OLMo 2 32B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
RTX A4500
20 GB · Q3_K_M · 22.9 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
106 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run OLMo 2 32B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
132 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
106
tok/s
64–169 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
106
tok/s
64–169 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
84.6
tok/s
51–135 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
84.6
tok/s
51–135 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
67.6
tok/s
41–108 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
64.7
tok/s
39–104 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
64.7
tok/s
39–104 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
61.9
tok/s
37–99 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
55.0
tok/s
33–88 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
55.0
tok/s
33–88 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
55.0
tok/s
33–88 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
52.2
tok/s
31–83 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
44.5
tok/s
27–71 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
44.5
tok/s
27–71 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
44.5
tok/s
27–71 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
44.5
tok/s
27–71 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
44.5
tok/s
27–71 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
40.9
tok/s
25–66 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 NVIDIA | 24 GB | 1,340 GB/s | Aug 2025 | 20.1 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
37.3
tok/s
22–60 · low confidence |
A30X NVIDIA | 24 GB | 1,220 GB/s | Apr 2021 | 20.1 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
36.0
tok/s
22–58 · low confidence |
DRIVE A100 PROD NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 27.5 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
36.0
tok/s
22–58 · low confidence |
GRID A100A NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 27.5 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
34.4
tok/s
21–55 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,790 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 27.5 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
34.4
tok/s
21–55 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 D NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,790 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 27.5 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
33.9
tok/s
20–54 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
33.9
tok/s
20–54 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 35.0 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Allen Institute for AI
- Organisation type
- Research collective
- Country
- United States of America
- Published
- 13 March 2025
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Question answering
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 32B
- Training data
- 4,000,000,000,000 tokens
- Epochs
- 1.5
32B
"It is trained up to 6T tokens and post-trained using Tulu 3.1." "OLMo 2 32B is trained for 1.5 epochs, up to 6T tokens" Pretraining Stage 1 (OLMo-Mix-1124) 6T tokens ( = 1.5 epochs) Pretraining Stage 2 (Dolmino-Mix-1124) 100B tokens (3 runs) 300B tokens (1 run) merged Post-training (Tulu 3 SFT OLMo mix) SFT + DPO + PPO (preference mix)
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 1.3 × 10²⁴ FLOP
- How it was established
- Reported
first table here: https://allenai.org/blog/olmo2-32B
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB
- Hardware utilisation
- MFU 38.0%
"Training infrastructure: OLMo 2 32B was trained on Augusta, a 160 node AI Hypercomputer provided by Google Cloud Engine. Each node has 8 H100 GPUs, and the nodes are connected with GPUDirect-TCPXO interconnect. Over the course of the training run, we reached performance of over 1800 tokens per second per GPU (~38% MFU)."
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Open source
- Hugging Face
- allenai
Apache 2.0 https://huggingface.co/allenai/OLMo-2-0325-32B (base) allenai/OLMo-2-0325-32B-Instruct (base+SFT+DPO+RVLR) Apache 2.0 https://github.com/allenai/OLMo-core
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- OLMo 2 32B: First fully open model to outperform GPT 3.5 and GPT 4o mini
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run OLMo 2 32B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 106 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 106 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 84.6 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 84.6 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 67.6 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 64.7 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 64.7 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 61.9 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 55.0 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 55.0 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run OLMo 2 32B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 RTX 4000 Ada Generation 20 GB · needs 16.3 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 12.9 tok/s
- 02 RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 20 GB · needs 16.3 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 10.0 tok/s
- 03 Radeon RX 7900 XT 20 GB · needs 16.3 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 22.3 tok/s
- 04 A10M 20 GB · needs 16.3 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 17.9 tok/s
- 05 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20 GB 20 GB · needs 16.3 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 27.2 tok/s
- 06 RTX A4500 20 GB · needs 16.3 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 22.9 tok/s
- 07 Arc Pro B60 24 GB · needs 20.1 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 9.1 tok/s
- 08 GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 24 GB · needs 20.1 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 40.9 tok/s
- 09 RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 24 GB · needs 20.1 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 13.2 tok/s
- 10 GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile 24 GB · needs 20.1 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 27.4 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What it takes to run this model
Minimum card
RTX A4500
Memory needed
16.3 GB
Fastest
106 tok/s
With 32B parameters, OLMo 2 32B lands in the range a serious desktop card can handle once the weights are compressed. 132 of the cards we track can run it.
The smallest card that holds it is the RTX A4500 with 20 GB, running it at Q3_K_M and producing around 22.9 tokens per second.
A B200 is the fastest we calculate for it: about 106 tokens per second, from 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
About this model
OLMo 2 32B was published by Allen Institute for AI, in United States of America, in March 2025. research collective is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Language, and is recorded as doing language modeling/generation, Question answering.
Because its weights were released, nothing about running it depends on a provider staying available — it is yours once downloaded. It is published under the allenai organisation on Hugging Face.
How fast it runs, and why
Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range is about 20.7 tokens per second, and 103 of them clear the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed.
Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.
Its internal architecture is not on file, so memory is approximated from the parameter count and marked accordingly. Expect the real figure to differ, more so at long context.
What went into building it
Producing it required around 1.3 × 10²⁴ FLOP of arithmetic, on NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB, which is a statement about the training budget rather than about inference.
The training set ran to roughly 4,000,000,000,000 tokens.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for OLMo 2 32B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start from the memory column
The table lists every card that can hold OLMo 2 32B — around 16.3 GB at Q3_K_M. That figure, not the card's headline performance, is what decides whether it runs.
-
02
Decide how long your conversations run
Set the context to what you will actually use. The cache grows with the conversation, and it is the usual reason OLMo 2 32B stops fitting a card that seemed fine.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
The quantisation column varies by card, because a bigger card holds a more accurate copy of OLMo 2 32B — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Set a floor to hold the comparison at one level.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
The speed ordering for OLMo 2 32B is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 106 tok/s.
-
05
Check the fit verdict before buying
Tight means OLMo 2 32B loads and works, with no room to raise the context later. Comfortable means you can. The difference matters more than a few tokens per second.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. Worth a look before buying for OLMo 2 32B alone — a card is usually bought for more than one model.
Answers
OLMo 2 32B — common questions
Can I run OLMo 2 32B if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part in system memory drags the whole thing down — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 5.7 GB. Our figures for OLMo 2 32B assume it is fully resident.
Would two GPUs run OLMo 2 32B faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed. That matters for OLMo 2 32B only if one card cannot hold it — 132 can, so a second adds little.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for OLMo 2 32B?
Each card is shown running the least-compressed copy it can hold, and OLMo 2 32B appears at 5 different compression levels across the cards that fit it. Bigger cards get the more accurate version.
How accurate are these OLMo 2 32B speed estimates?
They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range — 64–169 tok/s on the B200, for instance. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
What GPU do I need to run OLMo 2 32B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds OLMo 2 32B is the RTX A4500, with 20 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 16.3 GB, and produces roughly 22.9 tokens per second. 132 cards in total can run it.
How fast is OLMo 2 32B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 106 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 103 of the cards that can run OLMo 2 32B clear that.
How much VRAM does OLMo 2 32B need?
About 16.3 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run OLMo 2 32B on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q4_K_M, using about 20.1 GB and generating roughly 40.9 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Is OLMo 2 32B open source?
Its weights are published, so OLMo 2 32B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does OLMo 2 32B have?
OLMo 2 32B has 32B parameters. 32B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created OLMo 2 32B?
OLMo 2 32B was published by Allen Institute for AI, based in United States of America, categorised as research collective.
When was OLMo 2 32B released?
OLMo 2 32B was published in March 2025.
What is OLMo 2 32B used for?
OLMo 2 32B works in Language, and is recorded as handling language modeling/generation, Question answering. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.
Where can I download OLMo 2 32B?
Its weights are published under the allenai organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
How much compute was used to train OLMo 2 32B?
Around 1.3 × 10²⁴ FLOP, on NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.