Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Xeon Phi 5110P
8 GB · Q3_K_M · 19.7 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
280 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
509 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
280
tok/s
168–448 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 13.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
280
tok/s
168–448 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 13.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
224
tok/s
134–358 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 13.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
224
tok/s
134–358 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 13.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
179
tok/s
107–286 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 13.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
171
tok/s
103–274 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 13.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
171
tok/s
103–274 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 13.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
164
tok/s
98–262 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 13.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
145
tok/s
87–233 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 13.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
145
tok/s
87–233 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 13.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
145
tok/s
87–233 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 13.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
141
tok/s
84–225 · low confidence |
CMP 170HX 8 GB NVIDIA | 8 GB | 1,490 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 6.6 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
138
tok/s
83–221 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 13.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
126
tok/s
76–202 · low confidence |
CMP 170HX 10 GB NVIDIA | 10 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 8.0 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
118
tok/s
71–188 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 13.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
118
tok/s
71–188 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 13.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
118
tok/s
71–188 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 13.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
118
tok/s
71–188 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 13.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
118
tok/s
71–188 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 13.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
89.6
tok/s
54–143 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 13.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
89.6
tok/s
54–143 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 13.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
74.6
tok/s
45–119 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 13.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
73.0
tok/s
44–117 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 13.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
72.5
tok/s
44–116 · low confidence |
RTX A5000-8Q NVIDIA | 8 GB | 768 GB/s | Apr 2021 | 6.6 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
71.4
tok/s
43–114 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 13.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Salesforce Research
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 30 January 2023
- Authors
- Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Silvio Savarese, Steven Hoi
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Multimodal, Language, Vision
- Task
- Vision-language generation, Chat, Visual question answering
- Base model
- Flan-T5 11B
- Numerical format
- BF16
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 12.1B
- Training data
- tokens
12.1B, per Table 2. only 108M trainable params (i.e. params trained during the BLIP process)
"We use the same pre-training dataset as BLIP with 129M images in total"
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Fine-tuning compute
- 1.2 × 10²¹ FLOP
ViT-g is the other base model. "using a single 16-A100(40G) machine, our largest model with ViT-g and FlanT5-XXL requires less than 6 days for the first stage and less than 3 days for the second stage." 16 * 9 days * 24 * 3600 * 312 teraflops * 0.3 ~= 1.2e21
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB
- Wall-clock time
- 200 hours (8.3 days)
- Compute cost
- $99,690
"less than 6 days for the first stage and less than 3 days for the second stage" 9*24 is 216, rounding down a bit is 200 hours
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Open source
BSD license (commercial) https://github.com/salesforce/LAVIS/tree/main/projects/blip2
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
- Citations
- 8,019
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Models
- Last updated
- 25 May 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 280 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 280 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 224 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 224 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 179 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 171 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 171 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 164 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 145 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 145 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Radeon RX 7400 8 GB · needs 6.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 21.2 tok/s
- 02 Radeon RX 9060 8 GB · needs 6.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 23.7 tok/s
- 03 GeForce RTX 5050 8 GB · needs 6.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 30.2 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile 8 GB · needs 6.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 36.3 tok/s
- 05 Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB 8 GB · needs 6.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 23.7 tok/s
- 06 GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile 8 GB · needs 6.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 36.3 tok/s
- 07 GeForce RTX 5060 8 GB · needs 6.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 42.3 tok/s
- 08 GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB 8 GB · needs 6.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 42.3 tok/s
- 09 GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile 8 GB · needs 6.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 36.3 tok/s
- 10 Radeon RX 7650 GRE 8 GB · needs 6.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 21.2 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What it takes to run this model
Minimum card
Xeon Phi 5110P
Memory needed
6.6 GB
Fastest
280 tok/s
Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 is small enough at 12.1B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 509 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
The smallest card that holds it is the Xeon Phi 5110P with 8 GB, running it at Q3_K_M and producing around 19.7 tokens per second.
At the other end, a B200 generates roughly 280 tokens per second on it, on the strength of 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
Where it came from
Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 was published by Salesforce Research, in United States of America, in January 2023. industry is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Multimodal, Language, Vision, and is recorded as doing vision-language generation, Chat, Visual question answering.
Its starting point was Flan-T5 11B — most models at this scale are adapted from an existing base rather than built from nothing.
The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached.
Understanding the speeds
The median result is around 21.1 tokens per second; 455 cards produce text faster than most people read it.
Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.
Its internal architecture is not on file, so memory is approximated from the parameter count and marked accordingly. Expect the real figure to differ, more so at long context.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Check what it needs before anything else
The table lists every card that can hold Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 — around 6.6 GB at Q3_K_M. That figure, not the card's headline performance, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Match the context to your actual use
Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 stops fitting a card that seemed fine.
-
03
Decide how much compression you will accept
Compression is what makes Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. A minimum quality removes the ones that go too far.
-
04
Sort by speed
The speed ordering for Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 280 tok/s.
-
05
Look at the headroom, not just the fit
A tight fit runs Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation; comfortable has headroom. If you expect to grow the context, buy for comfortable.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Each card page repeats this sweep for every model we hold. It answers what else the hardware is good for, beyond Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2.
Answers
Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 — common questions
Would two GPUs run Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 faster?
Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. Since 509 of the cards we track already hold Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 on their own, a second card is rarely the answer here.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 has to be squeezed — 4 distinct levels appear in the table above. Set a minimum quality to compare at one.
How accurate are these Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 speed estimates?
These are estimates with real error bars. The fastest result here, 168–448 tok/s on the B200, could reasonably land anywhere in its published range depending on which runtime you use.
What GPU do I need to run Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 is the Xeon Phi 5110P, with 8 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 6.6 GB, and produces roughly 19.7 tokens per second. 509 cards in total can run it.
How fast is Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 280 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 455 of the cards that can run Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 clear that.
How much VRAM does Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 need?
About 6.6 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q3_K_M, using about 6.6 GB and generating roughly 141 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q5_K_M, using about 9.4 GB and generating roughly 57.0 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 13.7 GB and generating roughly 39.6 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 13.7 GB and generating roughly 46.9 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 open source?
Its weights are published, so Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 have?
Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 has 12.1B parameters. 12.1B, per Table 2. only 108M trainable params (i.e. params trained during the BLIP process). That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2?
Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 was published by Salesforce Research, based in United States of America, categorised as industry.
When was Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 released?
Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 was published in January 2023. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 used for?
Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 works in Multimodal, Language, Vision, and is recorded as handling vision-language generation, Chat, Visual question answering. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.
Where can I download Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2?
The weights for Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
Can I run Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 if it does not fit in my GPU?
Partly. Layers that do not fit sit in system memory and run at a fraction of the speed, so a mostly-offloaded Flan T5-XXL + BLIP-2 is rarely worth using — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 2.6 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is on the card.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.