Llama Nemotron Super 49B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Radeon PRO V710
28 GB · Q3_K_M · 9.2 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
69.2 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Llama Nemotron Super 49B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
93 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
69.2
tok/s
41–111 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 53.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
69.2
tok/s
41–111 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 53.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
55.2
tok/s
33–88 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 53.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
55.2
tok/s
33–88 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 53.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
44.2
tok/s
27–71 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 53.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
42.3
tok/s
25–68 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 53.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
42.3
tok/s
25–68 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 53.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
40.5
tok/s
24–65 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 53.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
39.7
tok/s
24–64 · low confidence |
DRIVE A100 PROD NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 27.5 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
39.7
tok/s
24–64 · low confidence |
GRID A100A NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 27.5 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
38.0
tok/s
23–61 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,790 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 27.5 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
38.0
tok/s
23–61 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 D NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,790 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 27.5 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
35.9
tok/s
22–57 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 53.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
35.9
tok/s
22–57 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 53.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
35.9
tok/s
22–57 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 53.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
34.1
tok/s
20–54 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 53.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
31.1
tok/s
19–50 · low confidence |
A100 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Jun 2020 | 30.3 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
31.1
tok/s
19–50 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | May 2020 | 30.3 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
31.1
tok/s
19–50 · low confidence |
A800 PCIe 40 GB NVIDIA | 40 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Nov 2022 | 30.3 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
29.0
tok/s
17–46 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 53.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
29.0
tok/s
17–46 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 53.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
29.0
tok/s
17–46 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 53.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
29.0
tok/s
17–46 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 53.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
29.0
tok/s
17–46 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 53.2 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
24.0
tok/s
14–38 · low confidence |
Tesla PG500-216 NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,130 GB/s | Nov 2019 | 27.5 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- NVIDIA
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 18 March 2025
- Authors
- Akhiad Bercovich, Itay Levy, Izik Golan, Mohammad Dabbah, Ran El-Yaniv, Omri Puny, Ido Galil, Zach Moshe, Tomer Ronen, Najeeb Nabwani, Ido Shahaf, Oren Tropp, Ehud Karpas, Ran Zilberstein, Jiaqi Zeng, Soumye Singhal, Alexander Bukharin, Yian Zhang, Tugrul Konuk, Gerald Shen, Ameya Sunil Mahabaleshwarkar, Bilal Kartal, Yoshi Suhara, Olivier Delalleau, Zijia Chen, Zhilin Wang, David Mosallanezhad, A…
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning, Code generation, Neural Architecture Search - NAS
- Base model
- Llama 3.3 70B
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 49B
- Training data
- 100,000,000,000 tokens
The model is a derivative of Meta’s Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct, using Neural Architecture Search (NAS). The NAS algorithm results in non-standard and non-repetitive blocks. This includes the following: Skip attention: In some blocks, the attention is skipped entirely, or replaced with a single linear layer. Variable FFN: The expansion/compression ratio in the FFN layer is different between blocks. We utilize a block-wise distillation of the reference model, where for each block we create multiple v…
"The model then undergoes knowledge distillation (KD), with a focus on English single and multi-turn chat use-cases. The KD step included 40 billion tokens consisting of a mixture of 3 datasets - FineWeb, Buzz-V1.2 and Dolma." KD: "LN-Super is trained for 40B tokens using a knowledge distillation objective over the Distillation Mix dataset introduced by Bercovich et al. (2024)." (from the paper) SFT: 60B tokens of NVIDIA generated synthetic data (from the blog https://developer.nvidia.com/blog…
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- How it was established
- Operation counting
- Fine-tuning compute
- 2.9 × 10²² FLOP
Knowledge Distillation + SFT: 6 FLOP / parameter / token * 49000000000 parameters * 100000000000 tokens = 2.94e+22 FLOP RL compute unknown, likely to be negligible
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- nvidia
GOVERNING TERMS: Your use of this model is governed by the NVIDIA Open Model License. Additional Information: Llama 3.3 Community License Agreement. Built with Llama. https://huggingface.co/nvidia/Llama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Likely
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Super is 49B distilled from Llama 3.3 70B for best accuracy with highest throughput on a data center GPU.
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Llama Nemotron Super 49B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 69.2 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 69.2 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 55.2 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 55.2 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 44.2 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 42.3 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 42.3 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 40.5 tok/s
- 09 DRIVE A100 PROD 32 GB · 1,870 GB/s · IQ4_XS 39.7 tok/s
- 10 GRID A100A 32 GB · 1,870 GB/s · IQ4_XS 39.7 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Llama Nemotron Super 49B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Radeon PRO V710 28 GB · needs 24.6 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 9.2 tok/s
- 02 Radeon AI PRO 9600D 32 GB · needs 27.5 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 9.5 tok/s
- 03 Radeon AI PRO R9700S 32 GB · needs 27.5 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 10.7 tok/s
- 04 Radeon AI PRO R9700 32 GB · needs 27.5 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 10.7 tok/s
- 05 RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell 32 GB · needs 27.5 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 19.0 tok/s
- 06 GeForce RTX 5090 32 GB · needs 27.5 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 38.0 tok/s
- 07 GeForce RTX 5090 D 32 GB · needs 27.5 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 38.0 tok/s
- 08 RTX 5000 Ada Generation 32 GB · needs 27.5 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 12.2 tok/s
- 09 Radeon PRO W7800 32 GB · needs 27.5 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 9.5 tok/s
- 10 Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB 32 GB · needs 27.5 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 4.4 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What you need to run it
Minimum card
Radeon PRO V710
Memory needed
24.6 GB
Fastest
69.2 tok/s
Llama Nemotron Super 49B reaches a parameter count of 49B. That lands in the range a serious desktop card can handle once the weights are compressed. The number of cards we track that can run it: 93.
The least hardware that works is Radeon PRO V710, with a memory capacity of 28 GB, running it at a compression of Q3_K_M and producing around 9.2 tokens per second.
The fastest we calculate for it is B200, generating roughly 69.2 tokens per second on the strength of a memory bandwidth of 8,000 GB/s.
About this model
Llama Nemotron Super 49B was published by NVIDIA, in the country recorded as United States of America, during March 2025. It comes out of an organisation categorised as industry.
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as performing the task of language modeling/generation, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning, Code generation, Neural Architecture Search - NAS.
Rather than being trained from scratch, it is derived from Llama 3.3 70B. That is the usual way a specialised model is produced.
Published weights mean the model runs on your machine rather than someone else's, which is what makes the hardware question below answerable at all. On Hugging Face it is published under the organisation nvidia.
How fast it runs, and why
The median result is around 17.5 tokens per second. Clearing the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed: 71 of them.
Being dense, it reads all of itself per token, which is why the ordering by speed below follows the ordering by memory bandwidth so closely.
Its internal architecture is not on file, so memory is approximated from the parameter count and marked accordingly. Expect the real figure to differ, more so at long context.
What went into building it
Training consumed a corpus of around 100,000,000,000 tokens of text.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Llama Nemotron Super 49B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start from the memory column
The table lists every card able to hold Llama Nemotron Super 49B, needing around 24.6 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
Longer conversations cost memory on top of what the weights need. Move the slider to your real working length before trusting any row for Llama Nemotron Super 49B.
-
03
Decide how much compression you will accept
Compression is what makes a model fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy, reaching a compression of Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a minimum quality drops the cards that only manage it by squeezing further than you would want, and holds the comparison at one level.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
Ranking by tokens per second follows memory bandwidth rather than core counts, for Llama Nemotron Super 49B. It will not match a gaming ordering, because generation is bound by memory bandwidth. The card topping the list is B200, at 69.2 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
Tight means it loads and works with no room to raise the context later, in the case of Llama Nemotron Super 49B. Comfortable means you can grow the context later. That difference matters more than a few tokens per second, so buy for comfortable if you expect to.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Following a card through to its own page shows every other model it can hold, which is the question that follows once you have settled on Llama Nemotron Super 49B.
Answers
Llama Nemotron Super 49B — common questions
Llama Nemotron Super 49B— can I run it if it does not fit in my GPU?
Partly. Layers that do not fit sit in system memory and run at a fraction of the speed, so a mostly-offloaded model is rarely worth using. The nearest miss we calculate falls short by 8.7 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is resident on the card.
Llama Nemotron Super 49B— would two GPUs run it faster?
Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. The number of cards already holding it on their own: 93. So a second card is rarely the answer here.
Llama Nemotron Super 49B— why does the quantisation differ between cards?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. The number of compression levels used across the cards that run it: 5. Bigger cards get the more accurate version, and the quality floor above pins the comparison to one level.
Llama Nemotron Super 49B— how accurate are these speed estimates?
These are estimates with real error bars, and any of them could reasonably land anywhere in its published range depending on which runtime you use. The fastest result here: 41–111 tok/s on B200. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
Llama Nemotron Super 49B— what GPU do I need to run it?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds it is Radeon PRO V710, with a memory capacity of 28 GB. It runs the model at a compression of Q3_K_M using about 24.6 GB, and produces roughly 9.2 tokens per second. The number of cards able to run it in total: 93.
Llama Nemotron Super 49B— how fast is it on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is B200, at about 69.2 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and the number of cards clearing that: 71.
Llama Nemotron Super 49B— how much VRAM does it need?
It needs about 24.6 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Llama Nemotron Super 49B— is it open source?
Its weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
Llama Nemotron Super 49B— how many parameters does it have?
It has a parameter count of 49B. The model is a derivative of Meta’s Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct, using Neural Architecture Search (NAS). The NAS algorithm results in non-standard and non-repetitive blocks. This includes the following: Skip attention: In some blocks, the attention is skipped entirely, or replaced with a single linear layer. Variable FFN: The expansion/compression ratio in the FFN layer is different between blocks. We utilize a block-wise distillation of the reference model, where for each block we create multiple variants providing different tradeoffs of quality vs. computational complexity, discussed in more depth below. We then search over the blocks to create a model which meets the required throughput and memory (optimized for a single H100-80GB GPU) while minimizing the quality degradation. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Llama Nemotron Super 49B— who created it?
It was published by NVIDIA, based in United States of America, an organisation categorised as industry.
Llama Nemotron Super 49B— when was it released?
It was published in March 2025.
Llama Nemotron Super 49B— what is it used for?
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as handling the task of language modeling/generation, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning, Code generation, Neural Architecture Search - NAS. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.
Llama Nemotron Super 49B— where can I download it?
Its weights are published on Hugging Face, under the organisation nvidia. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.