MamayLM TPS calculator

Open weights INSAIT,ETH Zurich 9B parameters April 2025

Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.

Calculated for this model

582 of 818 cards that can run it

Smallest card that fits

Quadro 6000

6 GB · Q3_K_M · 15.5 tok/s

Fastest card

B200

376 tok/s · 180 GB

Which GPUs can run MamayLM?

Set the inputs, read the answer

A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.

Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.

582 cards match

Calculating
Needs Quantisation Fit
376 tok/s

226–602 · low confidence

B200 NVIDIA 180 GB 8,000 GB/s Jan 2024 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
376 tok/s

226–602 · low confidence

B300 NVIDIA 288 GB 8,000 GB/s Sep 2025 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
301 tok/s

180–481 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD 288 GB 8,190 GB/s Jan 2025 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
301 tok/s

180–481 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD 288 GB 8,190 GB/s Jan 2025 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
240 tok/s

144–385 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD 128 GB 6,550 GB/s Jan 2023 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
230 tok/s

138–368 · low confidence

H200 NVL NVIDIA 141 GB 4,890 GB/s Nov 2024 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
230 tok/s

138–368 · low confidence

H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA 141 GB 4,890 GB/s Nov 2024 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
220 tok/s

132–352 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD 256 GB 6,000 GB/s Oct 2024 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
195 tok/s

117–313 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD 128 GB 5,325 GB/s Dec 2023 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
195 tok/s

117–313 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD 192 GB 5,325 GB/s Dec 2023 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
195 tok/s

117–313 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD 192 GB 5,325 GB/s Dec 2023 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
185 tok/s

111–297 · low confidence

H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA 94 GB 3,940 GB/s Mar 2023 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
158 tok/s

95–253 · low confidence

H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA 96 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
158 tok/s

95–253 · low confidence

H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA 80 GB 3,360 GB/s Oct 2022 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
158 tok/s

95–253 · low confidence

H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA 94 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
158 tok/s

95–253 · low confidence

H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA 96 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
158 tok/s

95–253 · low confidence

H800 SXM5 NVIDIA 80 GB 3,360 GB/s Mar 2023 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
125 tok/s

75–200 · low confidence

CMP 170HX 8 GB NVIDIA 8 GB 1,490 GB/s Sep 2021 7.2 GB Q5_K_M Tight
120 tok/s

72–193 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD 128 GB 3,280 GB/s Nov 2021 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
120 tok/s

72–193 · low confidence

Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD 128 GB 3,280 GB/s Nov 2021 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
107 tok/s

64–171 · low confidence

CMP 170HX 10 GB NVIDIA 10 GB 1,560 GB/s Sep 2021 8.2 GB Q6_K Tight
100 tok/s

60–161 · low confidence

Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel 128 GB 3,280 GB/s Jan 2023 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
98.2 tok/s

59–157 · low confidence

Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel 128 GB 3,210 GB/s Jan 2023 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
96.0 tok/s

58–154 · low confidence

A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA 80 GB 2,040 GB/s Nov 2020 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable
96.0 tok/s

58–154 · low confidence

A100X NVIDIA 80 GB 2,040 GB/s Jun 2021 10.3 GB Q8_0 Comfortable

Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.

On record

Full specification

Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.

Origin

Who built this model, where, and when it was published.

Organisation
INSAIT,ETH Zurich
Organisation type
Academia,Academia
Country
Bulgaria, Switzerland
Published
23 April 2025
Authors
Anton Alexandrov, Hannah Yukhymenko, Martin Vechev

What it does

The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.

Domain
Language
Task
Language modeling/generation, Language generation

Size

How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.

Parameters
9B

9B

Training data
8,075,000,000,000 tokens

Training compute

The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.

Training compute
4.4 × 10²³ FLOP

Gemma 2 9B pretrain on 8T tokens + MamayLM continual pretrain on 75B tokens. Unclear about SFT compute

Availability

Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.

Weights
Open — downloadable
Model access
Open weights (unrestricted)
Training code
Unreleased

How it is classified

Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.

Record confidence
Likely

Sources

Where this record came from and when it was last checked.

Reference
INSAIT introduces MamayLM-Gemma-2-9B-IT-v0.1, the best performing Ukrainian language model based on google/gemma-2-9b and google/gemma-2-9b-it.
Last updated
8 April 2026

The extremes

What the numbers mean

The hardware side

Minimum card

Quadro 6000

Memory needed

5.1 GB

Fastest

376 tok/s

MamayLM is small enough at 9B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 582 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.

At the low end, a Quadro 6000 handles it — 6 GB, at Q3_K_M, for about 15.5 tokens per second.

A B200 is the fastest we calculate for it: about 376 tokens per second, from 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

What this model is

MamayLM was published by INSAIT,ETH Zurich, in Bulgaria, in April 2025. It comes out of academia,Academia.

It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling/generation, Language generation.

Because its weights were released, nothing about running it depends on a provider staying available — it is yours once downloaded.

What decides the speed

Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range is about 21.1 tokens per second, and 541 of them clear the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed.

Being dense, it reads all of itself per token, which is why the ordering by speed below follows the ordering by memory bandwidth so closely.

Its internal architecture is not on file, so memory is approximated from the parameter count and marked accordingly. Expect the real figure to differ, more so at long context.

Training and provenance

Producing it required around 4.4 × 10²³ FLOP of arithmetic, which is a statement about the training budget rather than about inference.

It was trained on about 8,075,000,000,000 tokens of text.

Step by step

How to choose a GPU for MamayLM

The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.

  1. 01

    Start from the memory column

    Every card here has been checked against MamayLM — around 5.1 GB at Q3_K_M. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.

  2. 02

    Set the context length you will work at

    Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason MamayLM stops fitting a card that seemed fine.

  3. 03

    Decide how much compression you will accept

    Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a floor drops the cards that only manage MamayLM by squeezing it further than you would want.

  4. 04

    Compare tokens per second, not specifications

    Sort by speed to see how cards rank for MamayLM. It will not match a gaming ordering — generation is bound by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 376 tok/s.

  5. 05

    Look at the headroom, not just the fit

    Tight means MamayLM loads and works, with no room to raise the context later. Comfortable means you can. The difference matters more than a few tokens per second.

  6. 06

    Check the card from the other side

    Each card page repeats this sweep for every model we hold. It answers what else the hardware is good for, beyond MamayLM.

Answers

MamayLM — common questions

01

How fast is MamayLM on a GPU?

It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 376 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 541 of the cards that can run MamayLM clear that.

02

How much VRAM does MamayLM need?

About 5.1 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.

03

Can I run MamayLM on a 8 GB GPU?

Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q5_K_M, using about 7.2 GB and generating roughly 125 tokens per second — a tight fit.

04

Can I run MamayLM on a 12 GB GPU?

Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 10.3 GB and generating roughly 42.9 tokens per second — a tight fit.

05

Can I run MamayLM on a 16 GB GPU?

Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 10.3 GB and generating roughly 53.2 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.

06

Can I run MamayLM on a 24 GB GPU?

Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 10.3 GB and generating roughly 63.1 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.

07

Is MamayLM open source?

Its weights are published, so MamayLM can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.

08

How many parameters does MamayLM have?

MamayLM has 9B parameters. 9B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.

09

Who created MamayLM?

MamayLM was published by INSAIT,ETH Zurich, based in Bulgaria, categorised as academia,Academia.

10

When was MamayLM released?

MamayLM was published in April 2025.

11

What is MamayLM used for?

MamayLM works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling/generation, Language generation. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.

12

Where can I download MamayLM?

The weights for MamayLM are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.

13

How much compute was used to train MamayLM?

Around 4.4 × 10²³ FLOP. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.

14

Can I run MamayLM if it does not fit in my GPU?

It can be split between the card and system memory, but MamayLM generates painfully slowly that way — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 1.6 GB. Nothing on this page assumes offloading.

15

Would two GPUs run MamayLM faster?

Two cards buy memory rather than speed. That matters for MamayLM only if one card cannot hold it — 582 can, so a second adds little.

16

Why does the quantisation differ between cards for MamayLM?

A larger card holds a more accurate copy. Across the cards that run MamayLM, 4 compression levels are used; the floor control above pins it to one.

17

How accurate are these MamayLM speed estimates?

Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 226–602 tok/s on the B200 rather than a single number.

18

What GPU do I need to run MamayLM?

The smallest card in our catalogue that holds MamayLM is the Quadro 6000, with 6 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 5.1 GB, and produces roughly 15.5 tokens per second. 582 cards in total can run it.

Source

Original publication

Record last updated 8 April 2026

The other direction

Looking at it from the other side?

This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.