Hunyuan Video TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Xeon Phi 5110P
8 GB · Q3_K_M · 18.3 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
261 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Hunyuan Video?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
509 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
261
tok/s
156–417 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
261
tok/s
156–417 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
208
tok/s
125–333 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
208
tok/s
125–333 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
166
tok/s
100–266 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
159
tok/s
96–255 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
159
tok/s
96–255 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
152
tok/s
91–244 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
135
tok/s
81–217 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
135
tok/s
81–217 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
135
tok/s
81–217 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
131
tok/s
79–210 · low confidence |
CMP 170HX 8 GB NVIDIA | 8 GB | 1,490 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 7.1 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
128
tok/s
77–205 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
117
tok/s
70–188 · low confidence |
CMP 170HX 10 GB NVIDIA | 10 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 8.6 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
109
tok/s
66–175 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
109
tok/s
66–175 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
109
tok/s
66–175 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
109
tok/s
66–175 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
109
tok/s
66–175 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
83.4
tok/s
50–133 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
83.4
tok/s
50–133 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
69.5
tok/s
42–111 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
68.0
tok/s
41–109 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
67.5
tok/s
41–108 · low confidence |
RTX A5000-8Q NVIDIA | 8 GB | 768 GB/s | Apr 2021 | 7.1 GB | Q3_K_M | Tight |
|
66.5
tok/s
40–106 · low confidence |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 14.6 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Tencent
- Organisation type
- Industry
- Country
- China
- Published
- 3 December 2024
- Authors
- Weijie Kong, Qi Tian, Zijian Zhang, Rox Min, Zuozhuo Dai, Jin Zhou, Jiangfeng Xiong, Xin Li, Bo Wu, Jianwei Zhang, Kathrina Wu, Qin Lin, Junkun Yuan, Yanxin Long, Aladdin Wang, Andong Wang, Changlin Li, Duojun Huang, Fang Yang, Hao Tan, Hongmei Wang, Jacob Song, Jiawang Bai, Jianbing Wu, Jinbao Xue, Joey Wang, Kai Wang, Mengyang Liu, Pengyu Li, Shuai Li, Weiyan Wang, Wenqing Yu, Xinchi Deng, Yang …
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Video
- Task
- Video generation, Text-to-video
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 13B
- Training data
- tokens
13b
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- Training compute
- 1.5 × 10²³ FLOP
- How it was established
- Reported,Operation counting
from Figure 10: the optimal model has 13b parameters, 5.8e+07PF (image training) + 7.0e+07PF (video training) of compute and 740B (image tokens) + 928B (video tokens) 5.8e+07PF + 7.0e+07PF = 12.8e+07PF = 12.8*10^7*10^20/(24*3600) = 1.4814815e+23 FLOPs 6ND = 6*13*10^9*(740+928)*10^9 = 1.30104e+23
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Training code
- Unreleased
"THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT DOES NOT APPLY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION, UNITED KINGDOM AND SOUTH KOREA" also requires additional licensing in case of massive commercial use https://huggingface.co/tencent/HunyuanVideo/blob/main/LICENSE the code seems to be just inference code not training code
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Likely above 10²³ FLOP
- Yes
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- HunyuanVideo: A Systematic Framework For Large Video Generative Models
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Hunyuan Video
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 261 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 261 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 208 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 208 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 166 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 159 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 159 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 152 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 135 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 135 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Hunyuan Video
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Radeon RX 7400 8 GB · needs 7.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 19.8 tok/s
- 02 Radeon RX 9060 8 GB · needs 7.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 22.1 tok/s
- 03 GeForce RTX 5050 8 GB · needs 7.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 28.1 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile 8 GB · needs 7.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 33.8 tok/s
- 05 Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB 8 GB · needs 7.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 22.1 tok/s
- 06 GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile 8 GB · needs 7.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 33.8 tok/s
- 07 GeForce RTX 5060 8 GB · needs 7.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 39.4 tok/s
- 08 GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB 8 GB · needs 7.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 39.4 tok/s
- 09 GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile 8 GB · needs 7.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 33.8 tok/s
- 10 Radeon RX 7650 GRE 8 GB · needs 7.1 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 19.8 tok/s
What the numbers mean
The hardware side
Minimum card
Xeon Phi 5110P
Memory needed
7.1 GB
Fastest
261 tok/s
Hunyuan Video is small enough at 13B parameters that hardware is rarely the obstacle — 509 of the cards we track can run it, including cards several years old.
At the low end, a Xeon Phi 5110P handles it — 8 GB, at Q3_K_M, for about 18.3 tokens per second.
At the other end, a B200 generates roughly 261 tokens per second on it, on the strength of 8,000 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
About this model
Hunyuan Video was published by Tencent, in China, in December 2024. industry is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Video, and is recorded as doing video generation, Text-to-video.
Because its weights were released, nothing about running it depends on a provider staying available — it is yours once downloaded.
How fast it runs, and why
Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range is about 21.2 tokens per second, and 459 of them clear the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed.
Being dense, it reads all of itself per token, which is why the ordering by speed below follows the ordering by memory bandwidth so closely.
Without the attention layout on record, the memory column is an approximation. It is close enough to choose hardware by, and least reliable at long context.
How it was trained
The training run consumed about 1.5 × 10²³ FLOP. That figure describes the cost of creating it and has no bearing on how quickly it generates text.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Hunyuan Video
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Read the memory figure first
Every card here has been checked against Hunyuan Video — around 7.1 GB at Q3_K_M. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Match the context to your actual use
Longer conversations cost memory on top of what the weights need. Move the slider to your real working length before trusting any row for Hunyuan Video.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
Each card runs the least-compressed copy it can hold — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. Setting a floor drops the cards that only manage Hunyuan Video by squeezing it further than you would want.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
Ranking by tokens per second for Hunyuan Video follows memory bandwidth, not core counts, which is why the B200 tops it at 261 tok/s.
-
05
Look at the headroom, not just the fit
The fit column separates cards that just manage Hunyuan Video from those with room to spare. Buy for the second if the context might grow.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Each card page repeats this sweep for every model we hold. It answers what else the hardware is good for, beyond Hunyuan Video.
Answers
Hunyuan Video — common questions
How much VRAM does Hunyuan Video need?
About 7.1 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run Hunyuan Video on a 8 GB GPU?
Yes. A CMP 170HX 8 GB with 8 GB runs it at Q3_K_M, using about 7.1 GB and generating roughly 131 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run Hunyuan Video on a 12 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 3080 Ti with 12 GB runs it at Q5_K_M, using about 10.1 GB and generating roughly 53.1 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Can I run Hunyuan Video on a 16 GB GPU?
Yes. A Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB with 16 GB runs it at Q6_K, using about 11.6 GB and generating roughly 53.5 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Can I run Hunyuan Video on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q8_0, using about 14.6 GB and generating roughly 43.7 tokens per second — a comfortable fit.
Is Hunyuan Video open source?
Its weights are published, so Hunyuan Video can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does Hunyuan Video have?
Hunyuan Video has 13B parameters. 13b. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created Hunyuan Video?
Hunyuan Video was published by Tencent, based in China, categorised as industry.
When was Hunyuan Video released?
Hunyuan Video was published in December 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is Hunyuan Video used for?
Hunyuan Video works in Video, and is recorded as handling video generation, Text-to-video. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.
Where can I download Hunyuan Video?
The weights for Hunyuan Video are published, though we do not hold a repository link for it. This site calculates hardware requirements rather than hosting model files.
How much compute was used to train Hunyuan Video?
Around 1.5 × 10²³ FLOP. That measures what producing the model cost and says nothing about how quickly it answers once trained — inference speed comes from memory bandwidth, not from the training budget.
Can I run Hunyuan Video if it does not fit in my GPU?
Partly. Layers that do not fit sit in system memory and run at a fraction of the speed, so a mostly-offloaded Hunyuan Video is rarely worth using — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 3.2 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is on the card.
Would two GPUs run Hunyuan Video faster?
A second card roughly doubles the memory available but not the generation rate. With 509 cards already able to run Hunyuan Video alone, the case for pairing is weak.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Hunyuan Video?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. Across the cards that run Hunyuan Video, 5 compression levels are used; the floor control above pins it to one.
How accurate are these Hunyuan Video speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked. That is why each is published as a range such as 156–417 tok/s on the B200 rather than a single number.
What GPU do I need to run Hunyuan Video?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Hunyuan Video is the Xeon Phi 5110P, with 8 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 7.1 GB, and produces roughly 18.3 tokens per second. 509 cards in total can run it.
How fast is Hunyuan Video on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 261 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 459 of the cards that can run Hunyuan Video clear that.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.