DeepSeek LLM 7B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Xeon Phi 5110P
8 GB · Q5_K_M · 22.5 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
484 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run DeepSeek LLM 7B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
509 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
484
tok/s
411–581 |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 9.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
484
tok/s
411–581 |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 9.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
387
tok/s
232–618 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 9.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
387
tok/s
232–618 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 9.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
309
tok/s
185–495 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 9.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
296
tok/s
251–355 |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 9.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
296
tok/s
251–355 |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 9.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
283
tok/s
170–453 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 9.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
251
tok/s
151–402 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 9.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
251
tok/s
151–402 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 9.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
251
tok/s
151–402 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 9.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
238
tok/s
203–286 |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 9.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
203
tok/s
173–244 |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 9.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
203
tok/s
173–244 |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 9.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
203
tok/s
173–244 |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 9.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
203
tok/s
173–244 |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 9.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
203
tok/s
173–244 |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 9.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
161
tok/s
137–193 |
CMP 170HX 8 GB NVIDIA | 8 GB | 1,490 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 7.2 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
155
tok/s
93–248 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 9.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
155
tok/s
93–248 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 9.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
137
tok/s
117–165 |
CMP 170HX 10 GB NVIDIA | 10 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 8.0 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
129
tok/s
77–206 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 9.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
126
tok/s
76–202 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 9.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
123
tok/s
105–148 |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 9.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
123
tok/s
105–148 |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 9.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- DeepSeek
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- China
- Published
- 5 January 2024
- Authors
- Xiao Bi, Deli Chen, Guanting Chen, Shanhuang Chen, Damai Dai, Chengqi Deng, Honghui Ding, Kai Dong, Qiushi Du, Zhe Fu, Huazuo Gao, Kaige Gao, Wenjun Gao, Ruiqi Ge, Kang Guan, Daya Guo, Jianzhong Guo, Guangbo Hao, Zhewen Hao, Ying He, Wenjie Hu, Panpan Huang, Erhang Li, Guowei Li, Jiashi Li, Yao Li, Y.K. Li, Wenfeng Liang, Fangyun Lin, A.X. Liu, Bo Liu, Wen Liu, Xiaodong Liu, Xin Liu, Yiyuan Liu, H…
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Chat, Language modeling/generation, Question answering
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 7B
- Training data
- 2,000,000,000,000 tokens
- Epochs
- 1
7B
"We collect 2 trillion tokens for pre-training, primarily in Chinese and English"
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 8.4 × 10²² FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting
7B parameters * 2T tokens * 6 FLOP / parameter / token = 84*10^21 FLOP
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- deepseek-ai
repo with inference code and details, but no training code: https://github.com/deepseek-ai/deepseek-LLM/blob/main/LICENSE-MODEL
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run DeepSeek LLM 7B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 484 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 484 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 387 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 387 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 309 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 296 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 296 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 283 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 251 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 251 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run DeepSeek LLM 7B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Radeon RX 7400 8 GB · needs 7.2 GB · Q5_K_M · tight 24.3 tok/s
- 02 Radeon RX 9060 8 GB · needs 7.2 GB · Q5_K_M · tight 27.2 tok/s
- 03 GeForce RTX 5050 8 GB · needs 7.2 GB · Q5_K_M · tight 34.6 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile 8 GB · needs 7.2 GB · Q5_K_M · tight 41.5 tok/s
- 05 Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB 8 GB · needs 7.2 GB · Q5_K_M · tight 27.2 tok/s
- 06 GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile 8 GB · needs 7.2 GB · Q5_K_M · tight 41.5 tok/s
- 07 GeForce RTX 5060 8 GB · needs 7.2 GB · Q5_K_M · tight 48.4 tok/s
- 08 GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB 8 GB · needs 7.2 GB · Q5_K_M · tight 48.4 tok/s
- 09 GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile 8 GB · needs 7.2 GB · Q5_K_M · tight 41.5 tok/s
- 10 Radeon RX 7650 GRE 8 GB · needs 7.2 GB · Q5_K_M · tight 24.3 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What it takes to run this model
Minimum card
Xeon Phi 5110P
Memory needed
7.2 GB
Fastest
484 tok/s
DeepSeek LLM 7B is small enough at 7B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 509 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
The smallest card that holds it is the Xeon Phi 5110P with 8 GB, running it at Q5_K_M and producing around 22.5 tokens per second.
At the other end, a B200 generates roughly 484 tokens per second on it, on the strength of 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
Where it came from
DeepSeek LLM 7B was published by DeepSeek, in China, in January 2024. The organisation is categorised as industry.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing chat, Language modeling/generation, Question answering.
Published weights mean the model runs on your machine rather than someone else's, which is what makes the hardware question below answerable at all. It is published under the deepseek-ai organisation on Hugging Face.
Understanding the speeds
The median result is around 27.2 tokens per second; 482 cards produce text faster than most people read it.
Being dense, it reads all of itself per token, which is why the ordering by speed below follows the ordering by memory bandwidth so closely.
Because the architecture is recorded, the memory column is derived rather than estimated.
What went into building it
Producing it required around 8.4 × 10²² FLOP of arithmetic, which is a statement about the training budget rather than about inference.
It was trained on about 2,000,000,000,000 tokens of text.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for DeepSeek LLM 7B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Read the memory figure first
Every card here has been checked against DeepSeek LLM 7B — around 7.2 GB at Q5_K_M. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason DeepSeek LLM 7B stops fitting a card that seemed fine.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
Compression is what makes DeepSeek LLM 7B fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy — Q5_K_M on the smallest card that fits. A minimum quality removes the ones that go too far.
-
04
Sort by speed
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for DeepSeek LLM 7B. It will not match a gaming ordering — generation is bound by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 484 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
The fit column separates cards that just manage DeepSeek LLM 7B from those with room to spare. Buy for the second if the context might grow.
-
06
Check the card from the other side
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. Worth a look before buying for DeepSeek LLM 7B alone — a card is usually bought for more than one model.
Answers
DeepSeek LLM 7B — common questions
Can I run DeepSeek LLM 7B on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 9.6 GB and generating roughly 55.2 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run DeepSeek LLM 7B on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 9.6 GB and generating roughly 68.4 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run DeepSeek LLM 7B on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 9.6 GB and generating roughly 81.1 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is DeepSeek LLM 7B open source?
Its weights are published, so DeepSeek LLM 7B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does DeepSeek LLM 7B have?
DeepSeek LLM 7B has 7B parameters. 7B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created DeepSeek LLM 7B?
DeepSeek LLM 7B was published by DeepSeek, based in China, categorised as industry.
When was DeepSeek LLM 7B released?
DeepSeek LLM 7B was published in January 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is DeepSeek LLM 7B used for?
DeepSeek LLM 7B works in Language, and is recorded as handling chat, Language modeling/generation, Question answering. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.
Where can I download DeepSeek LLM 7B?
Its weights are published under the deepseek-ai organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
How much compute was used to train DeepSeek LLM 7B?
Around 8.4 × 10²² FLOP. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run DeepSeek LLM 7B if it does not fit in my GPU?
It can be split between the card and system memory, but DeepSeek LLM 7B generates painfully slowly that way — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 1.0 GB. Nothing on this page assumes offloading.
Would two GPUs run DeepSeek LLM 7B faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed. That matters for DeepSeek LLM 7B only if one card cannot hold it — 509 can, so a second adds little.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for DeepSeek LLM 7B?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard DeepSeek LLM 7B has to be squeezed — 3 distinct levels appear in the table above. Set a minimum quality to compare at one.
How accurate are these DeepSeek LLM 7B speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 411–581 tok/s on the B200 rather than a single number.
What GPU do I need to run DeepSeek LLM 7B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds DeepSeek LLM 7B is the Xeon Phi 5110P, with 8 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q5_K_M using about 7.2 GB, and produces roughly 22.5 tokens per second. 509 cards in total can run it.
How fast is DeepSeek LLM 7B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 484 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 482 of the cards that can run DeepSeek LLM 7B clear that.
How much VRAM does DeepSeek LLM 7B need?
About 7.2 GB at Q5_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run DeepSeek LLM 7B on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q5_K_M, using about 7.2 GB and generating roughly 161 tokens per second — a tight fit.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.