PLaMo-13B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Xeon Phi 5110P
8 GB · Q3_K_M · 18.3 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
261 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run PLaMo-13B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
509 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
261
tok/s
156–417 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
261
tok/s
156–417 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
208
tok/s
125–333 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
208
tok/s
125–333 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
166
tok/s
100–266 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
159
tok/s
96–255 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
159
tok/s
96–255 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
152
tok/s
91–244 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
135
tok/s
81–217 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
135
tok/s
81–217 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
135
tok/s
81–217 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
131
tok/s
79–210 · low confidence |
CMP 170HX 8 GB NVIDIA | 8 GB | 1,490 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 7.1 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
128
tok/s
77–205 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
117
tok/s
70–188 · low confidence |
CMP 170HX 10 GB NVIDIA | 10 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 8.6 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
109
tok/s
66–175 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
109
tok/s
66–175 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
109
tok/s
66–175 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
109
tok/s
66–175 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
109
tok/s
66–175 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
83.4
tok/s
50–133 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
83.4
tok/s
50–133 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
69.5
tok/s
42–111 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
68.0
tok/s
41–109 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
67.5
tok/s
41–108 · low confidence |
RTX A5000-8Q NVIDIA | 8 GB | 768 GB/s | Apr 2021 | 7.1 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
66.5
tok/s
40–106 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Preferred Networks Inc
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- Japan
- Published
- 28 September 2023
- Authors
- Preferred Networks, Inc
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Chat, Question answering
- Approach
- Self-supervised learning
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 13B
- Training data
- 1,500,000,000,000 tokens
Trained tokens: 1.5T tokens (English: 1.32T tokens, Japanese: 0.18T tokens) from https://huggingface.co/pfnet/plamo-13b#model-details 0.75*1.32T + 0.18T = 1170000000000 0.75 words per token for English 1 for Japanese
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 1.2 × 10²³ FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting
6ND = 6*13e9*1.5e12=1.17e+23 from https://huggingface.co/pfnet/plamo-13b#model-details 480 GPUs * 30 days [assumed, likely less] * 24 hours * 3600 s * 77970000000000 FLOP/s * 41.0 [reported utilization] = 3.9772934e+24
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB
- Chips used
- 480
- Chip-hours
- 345,600
- Wall-clock time
- 720 hours (30 days)
- Hardware utilisation
- MFU 41.0%
- Power draw
- 381.3 kW
"We used 60 ABCI A nodes (480 GPUs) for just under a month, and trained the training data with a total of 1.4T tokens with a context length of 4096." https://tech.preferred.jp/ja/blog/llm-plamo/
41% utilization is given in table 3. Manual calculation assuming 30 days: 1.17e23 FLOP (per ops-counting method) / (720 (h) * 3600 (s/h) * 3.12e14 (FLOP/GPU-s) * 480 (GPUs)) = 0.3014 Discrepancy is most likely due to our time assumption – blog post just says "less than a month". 41% utilization would imply ~22 days of training. So most likely, MFU = 41%.
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Unreleased
Apache 2.0 for weights. Open data
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Likely above 10²³ FLOP
- Yes
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- PLaMo-13B
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run PLaMo-13B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 261 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 261 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 208 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 208 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 166 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 159 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 159 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 152 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 135 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 135 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run PLaMo-13B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Radeon RX 7400 8 GB · needs 7.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 19.8 tok/s
- 02 Radeon RX 9060 8 GB · needs 7.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 22.1 tok/s
- 03 GeForce RTX 5050 8 GB · needs 7.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 28.1 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile 8 GB · needs 7.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 33.8 tok/s
- 05 Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB 8 GB · needs 7.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 22.1 tok/s
- 06 GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile 8 GB · needs 7.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 33.8 tok/s
- 07 GeForce RTX 5060 8 GB · needs 7.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 39.4 tok/s
- 08 GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB 8 GB · needs 7.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 39.4 tok/s
- 09 GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile 8 GB · needs 7.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 33.8 tok/s
- 10 Radeon RX 7650 GRE 8 GB · needs 7.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 19.8 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What it takes to run this model
Minimum card
Xeon Phi 5110P
Memory needed
7.1 GB
Fastest
261 tok/s
PLaMo-13B is small enough at 13B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 509 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
The smallest card that holds it is the Xeon Phi 5110P with 8 GB, running it at Q3_K_M and producing around 18.3 tokens per second.
Top of the range is the B200, at roughly 261 tokens per second thanks to 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth.
Where it came from
PLaMo-13B was published by Preferred Networks Inc, in Japan, in September 2023. It comes out of industry.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling/generation, Chat, Question answering.
The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached.
Understanding the speeds
The median result is around 21.2 tokens per second; 459 cards produce text faster than most people read it.
Being dense, it reads all of itself per token, which is why the ordering by speed below follows the ordering by memory bandwidth so closely.
Its internal architecture is not on file, so memory is approximated from the parameter count and marked accordingly. Expect the real figure to differ, more so at long context.
Training and provenance
Producing it required around 1.2 × 10²³ FLOP of arithmetic, on NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB, which is a statement about the training budget rather than about inference.
It was trained on about 1,500,000,000,000 tokens of text.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for PLaMo-13B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start from the memory column
Every card here has been checked against PLaMo-13B — around 7.1 GB at Q3_K_M. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Decide how long your conversations run
Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason PLaMo-13B stops fitting a card that seemed fine.
-
03
Set a quality floor
The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy of PLaMo-13B — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Set a floor to hold the comparison at one level.
-
04
Compare tokens per second, not specifications
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for PLaMo-13B. It will not match a gaming ordering — generation is bound by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 261 tok/s.
-
05
Check the fit verdict before buying
A tight fit runs PLaMo-13B but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation; comfortable has headroom. If you expect to grow the context, buy for comfortable.
-
06
Check the card from the other side
Each card page repeats this sweep for every model we hold. It answers what else the hardware is good for, beyond PLaMo-13B.
Answers
PLaMo-13B — common questions
Can I run PLaMo-13B if it does not fit in my GPU?
It can be split between the card and system memory, but PLaMo-13B generates painfully slowly that way — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 3.2 GB. Nothing on this page assumes offloading.
Would two GPUs run PLaMo-13B faster?
Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. Since 509 of the cards we track already hold PLaMo-13B on their own, a second card is rarely the answer here.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for PLaMo-13B?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. Across the cards that run PLaMo-13B, 5 compression levels are used; the floor control above pins it to one.
How accurate are these PLaMo-13B speed estimates?
These are estimates with real error bars. The fastest result here, 156–417 tok/s on the B200, could reasonably land anywhere in its published range depending on which runtime you use.
What GPU do I need to run PLaMo-13B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds PLaMo-13B is the Xeon Phi 5110P, with 8 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 7.1 GB, and produces roughly 18.3 tokens per second. 509 cards in total can run it.
How fast is PLaMo-13B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 261 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 459 of the cards that can run PLaMo-13B clear that.
How much VRAM does PLaMo-13B need?
About 7.1 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run PLaMo-13B on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q3_K_M, using about 7.1 GB and generating roughly 131 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run PLaMo-13B on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q5_K_M, using about 10.1 GB and generating roughly 53.1 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run PLaMo-13B on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q6_K, using about 11.6 GB and generating roughly 53.5 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run PLaMo-13B on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 14.6 GB and generating roughly 43.7 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is PLaMo-13B open source?
Its weights are published, so PLaMo-13B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does PLaMo-13B have?
PLaMo-13B has 13B parameters. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created PLaMo-13B?
PLaMo-13B was published by Preferred Networks Inc, based in Japan, categorised as industry.
When was PLaMo-13B released?
PLaMo-13B was published in September 2023. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is PLaMo-13B used for?
PLaMo-13B works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling/generation, Chat, Question answering. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.
Where can I download PLaMo-13B?
The weights for PLaMo-13B are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
How much compute was used to train PLaMo-13B?
Around 1.2 × 10²³ FLOP, on NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.