Polyglot-Ko-12.8B TPS calculator

Open weights EleutherAI 12.9B parameters June 2023

Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.

Calculated for this model

509 cards that can run it

818 cards we hold specifications for

Smallest card that fits

Xeon Phi 5110P

8 GB · Q3_K_M · 18.4 tok/s

Fastest card

B200

263 tok/s · 180 GB

Which GPUs can run Polyglot-Ko-12.8B?

Set the inputs, read the answer

A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.

Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.

509 cards match

Calculating
Needs Quantisation Fit
263 tok/s

158–420 · low confidence

B200 NVIDIA 180 GB 8,000 GB/s Jan 2024 14.5 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
263 tok/s

158–420 · low confidence

B300 NVIDIA 288 GB 8,000 GB/s Sep 2025 14.5 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
210 tok/s

126–336 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD 288 GB 8,190 GB/s Jan 2025 14.5 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
210 tok/s

126–336 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD 288 GB 8,190 GB/s Jan 2025 14.5 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
168 tok/s

101–268 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD 128 GB 6,550 GB/s Jan 2023 14.5 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
161 tok/s

96–257 · low confidence

H200 NVL NVIDIA 141 GB 4,890 GB/s Nov 2024 14.5 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
161 tok/s

96–257 · low confidence

H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA 141 GB 4,890 GB/s Nov 2024 14.5 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
154 tok/s

92–246 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD 256 GB 6,000 GB/s Oct 2024 14.5 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
136 tok/s

82–218 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD 128 GB 5,325 GB/s Dec 2023 14.5 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
136 tok/s

82–218 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD 192 GB 5,325 GB/s Dec 2023 14.5 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
136 tok/s

82–218 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD 192 GB 5,325 GB/s Dec 2023 14.5 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
132 tok/s

79–211 · low confidence

CMP 170HX 8 GB NVIDIA 8 GB 1,490 GB/s Sep 2021 7.0 GB Q3_K_M Tight
129 tok/s

78–207 · low confidence

H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA 94 GB 3,940 GB/s Mar 2023 14.5 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
118 tok/s

71–189 · low confidence

CMP 170HX 10 GB NVIDIA 10 GB 1,560 GB/s Sep 2021 8.5 GB Q4_K_M Tight
110 tok/s

66–177 · low confidence

H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA 96 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 14.5 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
110 tok/s

66–177 · low confidence

H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA 80 GB 3,360 GB/s Oct 2022 14.5 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
110 tok/s

66–177 · low confidence

H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA 94 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 14.5 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
110 tok/s

66–177 · low confidence

H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA 96 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 14.5 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
110 tok/s

66–177 · low confidence

H800 SXM5 NVIDIA 80 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 14.5 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
84.0 tok/s

50–134 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD 128 GB 3,280 GB/s Nov 2021 14.5 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
84.0 tok/s

50–134 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD 128 GB 3,280 GB/s Nov 2021 14.5 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
70.0 tok/s

42–112 · low confidence

Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel 128 GB 3,280 GB/s Jan 2023 14.5 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
68.5 tok/s

41–110 · low confidence

Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel 128 GB 3,210 GB/s Jan 2023 14.5 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
68.1 tok/s

41–109 · low confidence

RTX A5000-8Q NVIDIA 8 GB 768 GB/s Apr 2021 7.0 GB Q3_K_M Tight
67.0 tok/s

40–107 · low confidence

A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA 80 GB 2,040 GB/s Nov 2020 14.5 GB Q8_0 Comfortable

Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.

On record

Full specification

Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.

Origin

Who built this model, where, and when it was published.

Organisation
EleutherAI
Organisation type
Research collective
Country
United States of America
Published
4 June 2023
Authors
Hyunwoong Ko, Kichang Yang, Minho Ryu, Taekyoon Choi, Seungmu Yang, Jiwung Hyun, Sungho Park, Kyubyong Park

What it does

The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.

Domain
Language
Task
Translation, Language modeling/generation

Size

How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.

Parameters
12.9B
Training data
95,793,000,000 tokens

863 GB of Korean language data after processing ~111m Korean words per GB, so ~95,793,000,000 or ~96B words. ~1 token per korean word. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1G3vvQkn4x_W71MKg0GmHVtzfd9m0y3_Ofcoew0v902Q/edit#heading=h.ieihc08p8dn0

Batch size
554,817

from HuggingFace: "Polyglot-Ko-12.8B was trained for 167 billion tokens over 301,000 steps on 256 A100 GPUs with the GPT-NeoX framework." from the paper: "The overall batch size was maintained through the use of gradient accumulation steps (GAS). The model was trained for a total of 301,000 steps." GAS is a technique to train larger batches if you have limited memory. I don't think this text says anything in particular about whether the batch sizes changed over the course of training? 167B / 3…

Training compute

The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.

Training compute
1.3 × 10²² FLOP

trained for 167 billion tokens 167b * 12.8b * 6 = 1.28e22

How it was established
Operation counting

The training run

What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.

Training hardware
NVIDIA A100
Chips used
256
Power draw
203.9 kW

Availability

Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.

Weights
Open — downloadable
Model access
Open weights (unrestricted)

How it is classified

Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.

Record confidence
Confident
Citations
35

Sources

Where this record came from and when it was last checked.

Reference
A Technical Report for Polyglot-Ko: Open-Source Large-Scale Korean Language Models
Last updated
25 May 2026

The extremes

What the numbers mean

What it takes to run this model

Minimum card

Xeon Phi 5110P

Memory needed

7.0 GB

Fastest

263 tok/s

Polyglot-Ko-12.8B reaches a parameter count of 12.9B. That is small enough that hardware is rarely the obstacle, including on cards several years old. The number of cards we track that can run it: 509.

The smallest card that holds it is Xeon Phi 5110P, with a memory capacity of 8 GB, running it at a compression of Q3_K_M and producing around 18.4 tokens per second.

The fastest we calculate for it is B200, generating roughly 263 tokens per second on the strength of a memory bandwidth of 8,000 GB/s.

Where it came from

Polyglot-Ko-12.8B was published by EleutherAI, in the country recorded as United States of America, during June 2023. The category the publisher falls under is research collective.

It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as performing the task of translation, Language modeling/generation.

Because its weights were released, nothing about running it depends on a provider staying available — it is yours once downloaded.

Understanding the speeds

The median result is around 21.4 tokens per second. Producing text faster than most people read it: 459 of them.

Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.

Without the attention layout on record, the memory column is an approximation. It is close enough to choose hardware by, and least reliable at long context.

Training and provenance

Training it took a computation budget of roughly 1.3 × 10²² FLOP, on hardware recorded as NVIDIA A100. That figure measures what producing the model cost, and has no bearing on how fast it answers.

It was trained on a corpus of about 95,793,000,000 tokens of text.

Step by step

How to choose a GPU for Polyglot-Ko-12.8B

The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.

  1. 01

    Read the memory figure first

    Every card here has been checked against Polyglot-Ko-12.8B, needing around 7.0 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M. No amount of processing power compensates for a card that cannot hold it.

  2. 02

    Set the context length you will work at

    Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason a card that seemed fine stops fitting Polyglot-Ko-12.8B.

  3. 03

    Decide how much compression you will accept

    The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy, reaching a compression of Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a minimum quality drops the cards that only manage it by squeezing further than you would want, and holds the comparison at one level.

  4. 04

    Sort by speed

    The speed ordering is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, for Polyglot-Ko-12.8B. It will not match a gaming ordering, because generation is bound by memory bandwidth. The card topping the list is B200, at 263 tok/s.

  5. 05

    Look at the headroom, not just the fit

    A tight fit runs, but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation, in the case of Polyglot-Ko-12.8B. Comfortable means you can grow the context later. That difference matters more than a few tokens per second, so buy for comfortable if you expect to.

  6. 06

    See what else that card runs

    Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once you have settled on Polyglot-Ko-12.8B.

Answers

Polyglot-Ko-12.8B — common questions

01

Polyglot-Ko-12.8B— where can I download it?

The weights are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.

02

Polyglot-Ko-12.8B— how much compute was used to train it?

Training consumed around 1.3 × 10²² FLOP, on hardware recorded as NVIDIA A100. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.

03

Polyglot-Ko-12.8B— can I run it if it does not fit in my GPU?

It can be split between the card and system memory, but it generates painfully slowly that way. The nearest miss we calculate falls short by 3.1 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is resident on the card.

04

Polyglot-Ko-12.8B— would two GPUs run it faster?

Two cards buy memory rather than speed, which matters only if one card cannot hold it. The number that can: 509. So a second card is rarely the answer here.

05

Polyglot-Ko-12.8B— why does the quantisation differ between cards?

Because capacity varies, so does how hard it has to be squeezed. The number of distinct levels in the table above: 5. Bigger cards get the more accurate version, and the quality floor above pins the comparison to one level.

06

Polyglot-Ko-12.8B— how accurate are these speed estimates?

These are estimates with real error bars, and any of them could reasonably land anywhere in its published range depending on which runtime you use. The fastest result here: 158–420 tok/s on B200. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.

07

Polyglot-Ko-12.8B— what GPU do I need to run it?

The smallest card in our catalogue that holds it is Xeon Phi 5110P, with a memory capacity of 8 GB. It runs the model at a compression of Q3_K_M using about 7.0 GB, and produces roughly 18.4 tokens per second. The number of cards able to run it in total: 509.

08

Polyglot-Ko-12.8B— how fast is it on a GPU?

It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is B200, at about 263 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and the number of cards clearing that: 459.

09

Polyglot-Ko-12.8B— how much VRAM does it need?

It needs about 7.0 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.

10

Polyglot-Ko-12.8B— can I run it on a GPU holding 8 GB?

Yes. The card CMP 170HX 8 GB, holding 8 GB, runs it at a compression of Q3_K_M, using about 7.0 GB and generating roughly 132 tokens per second. The fit is tight.

11

Polyglot-Ko-12.8B— can I run it on a GPU holding 12 GB?

Yes. The card GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, holding 12 GB, runs it at a compression of Q5_K_M, using about 10.0 GB and generating roughly 53.5 tokens per second. The fit is tight.

12

Polyglot-Ko-12.8B— can I run it on a GPU holding 16 GB?

Yes. The card Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, holding 16 GB, runs it at a compression of Q6_K, using about 11.5 GB and generating roughly 53.9 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.

13

Polyglot-Ko-12.8B— can I run it on a GPU holding 24 GB?

Yes. The card GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, holding 24 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 14.5 GB and generating roughly 44.0 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.

14

Polyglot-Ko-12.8B— is it open source?

Its weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.

15

Polyglot-Ko-12.8B— how many parameters does it have?

It has a parameter count of 12.9B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.

16

Polyglot-Ko-12.8B— who created it?

It was published by EleutherAI, based in United States of America, an organisation categorised as research collective.

17

Polyglot-Ko-12.8B— when was it released?

It was published in June 2023. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.

18

Polyglot-Ko-12.8B— what is it used for?

It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as handling the task of translation, Language modeling/generation. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.

Source

Original publication

Record last updated 25 May 2026

The other direction

Looking at it from the other side?

This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.