Tk-Instruct TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Xeon Phi 5110P
8 GB · IQ4_XS · 19.7 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
308 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Tk-Instruct?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
509 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
308
tok/s
185–493 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 12.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
308
tok/s
185–493 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 12.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
246
tok/s
148–394 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 12.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
246
tok/s
148–394 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 12.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
197
tok/s
118–315 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 12.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
188
tok/s
113–301 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 12.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
188
tok/s
113–301 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 12.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
180
tok/s
108–288 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 12.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
160
tok/s
96–256 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 12.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
160
tok/s
96–256 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 12.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
160
tok/s
96–256 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 12.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
152
tok/s
91–243 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 12.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
141
tok/s
85–225 · low confidence |
CMP 170HX 8 GB NVIDIA | 8 GB | 1,490 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 6.7 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
129
tok/s
78–207 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 12.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
129
tok/s
78–207 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 12.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
129
tok/s
78–207 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 12.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
129
tok/s
78–207 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 12.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
129
tok/s
78–207 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 12.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
107
tok/s
64–172 · low confidence |
CMP 170HX 10 GB NVIDIA | 10 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 8.6 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
98.5
tok/s
59–158 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 12.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
98.5
tok/s
59–158 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 12.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
82.1
tok/s
49–131 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 12.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
80.3
tok/s
48–129 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 12.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
78.6
tok/s
47–126 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 12.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
78.6
tok/s
47–126 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 12.5 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- University of Washington,Arizona State University,Allen Institute for AI
- Organisation type
- Academia,Academia,Research collective
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 24 October 2022
- Authors
- Yizhong Wang, Swaroop Mishra, Pegah Alipoormolabashi, Yeganeh Kordi, Amirreza Mirzaei, Anjana Arunkumar, Arjun Ashok, Arut Selvan Dhanasekaran, Atharva Naik, David Stap, Eshaan Pathak, Giannis Karamanolakis, Haizhi Gary Lai, Ishan Purohit, Ishani Mondal, Jacob Anderson, Kirby Kuznia, Krima Doshi, Maitreya Patel, Kuntal Kumar Pal, Mehrad Moradshahi, Mihir Parmar, Mirali Purohit, Neeraj Varshney, Ph…
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Instruction interpretation
- Base model
- T5-11B
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 11B
- Training data
- 1,048,576,000 tokens
- Batch size
- 1,048,576
11B
56.6 words*1616 tasks + (1,048,576 tokens per batch/1,024 examples per batch)*5M instances = 5120091465.6 In total, the dataset includes 1616 tasks and 5M instances. On average, each instruction is paired with 2.8 positive and 2.4 negative examples. The average definition length is 56.6 in words.
batch size of 1,048,576 tokens (1,024 examples)
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- How it was established
- Operation counting
- Fine-tuning compute
- 3.4 × 10²⁰ FLOP
=5120091466*11B*6=3.379 × 10^20
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- Google TPU v3
- Wall-clock time
- 20 hours
1000 steps * 1024 examples = 10^6 examples per 4 hours 5M instances -> 20 hours of total training time "These experiments are run on Google V3-256 TPUs using a batch size of 1,048,576 tokens (1,024 examples), a constant learning rate of 1e-5 and a total of 1000 steps. Each training run takes 4 hours to complete."
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Open source
https://instructions.apps.allenai.org/ https://github.com/yizhongw/Tk-Instruct https://huggingface.co/models?search=tk-instruct-
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Speculative
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Tasks
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Tk-Instruct
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 308 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 308 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 246 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 246 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 197 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 188 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 188 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 180 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 160 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 160 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Tk-Instruct
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Radeon RX 7400 8 GB · needs 6.7 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 21.2 tok/s
- 02 Radeon RX 9060 8 GB · needs 6.7 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 23.8 tok/s
- 03 GeForce RTX 5050 8 GB · needs 6.7 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 30.3 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile 8 GB · needs 6.7 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 36.3 tok/s
- 05 Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB 8 GB · needs 6.7 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 23.8 tok/s
- 06 GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile 8 GB · needs 6.7 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 36.3 tok/s
- 07 GeForce RTX 5060 8 GB · needs 6.7 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 42.4 tok/s
- 08 GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB 8 GB · needs 6.7 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 42.4 tok/s
- 09 GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile 8 GB · needs 6.7 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 36.3 tok/s
- 10 Radeon RX 7650 GRE 8 GB · needs 6.7 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 21.2 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What it takes to run this model
Minimum card
Xeon Phi 5110P
Memory needed
6.7 GB
Fastest
308 tok/s
Tk-Instruct is small enough at 11B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 509 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
The smallest card that holds it is the Xeon Phi 5110P with 8 GB, running it at IQ4_XS and producing around 19.7 tokens per second.
At the other end, a B200 generates roughly 308 tokens per second on it, on the strength of 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
What this model is
Tk-Instruct was published by University of Washington,Arizona State University,Allen Institute for AI, in United States of America, in October 2022. It comes out of academia,Academia,Research collective.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing instruction interpretation.
It is derived from T5-11B rather than trained from scratch, which is the usual way a specialised model is produced.
The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached.
What decides the speed
Half the cards that hold it manage more than 21.2 tokens per second, and 460 exceed reading speed outright.
Being dense, it reads all of itself per token, which is why the ordering by speed below follows the ordering by memory bandwidth so closely.
Without the attention layout on record, the memory column is an approximation. It is close enough to choose hardware by, and least reliable at long context.
How it was trained
The training set ran to roughly 1,048,576,000 tokens.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Tk-Instruct
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Check what it needs before anything else
The table lists every card that can hold Tk-Instruct — around 6.7 GB at IQ4_XS. That figure, not the card's headline performance, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason Tk-Instruct stops fitting a card that seemed fine.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy of Tk-Instruct — IQ4_XS on the smallest card that fits. Set a floor to hold the comparison at one level.
-
04
Sort by speed
The speed ordering for Tk-Instruct is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 308 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
A tight fit runs Tk-Instruct but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation; comfortable has headroom. If you expect to grow the context, buy for comfortable.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. Worth a look before buying for Tk-Instruct alone — a card is usually bought for more than one model.
Answers
Tk-Instruct — common questions
Can I run Tk-Instruct on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at IQ4_XS, using about 6.7 GB and generating roughly 141 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run Tk-Instruct on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q6_K, using about 9.9 GB and generating roughly 51.0 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run Tk-Instruct on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 12.5 GB and generating roughly 43.5 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run Tk-Instruct on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 12.5 GB and generating roughly 51.6 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is Tk-Instruct open source?
Its weights are published, so Tk-Instruct can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does Tk-Instruct have?
Tk-Instruct has 11B parameters. 11B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created Tk-Instruct?
Tk-Instruct was published by University of Washington,Arizona State University,Allen Institute for AI, based in United States of America, categorised as academia,Academia,Research collective.
When was Tk-Instruct released?
Tk-Instruct was published in October 2022. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is Tk-Instruct used for?
Tk-Instruct works in Language, and is recorded as handling instruction interpretation. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.
Where can I download Tk-Instruct?
The weights for Tk-Instruct are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
Can I run Tk-Instruct if it does not fit in my GPU?
Partly. Layers that do not fit sit in system memory and run at a fraction of the speed, so a mostly-offloaded Tk-Instruct is rarely worth using — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 2.0 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is on the card.
Would two GPUs run Tk-Instruct faster?
Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. Since 509 of the cards we track already hold Tk-Instruct on their own, a second card is rarely the answer here.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Tk-Instruct?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. Across the cards that run Tk-Instruct, 4 compression levels are used; the floor control above pins it to one.
How accurate are these Tk-Instruct speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 185–493 tok/s on the B200 rather than a single number.
What GPU do I need to run Tk-Instruct?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Tk-Instruct is the Xeon Phi 5110P, with 8 GB of memory. It runs the model at IQ4_XS using about 6.7 GB, and produces roughly 19.7 tokens per second. 509 cards in total can run it.
How fast is Tk-Instruct on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 308 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 460 of the cards that can run Tk-Instruct clear that.
How much VRAM does Tk-Instruct need?
About 6.7 GB at IQ4_XS compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.