Nemotron-H 56B TPS calculator

Open weights NVIDIA 56B parameters April 2025

Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.

Calculated for this model

92 of 818 cards that can run it

Smallest card that fits

FirePro S9170

32 GB · Q3_K_M · 5.1 tok/s

Fastest card

B200

60.5 tok/s · 180 GB

Which GPUs can run Nemotron-H 56B?

Set the inputs, read the answer

A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.

Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.

92 cards match

Calculating
Needs Quantisation Fit
60.5 tok/s

36–97 · low confidence

B200 NVIDIA 180 GB 8,000 GB/s Jan 2024 60.7 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
60.5 tok/s

36–97 · low confidence

B300 NVIDIA 288 GB 8,000 GB/s Sep 2025 60.7 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
48.3 tok/s

29–77 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD 288 GB 8,190 GB/s Jan 2025 60.7 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
48.3 tok/s

29–77 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD 288 GB 8,190 GB/s Jan 2025 60.7 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
38.6 tok/s

23–62 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD 128 GB 6,550 GB/s Jan 2023 60.7 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
38.2 tok/s

23–61 · low confidence

DRIVE A100 PROD NVIDIA 32 GB 1,870 GB/s May 2020 28.1 GB Q3_K_M Tight
38.2 tok/s

23–61 · low confidence

GRID A100A NVIDIA 32 GB 1,870 GB/s May 2020 28.1 GB Q3_K_M Tight
37.0 tok/s

22–59 · low confidence

H200 NVL NVIDIA 141 GB 4,890 GB/s Nov 2024 60.7 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
37.0 tok/s

22–59 · low confidence

H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA 141 GB 4,890 GB/s Nov 2024 60.7 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
36.5 tok/s

22–58 · low confidence

GeForce RTX 5090 NVIDIA 32 GB 1,790 GB/s Jan 2025 28.1 GB Q3_K_M Tight
36.5 tok/s

22–58 · low confidence

GeForce RTX 5090 D NVIDIA 32 GB 1,790 GB/s Jan 2025 28.1 GB Q3_K_M Tight
35.4 tok/s

21–57 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD 256 GB 6,000 GB/s Oct 2024 60.7 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
31.4 tok/s

19–50 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD 128 GB 5,325 GB/s Dec 2023 60.7 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
31.4 tok/s

19–50 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD 192 GB 5,325 GB/s Dec 2023 60.7 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
31.4 tok/s

19–50 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD 192 GB 5,325 GB/s Dec 2023 60.7 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
29.8 tok/s

18–48 · low confidence

H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA 94 GB 3,940 GB/s Mar 2023 60.7 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
27.2 tok/s

16–44 · low confidence

A100 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA 40 GB 1,560 GB/s Jun 2020 34.6 GB Q4_K_M Tight
27.2 tok/s

16–44 · low confidence

A100 SXM4 40 GB NVIDIA 40 GB 1,560 GB/s May 2020 34.6 GB Q4_K_M Tight
27.2 tok/s

16–44 · low confidence

A800 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA 40 GB 1,560 GB/s Nov 2022 34.6 GB Q4_K_M Tight
25.4 tok/s

15–41 · low confidence

H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA 96 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 60.7 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
25.4 tok/s

15–41 · low confidence

H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA 80 GB 3,360 GB/s Oct 2022 60.7 GB Q8_0 Tight
25.4 tok/s

15–41 · low confidence

H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA 94 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 60.7 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
25.4 tok/s

15–41 · low confidence

H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA 96 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 60.7 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
25.4 tok/s

15–41 · low confidence

H800 SXM5 NVIDIA 80 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 60.7 GB Q8_0 Tight
25.3 tok/s

15–40 · low confidence

GRID A100B NVIDIA 48 GB 1,870 GB/s May 2020 41.1 GB Q5_K_M Tight

Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.

On record

Full specification

Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.

Origin

Who built this model, where, and when it was published.

Organisation
NVIDIA
Organisation type
Industry
Country
United States of America
Published
14 April 2025
Authors
NVIDIA: Aaron Blakeman, Aarti Basant, Abhinav Khattar, Adithya Renduchintala, Akhiad Bercovich, Aleksander Ficek, Alexis Bjorlin, Ali Taghibakhshi, Amala Sanjay Deshmukh, Ameya Sunil Mahabaleshwarkar, Andrew Tao, Anna Shors, Ashwath Aithal, Ashwin Poojary, Ayush Dattagupta, Balaram Buddharaju, Bobby Chen, Boris Ginsburg, Boxin Wang, Brandon Norick, Brian Butterfield, Bryan Catanzaro, Carlo del Mun…

What it does

The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.

Domain
Language
Task
Language modeling/generation, Question answering, Translation, Quantitative reasoning, Code generation
Numerical format
FP8

Size

How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.

Parameters
56B

Model Architecture Architecture Type: Hybrid Mamba-Transformer Network Architecture: Nemotron-H This model has 56B model parameters.

Training data
tokens

"We trained Nemotron-H-8B-Base on a token horizon of 15 trillion tokens and Nemotron-H-56B-Base on a token horizon of 20 trillion tokens. We used a sequence length of 8192 and global batch size of 768 (6291456 tokens per batch)."

Epochs
1
Batch size
6,291,456

"We used a sequence length of 8192 and global batch size of 768 (6291456 tokens per batch)."

Training compute

The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.

Training compute
6.7 × 10²⁴ FLOP

6 FLOP / parameter / token * 56 * 10^9 parameters * 20 * 10^12 tokens = 6.72e+24 FLOP

How it was established
Operation counting

The training run

What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.

Training hardware
NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB
Chips used
6,144
Power draw
8.4 MW

Availability

Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.

Weights
Open — downloadable
Model access
Open weights (non-commercial)
Training code
Unreleased

https://huggingface.co/nvidia/Nemotron-H-56B-Base-8K nvidia-internal-scientific-research-and-development-model-license

Hugging Face
nvidia

How it is classified

Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.

Likely above 10²³ FLOP
Yes
Record confidence
Confident

Sources

Where this record came from and when it was last checked.

Reference
Nemotron-H: A Family of Accurate and Efficient Hybrid Mamba-Transformer Models
Last updated
28 November 2025

The extremes

What the numbers mean

The hardware side

Minimum card

FirePro S9170

Memory needed

28.1 GB

Fastest

60.5 tok/s

With 56B parameters, Nemotron-H 56B lands in the range a serious desktop card can handle once the weights are compressed. 92 of the cards we track can run it.

At the low end, a FirePro S9170 handles it — 32 GB, at Q3_K_M, for about 5.1 tokens per second.

A B200 is the fastest we calculate for it: about 60.5 tokens per second, from 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Background

Nemotron-H 56B was published by NVIDIA, in United States of America, in April 2025. The organisation is categorised as industry.

It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling/generation, Question answering, Translation, Quantitative reasoning, Code generation.

The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached. It is published under the nvidia organisation on Hugging Face.

Reading the throughput figures

Half the cards that hold it manage more than 15.4 tokens per second, and 72 exceed reading speed outright.

Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.

Memory here is estimated from size rather than computed from the architecture, which is not recorded for this model — the numbers are indicative rather than exact.

Training and provenance

Producing it required around 6.7 × 10²⁴ FLOP of arithmetic, on NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB, which is a statement about the training budget rather than about inference.

Step by step

How to choose a GPU for Nemotron-H 56B

The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.

  1. 01

    Check what it needs before anything else

    Look at what Nemotron-H 56B actually needs — around 28.1 GB at Q3_K_M. No amount of processing power compensates for a card that cannot hold it.

  2. 02

    Decide how long your conversations run

    Longer conversations cost memory on top of what the weights need. Move the slider to your real working length before trusting any row for Nemotron-H 56B.

  3. 03

    Choose how far you will compress it

    Compression is what makes Nemotron-H 56B fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. A minimum quality removes the ones that go too far.

  4. 04

    Compare tokens per second, not specifications

    Sort by speed to see how cards rank for Nemotron-H 56B. It will not match a gaming ordering — generation is bound by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 60.5 tok/s.

  5. 05

    Look at the headroom, not just the fit

    A tight fit runs Nemotron-H 56B but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation; comfortable has headroom. If you expect to grow the context, buy for comfortable.

  6. 06

    Open the card you have settled on

    Each card page repeats this sweep for every model we hold. It answers what else the hardware is good for, beyond Nemotron-H 56B.

Answers

Nemotron-H 56B — common questions

01

Can I run Nemotron-H 56B if it does not fit in my GPU?

Partly. Layers that do not fit sit in system memory and run at a fraction of the speed, so a mostly-offloaded Nemotron-H 56B is rarely worth using — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 9.4 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is on the card.

02

Would two GPUs run Nemotron-H 56B faster?

Two cards buy memory rather than speed. That matters for Nemotron-H 56B only if one card cannot hold it — 92 can, so a second adds little.

03

Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Nemotron-H 56B?

Because capacity varies, so does how hard Nemotron-H 56B has to be squeezed — 5 distinct levels appear in the table above. Set a minimum quality to compare at one.

04

How accurate are these Nemotron-H 56B speed estimates?

Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 36–97 tok/s on the B200 rather than a single number.

05

What GPU do I need to run Nemotron-H 56B?

The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Nemotron-H 56B is the FirePro S9170, with 32 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 28.1 GB, and produces roughly 5.1 tokens per second. 92 cards in total can run it.

06

How fast is Nemotron-H 56B on a GPU?

It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 60.5 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 72 of the cards that can run Nemotron-H 56B clear that.

07

How much VRAM does Nemotron-H 56B need?

About 28.1 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.

08

Is Nemotron-H 56B open source?

Its weights are published, so Nemotron-H 56B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.

09

How many parameters does Nemotron-H 56B have?

Nemotron-H 56B has 56B parameters. Model Architecture Architecture Type: Hybrid Mamba-Transformer Network Architecture: Nemotron-H This model has 56B model parameters. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.

10

Who created Nemotron-H 56B?

Nemotron-H 56B was published by NVIDIA, based in United States of America, categorised as industry.

11

When was Nemotron-H 56B released?

Nemotron-H 56B was published in April 2025.

12

What is Nemotron-H 56B used for?

Nemotron-H 56B works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling/generation, Question answering, Translation, Quantitative reasoning, Code generation. A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.

13

Where can I download Nemotron-H 56B?

Its weights are published under the nvidia organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.

14

How much compute was used to train Nemotron-H 56B?

Around 6.7 × 10²⁴ FLOP, on NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.

Source

Original publication

Record last updated 28 November 2025

The other direction

Looking at it from the other side?

This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.