MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Xeon Phi 5110P
8 GB · Q4_K_M · 29.1 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
484 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune)?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
509 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
484
tok/s
411–581 |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 9.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
484
tok/s
411–581 |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 9.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
387
tok/s
232–618 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 9.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
387
tok/s
232–618 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 9.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
309
tok/s
185–495 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 9.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
296
tok/s
251–355 |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 9.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
296
tok/s
251–355 |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 9.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
283
tok/s
170–453 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 9.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
251
tok/s
151–402 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 9.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
251
tok/s
151–402 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 9.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
251
tok/s
151–402 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 9.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
238
tok/s
203–286 |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 9.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
208
tok/s
177–250 |
CMP 170HX 8 GB NVIDIA | 8 GB | 1,490 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 6.5 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
203
tok/s
173–244 |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 9.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
203
tok/s
173–244 |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 9.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
203
tok/s
173–244 |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 9.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
203
tok/s
173–244 |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 9.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
203
tok/s
173–244 |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 9.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
155
tok/s
93–248 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 9.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
155
tok/s
93–248 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 9.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
137
tok/s
117–165 |
CMP 170HX 10 GB NVIDIA | 10 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 8.1 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
129
tok/s
77–206 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 9.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
126
tok/s
76–202 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 9.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
123
tok/s
105–148 |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 9.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
123
tok/s
105–148 |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 9.8 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- University of Cambridge,Southern University of Science and Technology (SUSTech),Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST),Huawei Noah's Ark Lab,Alan Turing Institute,Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems
- Organisation type
- Academia,Academia,Academia,Industry,Government,Academia
- Country
- United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, China, Hong Kong, Germany
- Published
- 3 May 2024
- Authors
- Longhui Yu, Weisen Jiang, Han Shi, Jincheng Yu, Zhengying Liu, Yu Zhang, James T. Kwok, Zhenguo Li, Adrian Weller, Weiyang Liu
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Quantitative reasoning
- Base model
- Llama 2-7B
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 7B
- Training data
- tokens
- Epochs
- 3
7B
160K examples 396 MB 396 MB * 200000 english words per MB * 4/3 tokens per english word = 105600000 tokens
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- How it was established
- Operation counting
- Fine-tuning compute
- 1.3 × 10¹⁹ FLOP
6*7*10^9*105600000*3 = 1.33056 × 10^19
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA A100
- Chips used
- 8
- Power draw
- 6.3 kW
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language Models
- Last updated
- 11 February 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune)
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 484 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 484 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 387 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 387 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 309 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 296 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 296 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 283 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 251 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 251 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune)
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Radeon RX 7400 8 GB · needs 6.5 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 31.4 tok/s
- 02 Radeon RX 9060 8 GB · needs 6.5 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 35.1 tok/s
- 03 GeForce RTX 5050 8 GB · needs 6.5 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 44.7 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile 8 GB · needs 6.5 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 53.6 tok/s
- 05 Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB 8 GB · needs 6.5 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 35.1 tok/s
- 06 GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile 8 GB · needs 6.5 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 53.6 tok/s
- 07 GeForce RTX 5060 8 GB · needs 6.5 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 62.6 tok/s
- 08 GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB 8 GB · needs 6.5 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 62.6 tok/s
- 09 GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile 8 GB · needs 6.5 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 53.6 tok/s
- 10 Radeon RX 7650 GRE 8 GB · needs 6.5 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 31.4 tok/s
What the numbers mean
The hardware side
Minimum card
Xeon Phi 5110P
Memory needed
6.5 GB
Fastest
484 tok/s
MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) is small enough at 7B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 509 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
At the low end, a Xeon Phi 5110P handles it — 8 GB, at Q4_K_M, for about 29.1 tokens per second.
Top of the range is the B200, at roughly 484 tokens per second thanks to 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth.
Background
MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) was published by University of Cambridge,Southern University of Science and Technology (SUSTech),Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST),Huawei Noah's Ark Lab,Alan Turing Institute,Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, in May 2024. academia,Academia,Academia,Industry,Government,Academia is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing quantitative reasoning.
Its starting point was Llama 2-7B — most models at this scale are adapted from an existing base rather than built from nothing.
Because its weights were released, nothing about running it depends on a provider staying available — it is yours once downloaded.
Reading the throughput figures
The median result is around 30.4 tokens per second; 482 cards produce text faster than most people read it.
It is a dense model, so every parameter is read for every token produced. That makes speed track memory bandwidth almost exactly — a card with twice the bandwidth generates roughly twice as fast.
Its attention layout is on file, so the memory figures are computed exactly rather than approximated.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune)
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Read the memory figure first
Look at what MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) actually needs — around 6.5 GB at Q4_K_M. No amount of processing power compensates for a card that cannot hold it.
-
02
Match the context to your actual use
Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) stops fitting a card that seemed fine.
-
03
Decide how much compression you will accept
The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy of MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) — Q4_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Set a floor to hold the comparison at one level.
-
04
Sort by speed
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune). It will not match a gaming ordering — generation is bound by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 484 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
Tight means MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) loads and works, with no room to raise the context later. Comfortable means you can. The difference matters more than a few tokens per second.
-
06
See what else that card runs
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. Worth a look before buying for MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) alone — a card is usually bought for more than one model.
Answers
MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) — common questions
How accurate are these MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) speed estimates?
They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range — 411–581 tok/s on the B200, for instance. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
What GPU do I need to run MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune)?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) is the Xeon Phi 5110P, with 8 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q4_K_M using about 6.5 GB, and produces roughly 29.1 tokens per second. 509 cards in total can run it.
How fast is MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 484 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 482 of the cards that can run MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) clear that.
How much VRAM does MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) need?
About 6.5 GB at Q4_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q4_K_M, using about 6.5 GB and generating roughly 208 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 9.8 GB and generating roughly 55.2 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 9.8 GB and generating roughly 68.4 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 9.8 GB and generating roughly 81.1 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) open source?
Its weights are published, so MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) have?
MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) has 7B parameters. 7B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune)?
MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) was published by University of Cambridge,Southern University of Science and Technology (SUSTech),Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST),Huawei Noah's Ark Lab,Alan Turing Institute,Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, based in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, categorised as academia,Academia,Academia,Industry,Government,Academia.
When was MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) released?
MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) was published in May 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) used for?
MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) works in Language, and is recorded as handling quantitative reasoning. A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.
Where can I download MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune)?
The weights for MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
Can I run MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) if it does not fit in my GPU?
It can be split between the card and system memory, but MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) generates painfully slowly that way — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 1.1 GB. Nothing on this page assumes offloading.
Would two GPUs run MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed. That matters for MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune) only if one card cannot hold it — 509 can, so a second adds little.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune)?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. Across the cards that run MetaMath 7B (LLaMa finetune), 3 compression levels are used; the floor control above pins it to one.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.