Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Xeon Phi 5110P
8 GB · Q3_K_M · 19.8 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
282 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
509 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
282
tok/s
240–339 |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 13.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
282
tok/s
240–339 |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 13.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
225
tok/s
135–361 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 13.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
225
tok/s
135–361 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 13.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
180
tok/s
108–289 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 13.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
173
tok/s
147–207 |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 13.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
173
tok/s
147–207 |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 13.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
165
tok/s
99–264 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 13.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
147
tok/s
88–235 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 13.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
147
tok/s
88–235 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 13.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
147
tok/s
88–235 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 13.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
142
tok/s
121–170 |
CMP 170HX 8 GB NVIDIA | 8 GB | 1,490 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 6.6 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
139
tok/s
118–167 |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 13.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
127
tok/s
108–153 |
CMP 170HX 10 GB NVIDIA | 10 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 8.0 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
119
tok/s
101–142 |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 13.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
119
tok/s
101–142 |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 13.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
119
tok/s
101–142 |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 13.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
119
tok/s
101–142 |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 13.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
119
tok/s
101–142 |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 13.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
90.3
tok/s
54–144 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 13.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
90.3
tok/s
54–144 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 13.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
75.3
tok/s
45–120 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 13.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
73.6
tok/s
44–118 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 13.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
73.1
tok/s
62–88 |
RTX A5000-8Q NVIDIA | 8 GB | 768 GB/s | Apr 2021 | 6.6 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
72.0
tok/s
61–86 |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 13.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Typhoon / SCB 10X
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- Thailand
- Published
- 5 May 2025
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning, Code generation, Translation
- Base model
- Gemma 3 12B
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 12B
- Training data
- tokens
12B
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- scb10x
gemma license https://huggingface.co/scb10x/typhoon2.1-gemma3-12b
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Typhoon 2.1 Gemma Release: Big Performance in Small Sizes
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 282 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 282 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 225 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 225 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 180 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 173 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 173 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 165 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 147 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 147 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Radeon RX 7400 8 GB · needs 6.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 21.4 tok/s
- 02 Radeon RX 9060 8 GB · needs 6.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 23.9 tok/s
- 03 GeForce RTX 5050 8 GB · needs 6.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 30.5 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile 8 GB · needs 6.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 36.6 tok/s
- 05 Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB 8 GB · needs 6.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 23.9 tok/s
- 06 GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile 8 GB · needs 6.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 36.6 tok/s
- 07 GeForce RTX 5060 8 GB · needs 6.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 42.7 tok/s
- 08 GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB 8 GB · needs 6.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 42.7 tok/s
- 09 GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile 8 GB · needs 6.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 36.6 tok/s
- 10 Radeon RX 7650 GRE 8 GB · needs 6.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 21.4 tok/s
What the numbers mean
Hardware requirements in practice
Minimum card
Xeon Phi 5110P
Memory needed
6.6 GB
Fastest
282 tok/s
Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B is small enough at 12B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 509 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
The entry point is the Xeon Phi 5110P: 8 GB of memory, Q3_K_M compression, roughly 19.8 tokens per second.
The quickest result comes from a B200 at around 282 tokens per second — its 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth is what buys that.
About this model
Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B was published by Typhoon / SCB 10X, in Thailand, in May 2025. It comes out of industry.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling/generation, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning, Code generation, Translation.
It is derived from Gemma 3 12B rather than trained from scratch, which is the usual way a specialised model is produced.
The weights being open is what puts this page in the calculator rather than only in the catalogue: it is a model you can actually hold. It is published under the scb10x organisation on Hugging Face.
How fast it runs, and why
Half the cards that hold it manage more than 21.2 tokens per second, and 455 exceed reading speed outright.
Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.
Its attention layout is on file, so the memory figures are computed exactly rather than approximated.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Read the memory figure first
The table lists every card that can hold Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B — around 6.6 GB at Q3_K_M. That figure, not the card's headline performance, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Decide how long your conversations run
Longer conversations cost memory on top of what the weights need. Move the slider to your real working length before trusting any row for Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B.
-
03
Set a quality floor
Compression is what makes Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. A minimum quality removes the ones that go too far.
-
04
Sort by speed
The speed ordering for Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 282 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
Tight means Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B loads and works, with no room to raise the context later. Comfortable means you can. The difference matters more than a few tokens per second.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Each card page repeats this sweep for every model we hold. It answers what else the hardware is good for, beyond Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B.
Answers
Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B — common questions
Can I run Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 13.6 GB and generating roughly 47.3 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B open source?
Its weights are published, so Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B have?
Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B has 12B parameters. 12B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B?
Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B was published by Typhoon / SCB 10X, based in Thailand, categorised as industry.
When was Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B released?
Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B was published in May 2025.
What is Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B used for?
Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling/generation, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning, Code generation, Translation. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.
Where can I download Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B?
Its weights are published under the scb10x organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
Can I run Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part in system memory drags the whole thing down — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 2.6 GB. Our figures for Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B assume it is fully resident.
Would two GPUs run Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B faster?
Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. Since 509 of the cards we track already hold Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B on their own, a second card is rarely the answer here.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B?
Each card is shown running the least-compressed copy it can hold, and Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B appears at 4 different compression levels across the cards that fit it. Bigger cards get the more accurate version.
How accurate are these Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B speed estimates?
These are estimates with real error bars. The fastest result here, 240–339 tok/s on the B200, could reasonably land anywhere in its published range depending on which runtime you use.
What GPU do I need to run Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B is the Xeon Phi 5110P, with 8 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 6.6 GB, and produces roughly 19.8 tokens per second. 509 cards in total can run it.
How fast is Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 282 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 455 of the cards that can run Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B clear that.
How much VRAM does Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B need?
About 6.6 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q3_K_M, using about 6.6 GB and generating roughly 142 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q5_K_M, using about 9.4 GB and generating roughly 57.5 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run Typhoon 2.1 Gemma 12B on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 13.6 GB and generating roughly 39.9 tokens per second — a tight fit.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.