GLM-4.1V-Thinking TPS calculator

Open weights Z.ai (Zhipu AI),Tsinghua University 9B parameters August 2025

Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.

Calculated for this model

582 cards that can run it

818 cards we hold specifications for

Smallest card that fits

Quadro 6000

6 GB · Q3_K_M · 15.5 tok/s

Fastest card

B200

376 tok/s · 180 GB

Which GPUs can run GLM-4.1V-Thinking?

Set the inputs, read the answer

A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.

Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.

582 cards match

Calculating
Needs Quantisation Fit
376 tok/s

226–602 · low confidence

B200 NVIDIA 180 GB 8,000 GB/s Jan 2024 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
376 tok/s

226–602 · low confidence

B300 NVIDIA 288 GB 8,000 GB/s Sep 2025 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
301 tok/s

180–481 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD 288 GB 8,190 GB/s Jan 2025 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
301 tok/s

180–481 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD 288 GB 8,190 GB/s Jan 2025 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
240 tok/s

144–385 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD 128 GB 6,550 GB/s Jan 2023 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
230 tok/s

138–368 · low confidence

H200 NVL NVIDIA 141 GB 4,890 GB/s Nov 2024 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
230 tok/s

138–368 · low confidence

H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA 141 GB 4,890 GB/s Nov 2024 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
220 tok/s

132–352 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD 256 GB 6,000 GB/s Oct 2024 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
195 tok/s

117–313 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD 128 GB 5,325 GB/s Dec 2023 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
195 tok/s

117–313 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD 192 GB 5,325 GB/s Dec 2023 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
195 tok/s

117–313 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD 192 GB 5,325 GB/s Dec 2023 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
185 tok/s

111–297 · low confidence

H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA 94 GB 3,940 GB/s Mar 2023 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
158 tok/s

95–253 · low confidence

H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA 96 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
158 tok/s

95–253 · low confidence

H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA 80 GB 3,360 GB/s Oct 2022 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
158 tok/s

95–253 · low confidence

H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA 94 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
158 tok/s

95–253 · low confidence

H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA 96 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
158 tok/s

95–253 · low confidence

H800 SXM5 NVIDIA 80 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
125 tok/s

75–200 · low confidence

CMP 170HX 8 GB NVIDIA 8 GB 1,490 GB/s Sep 2021 7.2 GB Q5_K_M Tight
120 tok/s

72–193 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD 128 GB 3,280 GB/s Nov 2021 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
120 tok/s

72–193 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD 128 GB 3,280 GB/s Nov 2021 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
107 tok/s

64–171 · low confidence

CMP 170HX 10 GB NVIDIA 10 GB 1,560 GB/s Sep 2021 8.2 GB Q6_K Tight
100 tok/s

60–161 · low confidence

Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel 128 GB 3,280 GB/s Jan 2023 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
98.2 tok/s

59–157 · low confidence

Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel 128 GB 3,210 GB/s Jan 2023 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
96.0 tok/s

58–154 · low confidence

A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA 80 GB 2,040 GB/s Nov 2020 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
96.0 tok/s

58–154 · low confidence

A100X NVIDIA 80 GB 2,040 GB/s Jun 2021 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable

Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.

On record

Full specification

Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.

Origin

Who built this model, where, and when it was published.

Organisation
Z.ai (Zhipu AI),Tsinghua University
Organisation type
Industry,Academia
Country
China
Published
15 August 2025
Authors
GLM-V Team: Wenyi Hong, Wenmeng Yu, Xiaotao Gu, Guo Wang, Guobing Gan, Haomiao Tang, Jiale Cheng, Ji Qi, Junhui Ji, Lihang Pan, Shuaiqi Duan, Weihan Wang, Yan Wang, Yean Cheng, Zehai He, Zhe Su, Zhen Yang, Ziyang Pan, Aohan Zeng, Baoxu Wang, Bin Chen, Boyan Shi, Changyu Pang, Chenhui Zhang, Da Yin, Fan Yang, Guoqing Chen, Jiazheng Xu, Jiale Zhu, Jiali Chen, Jing Chen, Jinhao Chen, Jinghao Lin, Jin…

What it does

The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.

Domain
Multimodal, Vision, Language
Task
Language modeling/generation, Question answering, Visual question answering, Image captioning
Base model
GLM-4-9B-0414

Size

How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.

Parameters
9B

9B

Training data
tokens

Pre-training: "The training utilizes a sequence length of 8,192 and a global batch size of 1,536 for a total of 120,000 steps." Continual training: "To accommodate these longer inputs, we increase the sequence length to 32,768 and enhance our parallelism strategy by setting the context parallel size to 4 in addition to the base parallel configuration. This stage is run for an additional 10,000 steps, while maintaining the global batch size of 1,536." 8192*1536*120000 + 32768*1536*10000 = 2.013…

Training compute

The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.

Training compute
9.2 × 10²³ FLOP

8.1e+23 FLOP [backbone model compute, "Likely" confidence] + 1.08e+23 FLOP ["Confident"] = 9.18e+23 FLOP

How it was established
Operation counting
Fine-tuning compute
1.1 × 10²³ FLOP

6 FLOP / token / parameter * 9 * 10^9 parameters * 2 *10^12 tokens [see dataset size notes] = 1.08e+23 FLOP

Availability

Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.

Weights
Open — downloadable
Model access
Open weights (unrestricted)
Training code
Unreleased

MIT license https://huggingface.co/zai-org/GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking Apache 2.0 https://github.com/zai-org/GLM-V

Hugging Face
zai-org

How it is classified

Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.

Record confidence
Likely

Sources

Where this record came from and when it was last checked.

Reference
GLM-4.5V and GLM-4.1V-Thinking: Towards Versatile Multimodal Reasoning with Scalable Reinforcement Learning
Last updated
28 November 2025

The extremes

What the numbers mean

What it takes to run this model

Minimum card

Quadro 6000

Memory needed

5.1 GB

Fastest

376 tok/s

GLM-4.1V-Thinking reaches a parameter count of 9B. That is small enough that hardware is rarely the obstacle, including on cards several years old. The number of cards we track that can run it: 582.

The smallest card that holds it is Quadro 6000, with a memory capacity of 6 GB, running it at a compression of Q3_K_M and producing around 15.5 tokens per second.

The fastest we calculate for it is B200, generating roughly 376 tokens per second on the strength of a memory bandwidth of 8,000 GB/s.

Background

GLM-4.1V-Thinking was published by Z.ai (Zhipu AI),Tsinghua University, in the country recorded as China, during August 2025. It comes out of an organisation categorised as industry,Academia.

It works in the domain of Multimodal, Vision, Language, and is recorded as performing the task of language modeling/generation, Question answering, Visual question answering, Image captioning.

Its starting point was an existing base model, GLM-4-9B-0414. That is the usual way a specialised model is produced.

Because its weights were released, nothing about running it depends on a provider staying available — it is yours once downloaded. On Hugging Face it is published under the organisation zai-org.

Reading the throughput figures

Half the cards that hold it manage more than 21.1 tokens per second. Clearing the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed: 541 of them.

Being dense, it reads all of itself per token, which is why the ordering by speed below follows the ordering by memory bandwidth so closely.

Without the attention layout on record, the memory column is an approximation. It is close enough to choose hardware by, and least reliable at long context.

Training and provenance

The training run consumed about 9.2 × 10²³ FLOP. That figure measures what producing the model cost, and has no bearing on how fast it answers.

Step by step

How to choose a GPU for GLM-4.1V-Thinking

The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.

  1. 01

    Check what it needs before anything else

    The table lists every card able to hold GLM-4.1V-Thinking, needing around 5.1 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M. That figure, not the headline performance of a card, is what decides whether it runs.

  2. 02

    Set the context length you will work at

    Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason a card that seemed fine stops fitting GLM-4.1V-Thinking.

  3. 03

    Choose how far you will compress it

    Compression is what makes a model fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy, reaching a compression of Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a minimum quality drops the cards that only manage it by squeezing further than you would want, and holds the comparison at one level.

  4. 04

    Sort by speed

    Sort by speed to see how cards rank for GLM-4.1V-Thinking. It will not match a gaming ordering, because generation is bound by memory bandwidth. The card topping the list is B200, at 376 tok/s.

  5. 05

    Check the fit verdict before buying

    A tight fit runs, but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation, in the case of GLM-4.1V-Thinking. Comfortable means you can grow the context later. That difference matters more than a few tokens per second, so buy for comfortable if you expect to.

  6. 06

    Check the card from the other side

    Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once you have settled on GLM-4.1V-Thinking.

Answers

GLM-4.1V-Thinking — common questions

01

GLM-4.1V-Thinking— can I run it on a GPU holding 12 GB?

Yes. The card GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, holding 12 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 10.3 GB and generating roughly 42.9 tokens per second. The fit is tight.

02

GLM-4.1V-Thinking— can I run it on a GPU holding 16 GB?

Yes. The card Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, holding 16 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 10.3 GB and generating roughly 53.2 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.

03

GLM-4.1V-Thinking— can I run it on a GPU holding 24 GB?

Yes. The card GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, holding 24 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 10.3 GB and generating roughly 63.1 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.

04

GLM-4.1V-Thinking— is it open source?

Its weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.

05

GLM-4.1V-Thinking— how many parameters does it have?

It has a parameter count of 9B. 9B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.

06

GLM-4.1V-Thinking— who created it?

It was published by Z.ai (Zhipu AI),Tsinghua University, based in China, an organisation categorised as industry,Academia.

07

GLM-4.1V-Thinking— when was it released?

It was published in August 2025.

08

GLM-4.1V-Thinking— what is it used for?

It works in the domain of Multimodal, Vision, Language, and is recorded as handling the task of language modeling/generation, Question answering, Visual question answering, Image captioning. A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.

09

GLM-4.1V-Thinking— where can I download it?

Its weights are published on Hugging Face, under the organisation zai-org. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.

10

GLM-4.1V-Thinking— how much compute was used to train it?

Training consumed around 9.2 × 10²³ FLOP. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.

11

GLM-4.1V-Thinking— can I run it if it does not fit in my GPU?

Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part held in system memory drags the whole thing down. The nearest miss we calculate falls short by 1.6 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is resident on the card.

12

GLM-4.1V-Thinking— would two GPUs run it faster?

Two cards buy memory rather than speed, which matters only if one card cannot hold it. The number that can: 582. So a second card is rarely the answer here.

13

GLM-4.1V-Thinking— why does the quantisation differ between cards?

Because capacity varies, so does how hard it has to be squeezed. The number of distinct levels in the table above: 4. Bigger cards get the more accurate version, and the quality floor above pins the comparison to one level.

14

GLM-4.1V-Thinking— how accurate are these speed estimates?

Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked, which is why each is published as a range rather than a single number. One example: 226–602 tok/s on B200. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.

15

GLM-4.1V-Thinking— what GPU do I need to run it?

The smallest card in our catalogue that holds it is Quadro 6000, with a memory capacity of 6 GB. It runs the model at a compression of Q3_K_M using about 5.1 GB, and produces roughly 15.5 tokens per second. The number of cards able to run it in total: 582.

16

GLM-4.1V-Thinking— how fast is it on a GPU?

It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is B200, at about 376 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and the number of cards clearing that: 541.

17

GLM-4.1V-Thinking— how much VRAM does it need?

It needs about 5.1 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.

18

GLM-4.1V-Thinking— can I run it on a GPU holding 8 GB?

Yes. The card CMP 170HX 8 GB, holding 8 GB, runs it at a compression of Q5_K_M, using about 7.2 GB and generating roughly 125 tokens per second. The fit is tight.

Source

Original publication

Record last updated 28 November 2025

The other direction

Looking at it from the other side?

This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.