Persimmon-8B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
Smallest card that fits
Quadro 6000
6 GB · Q3_K_M · 15.0 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
364 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Persimmon-8B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
582 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
364
tok/s
219–583 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 10.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
364
tok/s
219–583 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 10.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
291
tok/s
175–465 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 10.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
291
tok/s
175–465 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 10.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
233
tok/s
140–372 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 10.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
223
tok/s
134–356 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 10.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
223
tok/s
134–356 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 10.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
213
tok/s
128–341 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 10.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
189
tok/s
113–303 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 10.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
189
tok/s
113–303 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 10.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
189
tok/s
113–303 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 10.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
179
tok/s
108–287 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 10.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
157
tok/s
94–251 · low confidence |
CMP 170HX 8 GB NVIDIA | 8 GB | 1,490 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 6.3 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
153
tok/s
92–245 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 10.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
153
tok/s
92–245 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 10.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
153
tok/s
92–245 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 10.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
153
tok/s
92–245 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 10.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
153
tok/s
92–245 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 10.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
117
tok/s
70–186 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 10.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
117
tok/s
70–186 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 10.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
103
tok/s
62–165 · low confidence |
CMP 170HX 10 GB NVIDIA | 10 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 8.5 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
97.1
tok/s
58–155 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 10.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
95.0
tok/s
57–152 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 10.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
92.9
tok/s
56–149 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 10.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
92.9
tok/s
56–149 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 10.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Adept
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 7 September 2023
- Authors
- Erich Elsen, Augustus Odena, Maxwell Nye, Sağnak Taşırlar, Tri Dao, Curtis Hawthorne, Deepak Moparthi, Arushi Somani
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 9.3B
- Training data
- 737,000,000,000 tokens
"The checkpoint we are releasing has approximately 9.3B parameters. In order to make pipelining during training more efficient, we chose to decouple the input and output embeddings. Doing this does not increase the capacity of the model–it is purely a systems optimization to avoid all-reducing the gradients for the (very large) embeddings across potentially slow communication links. In terms of inference cost, the model is equivalent to an 8B parameter model with coupled input/output embeddings.…
737B tokens = 552750M words
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 4.1 × 10²² FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting
6*9300000000*737000000000=4.11246e+22
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Releasing Persimmon-8B
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs for Persimmon-8B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 364 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 364 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 291 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 291 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 233 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 223 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 223 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 213 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 189 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 189 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Persimmon-8B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation 6 GB · needs 5.2 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 23.6 tok/s
- 02 GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 6 GB · needs 5.2 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 20.7 tok/s
- 03 Arc A380M 6 GB · needs 5.2 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 14.9 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q 6 GB · needs 5.2 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 23.6 tok/s
- 05 GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile 6 GB · needs 5.2 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 23.6 tok/s
- 06 Data Center GPU Flex 140 6 GB · needs 5.2 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 14.9 tok/s
- 07 Arc Pro A40 6 GB · needs 5.2 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 15.3 tok/s
- 08 Arc Pro A50 6 GB · needs 5.2 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 15.3 tok/s
- 09 GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB 6 GB · needs 5.2 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 16.2 tok/s
- 10 GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB 6 GB · needs 5.2 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 20.7 tok/s
What the numbers mean
The hardware side
Minimum card
Quadro 6000
Memory needed
5.2 GB
Fastest
364 tok/s
Persimmon-8B is small enough at 9.3B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 582 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
At the low end, a Quadro 6000 handles it — 6 GB, at Q3_K_M, for about 15.0 tokens per second.
A B200 is the fastest we calculate for it: about 364 tokens per second, from 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
What this model is
Persimmon-8B was published by Adept, in United States of America, in September 2023. industry is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling.
The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached.
What decides the speed
Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range is about 23.0 tokens per second, and 543 of them clear the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed.
Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.
Memory here is estimated from size rather than computed from the architecture, which is not recorded for this model — the numbers are indicative rather than exact.
What went into building it
The training run consumed about 4.1 × 10²² FLOP. That figure describes the cost of creating it and has no bearing on how quickly it generates text.
The training set ran to roughly 737,000,000,000 tokens.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Persimmon-8B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Read the memory figure first
Look at what Persimmon-8B actually needs — around 5.2 GB at Q3_K_M. No amount of processing power compensates for a card that cannot hold it.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason Persimmon-8B stops fitting a card that seemed fine.
-
03
Decide how much compression you will accept
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a floor drops the cards that only manage Persimmon-8B by squeezing it further than you would want.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
Ranking by tokens per second for Persimmon-8B follows memory bandwidth, not core counts, which is why the B200 tops it at 364 tok/s.
-
05
Check the fit verdict before buying
Tight means Persimmon-8B loads and works, with no room to raise the context later. Comfortable means you can. The difference matters more than a few tokens per second.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once Persimmon-8B is settled.
Answers
Persimmon-8B — common questions
How fast is Persimmon-8B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 364 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 543 of the cards that can run Persimmon-8B clear that.
How much VRAM does Persimmon-8B need?
About 5.2 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run Persimmon-8B on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q4_K_M, using about 6.3 GB and generating roughly 157 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run Persimmon-8B on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 10.7 GB and generating roughly 41.6 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run Persimmon-8B on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 10.7 GB and generating roughly 51.5 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run Persimmon-8B on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 10.7 GB and generating roughly 61.0 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is Persimmon-8B open source?
Its weights are published, so Persimmon-8B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does Persimmon-8B have?
Persimmon-8B has 9.3B parameters. "The checkpoint we are releasing has approximately 9.3B parameters. In order to make pipelining during training more efficient, we chose to decouple the input and output embeddings. Doing this does not increase the capacity of the model–it is purely a systems optimization to avoid all-reducing the gradients for the (very large) embeddings across potentially slow communication links. In terms of inference cost, the model is equivalent to an 8B parameter model with coupled input/output embeddings.". That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created Persimmon-8B?
Persimmon-8B was published by Adept, based in United States of America, categorised as industry.
When was Persimmon-8B released?
Persimmon-8B was published in September 2023. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is Persimmon-8B used for?
Persimmon-8B works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling. A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.
Where can I download Persimmon-8B?
The weights for Persimmon-8B are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
How much compute was used to train Persimmon-8B?
Around 4.1 × 10²² FLOP. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run Persimmon-8B if it does not fit in my GPU?
It can be split between the card and system memory, but Persimmon-8B generates painfully slowly that way — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 1.8 GB. Nothing on this page assumes offloading.
Would two GPUs run Persimmon-8B faster?
A second card roughly doubles the memory available but not the generation rate. With 582 cards already able to run Persimmon-8B alone, the case for pairing is weak.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Persimmon-8B?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. Across the cards that run Persimmon-8B, 4 compression levels are used; the floor control above pins it to one.
How accurate are these Persimmon-8B speed estimates?
They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range — 219–583 tok/s on the B200, for instance. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
What GPU do I need to run Persimmon-8B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Persimmon-8B is the Quadro 6000, with 6 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 5.2 GB, and produces roughly 15.0 tokens per second. 582 cards in total can run it.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.