CPM-Ant TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Xeon Phi 5110P
8 GB · Q4_K_M · 20.3 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
339 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run CPM-Ant?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
509 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
339
tok/s
203–542 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 11.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
339
tok/s
203–542 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 11.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
271
tok/s
162–433 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 11.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
271
tok/s
162–433 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 11.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
216
tok/s
130–346 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 11.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
207
tok/s
124–331 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 11.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
207
tok/s
124–331 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 11.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
198
tok/s
119–317 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 11.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
176
tok/s
106–281 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 11.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
176
tok/s
106–281 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 11.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
176
tok/s
106–281 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 11.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
167
tok/s
100–267 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 11.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
146
tok/s
87–233 · low confidence |
CMP 170HX 8 GB NVIDIA | 8 GB | 1,490 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 6.7 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
142
tok/s
85–228 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 11.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
142
tok/s
85–228 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 11.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
142
tok/s
85–228 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 11.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
142
tok/s
85–228 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 11.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
142
tok/s
85–228 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 11.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
118
tok/s
71–189 · low confidence |
CMP 170HX 10 GB NVIDIA | 10 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 7.9 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
108
tok/s
65–173 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 11.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
108
tok/s
65–173 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 11.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
90.3
tok/s
54–144 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 11.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
88.4
tok/s
53–141 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 11.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
86.4
tok/s
52–138 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 11.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
86.4
tok/s
52–138 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 11.4 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Tsinghua University,Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence / BAAI,ModelBest,OpenBMB (Open Lab for Big Model Base)
- Organisation type
- Academia,Academia,Industry
- Country
- China
- Published
- 22 September 2022
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Question answering
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 10B
- Training data
- 33,400,000,000 tokens
"CPM-Ant is an open-source Chinese pre-trained language model (PLM) with 10B parameters."
Final log: https://github.com/OpenBMB/CPM-Live/blob/cpm-ant/logs/2022-09-22.md “Completed Data: ≈ 1,145.16GB” But plans for CPM-Bee suggest that this was counting raw data, and only 200GB of clean data was used for training: https://github.com/OpenBMB/CPM-Live/blob/master/plans/CPM-Bee%E8%AE%AD%E7%BB%83%E8%AE%A1%E5%88%92%E4%B9%A6.md 200 * 167M ~= 33.4B tokens
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 2 × 10²² FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting
6 FLOP / parameter / token * 10*10e9 parameters * 3.34e10 tokens [see training dataset size notes] = 2.004e+22 FLOP
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Wall-clock time
- 1,632 hours (68 days)
- Compute cost
- $66,779
"The training of CPM-Ant lasts 68 days"
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (non-commercial)
- Training code
- Unreleased
no clear license https://github.com/OpenBMB/CPM-Live/tree/cpm-ant/cpm-live#model-checkpoints
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Open-Source 10B-Parameter Chinese pretrained language model
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run CPM-Ant
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 339 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 339 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 271 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 271 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 216 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 207 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 207 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 198 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 176 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 176 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run CPM-Ant
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Radeon RX 7400 8 GB · needs 6.7 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 22.0 tok/s
- 02 Radeon RX 9060 8 GB · needs 6.7 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 24.6 tok/s
- 03 GeForce RTX 5050 8 GB · needs 6.7 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 31.3 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile 8 GB · needs 6.7 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 37.6 tok/s
- 05 Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB 8 GB · needs 6.7 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 24.6 tok/s
- 06 GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile 8 GB · needs 6.7 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 37.6 tok/s
- 07 GeForce RTX 5060 8 GB · needs 6.7 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 43.8 tok/s
- 08 GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB 8 GB · needs 6.7 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 43.8 tok/s
- 09 GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile 8 GB · needs 6.7 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 37.6 tok/s
- 10 Radeon RX 7650 GRE 8 GB · needs 6.7 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 22.0 tok/s
What the numbers mean
The hardware side
Minimum card
Xeon Phi 5110P
Memory needed
6.7 GB
Fastest
339 tok/s
CPM-Ant is small enough at 10B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 509 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
At the low end, a Xeon Phi 5110P handles it — 8 GB, at Q4_K_M, for about 20.3 tokens per second.
Top of the range is the B200, at roughly 339 tokens per second thanks to 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth.
What this model is
CPM-Ant was published by Tsinghua University,Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence / BAAI,ModelBest,OpenBMB (Open Lab for Big Model Base), in China, in September 2022. academia,Academia,Industry is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling/generation, Question answering.
The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached.
What decides the speed
Half the cards that hold it manage more than 22.0 tokens per second, and 469 exceed reading speed outright.
Being dense, it reads all of itself per token, which is why the ordering by speed below follows the ordering by memory bandwidth so closely.
Without the attention layout on record, the memory column is an approximation. It is close enough to choose hardware by, and least reliable at long context.
What went into building it
Training it took roughly 2 × 10²² FLOP of computation — a measure of what producing the model cost, not of how fast it answers.
Around 33,400,000,000 tokens went into training it.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for CPM-Ant
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Read the memory figure first
Look at what CPM-Ant actually needs — around 6.7 GB at Q4_K_M. No amount of processing power compensates for a card that cannot hold it.
-
02
Decide how long your conversations run
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect: at long context CPM-Ant can slip off a card that handles short questions easily.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
Compression is what makes CPM-Ant fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy — Q4_K_M on the smallest card that fits. A minimum quality removes the ones that go too far.
-
04
Sort by speed
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for CPM-Ant. It will not match a gaming ordering — generation is bound by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 339 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
The fit column separates cards that just manage CPM-Ant from those with room to spare. Buy for the second if the context might grow.
-
06
Check the card from the other side
Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once CPM-Ant is settled.
Answers
CPM-Ant — common questions
How fast is CPM-Ant on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 339 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 469 of the cards that can run CPM-Ant clear that.
How much VRAM does CPM-Ant need?
About 6.7 GB at Q4_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run CPM-Ant on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q4_K_M, using about 6.7 GB and generating roughly 146 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run CPM-Ant on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q6_K, using about 9.1 GB and generating roughly 56.2 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run CPM-Ant on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 11.4 GB and generating roughly 47.9 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run CPM-Ant on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 11.4 GB and generating roughly 56.8 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is CPM-Ant open source?
Its weights are published, so CPM-Ant can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does CPM-Ant have?
CPM-Ant has 10B parameters. "CPM-Ant is an open-source Chinese pre-trained language model (PLM) with 10B parameters.". That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created CPM-Ant?
CPM-Ant was published by Tsinghua University,Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence / BAAI,ModelBest,OpenBMB (Open Lab for Big Model Base), based in China, categorised as academia,Academia,Industry.
When was CPM-Ant released?
CPM-Ant was published in September 2022. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is CPM-Ant used for?
CPM-Ant works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling/generation, Question answering. A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.
Where can I download CPM-Ant?
The weights for CPM-Ant are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
How much compute was used to train CPM-Ant?
Around 2 × 10²² FLOP. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run CPM-Ant if it does not fit in my GPU?
Partly. Layers that do not fit sit in system memory and run at a fraction of the speed, so a mostly-offloaded CPM-Ant is rarely worth using — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 1.3 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is on the card.
Would two GPUs run CPM-Ant faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed. That matters for CPM-Ant only if one card cannot hold it — 509 can, so a second adds little.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for CPM-Ant?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. Across the cards that run CPM-Ant, 4 compression levels are used; the floor control above pins it to one.
How accurate are these CPM-Ant speed estimates?
These are estimates with real error bars. The fastest result here, 203–542 tok/s on the B200, could reasonably land anywhere in its published range depending on which runtime you use.
What GPU do I need to run CPM-Ant?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds CPM-Ant is the Xeon Phi 5110P, with 8 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q4_K_M using about 6.7 GB, and produces roughly 20.3 tokens per second. 509 cards in total can run it.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.