Eagle 2 TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Quadro 6000
6 GB · Q3_K_M · 15.6 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
379 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Eagle 2?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
582 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
379
tok/s
228–607 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
379
tok/s
228–607 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
303
tok/s
182–485 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
303
tok/s
182–485 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
242
tok/s
145–388 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
232
tok/s
139–371 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
232
tok/s
139–371 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
222
tok/s
133–355 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
197
tok/s
118–315 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
197
tok/s
118–315 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
197
tok/s
118–315 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
187
tok/s
112–299 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
159
tok/s
96–255 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
159
tok/s
96–255 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
159
tok/s
96–255 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
159
tok/s
96–255 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
159
tok/s
96–255 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
126
tok/s
76–202 · low confidence |
CMP 170HX 8 GB NVIDIA | 8 GB | 1,490 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 7.1 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
121
tok/s
73–194 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
121
tok/s
73–194 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
108
tok/s
65–172 · low confidence |
CMP 170HX 10 GB NVIDIA | 10 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 8.2 GB | Q6_K | Tight |
|
101
tok/s
61–162 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
99.0
tok/s
59–158 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
96.8
tok/s
58–155 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
96.8
tok/s
58–155 · low confidence |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 10.3 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- NVIDIA,Nanjing University,Tsinghua University,Hong Kong Polytechnic University,Johns Hopkins University,New York University (NYU)
- Organisation type
- Industry,Academia,Academia,Academia,Academia,Academia
- Country
- United States of America, China, Hong Kong
- Published
- 20 January 2025
- Authors
- Zhiqi Li, Guo Chen, Shilong Liu, Shihao Wang, Vibashan VS, Yishen Ji, Shiyi Lan, Hao Zhang, Yilin Zhao, Subhashree Radhakrishnan, Nadine Chang, Karan Sapra, Amala Sanjay Deshmukh, Tuomas Rintamaki, Matthieu Le, Ilia Karmanov, Lukas Voegtle, Philipp Fischer, De-An Huang, Timo Roman, Tong Lu, Jose M. Alvarez, Bryan Catanzaro, Jan Kautz, Andrew Tao, Guilin Liu, Zhiding Yu
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Vision, Robotics, Language
- Base model
- Qwen2.5-7B
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 8.9B
- Training data
- tokens
Table 4 https://huggingface.co/nvidia/Eagle2-9B "8.93B params"
Table 4:
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 4.7 × 10²² FLOP
Appendix A. Compute: "We show our training resource for Eagle2-9B in Tab. A. In actual development, we rarely iterate the Stage-1 model. Usually, we iterate Stage-1.5 once after iterating Stage-2 >10 times." Assume ">10 times" -> 12 Assume "H100" -> NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB Assume bf16 Assume 0.4 utilization (NVIDIA in-house) H100 SXM5 performance = 989400000000000 FLOP/s = 9.894e14 FLOP/s Stage 1: (H100 * 128) * (2.5 hr * 1) Stage 1.5: (H100 * 256) * (28 hr * 2) Stage 2: (H100 * 256) * (…
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB
- Chips used
- 256
- Wall-clock time
- 131 hours
- Power draw
- 352.1 kW
Appendix A. Compute: "We show our training resource for Eagle2-9B in Tab. A. In actual development, we rarely iterate the Stage-1 model. Usually, we iterate Stage-1.5 once after iterating Stage-2 >10 times. Assume ">10 times" -> 12 Stage 1.0: 2.5 hr * 1 Stage 1.5 28 hr * 2 Stage 2.0: 6 hr * 12 (2.5 hr * 1) + (28 hr * 2) + (6 hr * 12) = 130.5 hr
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (non-commercial)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- nvidia
https://huggingface.co/nvidia/Eagle2-9B "Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0" Apache 2.0 for code https://github.com/NVlabs/EAGLE
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Why it is tracked
- SOTA improvement
- Record confidence
- Confident
- Citations
- 57
Figure 1: "Overview of Eagle2-9B’s result across different multimodal benchmarks, in comparison to state-of-the-art open-source and commercial frontier models." Claim SOTA on OCRBench, InfoVQA, ChartQA (Test), MathVista, AI2D (Test), MMStar (relative to the selected open-source + commercial frontier models) Todo: check Table 7 to confirm they didn't just omit larger models from Figure 1 VLM backbone of GR00T N1
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Eagle 2: Building Post-Training Data Strategies from Scratch for Frontier Vision-Language Models
- Last updated
- 25 May 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Eagle 2
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 379 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 379 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 303 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 303 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 242 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 232 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 232 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 222 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 197 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 197 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Eagle 2
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation 6 GB · needs 5.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 24.6 tok/s
- 02 GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 6 GB · needs 5.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 21.5 tok/s
- 03 Arc A380M 6 GB · needs 5.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 15.5 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q 6 GB · needs 5.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 24.6 tok/s
- 05 GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile 6 GB · needs 5.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 24.6 tok/s
- 06 Data Center GPU Flex 140 6 GB · needs 5.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 15.5 tok/s
- 07 Arc Pro A40 6 GB · needs 5.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 16.0 tok/s
- 08 Arc Pro A50 6 GB · needs 5.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 16.0 tok/s
- 09 GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB 6 GB · needs 5.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 16.9 tok/s
- 10 GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB 6 GB · needs 5.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 21.5 tok/s
What the numbers mean
Hardware requirements in practice
Minimum card
Quadro 6000
Memory needed
5.1 GB
Fastest
379 tok/s
Eagle 2 is small enough at 8.9B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 582 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
The entry point is the Quadro 6000: 6 GB of memory, Q3_K_M compression, roughly 15.6 tokens per second.
At the other end, a B200 generates roughly 379 tokens per second on it, on the strength of 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
What this model is
Eagle 2 was published by NVIDIA,Nanjing University,Tsinghua University,Hong Kong Polytechnic University,Johns Hopkins University,New York University (NYU), in United States of America, in January 2025. industry,Academia,Academia,Academia,Academia,Academia is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Vision, Robotics, Language.
Its starting point was Qwen2.5-7B — most models at this scale are adapted from an existing base rather than built from nothing.
The weights being open is what puts this page in the calculator rather than only in the catalogue: it is a model you can actually hold. It is published under the nvidia organisation on Hugging Face.
What decides the speed
Half the cards that hold it manage more than 21.3 tokens per second, and 541 exceed reading speed outright.
Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.
Its internal architecture is not on file, so memory is approximated from the parameter count and marked accordingly. Expect the real figure to differ, more so at long context.
How it was trained
Producing it required around 4.7 × 10²² FLOP of arithmetic, on NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB, which is a statement about the training budget rather than about inference.
The reason it appears in this catalogue at all is sOTA improvement.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Eagle 2
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Check what it needs before anything else
Every card here has been checked against Eagle 2 — around 5.1 GB at Q3_K_M. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Match the context to your actual use
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect: at long context Eagle 2 can slip off a card that handles short questions easily.
-
03
Decide how much compression you will accept
Compression is what makes Eagle 2 fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. A minimum quality removes the ones that go too far.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for Eagle 2. It will not match a gaming ordering — generation is bound by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 379 tok/s.
-
05
Look at the headroom, not just the fit
A tight fit runs Eagle 2 but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation; comfortable has headroom. If you expect to grow the context, buy for comfortable.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Each card page repeats this sweep for every model we hold. It answers what else the hardware is good for, beyond Eagle 2.
Answers
Eagle 2 — common questions
Can I run Eagle 2 on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q5_K_M, using about 7.1 GB and generating roughly 126 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run Eagle 2 on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 10.3 GB and generating roughly 43.3 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run Eagle 2 on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 10.3 GB and generating roughly 53.6 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run Eagle 2 on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 10.3 GB and generating roughly 63.6 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is Eagle 2 open source?
Its weights are published, so Eagle 2 can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does Eagle 2 have?
Eagle 2 has 8.9B parameters. Table 4 https://huggingface.co/nvidia/Eagle2-9B "8.93B params". That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created Eagle 2?
Eagle 2 was published by NVIDIA,Nanjing University,Tsinghua University,Hong Kong Polytechnic University,Johns Hopkins University,New York University (NYU), based in United States of America, categorised as industry,Academia,Academia,Academia,Academia,Academia.
When was Eagle 2 released?
Eagle 2 was published in January 2025.
What is Eagle 2 used for?
Eagle 2 works in Vision, Robotics, Language. A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.
Where can I download Eagle 2?
Its weights are published under the nvidia organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
How much compute was used to train Eagle 2?
Around 4.7 × 10²² FLOP, on NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run Eagle 2 if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part in system memory drags the whole thing down — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 1.6 GB. Our figures for Eagle 2 assume it is fully resident.
Would two GPUs run Eagle 2 faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed. That matters for Eagle 2 only if one card cannot hold it — 582 can, so a second adds little.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Eagle 2?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard Eagle 2 has to be squeezed — 4 distinct levels appear in the table above. Set a minimum quality to compare at one.
How accurate are these Eagle 2 speed estimates?
These are estimates with real error bars. The fastest result here, 228–607 tok/s on the B200, could reasonably land anywhere in its published range depending on which runtime you use.
What GPU do I need to run Eagle 2?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Eagle 2 is the Quadro 6000, with 6 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 5.1 GB, and produces roughly 15.6 tokens per second. 582 cards in total can run it.
How fast is Eagle 2 on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 379 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 541 of the cards that can run Eagle 2 clear that.
How much VRAM does Eagle 2 need?
About 5.1 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.