OLMo 2 Furious 13B TPS calculator

Open weights Allen Institute for AI,University of Washington,New York University (NYU) 13B parameters December 2024

Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.

Calculated for this model

509 cards that can run it

818 cards we hold specifications for

Smallest card that fits

Xeon Phi 5110P

8 GB · Q3_K_M · 18.3 tok/s

Fastest card

B200

261 tok/s · 180 GB

Which GPUs can run OLMo 2 Furious 13B?

Set the inputs, read the answer

Context length tokens

A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.

Minimum quality

Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.

Search cards

Card memory

Also show cards that cannot run it

509 cards match

Calculating

					Needs	Quantisation	Fit
261 tok/s 156–417 · low confidence	B200 NVIDIA	180 GB	8,000 GB/s	Jan 2024	14.6 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
261 tok/s 156–417 · low confidence	B300 NVIDIA	288 GB	8,000 GB/s	Sep 2025	14.6 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
208 tok/s 125–333 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD	288 GB	8,190 GB/s	Jan 2025	14.6 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
208 tok/s 125–333 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD	288 GB	8,190 GB/s	Jan 2025	14.6 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
166 tok/s 100–266 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD	128 GB	6,550 GB/s	Jan 2023	14.6 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
159 tok/s 96–255 · low confidence	H200 NVL NVIDIA	141 GB	4,890 GB/s	Nov 2024	14.6 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
159 tok/s 96–255 · low confidence	H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA	141 GB	4,890 GB/s	Nov 2024	14.6 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
152 tok/s 91–244 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD	256 GB	6,000 GB/s	Oct 2024	14.6 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
135 tok/s 81–217 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD	128 GB	5,325 GB/s	Dec 2023	14.6 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
135 tok/s 81–217 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD	192 GB	5,325 GB/s	Dec 2023	14.6 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
135 tok/s 81–217 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD	192 GB	5,325 GB/s	Dec 2023	14.6 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
131 tok/s 79–210 · low confidence	CMP 170HX 8 GB NVIDIA	8 GB	1,490 GB/s	Sep 2021	7.1 GB	Q3_K_M	Tight
128 tok/s 77–205 · low confidence	H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA	94 GB	3,940 GB/s	Mar 2023	14.6 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
117 tok/s 70–188 · low confidence	CMP 170HX 10 GB NVIDIA	10 GB	1,560 GB/s	Sep 2021	8.6 GB	Q4_K_M	Tight
109 tok/s 66–175 · low confidence	H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA	96 GB	3,360 GB/s	Mar 2023	14.6 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
109 tok/s 66–175 · low confidence	H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA	80 GB	3,360 GB/s	Oct 2022	14.6 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
109 tok/s 66–175 · low confidence	H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA	94 GB	3,360 GB/s	Mar 2023	14.6 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
109 tok/s 66–175 · low confidence	H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA	96 GB	3,360 GB/s	Mar 2023	14.6 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
109 tok/s 66–175 · low confidence	H800 SXM5 NVIDIA	80 GB	3,360 GB/s	Mar 2023	14.6 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
83.4 tok/s 50–133 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD	128 GB	3,280 GB/s	Nov 2021	14.6 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
83.4 tok/s 50–133 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD	128 GB	3,280 GB/s	Nov 2021	14.6 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
69.5 tok/s 42–111 · low confidence	Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel	128 GB	3,280 GB/s	Jan 2023	14.6 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
68.0 tok/s 41–109 · low confidence	Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel	128 GB	3,210 GB/s	Jan 2023	14.6 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
67.5 tok/s 41–108 · low confidence	RTX A5000-8Q NVIDIA	8 GB	768 GB/s	Apr 2021	7.1 GB	Q3_K_M	Tight
66.5 tok/s 40–106 · low confidence	A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA	80 GB	2,040 GB/s	Nov 2020	14.6 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable

Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.

On record

Full specification

Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.

Origin

Who built this model, where, and when it was published.

Organisation: Allen Institute for AI,University of Washington,New York University (NYU)
Organisation type: Research collective,Academia,Academia
Country: United States of America
Published: 31 December 2024
Authors: Team OLMo, Pete Walsh, Luca Soldaini, Dirk Groeneveld, Kyle Lo, Shane Arora, Akshita Bhagia, Yuling Gu, Shengyi Huang, Matt Jordan, Nathan Lambert, Dustin Schwenk, Oyvind Tafjord, Taira Anderson, David Atkinson, Faeze Brahman, Christopher Clark, Pradeep Dasigi, Nouha Dziri, Michal Guerquin, Hamish Ivison, Pang Wei Koh, Jiacheng Liu, Saumya Malik, William Merrill, Lester James V. Miranda, Jacob Mor…

What it does

The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.

Domain: Language
Task: Language modeling/generation, Question answering

Size

How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.

Parameters: 13B
Training data: tokens
Epochs: 1.2

Training compute

The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.

Training compute: 4.6 × 10²³ FLOP
How it was established: Reported,Operation counting

The training run

What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.

Training hardware: NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB
Chip-hours: 1,280

Availability

Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.

Weights: Open — downloadable
Model access: Open weights (unrestricted)
Training code: Open source
Hugging Face: allenai

How it is classified

Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.

Likely above 10²³ FLOP: Yes
Record confidence: Confident

Sources

Where this record came from and when it was last checked.

Reference: 2 OLMo 2 Furious
Last updated: 28 November 2025

The extremes

The ten fastest GPUs that run OLMo 2 Furious 13B

Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.

The smallest GPUs that still run OLMo 2 Furious 13B

The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.

What the numbers mean

What you need to run it

Minimum card

Xeon Phi 5110P

Memory needed

7.1 GB

Fastest

261 tok/s

OLMo 2 Furious 13B reaches a parameter count of 13B. That is small enough that hardware is rarely the obstacle, including on cards several years old. The number of cards we track that can run it: 509.

The least hardware that works is Xeon Phi 5110P, with a memory capacity of 8 GB, running it at a compression of Q3_K_M and producing around 18.3 tokens per second.

The quickest result comes from B200, generating roughly 261 tokens per second on the strength of a memory bandwidth of 8,000 GB/s.

Background

OLMo 2 Furious 13B was published by Allen Institute for AI,University of Washington,New York University (NYU), in the country recorded as United States of America, during December 2024. The publishing organisation is categorised as research collective,Academia,Academia.

It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as performing the task of language modeling/generation, Question answering.

Published weights mean the model runs on your machine rather than someone else's, which is what makes the hardware question below answerable at all. On Hugging Face it is published under the organisation allenai.

Reading the throughput figures

The median result is around 21.2 tokens per second. Producing text faster than most people read it: 459 of them.

Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.

Memory here is estimated from size rather than computed from the architecture, which is not recorded for this model — the numbers are indicative rather than exact.

Training and provenance

Producing it required arithmetic totalling around 4.6 × 10²³ FLOP, on hardware recorded as NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB. That figure measures what producing the model cost, and has no bearing on how fast it answers.

Step by step

How to choose a GPU for OLMo 2 Furious 13B

The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.

01

Check what it needs before anything else

Start from what it actually needs, which is the requirement of OLMo 2 Furious 13B, needing around 7.1 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M. No amount of processing power compensates for a card that cannot hold it.
02

Decide how long your conversations run

The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect, because at long context a card that handles short questions easily can be dropped by OLMo 2 Furious 13B.
03

Choose how far you will compress it

Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold, reaching a compression of Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a minimum quality drops the cards that only manage it by squeezing further than you would want, and holds the comparison at one level.
04

Compare tokens per second, not specifications

The speed ordering is effectively an ordering by memory bandwidth, for OLMo 2 Furious 13B. It will not match a gaming ordering, because generation is bound by memory bandwidth. The card topping the list is B200, at 261 tok/s.
05

Look at the headroom, not just the fit

A tight fit runs, but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation, in the case of OLMo 2 Furious 13B. Comfortable means you can grow the context later. That difference matters more than a few tokens per second, so buy for comfortable if you expect to.
06

See what else that card runs

Each card page repeats this sweep for every model we hold, answering what else the hardware is good for beyond OLMo 2 Furious 13B.

Answers

OLMo 2 Furious 13B — common questions

OLMo 2 Furious 13B— is it open source?

Its weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.

OLMo 2 Furious 13B— how many parameters does it have?

It has a parameter count of 13B. 13B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.

OLMo 2 Furious 13B— who created it?

It was published by Allen Institute for AI,University of Washington,New York University (NYU), based in United States of America, an organisation categorised as research collective,Academia,Academia.

OLMo 2 Furious 13B— when was it released?

It was published in December 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.

OLMo 2 Furious 13B— what is it used for?

It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as handling the task of language modeling/generation, Question answering. A model can carry several of each, so these are the areas it was built for rather than a limit on what it will attempt.

OLMo 2 Furious 13B— where can I download it?

Its weights are published on Hugging Face, under the organisation allenai. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.

OLMo 2 Furious 13B— how much compute was used to train it?

Training consumed around 4.6 × 10²³ FLOP, on hardware recorded as NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.

OLMo 2 Furious 13B— can I run it if it does not fit in my GPU?

It can be split between the card and system memory, but it generates painfully slowly that way. The nearest miss we calculate falls short by 3.2 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is resident on the card.

OLMo 2 Furious 13B— would two GPUs run it faster?

A second card roughly doubles the memory available but not the generation rate. The number already able to run it alone: 509. So a second card is rarely the answer here.

OLMo 2 Furious 13B— why does the quantisation differ between cards?

Each card is shown running the least-compressed copy it can hold. The number of distinct compression levels across the cards that fit it: 5. Bigger cards get the more accurate version, and the quality floor above pins the comparison to one level.

OLMo 2 Furious 13B— how accurate are these speed estimates?

Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked, which is why each is published as a range rather than a single number. One example: 156–417 tok/s on B200. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.

OLMo 2 Furious 13B— what GPU do I need to run it?

The smallest card in our catalogue that holds it is Xeon Phi 5110P, with a memory capacity of 8 GB. It runs the model at a compression of Q3_K_M using about 7.1 GB, and produces roughly 18.3 tokens per second. The number of cards able to run it in total: 509.

OLMo 2 Furious 13B— how fast is it on a GPU?

It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is B200, at about 261 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and the number of cards clearing that: 459.

OLMo 2 Furious 13B— how much VRAM does it need?

It needs about 7.1 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.

OLMo 2 Furious 13B— can I run it on a GPU holding 8 GB?

Yes. The card CMP 170HX 8 GB, holding 8 GB, runs it at a compression of Q3_K_M, using about 7.1 GB and generating roughly 131 tokens per second. The fit is tight.

OLMo 2 Furious 13B— can I run it on a GPU holding 12 GB?

Yes. The card GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, holding 12 GB, runs it at a compression of Q5_K_M, using about 10.1 GB and generating roughly 53.1 tokens per second. The fit is tight.

OLMo 2 Furious 13B— can I run it on a GPU holding 16 GB?

Yes. The card Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, holding 16 GB, runs it at a compression of Q6_K, using about 11.6 GB and generating roughly 53.5 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.

OLMo 2 Furious 13B— can I run it on a GPU holding 24 GB?

Yes. The card GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, holding 24 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 14.6 GB and generating roughly 43.7 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.

Source

Original publication

Record last updated 28 November 2025

The other direction

Looking at it from the other side?

This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.

All AI models