EXAONE Deep 7.8B TPS calculator

Open weights LG AI Research 7.8B parameters March 2025

Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.

Calculated for this model

582 cards that can run it

818 cards we hold specifications for

Smallest card that fits

Quadro 6000

6 GB · IQ4_XS · 16.3 tok/s

Fastest card

B200

434 tok/s · 180 GB

Which GPUs can run EXAONE Deep 7.8B?

Set the inputs, read the answer

Context length tokens

A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.

Minimum quality

Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.

Search cards

Card memory

Also show cards that cannot run it

582 cards match

Calculating

					Needs	Quantisation	Fit
434 tok/s 261–695 · low confidence	B200 NVIDIA	180 GB	8,000 GB/s	Jan 2024	9.1 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
434 tok/s 261–695 · low confidence	B300 NVIDIA	288 GB	8,000 GB/s	Sep 2025	9.1 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
347 tok/s 208–555 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD	288 GB	8,190 GB/s	Jan 2025	9.1 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
347 tok/s 208–555 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD	288 GB	8,190 GB/s	Jan 2025	9.1 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
277 tok/s 166–444 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD	128 GB	6,550 GB/s	Jan 2023	9.1 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
266 tok/s 159–425 · low confidence	H200 NVL NVIDIA	141 GB	4,890 GB/s	Nov 2024	9.1 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
266 tok/s 159–425 · low confidence	H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA	141 GB	4,890 GB/s	Nov 2024	9.1 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
254 tok/s 152–407 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD	256 GB	6,000 GB/s	Oct 2024	9.1 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
226 tok/s 135–361 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD	128 GB	5,325 GB/s	Dec 2023	9.1 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
226 tok/s 135–361 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD	192 GB	5,325 GB/s	Dec 2023	9.1 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
226 tok/s 135–361 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD	192 GB	5,325 GB/s	Dec 2023	9.1 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
214 tok/s 128–342 · low confidence	H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA	94 GB	3,940 GB/s	Mar 2023	9.1 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
182 tok/s 109–292 · low confidence	H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA	96 GB	3,360 GB/s	Mar 2023	9.1 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
182 tok/s 109–292 · low confidence	H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA	80 GB	3,360 GB/s	Oct 2022	9.1 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
182 tok/s 109–292 · low confidence	H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA	94 GB	3,360 GB/s	Mar 2023	9.1 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
182 tok/s 109–292 · low confidence	H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA	96 GB	3,360 GB/s	Mar 2023	9.1 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
182 tok/s 109–292 · low confidence	H800 SXM5 NVIDIA	80 GB	3,360 GB/s	Mar 2023	9.1 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
144 tok/s 87–231 · low confidence	CMP 170HX 8 GB NVIDIA	8 GB	1,490 GB/s	Sep 2021	6.3 GB	Q5_K_M	Tight
139 tok/s 83–222 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD	128 GB	3,280 GB/s	Nov 2021	9.1 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
139 tok/s 83–222 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD	128 GB	3,280 GB/s	Nov 2021	9.1 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
123 tok/s 74–197 · low confidence	CMP 170HX 10 GB NVIDIA	10 GB	1,560 GB/s	Sep 2021	7.2 GB	Q6_K	Comfortable
116 tok/s 69–185 · low confidence	Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel	128 GB	3,280 GB/s	Jan 2023	9.1 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
113 tok/s 68–181 · low confidence	Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel	128 GB	3,210 GB/s	Jan 2023	9.1 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
111 tok/s 66–177 · low confidence	A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA	80 GB	2,040 GB/s	Nov 2020	9.1 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
111 tok/s 66–177 · low confidence	A100X NVIDIA	80 GB	2,040 GB/s	Jun 2021	9.1 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable

Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.

On record

Full specification

Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.

Origin

Who built this model, where, and when it was published.

Organisation: LG AI Research
Organisation type: Industry
Country: Korea (Republic of)
Published: 16 March 2025
Authors: LG AI Research, Kyunghoon Bae, Eunbi Choi, Kibong Choi, Stanley Jungkyu Choi, Yemuk Choi, Seokhee Hong, Junwon Hwang, Hyojin Jeon, Kijeong Jeon, Gerrard Jeongwon Jo, Hyunjik Jo, Jiyeon Jung, Hyosang Kim, Joonkee Kim, Seonghwan Kim, Soyeon Kim, Sunkyoung Kim, Yireun Kim, Yongil Kim, Youchul Kim, Edward Hwayoung Lee, Haeju Lee, Honglak Lee, Jinsik Lee, Kyungmin Lee, Sangha Park, Yongmin Park, Sihoon…

What it does

The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.

Domain: Language
Task: Language modeling/generation, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning, Code generation
Base model: EXAONE 3.5 7.8B

Size

How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.

Parameters: 7.8B
Training data: 12,000,000,000 tokens

Training compute

The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.

Training compute: 4.2 × 10²³ FLOP
How it was established: Reported,Operation counting
Fine-tuning compute: 1.7 × 10²¹ FLOP

The training run

What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.

Training hardware: NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB
Cloud vendor: Google Cloud

Availability

Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.

Weights: Open — downloadable
Model access: Open weights (non-commercial)
Training code: Unreleased
Hugging Face: LGAI-EXAONE

How it is classified

Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.

Likely above 10²³ FLOP: Yes
Record confidence: Confident

Sources

Where this record came from and when it was last checked.

Reference: EXAONE Deep: LLMs with Enhanced Reasoning Performance
Last updated: 28 November 2025

The extremes

The ten fastest GPUs that run EXAONE Deep 7.8B

Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.

The smallest GPUs that still run EXAONE Deep 7.8B

The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.

What the numbers mean

Hardware requirements in practice

Minimum card

Quadro 6000

Memory needed

5.0 GB

Fastest

434 tok/s

EXAONE Deep 7.8B is small enough at 7.8B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 582 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.

The entry point is the Quadro 6000: 6 GB of memory, IQ4_XS compression, roughly 16.3 tokens per second.

The quickest result comes from a B200 at around 434 tokens per second — its 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth is what buys that.

What this model is

EXAONE Deep 7.8B was published by LG AI Research, in Korea (Republic of), in March 2025. The organisation is categorised as industry.

It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling/generation, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning, Code generation.

It is derived from EXAONE 3.5 7.8B rather than trained from scratch, which is the usual way a specialised model is produced.

The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached. It is published under the LGAI-EXAONE organisation on Hugging Face.

What decides the speed

Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range is about 24.4 tokens per second, and 551 of them clear the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed.

It is a dense model, so every parameter is read for every token produced. That makes speed track memory bandwidth almost exactly — a card with twice the bandwidth generates roughly twice as fast.

Without the attention layout on record, the memory column is an approximation. It is close enough to choose hardware by, and least reliable at long context.

Training and provenance

The training run consumed about 4.2 × 10²³ FLOP, on NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB. That figure describes the cost of creating it and has no bearing on how quickly it generates text.

Around 12,000,000,000 tokens went into training it.

Step by step

How to choose a GPU for EXAONE Deep 7.8B

The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.

01

Start from the memory column

Every card here has been checked against EXAONE Deep 7.8B — around 5.0 GB at IQ4_XS. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
02

Set the context length you will work at

Longer conversations cost memory on top of what the weights need. Move the slider to your real working length before trusting any row for EXAONE Deep 7.8B.
03

Choose how far you will compress it

The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy of EXAONE Deep 7.8B — IQ4_XS on the smallest card that fits. Set a floor to hold the comparison at one level.
04

Compare tokens per second, not specifications

The speed ordering for EXAONE Deep 7.8B is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 434 tok/s.
05

Look at the headroom, not just the fit

Tight means EXAONE Deep 7.8B loads and works, with no room to raise the context later. Comfortable means you can. The difference matters more than a few tokens per second.
06

Check the card from the other side

Each card page repeats this sweep for every model we hold. It answers what else the hardware is good for, beyond EXAONE Deep 7.8B.

Answers

EXAONE Deep 7.8B — common questions

What is EXAONE Deep 7.8B used for?

EXAONE Deep 7.8B works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling/generation, Question answering, Quantitative reasoning, Code generation. A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.

Where can I download EXAONE Deep 7.8B?

Its weights are published under the LGAI-EXAONE organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.

How much compute was used to train EXAONE Deep 7.8B?

Around 4.2 × 10²³ FLOP, on NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.

Can I run EXAONE Deep 7.8B if it does not fit in my GPU?

Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part in system memory drags the whole thing down — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 0.9 GB. Our figures for EXAONE Deep 7.8B assume it is fully resident.

Would two GPUs run EXAONE Deep 7.8B faster?

A second card roughly doubles the memory available but not the generation rate. With 582 cards already able to run EXAONE Deep 7.8B alone, the case for pairing is weak.

Why does the quantisation differ between cards for EXAONE Deep 7.8B?

Each card is shown running the least-compressed copy it can hold, and EXAONE Deep 7.8B appears at 4 different compression levels across the cards that fit it. Bigger cards get the more accurate version.

How accurate are these EXAONE Deep 7.8B speed estimates?

Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 261–695 tok/s on the B200 rather than a single number.

What GPU do I need to run EXAONE Deep 7.8B?

The smallest card in our catalogue that holds EXAONE Deep 7.8B is the Quadro 6000, with 6 GB of memory. It runs the model at IQ4_XS using about 5.0 GB, and produces roughly 16.3 tokens per second. 582 cards in total can run it.

How fast is EXAONE Deep 7.8B on a GPU?

It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 434 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 551 of the cards that can run EXAONE Deep 7.8B clear that.

How much VRAM does EXAONE Deep 7.8B need?

About 5.0 GB at IQ4_XS compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.

Can I run EXAONE Deep 7.8B on a 8 GB GPU?

Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q5_K_M, using about 6.3 GB and generating roughly 144 tokens per second — a tight fit.

Can I run EXAONE Deep 7.8B on a 12 GB GPU?

Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 9.1 GB and generating roughly 49.5 tokens per second — a tight fit.

Can I run EXAONE Deep 7.8B on a 16 GB GPU?

Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 9.1 GB and generating roughly 61.4 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.

Can I run EXAONE Deep 7.8B on a 24 GB GPU?

Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 9.1 GB and generating roughly 72.8 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.

Is EXAONE Deep 7.8B open source?

Its weights are published, so EXAONE Deep 7.8B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.

How many parameters does EXAONE Deep 7.8B have?

EXAONE Deep 7.8B has 7.8B parameters. 7.8B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.

Who created EXAONE Deep 7.8B?

EXAONE Deep 7.8B was published by LG AI Research, based in Korea (Republic of), categorised as industry.

When was EXAONE Deep 7.8B released?

EXAONE Deep 7.8B was published in March 2025.

Source

Original publication

Record last updated 28 November 2025

The other direction

Looking at it from the other side?

This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.

All AI models