Shuka-1 TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Quadro 6000
6 GB · Q3_K_M · 14.6 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
354 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Shuka-1?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
582 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
354
tok/s
213–567 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 10.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
354
tok/s
213–567 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 10.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
283
tok/s
170–453 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 10.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
283
tok/s
170–453 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 10.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
226
tok/s
136–362 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 10.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
217
tok/s
130–347 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 10.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
217
tok/s
130–347 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 10.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
207
tok/s
124–332 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 10.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
184
tok/s
110–294 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 10.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
184
tok/s
110–294 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 10.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
184
tok/s
110–294 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 10.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
175
tok/s
105–279 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 10.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
152
tok/s
91–244 · low confidence |
CMP 170HX 8 GB NVIDIA | 8 GB | 1,490 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 6.5 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
149
tok/s
89–238 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 10.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
149
tok/s
89–238 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 10.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
149
tok/s
89–238 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 10.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
149
tok/s
89–238 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 10.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
149
tok/s
89–238 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 10.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
113
tok/s
68–181 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 10.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
113
tok/s
68–181 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 10.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
100
tok/s
60–161 · low confidence |
CMP 170HX 10 GB NVIDIA | 10 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 8.7 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
94.5
tok/s
57–151 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 10.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
92.4
tok/s
55–148 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 10.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
90.4
tok/s
54–145 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 10.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
90.4
tok/s
54–145 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 10.9 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Sarvam
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- India
- Published
- 30 August 2024
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Speech
- Task
- Speech recognition (ASR), Speech-to-text
- Base model
- Saaras v1,Llama 3-8B
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 9.6B
- Training data
- tokens
"Our state-of-the-art, in-house, audio encoder: Saaras v1 Meta’s Llama3-8B-Instruct as the decoder The encoder and decoder are connected by a small projector with ~60M parameters."
"we train Shuka v1 on less than 100 hours of audio."
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- sarvamai
llama3 license https://huggingface.co/sarvamai/shuka-1
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Shuka v1: Revolutionizing Audio Understanding for Indic Languages
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Shuka-1
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 354 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 354 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 283 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 283 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 226 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 217 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 217 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 207 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 184 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 184 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Shuka-1
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation 6 GB · needs 5.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 23.0 tok/s
- 02 GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 6 GB · needs 5.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 20.1 tok/s
- 03 Arc A380M 6 GB · needs 5.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 14.5 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q 6 GB · needs 5.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 23.0 tok/s
- 05 GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile 6 GB · needs 5.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 23.0 tok/s
- 06 Data Center GPU Flex 140 6 GB · needs 5.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 14.5 tok/s
- 07 Arc Pro A40 6 GB · needs 5.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 14.9 tok/s
- 08 Arc Pro A50 6 GB · needs 5.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 14.9 tok/s
- 09 GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB 6 GB · needs 5.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 15.8 tok/s
- 10 GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB 6 GB · needs 5.4 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 20.1 tok/s
What the numbers mean
The hardware side
Minimum card
Quadro 6000
Memory needed
5.4 GB
Fastest
354 tok/s
Shuka-1 is small enough at 9.6B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 582 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
At the low end, a Quadro 6000 handles it — 6 GB, at Q3_K_M, for about 14.6 tokens per second.
At the other end, a B200 generates roughly 354 tokens per second on it, on the strength of 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
Background
Shuka-1 was published by Sarvam, in India, in August 2024. industry is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Speech, and is recorded as doing speech recognition (ASR), Speech-to-text.
Its starting point was Saaras v1,Llama 3-8B — most models at this scale are adapted from an existing base rather than built from nothing.
The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached. It is published under the sarvamai organisation on Hugging Face.
Reading the throughput figures
Half the cards that hold it manage more than 23.0 tokens per second, and 545 exceed reading speed outright.
It is a dense model, so every parameter is read for every token produced. That makes speed track memory bandwidth almost exactly — a card with twice the bandwidth generates roughly twice as fast.
Memory here is estimated from size rather than computed from the architecture, which is not recorded for this model — the numbers are indicative rather than exact.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Shuka-1
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start from the memory column
The table lists every card that can hold Shuka-1 — around 5.4 GB at Q3_K_M. That figure, not the card's headline performance, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Decide how long your conversations run
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect: at long context Shuka-1 can slip off a card that handles short questions easily.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
Compression is what makes Shuka-1 fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. A minimum quality removes the ones that go too far.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
Ranking by tokens per second for Shuka-1 follows memory bandwidth, not core counts, which is why the B200 tops it at 354 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
A tight fit runs Shuka-1 but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation; comfortable has headroom. If you expect to grow the context, buy for comfortable.
-
06
Check the card from the other side
Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once Shuka-1 is settled.
Answers
Shuka-1 — common questions
How many parameters does Shuka-1 have?
Shuka-1 has 9.6B parameters. "Our state-of-the-art, in-house, audio encoder: Saaras v1 Meta’s Llama3-8B-Instruct as the decoder The encoder and decoder are connected by a small projector with ~60M parameters.". That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created Shuka-1?
Shuka-1 was published by Sarvam, based in India, categorised as industry.
When was Shuka-1 released?
Shuka-1 was published in August 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is Shuka-1 used for?
Shuka-1 works in Speech, and is recorded as handling speech recognition (ASR), Speech-to-text. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.
Where can I download Shuka-1?
Its weights are published under the sarvamai organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
Can I run Shuka-1 if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part in system memory drags the whole thing down — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 2.0 GB. Our figures for Shuka-1 assume it is fully resident.
Would two GPUs run Shuka-1 faster?
Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. Since 582 of the cards we track already hold Shuka-1 on their own, a second card is rarely the answer here.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Shuka-1?
Each card is shown running the least-compressed copy it can hold, and Shuka-1 appears at 4 different compression levels across the cards that fit it. Bigger cards get the more accurate version.
How accurate are these Shuka-1 speed estimates?
They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range — 213–567 tok/s on the B200, for instance. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
What GPU do I need to run Shuka-1?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Shuka-1 is the Quadro 6000, with 6 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 5.4 GB, and produces roughly 14.6 tokens per second. 582 cards in total can run it.
How fast is Shuka-1 on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 354 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 545 of the cards that can run Shuka-1 clear that.
How much VRAM does Shuka-1 need?
About 5.4 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run Shuka-1 on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q4_K_M, using about 6.5 GB and generating roughly 152 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run Shuka-1 on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q6_K, using about 8.7 GB and generating roughly 58.7 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run Shuka-1 on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 10.9 GB and generating roughly 50.1 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run Shuka-1 on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 10.9 GB and generating roughly 59.4 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is Shuka-1 open source?
Its weights are published, so Shuka-1 can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.