Gemma2 9B CPT Sahabat-AI TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
818 cards we hold specifications for
Smallest card that fits
Xeon Phi 5110P
8 GB · IQ4_XS · 24.0 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
376 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Gemma2 9B CPT Sahabat-AI?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
509 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
376
tok/s
320–452 |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 11.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
376
tok/s
320–452 |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 11.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
301
tok/s
180–481 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 11.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
301
tok/s
180–481 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 11.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
240
tok/s
144–385 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 11.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
230
tok/s
196–276 |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 11.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
230
tok/s
196–276 |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 11.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
220
tok/s
132–352 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 11.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
195
tok/s
117–313 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 11.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
195
tok/s
117–313 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 11.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
195
tok/s
117–313 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 11.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
185
tok/s
158–222 |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 11.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
172
tok/s
146–207 |
CMP 170HX 8 GB NVIDIA | 8 GB | 1,490 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 7.0 GB | IQ4_XS | Tight |
|
158
tok/s
134–190 |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 11.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
158
tok/s
134–190 |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 11.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
158
tok/s
134–190 |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 11.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
158
tok/s
134–190 |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 11.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
158
tok/s
134–190 |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 11.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
131
tok/s
111–157 |
CMP 170HX 10 GB NVIDIA | 10 GB | 1,560 GB/s | Sep 2021 | 8.6 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
120
tok/s
72–193 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 11.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
120
tok/s
72–193 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 11.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
100
tok/s
60–161 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Intel | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 11.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
98.2
tok/s
59–157 · low confidence |
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Intel | 128 GB | 3,210 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 11.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
96.0
tok/s
82–115 |
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Nov 2020 | 11.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
96.0
tok/s
82–115 |
A100X NVIDIA | 80 GB | 2,040 GB/s | Jun 2021 | 11.7 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Indosat,Tech Mahindra,AI Singapore,GoTo
- Organisation type
- Industry,Industry,Government,Government
- Country
- Indonesia, India, Singapore
- Published
- 14 November 2024
- Authors
- AI Singapore: Chan Adwin, Cheng Nicholas, Choa Esther, Huang Yuli, Lau Wayne, Lee Chwan Ren, Leong Wai Yi, Leong Wei Qi, Limkonchotiwat Peerat, Liu Bing Jie Darius, Montalan Jann Railey, Ng Boon Cheong Raymond, Ngui Jian Gang, Nguyen Thanh Ngan, Ong Brandon, Ong Tat-Wee David, Ong Zhi Hao, Rengarajan Hamsawardhini, Siow Bryan, Susanto Yosephine, Tai Ngee Chia, Tan Choon Meng, Teng Walter, Teo Eng…
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Language
- Task
- Language modeling/generation, Question answering
- Base model
- Gemma 2 9B
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 9B
- Training data
- tokens
9B
Training compute
The arithmetic performed to train the model, measured in floating-point operations. It is a measure of what the training run cost, not of how fast the finished model answers you.
- How it was established
- Hardware
- Fine-tuning compute
- 5.1 × 10¹⁹ FLOP
989400000000000 FLOP / GPU / sec [bf16 assumed] ** 8 GPUs * 6 hours * 3600 sec / hour * 0.3 [assumed utilization] = 5.1290496e+19 FLOP
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA H100 SXM5 80GB
- Chips used
- 8
- Wall-clock time
- 6 hours
- Power draw
- 11.0 kW
"The training process for fine-tuning was approximately 4 hours, with alignment taking 2 hours, both on 8x H100-80GB GPUs"
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (restricted use)
- Training code
- Unreleased
- Hugging Face
- GoToCompany
Gemma Community License https://huggingface.co/GoToCompany/gemma2-9b-cpt-sahabatai-v1-instruct
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Record confidence
- Confident
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- The First Large Language Model In Bahasa Indonesia Developed by Indonesians
- Last updated
- 28 November 2025
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs that run Gemma2 9B CPT Sahabat-AI
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 376 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 376 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 301 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 301 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 240 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 230 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 230 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 220 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 195 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 195 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Gemma2 9B CPT Sahabat-AI
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 Radeon RX 7400 8 GB · needs 7.0 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 26.0 tok/s
- 02 Radeon RX 9060 8 GB · needs 7.0 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 29.1 tok/s
- 03 GeForce RTX 5050 8 GB · needs 7.0 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 37.0 tok/s
- 04 GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile 8 GB · needs 7.0 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 44.4 tok/s
- 05 Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB 8 GB · needs 7.0 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 29.1 tok/s
- 06 GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile 8 GB · needs 7.0 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 44.4 tok/s
- 07 GeForce RTX 5060 8 GB · needs 7.0 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 51.8 tok/s
- 08 GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB 8 GB · needs 7.0 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 51.8 tok/s
- 09 GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile 8 GB · needs 7.0 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 44.4 tok/s
- 10 Radeon RX 7650 GRE 8 GB · needs 7.0 GB · IQ4_XS · tight 26.0 tok/s
What the numbers mean
The hardware side
Minimum card
Xeon Phi 5110P
Memory needed
7.0 GB
Fastest
376 tok/s
Gemma2 9B CPT Sahabat-AI reaches a parameter count of 9B. That is small enough that hardware is rarely the obstacle, including on cards several years old. The number of cards we track that can run it: 509.
At the low end it is handled by Xeon Phi 5110P, with a memory capacity of 8 GB, running it at a compression of IQ4_XS and producing around 24.0 tokens per second.
The fastest we calculate for it is B200, generating roughly 376 tokens per second on the strength of a memory bandwidth of 8,000 GB/s.
About this model
Gemma2 9B CPT Sahabat-AI was published by Indosat,Tech Mahindra,AI Singapore,GoTo, in the country recorded as Indonesia, during November 2024. The category the publisher falls under is industry,Industry,Government,Government.
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as performing the task of language modeling/generation, Question answering.
It builds on Gemma 2 9B. That is why it shares the base model's general shape and size.
The weights being open is what puts this page in the calculator rather than only in the catalogue: it is a model you can actually hold. On Hugging Face it is published under the organisation GoToCompany.
How fast it runs, and why
The median result is around 26.0 tokens per second. Exceeding reading speed outright: 473 of them.
Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.
Its attention layout is on file, so the memory figures are computed exactly rather than approximated.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Gemma2 9B CPT Sahabat-AI
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Start from the memory column
Every card here has been checked against Gemma2 9B CPT Sahabat-AI, needing around 7.0 GB at a compression of IQ4_XS. Capacity is the gate — a card either holds it or it does not.
-
02
Set the context length you will work at
Longer conversations cost memory on top of what the weights need. Move the slider to your real working length before trusting any row for Gemma2 9B CPT Sahabat-AI.
-
03
Set a quality floor
Compression is what makes a model fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy, reaching a compression of IQ4_XS on the smallest card that fits. Setting a minimum quality drops the cards that only manage it by squeezing further than you would want, and holds the comparison at one level.
-
04
Compare tokens per second, not specifications
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for Gemma2 9B CPT Sahabat-AI. It will not match a gaming ordering, because generation is bound by memory bandwidth. The card topping the list is B200, at 376 tok/s.
-
05
Check the fit verdict before buying
Tight means it loads and works with no room to raise the context later, in the case of Gemma2 9B CPT Sahabat-AI. Comfortable means you can grow the context later. That difference matters more than a few tokens per second, so buy for comfortable if you expect to.
-
06
Open the card you have settled on
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. A card is usually bought for more than one model, so it is worth a look before buying for Gemma2 9B CPT Sahabat-AI.
Answers
Gemma2 9B CPT Sahabat-AI — common questions
Gemma2 9B CPT Sahabat-AI— can I run it if it does not fit in my GPU?
Only by offloading, which is usually a false economy: the part held in system memory drags the whole thing down. The nearest miss we calculate falls short by 2.2 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is resident on the card.
Gemma2 9B CPT Sahabat-AI— would two GPUs run it faster?
A second card roughly doubles the memory available but not the generation rate. The number already able to run it alone: 509. So a second card is rarely the answer here.
Gemma2 9B CPT Sahabat-AI— why does the quantisation differ between cards?
Because capacity varies, so does how hard it has to be squeezed. The number of distinct levels in the table above: 4. Bigger cards get the more accurate version, and the quality floor above pins the comparison to one level.
Gemma2 9B CPT Sahabat-AI— how accurate are these speed estimates?
Every figure is derived from memory bandwidth and model size, not benchmarked, which is why each is published as a range rather than a single number. One example: 320–452 tok/s on B200. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
Gemma2 9B CPT Sahabat-AI— what GPU do I need to run it?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds it is Xeon Phi 5110P, with a memory capacity of 8 GB. It runs the model at a compression of IQ4_XS using about 7.0 GB, and produces roughly 24.0 tokens per second. The number of cards able to run it in total: 509.
Gemma2 9B CPT Sahabat-AI— how fast is it on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is B200, at about 376 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and the number of cards clearing that: 473.
Gemma2 9B CPT Sahabat-AI— how much VRAM does it need?
It needs about 7.0 GB at a compression of IQ4_XS, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Gemma2 9B CPT Sahabat-AI— can I run it on a GPU holding 8 GB?
Yes. The card CMP 170HX 8 GB, holding 8 GB, runs it at a compression of IQ4_XS, using about 7.0 GB and generating roughly 172 tokens per second. The fit is tight.
Gemma2 9B CPT Sahabat-AI— can I run it on a GPU holding 12 GB?
Yes. The card GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, holding 12 GB, runs it at a compression of Q6_K, using about 9.6 GB and generating roughly 62.4 tokens per second. The fit is tight.
Gemma2 9B CPT Sahabat-AI— can I run it on a GPU holding 16 GB?
Yes. The card Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB, holding 16 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 11.7 GB and generating roughly 53.2 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.
Gemma2 9B CPT Sahabat-AI— can I run it on a GPU holding 24 GB?
Yes. The card GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, holding 24 GB, runs it at a compression of Q8_0, using about 11.7 GB and generating roughly 63.1 tokens per second. The fit is comfortable.
Gemma2 9B CPT Sahabat-AI— is it open source?
Its weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
Gemma2 9B CPT Sahabat-AI— how many parameters does it have?
It has a parameter count of 9B. 9B. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Gemma2 9B CPT Sahabat-AI— who created it?
It was published by Indosat,Tech Mahindra,AI Singapore,GoTo, based in Indonesia, an organisation categorised as industry,Industry,Government,Government.
Gemma2 9B CPT Sahabat-AI— when was it released?
It was published in November 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
Gemma2 9B CPT Sahabat-AI— what is it used for?
It works in the domain of Language, and is recorded as handling the task of language modeling/generation, Question answering. Models frequently carry more than one of each, and the tags describe purpose rather than capability limits.
Gemma2 9B CPT Sahabat-AI— where can I download it?
Its weights are published on Hugging Face, under the organisation GoToCompany. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.