Kimi Linear TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
Smallest card that fits
Radeon PRO V710
28 GB · Q3_K_M · 9.4 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
70.6 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Kimi Linear?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
93 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.6
tok/s
42–113 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 52.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
70.6
tok/s
42–113 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 52.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
56.4
tok/s
34–90 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 52.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
56.4
tok/s
34–90 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 52.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
45.1
tok/s
27–72 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 52.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
43.2
tok/s
26–69 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 52.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
43.2
tok/s
26–69 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 52.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
41.3
tok/s
25–66 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 52.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
40.5
tok/s
24–65 · low confidence |
DRIVE A100 PROD NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 26.9 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
40.5
tok/s
24–65 · low confidence |
GRID A100A NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 26.9 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
38.8
tok/s
23–62 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,790 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 26.9 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
38.8
tok/s
23–62 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 D NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,790 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 26.9 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
36.7
tok/s
22–59 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 52.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
36.7
tok/s
22–59 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 52.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
36.7
tok/s
22–59 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 52.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
34.8
tok/s
21–56 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 52.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
29.7
tok/s
18–47 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 52.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
29.7
tok/s
18–47 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 52.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
29.7
tok/s
18–47 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 52.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
29.7
tok/s
18–47 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 52.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
29.7
tok/s
18–47 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 52.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
24.6
tok/s
15–39 · low confidence |
A100 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Jun 2020 | 35.3 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
24.6
tok/s
15–39 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | May 2020 | 35.3 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
24.6
tok/s
15–39 · low confidence |
A800 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Nov 2022 | 35.3 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
24.5
tok/s
15–39 · low confidence |
Tesla PG500-216 NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,130 GB/s | Nov 2019 | 26.9 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Moonshot
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- China
- Published
- 30 October 2025
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Question answering, Mathematical reasoning
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 48B
- Training data
- 5,700,000,000,000 tokens
3B activated parameters and 48B total parameters
"Our final released Kimi Linear checkpoint is pretrained using the same procedure, but with an expanded total of 5.7 trillion tokens to match the pretraining tokens of Moonlight. In addition, the final checkpoint supports a context length of up to 1 million tokens"
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 1 × 10²³ FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting
6 FLOP/parameter/token * 3000000000 activated parameters * 5700000000000 tokens = 1.026e+23 FLOP
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- moonshotai
MIT license https://huggingface.co/moonshotai/Kimi-Linear-48B-A3B-Instruct https://github.com/MoonshotAI/Kimi-Linear/tree/master
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- KIMI LINEAR: AN EXPRESSIVE, EFFICIENT ATTENTION ARCHITECTURE
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs for Kimi Linear
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 70.6 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 70.6 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 56.4 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 56.4 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 45.1 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 43.2 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 43.2 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 41.3 tok/s
- 09 DRIVE A100 PROD 32 GB · 1,870 GB/s · IQ4_XS 40.5 tok/s
- 10 GRID A100A 32 GB · 1,870 GB/s · IQ4_XS 40.5 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Kimi Linear
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Radeon PRO V710 28 GB · needs 24.2 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 9.4 tok/s
- 02 Radeon AI PRO 9600D 32 GB · needs 26.9 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 9.7 tok/s
- 03 Radeon AI PRO R9700S 32 GB · needs 26.9 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 10.9 tok/s
- 04 Radeon AI PRO R9700 32 GB · needs 26.9 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 10.9 tok/s
- 05 RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell 32 GB · needs 26.9 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 19.4 tok/s
- 06 GeForce RTX 5090 32 GB · needs 26.9 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 38.8 tok/s
- 07 GeForce RTX 5090 D 32 GB · needs 26.9 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 38.8 tok/s
- 08 RTX 5000 Ada Generation 32 GB · needs 26.9 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 12.5 tok/s
- 09 Radeon PRO W7800 32 GB · needs 26.9 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 9.7 tok/s
- 10 Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB 32 GB · needs 26.9 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 4.4 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What you need to run it
Minimum card
Radeon PRO V710
Memory needed
24.2 GB
Fastest
70.6 tok/s
With 48B parameters, Kimi Linear lands in the range a serious desktop card can handle once the weights are compressed. 93 of the cards we track can run it.
The least hardware that works is a Radeon PRO V710. Its 28 GB is enough at Q3_K_M compression, giving roughly 9.4 tokens per second.
The quickest result comes from a B200 at around 70.6 tokens per second — its 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth is what buys that.
What this model is
Kimi Linear was published by Moonshot, in China, in October 2025. industry is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling/generation, Question answering, Mathematical reasoning.
The weights being open is what puts this page in the calculator rather than only in the catalogue: it is a model you can actually hold. It is published under the moonshotai organisation on Hugging Face.
What decides the speed
Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range is about 17.8 tokens per second, and 71 of them clear the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed.
It is a dense model, so every parameter is read for every token produced. That makes speed track memory bandwidth almost exactly — a card with twice the bandwidth generates roughly twice as fast.
Memory here is estimated from size rather than computed from the architecture, which is not recorded for this model — the numbers are indicative rather than exact.
Training and provenance
Training it took roughly 1 × 10²³ FLOP of computation — a measure of what producing the model cost, not of how fast it answers.
Around 5,700,000,000,000 tokens went into training it.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Kimi Linear
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Read the memory figure first
Every card here has been checked against Kimi Linear — around 24.2 GB at Q3_K_M. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Decide how long your conversations run
Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason Kimi Linear stops fitting a card that seemed fine.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a floor drops the cards that only manage Kimi Linear by squeezing it further than you would want.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
The speed ordering for Kimi Linear is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 70.6 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
A tight fit runs Kimi Linear but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation; comfortable has headroom. If you expect to grow the context, buy for comfortable.
-
06
See what else that card runs
Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once Kimi Linear is settled.
Answers
Kimi Linear — common questions
Can I run Kimi Linear if it does not fit in my GPU?
Partly. Layers that do not fit sit in system memory and run at a fraction of the speed, so a mostly-offloaded Kimi Linear is rarely worth using — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 8.1 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is on the card.
Would two GPUs run Kimi Linear faster?
A second card roughly doubles the memory available but not the generation rate. With 93 cards already able to run Kimi Linear alone, the case for pairing is weak.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Kimi Linear?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard Kimi Linear has to be squeezed — 5 distinct levels appear in the table above. Set a minimum quality to compare at one.
How accurate are these Kimi Linear speed estimates?
They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range — 42–113 tok/s on the B200, for instance. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
What GPU do I need to run Kimi Linear?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Kimi Linear is the Radeon PRO V710, with 28 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 24.2 GB, and produces roughly 9.4 tokens per second. 93 cards in total can run it.
How fast is Kimi Linear on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 70.6 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 71 of the cards that can run Kimi Linear clear that.
How much VRAM does Kimi Linear need?
About 24.2 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Is Kimi Linear open source?
Its weights are published, so Kimi Linear can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does Kimi Linear have?
Kimi Linear has 48B parameters. 3B activated parameters and 48B total parameters. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created Kimi Linear?
Kimi Linear was published by Moonshot, based in China, categorised as industry.
When was Kimi Linear released?
Kimi Linear was published in October 2025.
What is Kimi Linear used for?
Kimi Linear works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling/generation, Question answering, Mathematical reasoning. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.
Where can I download Kimi Linear?
Its weights are published under the moonshotai organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
How much compute was used to train Kimi Linear?
Around 1 × 10²³ FLOP. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.