth of 8,000 GB/s.
Background
Bonsai 27B was published by PrismML, in the country recorded as United States of America, during July 2026. It comes out of an organisation categorised as industry.
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as performing the task of language modeling/generation.
The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached.
Reading the throughput figures
Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range sits at 19.0 tokens per second. Exceeding reading speed outright: 196 of them.
It is a dense model, so every parameter is read for every token produced. That makes speed track memory bandwidth almost exactly — a card with twice the bandwidth generates roughly twice as fast.
Without the attention layout on record, the memory column is an approximation. It is close enough to choose hardware by, and least reliable at long context.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Bonsai 27B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Read the memory figure first
The table lists every card able to hold Bonsai 27B, needing around 13.9 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M. That figure, not the headline performance of a card, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect, because at long context a card that handles short questions easily can be dropped by Bonsai 27B.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold, reaching a compression of Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a minimum quality drops the cards that only manage it by squeezing further than you would want, and holds the comparison at one level.
-
04
Sort by speed
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for Bonsai 27B. It will not match a gaming ordering, because generation is bound by memory bandwidth. The card topping the list is B200, at 125 tok/s.
-
05
Look at the headroom, not just the fit
The fit column separates cards that just manage it from those with room to spare, in the case of Bonsai 27B. Comfortable means you can grow the context later. That difference matters more than a few tokens per second, so buy for comfortable if you expect to.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once you have settled on Bonsai 27B.
Answers
Bonsai 27B — common questions
Bonsai 27B— how much VRAM does it need?
It needs about 13.9 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Bonsai 27B— can I run it on a GPU holding 16 GB?
Yes. The card Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, holding 16 GB, runs it at a compression of Q3_K_M, using about 13.9 GB and generating roughly 47.8 tokens per second. The fit is tight.
Bonsai 27B— can I run it on a GPU holding 24 GB?
Yes. The card GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, holding 24 GB, runs it at a compression of Q5_K_M, using about 20.2 GB and generating roughly 37.5 tokens per second. The fit is tight.
Bonsai 27B— is it open source?
Its weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
Bonsai 27B— how many parameters does it have?
It has a parameter count of 27B. 1-bit/ternary Qwen3.6 27B variant. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Bonsai 27B— who created it?
It was published by PrismML, based in United States of America, an organisation categorised as industry.
Bonsai 27B— when was it released?
It was published in July 2026.
Bonsai 27B— what is it used for?
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as handling the task of language modeling/generation. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.
Bonsai 27B— where can I download it?
The weights are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
Bonsai 27B— can I run it if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part held in system memory drags the whole thing down. The nearest miss we calculate falls short by 6.2 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is resident on the card.
Bonsai 27B— would two GPUs run it faster?
A second card roughly doubles the memory available but not the generation rate. The number already able to run it alone: 241. So a second card is rarely the answer here.
Bonsai 27B— why does the quantisation differ between cards?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. The number of compression levels used across the cards that run it: 5. Bigger cards get the more accurate version, and the quality floor above pins the comparison to one level.
Bonsai 27B— how accurate are these speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked, which is why each is published as a range rather than a single number. One example: 75–201 tok/s on B200. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
Bonsai 27B— what GPU do I need to run it?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds it is Xeon Phi 7120P, with a memory capacity of 16 GB. It runs the model at a compression of Q3_K_M using about 13.9 GB, and produces roughly 9.7 tokens per second. The number of cards able to run it in total: 241.
Bonsai 27B— how fast is it on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is B200, at about 125 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and the number of cards clearing that: 196.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.