T-Pro 2.0 TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
RTX A4500
20 GB · Q3_K_M · 22.9 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
106 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run T-Pro 2.0?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
132 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
106
tok/s
64–169 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
106
tok/s
64–169 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
84.6
tok/s
51–135 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
84.6
tok/s
51–135 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
67.6
tok/s
41–108 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
64.7
tok/s
39–104 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
64.7
tok/s
39–104 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
61.9
tok/s
37–99 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
55.0
tok/s
33–88 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
55.0
tok/s
33–88 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
55.0
tok/s
33–88 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
52.2
tok/s
31–83 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
44.5
tok/s
27–71 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
44.5
tok/s
27–71 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
44.5
tok/s
27–71 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
44.5
tok/s
27–71 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
44.5
tok/s
27–71 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
40.9
tok/s
25–66 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 NVIDIA | 24 GB | 1,340 GB/s | Aug 2025 | 20.1 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
37.3
tok/s
22–60 · low confidence |
A30X NVIDIA | 24 GB | 1,220 GB/s | Apr 2021 | 20.1 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
36.0
tok/s
22–58 · low confidence |
DRIVE A100 PROD NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 27.5 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
36.0
tok/s
22–58 · low confidence |
GRID A100A NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 27.5 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
34.4
tok/s
21–55 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,790 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 27.5 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
34.4
tok/s
21–55 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 D NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,790 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 27.5 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
33.9
tok/s
20–54 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
33.9
tok/s
20–54 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- T-Bank
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- Russia
- Published
- 18 July 2025
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning
- Base model
- Qwen3-32B
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 32B
- Training data
- 40,000,000,000 tokens
32B
"Instruction Pre-Training: 40B tokens of instruction data, with one-third focused on reasoning tasks. Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT): ~500K high-quality and diverse instructions with balanced complexity. Reasoning tasks make up about 20% of the dataset. Preference Tuning: ~100K carefully selected instructions, filtered by length and type for general tasks and with domain-balanced selection for reasoning tasks."
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- How it was established
- Operation counting
- Fine-tuning compute
- 7.7 × 10²¹ FLOP
6 FLOP / token / parameter * 32 * 10^9 parameters * 40 * 10^9 tokens = 7.68e+21 FLOP
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- t-tech
Apache 2.0 https://huggingface.co/t-tech/T-pro-it-2.0
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- T-pro-it-2.0 is a model built upon the Qwen 3 model family and incorporates both continual pre-training and alignment techniques.
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run T-Pro 2.0
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 106 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 106 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 84.6 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 84.6 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 67.6 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 64.7 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 64.7 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 61.9 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 55.0 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 55.0 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run T-Pro 2.0
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 RTX 4000 Ada Generation 20 GB · needs 16.3 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 12.9 tok/s
- 02 RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 20 GB · needs 16.3 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 10.0 tok/s
- 03 Radeon RX 7900 XT 20 GB · needs 16.3 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 22.3 tok/s
- 04 A10M 20 GB · needs 16.3 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 17.9 tok/s
- 05 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20 GB 20 GB · needs 16.3 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 27.2 tok/s
- 06 RTX A4500 20 GB · needs 16.3 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 22.9 tok/s
- 07 Arc Pro B60 24 GB · needs 20.1 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 9.1 tok/s
- 08 GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 24 GB · needs 20.1 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 40.9 tok/s
- 09 RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 24 GB · needs 20.1 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 13.2 tok/s
- 10 GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile 24 GB · needs 20.1 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 27.4 tok/s
What the numbers mean
The hardware side
Minimum card
RTX A4500
Memory needed
16.3 GB
Fastest
106 tok/s
With 32B parameters, T-Pro 2.0 lands in the range a serious desktop card can handle once the weights are compressed. 132 of the cards we track can run it.
At the low end, a RTX A4500 handles it — 20 GB, at Q3_K_M, for about 22.9 tokens per second.
A B200 is the fastest we calculate for it: about 106 tokens per second, from 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
Background
T-Pro 2.0 was published by T-Bank, in Russia, in July 2025. industry is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling/generation, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning.
Its starting point was Qwen3-32B — most models at this scale are adapted from an existing base rather than built from nothing.
The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached. It is published under the t-tech organisation on Hugging Face.
Reading the throughput figures
The median result is around 20.7 tokens per second; 103 cards produce text faster than most people read it.
It is a dense model, so every parameter is read for every token produced. That makes speed track memory bandwidth almost exactly — a card with twice the bandwidth generates roughly twice as fast.
Without the attention layout on record, the memory column is an approximation. It is close enough to choose hardware by, and least reliable at long context.
Training and provenance
Around 40,000,000,000 tokens went into training it.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for T-Pro 2.0
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Read the memory figure first
Look at what T-Pro 2.0 actually needs — around 16.3 GB at Q3_K_M. No amount of processing power compensates for a card that cannot hold it.
-
02
Decide how long your conversations run
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect: at long context T-Pro 2.0 can slip off a card that handles short questions easily.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a floor drops the cards that only manage T-Pro 2.0 by squeezing it further than you would want.
-
04
Compare tokens per second, not specifications
Ranking by tokens per second for T-Pro 2.0 follows memory bandwidth, not core counts, which is why the B200 tops it at 106 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
Tight means T-Pro 2.0 loads and works, with no room to raise the context later. Comfortable means you can. The difference matters more than a few tokens per second.
-
06
Check the card from the other side
Each card page repeats this sweep for every model we hold. It answers what else the hardware is good for, beyond T-Pro 2.0.
Answers
T-Pro 2.0 — common questions
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for T-Pro 2.0?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard T-Pro 2.0 has to be squeezed — 5 distinct levels appear in the table above. Set a minimum quality to compare at one.
How accurate are these T-Pro 2.0 speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 64–169 tok/s on the B200 rather than a single number.
What GPU do I need to run T-Pro 2.0?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds T-Pro 2.0 is the RTX A4500, with 20 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 16.3 GB, and produces roughly 22.9 tokens per second. 132 cards in total can run it.
How fast is T-Pro 2.0 on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 106 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 103 of the cards that can run T-Pro 2.0 clear that.
How much VRAM does T-Pro 2.0 need?
About 16.3 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run T-Pro 2.0 on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q4_K_M, using about 20.1 GB and generating roughly 40.9 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Is T-Pro 2.0 open source?
Its weights are published, so T-Pro 2.0 can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does T-Pro 2.0 have?
T-Pro 2.0 has 32B parameters. 32B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created T-Pro 2.0?
T-Pro 2.0 was published by T-Bank, based in Russia, categorised as industry.
When was T-Pro 2.0 released?
T-Pro 2.0 was published in July 2025.
What is T-Pro 2.0 used for?
T-Pro 2.0 works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling/generation, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.
Where can I download T-Pro 2.0?
Its weights are published under the t-tech organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
Can I run T-Pro 2.0 if it does not fit in my GPU?
Partly. Layers that do not fit sit in system memory and run at a fraction of the speed, so a mostly-offloaded T-Pro 2.0 is rarely worth using — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 5.7 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is on the card.
Would two GPUs run T-Pro 2.0 faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed. That matters for T-Pro 2.0 only if one card cannot hold it — 132 can, so a second adds little.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.