EXAONE 3.5 32B TPS calculator

Open weights LG AI Research 32B parameters December 2024

Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.

Calculated for this model

132 cards that can run it

818 cards we hold specifications for

Smallest card that fits

RTX A4500

20 GB · Q3_K_M · 22.9 tok/s

Fastest card

B200

106 tok/s · 180 GB

Which GPUs can run EXAONE 3.5 32B?

Set the inputs, read the answer

Context length tokens

A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.

Minimum quality

Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.

Search cards

Card memory

Also show cards that cannot run it

132 cards match

Calculating

					Needs	Quantisation	Fit
106 tok/s 64–169 · low confidence	B200 NVIDIA	180 GB	8,000 GB/s	Jan 2024	35.0 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
106 tok/s 64–169 · low confidence	B300 NVIDIA	288 GB	8,000 GB/s	Sep 2025	35.0 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
84.6 tok/s 51–135 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD	288 GB	8,190 GB/s	Jan 2025	35.0 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
84.6 tok/s 51–135 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD	288 GB	8,190 GB/s	Jan 2025	35.0 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
67.6 tok/s 41–108 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD	128 GB	6,550 GB/s	Jan 2023	35.0 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
64.7 tok/s 39–104 · low confidence	H200 NVL NVIDIA	141 GB	4,890 GB/s	Nov 2024	35.0 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
64.7 tok/s 39–104 · low confidence	H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA	141 GB	4,890 GB/s	Nov 2024	35.0 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
61.9 tok/s 37–99 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD	256 GB	6,000 GB/s	Oct 2024	35.0 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
55.0 tok/s 33–88 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD	128 GB	5,325 GB/s	Dec 2023	35.0 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
55.0 tok/s 33–88 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD	192 GB	5,325 GB/s	Dec 2023	35.0 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
55.0 tok/s 33–88 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD	192 GB	5,325 GB/s	Dec 2023	35.0 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
52.2 tok/s 31–83 · low confidence	H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA	94 GB	3,940 GB/s	Mar 2023	35.0 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
44.5 tok/s 27–71 · low confidence	H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA	96 GB	3,360 GB/s	Mar 2023	35.0 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
44.5 tok/s 27–71 · low confidence	H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA	80 GB	3,360 GB/s	Oct 2022	35.0 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
44.5 tok/s 27–71 · low confidence	H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA	94 GB	3,360 GB/s	Mar 2023	35.0 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
44.5 tok/s 27–71 · low confidence	H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA	96 GB	3,360 GB/s	Mar 2023	35.0 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
44.5 tok/s 27–71 · low confidence	H800 SXM5 NVIDIA	80 GB	3,360 GB/s	Mar 2023	35.0 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
40.9 tok/s 25–66 · low confidence	GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 NVIDIA	24 GB	1,340 GB/s	Aug 2025	20.1 GB	Q4_K_M	Tight
37.3 tok/s 22–60 · low confidence	A30X NVIDIA	24 GB	1,220 GB/s	Apr 2021	20.1 GB	Q4_K_M	Tight
36.0 tok/s 22–58 · low confidence	DRIVE A100 PROD NVIDIA	32 GB	1,870 GB/s	May 2020	27.5 GB	Q6_K	Tight
36.0 tok/s 22–58 · low confidence	GRID A100A NVIDIA	32 GB	1,870 GB/s	May 2020	27.5 GB	Q6_K	Tight
34.4 tok/s 21–55 · low confidence	GeForce RTX 5090 NVIDIA	32 GB	1,790 GB/s	Jan 2025	27.5 GB	Q6_K	Tight
34.4 tok/s 21–55 · low confidence	GeForce RTX 5090 D NVIDIA	32 GB	1,790 GB/s	Jan 2025	27.5 GB	Q6_K	Tight
33.9 tok/s 20–54 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD	128 GB	3,280 GB/s	Nov 2021	35.0 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable
33.9 tok/s 20–54 · low confidence	Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD	128 GB	3,280 GB/s	Nov 2021	35.0 GB	Q8_0	Comfortable

Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.

On record

Full specification

Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.

Origin

Who built this model, where, and when it was published.

Organisation: LG AI Research
Organisation type: Industry
Country: Korea (Republic of)
Published: 9 December 2024
Authors: Soyoung An, Kyunghoon Bae, Eunbi Choi, Kibong Choi, Stanley Jungkyu Choi, Seokhee Hong, Junwon Hwang, Hyojin Jeon, Gerrard Jeongwon Jo, Hyunjik Jo, Jiyeon Jung, Yountae Jung, Hyosang Kim, Joonkee Kim, Seonghwan Kim, Soyeon Kim, Sunkyoung Kim, Yireun Kim, Yongil Kim, Youchul Kim, Edward Hwayoung Lee, Haeju Lee, Honglak Lee, Jinsik Lee, Kyungmin Lee, Woohyung Lim, Sangha Park, Sooyoun Park, Yongmin …

What it does

The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.

Domain: Language
Task: Language modeling/generation, Question answering, Translation

Size

How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.

Parameters: 32B
Training data: 6,500,000,000,000 tokens

Training compute

The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.

Training compute: 1.3 × 10²⁴ FLOP
How it was established: Reported

Availability

Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.

Weights: Open — downloadable
Model access: Open weights (non-commercial)
Training code: Unreleased
Hugging Face: LGAI-EXAONE

How it is classified

Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.

Likely above 10²³ FLOP: Yes
Why it is tracked: Training cost
Record confidence: Confident

Sources

Where this record came from and when it was last checked.

Reference: EXAONE 3.5: Series of Large Language Models for Real-world Use Cases
Last updated: 18 December 2025

The extremes

The ten fastest GPUs that run EXAONE 3.5 32B

Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.

The smallest GPUs that still run EXAONE 3.5 32B

The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.

What the numbers mean

What you need to run it

Minimum card

RTX A4500

Memory needed

16.3 GB

Fastest

106 tok/s

EXAONE 3.5 32B reaches a parameter count of 32B. That lands in the range a serious desktop card can handle once the weights are compressed. The number of cards we track that can run it: 132.

The least hardware that works is RTX A4500, with a memory capacity of 20 GB, running it at a compression of Q3_K_M and producing around 22.9 tokens per second.

At the other end sits B200, generating roughly 106 tokens per second on the strength of a memory bandwidth of 8,000 GB/s.

About this model

EXAONE 3.5 32B was published by LG AI Research, in the country recorded as Korea (Republic of), during December 2024. The publishing organisation is categorised as industry.

It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as performing the task of language modeling/generation, Question answering, Translation.

The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached. On Hugging Face it is published under the organisation LGAI-EXAONE.

How fast it runs, and why

Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range sits at 20.7 tokens per second. Exceeding reading speed outright: 103 of them.

Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.

Its internal architecture is not on file, so memory is approximated from the parameter count and marked accordingly. Expect the real figure to differ, more so at long context.

How it was trained

Training it took a computation budget of roughly 1.3 × 10²⁴ FLOP. That figure measures what producing the model cost, and has no bearing on how fast it answers.

The training set ran to roughly 6,500,000,000,000 tokens of text.

Its inclusion criterion: training cost.

Step by step

How to choose a GPU for EXAONE 3.5 32B

The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.

01

Start from the memory column

Every card here has been checked against EXAONE 3.5 32B, needing around 16.3 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M. That figure, not the headline performance of a card, is what decides whether it runs.
02

Set the context length you will work at

Longer conversations cost memory on top of what the weights need. Move the slider to your real working length before trusting any row for EXAONE 3.5 32B.
03

Set a quality floor

Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold, reaching a compression of Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a minimum quality drops the cards that only manage it by squeezing further than you would want, and holds the comparison at one level.
04

Compare tokens per second, not specifications

Sort by speed to see how cards rank for EXAONE 3.5 32B. It will not match a gaming ordering, because generation is bound by memory bandwidth. The card topping the list is B200, at 106 tok/s.
05

Look at the headroom, not just the fit

A tight fit runs, but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation, in the case of EXAONE 3.5 32B. Comfortable means you can grow the context later. That difference matters more than a few tokens per second, so buy for comfortable if you expect to.
06

Check the card from the other side

Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. A card is usually bought for more than one model, so it is worth a look before buying for EXAONE 3.5 32B.

Answers

EXAONE 3.5 32B — common questions

EXAONE 3.5 32B— would two GPUs run it faster?

Capacity adds across cards; throughput does not. The number of cards already holding it on their own: 132. So a second card is rarely the answer here.

EXAONE 3.5 32B— why does the quantisation differ between cards?

Each card is shown running the least-compressed copy it can hold. The number of distinct compression levels across the cards that fit it: 5. Bigger cards get the more accurate version, and the quality floor above pins the comparison to one level.

EXAONE 3.5 32B— how accurate are these speed estimates?

Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked, which is why each is published as a range rather than a single number. One example: 64–169 tok/s on B200. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.

EXAONE 3.5 32B— what GPU do I need to run it?

The smallest card in our catalogue that holds it is RTX A4500, with a memory capacity of 20 GB. It runs the model at a compression of Q3_K_M using about 16.3 GB, and produces roughly 22.9 tokens per second. The number of cards able to run it in total: 132.

EXAONE 3.5 32B— how fast is it on a GPU?

It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is B200, at about 106 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and the number of cards clearing that: 103.

EXAONE 3.5 32B— how much VRAM does it need?

It needs about 16.3 GB at a compression of Q3_K_M, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.

EXAONE 3.5 32B— can I run it on a GPU holding 24 GB?

Yes. The card GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, holding 24 GB, runs it at a compression of Q4_K_M, using about 20.1 GB and generating roughly 40.9 tokens per second. The fit is tight.

EXAONE 3.5 32B— is it open source?

Its weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.

EXAONE 3.5 32B— how many parameters does it have?

It has a parameter count of 32B. 32B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.

EXAONE 3.5 32B— who created it?

It was published by LG AI Research, based in Korea (Republic of), an organisation categorised as industry.

EXAONE 3.5 32B— when was it released?

It was published in December 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.

EXAONE 3.5 32B— what is it used for?

It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as handling the task of language modeling/generation, Question answering, Translation. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.

EXAONE 3.5 32B— where can I download it?

Its weights are published on Hugging Face, under the organisation LGAI-EXAONE. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.

EXAONE 3.5 32B— how much compute was used to train it?

Training consumed around 1.3 × 10²⁴ FLOP. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.

EXAONE 3.5 32B— can I run it if it does not fit in my GPU?

Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part held in system memory drags the whole thing down. The nearest miss we calculate falls short by 5.7 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is resident on the card.

Source

Original publication

Record last updated 18 December 2025

The other direction

Looking at it from the other side?

This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.

All AI models