Code Llama-34B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
RTX A4500
20 GB · Q3_K_M · 21.5 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
99.7 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Code Llama-34B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
132 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
99.7
tok/s
85–120 |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 36.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
99.7
tok/s
85–120 |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 36.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
79.6
tok/s
48–127 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 36.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
79.6
tok/s
48–127 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 36.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
63.6
tok/s
38–102 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 36.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
60.9
tok/s
52–73 |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 36.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
60.9
tok/s
52–73 |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 36.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
58.3
tok/s
35–93 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 36.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
51.7
tok/s
31–83 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 36.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
51.7
tok/s
31–83 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 36.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
51.7
tok/s
31–83 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 36.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
49.1
tok/s
42–59 |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 36.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
41.9
tok/s
36–50 |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 36.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
41.9
tok/s
36–50 |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 36.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
41.9
tok/s
36–50 |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 36.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
41.9
tok/s
36–50 |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 36.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
41.9
tok/s
36–50 |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 36.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
38.5
tok/s
33–46 |
GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 NVIDIA | 24 GB | 1,340 GB/s | Aug 2025 | 20.6 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
35.1
tok/s
30–42 |
A30X NVIDIA | 24 GB | 1,220 GB/s | Apr 2021 | 20.6 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
33.9
tok/s
29–41 |
DRIVE A100 PROD NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 28.6 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
33.9
tok/s
29–41 |
GRID A100A NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 28.6 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
32.4
tok/s
28–39 |
GeForce RTX 5090 NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,790 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 28.6 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
32.4
tok/s
28–39 |
GeForce RTX 5090 D NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,790 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 28.6 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
31.9
tok/s
19–51 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 36.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
31.9
tok/s
19–51 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 36.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Meta AI
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 14 August 2023
- Authors
- Baptiste Rozière, Jonas Gehring, Fabian Gloeckle, Sten Sootla, Itai Gat, Ellen Tan, Yossef (Yossi) Adi, Jingyu Liu, Tal Remez, Jérémy Rapin, Artyom Kozhevnikov, Ivan Evtimov, Joanna Bitton, Manish Bhatt, Cristian Canton Ferrer, Aaron Grattafiori, Wenhan Xiong, Alexandre Defossez, Jade Copet, Faisal Azhar, Hugo Touvron, Gabriel Synnaeve, Louis Martin, Nicolas Usunier, Thomas Scialom
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Code generation
- Base model
- Llama 2-34B
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 34B
- Training data
- 600,000,000,000 tokens
- Batch size
- 4,000,000
34B
Llama 2 used 2T tokens, and "We train Code Llama on 500B additional tokens and Code Llama - Python further on 100B tokens" 2T + 500B + 100B = 2600000000000
Llama 2 pretraining used 4M batches. I believe the sentence below refers to the training from Llama 2 -> Code Llama-base. "We use a batch size of 4M tokens which are presented as sequences of 4,096 tokens each." Subsequent fine-tuning batch sizes are 500k-1M. "For Code Llama - Instruct, we train with a batch size of 524,288 tokens and on approx. 5B tokens in total... For long context fine-tuning (LCFT)... the batch size is set to 2M tokens for model sizes 7B and 13B and to 1M tokens for mod…
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 5.3 × 10²³ FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting
- Fine-tuning compute
- 1.2 × 10²³ FLOP
1.22e23 finetune compute, or ~5.3e23 including Llama-2 34B base compute. See finetune compute notes for calculation.
Training the nine Code Llama models took 400k A100-hours across all the models, per model card. It's nine models because there are three base models at 7B, 13B, 34B, and then Instruct and Python models across all three sizes. I'll calculate for Code Llama Python-34B since it's the most trained. Code Llama-base is trained from Llama 2 with 500B tokens: "We train Code Llama on 500B tokens during the initial phase, starting from the 7B, 13B, and 34B versions of Llama 2" Code Llama-Python required…
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Training code
- Unreleased
Llama 2 license. can't use outputs to train models. https://github.com/meta-llama/llama/blob/main/LICENSE
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Likely above 10²³ FLOP
- Yes
- Record confidence
- Confident
- Citations
- 3,163
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Code
- Last updated
- 25 May 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Code Llama-34B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 99.7 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 99.7 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 79.6 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 79.6 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 63.6 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 60.9 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 60.9 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 58.3 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 51.7 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 51.7 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Code Llama-34B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 RTX 4000 Ada Generation 20 GB · needs 16.7 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 12.1 tok/s
- 02 RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 20 GB · needs 16.7 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 9.4 tok/s
- 03 Radeon RX 7900 XT 20 GB · needs 16.7 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 21.0 tok/s
- 04 A10M 20 GB · needs 16.7 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 16.8 tok/s
- 05 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20 GB 20 GB · needs 16.7 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 25.6 tok/s
- 06 RTX A4500 20 GB · needs 16.7 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 21.5 tok/s
- 07 Arc Pro B60 24 GB · needs 20.6 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 8.5 tok/s
- 08 GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 24 GB · needs 20.6 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 38.5 tok/s
- 09 RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 24 GB · needs 20.6 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 12.4 tok/s
- 10 GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile 24 GB · needs 20.6 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 25.8 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What it takes to run this model
Minimum card
RTX A4500
Memory needed
16.7 GB
Fastest
99.7 tok/s
With 34B parameters, Code Llama-34B lands in the range a serious desktop card can handle once the weights are compressed. 132 of the cards we track can run it.
The smallest card that holds it is the RTX A4500 with 20 GB, running it at Q3_K_M and producing around 21.5 tokens per second.
Top of the range is the B200, at roughly 99.7 tokens per second thanks to 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth.
What this model is
Code Llama-34B was published by Meta AI, in United States of America, in August 2023. industry is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing code generation.
Its starting point was Llama 2-34B — most models at this scale are adapted from an existing base rather than built from nothing.
The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached.
What decides the speed
Half the cards that hold it manage more than 19.7 tokens per second, and 100 exceed reading speed outright.
Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.
Because the architecture is recorded, the memory column is derived rather than estimated.
What went into building it
Training it took roughly 5.3 × 10²³ FLOP of computation, on NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB — a measure of what producing the model cost, not of how fast it answers.
Around 600,000,000,000 tokens went into training it.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Code Llama-34B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Read the memory figure first
Every card here has been checked against Code Llama-34B — around 16.7 GB at Q3_K_M. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Match the context to your actual use
Longer conversations cost memory on top of what the weights need. Move the slider to your real working length before trusting any row for Code Llama-34B.
-
03
Set a quality floor
The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy of Code Llama-34B — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Set a floor to hold the comparison at one level.
-
04
Sort by speed
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for Code Llama-34B. It will not match a gaming ordering — generation is bound by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 99.7 tok/s.
-
05
Look at the headroom, not just the fit
The fit column separates cards that just manage Code Llama-34B from those with room to spare. Buy for the second if the context might grow.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Each card page repeats this sweep for every model we hold. It answers what else the hardware is good for, beyond Code Llama-34B.
Answers
Code Llama-34B — common questions
How much VRAM does Code Llama-34B need?
About 16.7 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run Code Llama-34B on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q4_K_M, using about 20.6 GB and generating roughly 38.5 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Is Code Llama-34B open source?
Its weights are published, so Code Llama-34B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does Code Llama-34B have?
Code Llama-34B has 34B parameters. 34B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created Code Llama-34B?
Code Llama-34B was published by Meta AI, based in United States of America, categorised as industry.
When was Code Llama-34B released?
Code Llama-34B was published in August 2023. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is Code Llama-34B used for?
Code Llama-34B works in Language, and is recorded as handling code generation. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.
Where can I download Code Llama-34B?
The weights for Code Llama-34B are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
How much compute was used to train Code Llama-34B?
Around 5.3 × 10²³ FLOP, on NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run Code Llama-34B if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part in system memory drags the whole thing down — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 6.2 GB. Our figures for Code Llama-34B assume it is fully resident.
Would two GPUs run Code Llama-34B faster?
A second card roughly doubles the memory available but not the generation rate. With 132 cards already able to run Code Llama-34B alone, the case for pairing is weak.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Code Llama-34B?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard Code Llama-34B has to be squeezed — 5 distinct levels appear in the table above. Set a minimum quality to compare at one.
How accurate are these Code Llama-34B speed estimates?
These are estimates with real error bars. The fastest result here, 85–120 tok/s on the B200, could reasonably land anywhere in its published range depending on which runtime you use.
What GPU do I need to run Code Llama-34B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Code Llama-34B is the RTX A4500, with 20 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 16.7 GB, and produces roughly 21.5 tokens per second. 132 cards in total can run it.
How fast is Code Llama-34B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 99.7 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 100 of the cards that can run Code Llama-34B clear that.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.