GLM-4-9B-0414 TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
Smallest card that fits
Quadro 6000
6 GB · Q3_K_M · 15.5 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
376 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run GLM-4-9B-0414?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
582 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
376
tok/s
226–602 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
376
tok/s
226–602 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
301
tok/s
180–481 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
301
tok/s
180–481 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
240
tok/s
144–385 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
230
tok/s
138–368 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
230
tok/s
138–368 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
220
tok/s
132–352 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
195
tok/s
117–313 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
195
tok/s
117–313 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
195
tok/s
117–313 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
185
tok/s
111–297 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
158
tok/s
95–253 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
158
tok/s
95–253 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
158
tok/s
95–253 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
158
tok/s
95–253 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
158
tok/s
95–253 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
125
tok/s
75–200 · low confidence |
CMP 170HX 8 GB NVIDIA | 8 GB | 1,490 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 7.2 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
120
tok/s
72–193 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
120
tok/s
72–193 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
107
tok/s
64–171 · low confidence |
CMP 170HX 10 GB NVIDIA | 10 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 8.2 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
100
tok/s
60–161 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
98.2
tok/s
59–157 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
96.0
tok/s
58–154 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
96.0
tok/s
58–154 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Tsinghua University
- Organisation type
- Academia
- Country
- China
- Published
- 14 April 2025
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning, Code generation
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 9B
- Training data
- tokens
9B
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 8.1 × 10²³ FLOP
- How it was established
- Operation counting
Assuming it was trained on the same 15T dataset as 32B model: 6 FLOP / parameter / token * 9 * 10^9 parameters * 15 * 10^12 tokens = 8.1e+23 FLOP "Likely" confidence due to the uncertain dataset size
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- THUDM
MIT license https://huggingface.co/THUDM/GLM-4-9B-0414
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Likely above 10²³ FLOP
- Yes
- Record confidence
- Likely
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- GLM-4-9B-0414
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs for GLM-4-9B-0414
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 376 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 376 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 301 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 301 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 240 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 230 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 230 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 220 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 195 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 195 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run GLM-4-9B-0414
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation 6 GB · needs 5.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 24.4 tok/s
- 02 GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 6 GB · needs 5.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 21.3 tok/s
- 03 Arc A380M 6 GB · needs 5.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 15.4 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q 6 GB · needs 5.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 24.4 tok/s
- 05 GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile 6 GB · needs 5.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 24.4 tok/s
- 06 Data Center GPU Flex 140 6 GB · needs 5.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 15.4 tok/s
- 07 Arc Pro A40 6 GB · needs 5.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 15.9 tok/s
- 08 Arc Pro A50 6 GB · needs 5.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 15.9 tok/s
- 09 GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB 6 GB · needs 5.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 16.8 tok/s
- 10 GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB 6 GB · needs 5.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 21.3 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What you need to run it
Minimum card
Quadro 6000
Memory needed
5.1 GB
Fastest
376 tok/s
GLM-4-9B-0414 is small enough at 9B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 582 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
The least hardware that works is a Quadro 6000. Its 6 GB is enough at Q3_K_M compression, giving roughly 15.5 tokens per second.
At the other end, a B200 generates roughly 376 tokens per second on it, on the strength of 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
What this model is
GLM-4-9B-0414 was published by Tsinghua University, in China, in April 2025. It comes out of academia.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling/generation, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning, Code generation.
Published weights mean the model runs on your machine rather than someone else's, which is what makes the hardware question below answerable at all. It is published under the THUDM organisation on Hugging Face.
What decides the speed
The median result is around 21.1 tokens per second; 541 cards produce text faster than most people read it.
It is a dense model, so every parameter is read for every token produced. That makes speed track memory bandwidth almost exactly — a card with twice the bandwidth generates roughly twice as fast.
Memory here is estimated from size rather than computed from the architecture, which is not recorded for this model — the numbers are indicative rather than exact.
Training and provenance
The training run consumed about 8.1 × 10²³ FLOP. That figure describes the cost of creating it and has no bearing on how quickly it generates text.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for GLM-4-9B-0414
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Check what it needs before anything else
The table lists every card that can hold GLM-4-9B-0414 — around 5.1 GB at Q3_K_M. That figure, not the card's headline performance, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason GLM-4-9B-0414 stops fitting a card that seemed fine.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a floor drops the cards that only manage GLM-4-9B-0414 by squeezing it further than you would want.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
The speed ordering for GLM-4-9B-0414 is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 376 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
The fit column separates cards that just manage GLM-4-9B-0414 from those with room to spare. Buy for the second if the context might grow.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once GLM-4-9B-0414 is settled.
Answers
GLM-4-9B-0414 — common questions
Can I run GLM-4-9B-0414 on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q5_K_M, using about 7.2 GB and generating roughly 125 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run GLM-4-9B-0414 on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 10.3 GB and generating roughly 42.9 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run GLM-4-9B-0414 on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 10.3 GB and generating roughly 53.2 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run GLM-4-9B-0414 on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 10.3 GB and generating roughly 63.1 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is GLM-4-9B-0414 open source?
Its weights are published, so GLM-4-9B-0414 can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does GLM-4-9B-0414 have?
GLM-4-9B-0414 has 9B parameters. 9B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created GLM-4-9B-0414?
GLM-4-9B-0414 was published by Tsinghua University, based in China, categorised as academia.
When was GLM-4-9B-0414 released?
GLM-4-9B-0414 was published in April 2025.
What is GLM-4-9B-0414 used for?
GLM-4-9B-0414 works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling/generation, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning, Code generation. A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.
Where can I download GLM-4-9B-0414?
Its weights are published under the THUDM organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
How much compute was used to train GLM-4-9B-0414?
Around 8.1 × 10²³ FLOP. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run GLM-4-9B-0414 if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part in system memory drags the whole thing down — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 1.6 GB. Our figures for GLM-4-9B-0414 assume it is fully resident.
Would two GPUs run GLM-4-9B-0414 faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed. That matters for GLM-4-9B-0414 only if one card cannot hold it — 582 can, so a second adds little.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for GLM-4-9B-0414?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. Across the cards that run GLM-4-9B-0414, 4 compression levels are used; the floor control above pins it to one.
How accurate are these GLM-4-9B-0414 speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 226–602 tok/s on the B200 rather than a single number.
What GPU do I need to run GLM-4-9B-0414?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds GLM-4-9B-0414 is the Quadro 6000, with 6 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 5.1 GB, and produces roughly 15.5 tokens per second. 582 cards in total can run it.
How fast is GLM-4-9B-0414 on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 376 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 541 of the cards that can run GLM-4-9B-0414 clear that.
How much VRAM does GLM-4-9B-0414 need?
About 5.1 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.