Oryx 34B TPS calculator
Each card below is assessed against this model at the context length and minimum quality you choose. Speed is an estimate for a single request, calculated from the card's memory bandwidth and the size of the model once compressed.
Calculated for this model
Smallest card that fits
RTX A4500
20 GB · Q3_K_M · 21.5 tok/s
Fastest card
B200
99.7 tok/s · 180 GB
Which GPUs can run Oryx 34B?
Set the inputs, read the answer
A longer conversation needs more memory, which can push this model off smaller cards.
Hides cards that would only fit the model by compressing it below this point.
132 cards match
Calculating| Needs | Quantisation | Fit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
99.7
tok/s
60–159 · low confidence |
B200 NVIDIA | 180 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Jan 2024 | 37.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
99.7
tok/s
60–159 · low confidence |
B300 NVIDIA | 288 GB | 8,000 GB/s | Sep 2025 | 37.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
79.6
tok/s
48–127 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI350X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 37.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
79.6
tok/s
48–127 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI355X AMD | 288 GB | 8,190 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 37.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
63.6
tok/s
38–102 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300 AMD | 128 GB | 6,550 GB/s | Jan 2023 | 37.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
60.9
tok/s
37–97 · low confidence |
H200 NVL NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 37.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
60.9
tok/s
37–97 · low confidence |
H200 SXM 141 GB NVIDIA | 141 GB | 4,890 GB/s | Nov 2024 | 37.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
58.3
tok/s
35–93 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI325X AMD | 256 GB | 6,000 GB/s | Oct 2024 | 37.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
51.7
tok/s
31–83 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300A AMD | 128 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 37.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
51.7
tok/s
31–83 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI300X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 37.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
51.7
tok/s
31–83 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI308X AMD | 192 GB | 5,325 GB/s | Dec 2023 | 37.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
49.1
tok/s
29–79 · low confidence |
H100 NVL 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,940 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 37.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
41.9
tok/s
25–67 · low confidence |
H100 PCIe 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 37.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
41.9
tok/s
25–67 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 80 GB NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Oct 2022 | 37.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
41.9
tok/s
25–67 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 94 GB NVIDIA | 94 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 37.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
41.9
tok/s
25–67 · low confidence |
H100 SXM5 96 GB NVIDIA | 96 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 37.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
41.9
tok/s
25–67 · low confidence |
H800 SXM5 NVIDIA | 80 GB | 3,360 GB/s | Mar 2023 | 37.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
41.6
tok/s
25–67 · low confidence |
DRIVE A100 PROD NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 25.2 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
41.6
tok/s
25–67 · low confidence |
GRID A100A NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,870 GB/s | May 2020 | 25.2 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
39.8
tok/s
24–64 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,790 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 25.2 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
39.8
tok/s
24–64 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 D NVIDIA | 32 GB | 1,790 GB/s | Jan 2025 | 25.2 GB | Q5_K_M | Tight |
|
38.5
tok/s
23–62 · low confidence |
GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 NVIDIA | 24 GB | 1,340 GB/s | Aug 2025 | 21.3 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
35.1
tok/s
21–56 · low confidence |
A30X NVIDIA | 24 GB | 1,220 GB/s | Apr 2021 | 21.3 GB | Q4_K_M | Tight |
|
31.9
tok/s
19–51 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250 AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 37.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
|
31.9
tok/s
19–51 · low confidence |
Radeon Instinct MI250X AMD | 128 GB | 3,280 GB/s | Nov 2021 | 37.1 GB | Q8_0 | Comfortable |
Speeds are estimates for a single request — one conversation at a time — calculated from memory bandwidth, model size and quantisation. Real throughput varies with the inference runtime and its version. Figures published by hardware vendors measure many simultaneous requests and are much higher.
On record
Full specification
Everything on record for this model. Most of it describes how it was trained rather than how it runs — useful context for judging how much work went into it, and how it compares with models built at a different scale.
Origin
Who built this model, where, and when it was published.
- Organisation
- Tsinghua University,Tencent,Nanyang Technological University
- Organisation type
- Academia,Industry,Academia
- Country
- China, Singapore
- Published
- 19 September 2024
- Authors
- Zuyan Liu, Yuhao Dong, Ziwei Liu, Winston Hu, Jiwen Lu, Yongming Rao
What it does
The problem areas the model was built for. A model can carry several of each.
- Domain
- Multimodal, Vision, 3D modeling, Video, Language
- Task
- Visual question answering, Video compression, Image captioning, Video description, Language modeling/generation
- Base model
- Yi-1.5-34B
Size
How large the model is and how much data it was trained on. Parameters are the figure that decides whether it fits on a given graphics card.
- Parameters
- 34B
- Training data
- tokens
- Batch size
- 128
The training run
What it physically took to train: which chips, how many, for how long, and what that drew from the wall.
- Training hardware
- NVIDIA A800 SXM
- Chips used
- 64
- Power draw
- 50.4 kW
Availability
Whether you can obtain the model and run it on your own hardware, which is what decides if any of the graphics-card figures on this page apply.
- Weights
- Open — downloadable
- Model access
- Open weights (unrestricted)
- Training code
- Open source
- Hugging Face
- THUdyh
Apache 2.0 https://huggingface.co/THUdyh/Oryx-1.5-32B MIT license https://github.com/Oryx-mllm/Oryx
How it is classified
Labels the source dataset applies when tracking notable models, and how confident it is in the entry.
- Why it is tracked
- SOTA improvement
- Record confidence
- Confident
- Citations
- 161
Best performance on MLVU benchmark (long-form temporal understanding), MMBench and TextVQA (image understanding).
Sources
Where this record came from and when it was last checked.
- Reference
- Oryx MLLM: On-Demand Spatial-Temporal Understanding at Arbitrary Resolution
- Last updated
- 25 May 2026
The extremes
The ten fastest GPUs for Oryx 34B
Ranked by estimated tokens per second, newest card first where speeds tie. Because generation is bound by memory bandwidth, this ordering follows bandwidth rather than any gaming benchmark.
- 01 B300 288 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 99.7 tok/s
- 02 B200 180 GB · 8,000 GB/s · Q8_0 99.7 tok/s
- 03 Radeon Instinct MI350X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 79.6 tok/s
- 04 Radeon Instinct MI355X 288 GB · 8,190 GB/s · Q8_0 79.6 tok/s
- 05 Radeon Instinct MI300 128 GB · 6,550 GB/s · Q8_0 63.6 tok/s
- 06 H200 NVL 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 60.9 tok/s
- 07 H200 SXM 141 GB 141 GB · 4,890 GB/s · Q8_0 60.9 tok/s
- 08 Radeon Instinct MI325X 256 GB · 6,000 GB/s · Q8_0 58.3 tok/s
- 09 Radeon Instinct MI300A 128 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 51.7 tok/s
- 10 Radeon Instinct MI300X 192 GB · 5,325 GB/s · Q8_0 51.7 tok/s
The smallest GPUs that still run Oryx 34B
The cheapest route in, by memory capacity. A tight fit runs the model but leaves nothing spare for a longer conversation.
- 01 RTX 4000 Ada Generation 20 GB · needs 17.3 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 12.1 tok/s
- 02 RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 20 GB · needs 17.3 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 9.4 tok/s
- 03 Radeon RX 7900 XT 20 GB · needs 17.3 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 21.0 tok/s
- 04 A10M 20 GB · needs 17.3 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 16.8 tok/s
- 05 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20 GB 20 GB · needs 17.3 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 25.6 tok/s
- 06 RTX A4500 20 GB · needs 17.3 GB · Q3_K_M · tight 21.5 tok/s
- 07 Arc Pro B60 24 GB · needs 21.3 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 8.5 tok/s
- 08 GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 24 GB · needs 21.3 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 38.5 tok/s
- 09 RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 24 GB · needs 21.3 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 12.4 tok/s
- 10 GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile 24 GB · needs 21.3 GB · Q4_K_M · tight 25.8 tok/s
What the numbers mean
What it takes to run this model
Minimum card
RTX A4500
Memory needed
17.3 GB
Fastest
99.7 tok/s
With 34B parameters, Oryx 34B lands in the range a serious desktop card can handle once the weights are compressed. 132 of the cards we track can run it.
The smallest card that holds it is the RTX A4500 with 20 GB, running it at Q3_K_M and producing around 21.5 tokens per second.
Top of the range is the B200, at roughly 99.7 tokens per second thanks to 8,000 GB/s of bandwidth.
About this model
Oryx 34B was published by Tsinghua University,Tencent,Nanyang Technological University, in China, in September 2024. academia,Industry,Academia is the category the publisher falls under.
It works in Multimodal, Vision, 3D modeling, Video, Language, and is recorded as doing visual question answering, Video compression, Image captioning, Video description, Language modeling/generation.
Its starting point was Yi-1.5-34B — most models at this scale are adapted from an existing base rather than built from nothing.
The weights are published, so it can be downloaded and run on your own hardware indefinitely, offline, with no account attached. It is published under the THUdyh organisation on Hugging Face.
How fast it runs, and why
Across every card that can run it, the middle of the range is about 21.2 tokens per second, and 103 of them clear the ten tokens per second that roughly matches reading speed.
Every weight participates in every token here, so bandwidth is the whole story: the ranking below is effectively a ranking of memory throughput.
Memory here is estimated from size rather than computed from the architecture, which is not recorded for this model — the numbers are indicative rather than exact.
How it was trained
Its inclusion criterion is sOTA improvement.
Step by step
How to choose a GPU for Oryx 34B
The table above has already assessed every card we hold specifications for against this model. Getting to your answer takes six steps.
-
01
Read the memory figure first
Look at what Oryx 34B actually needs — around 17.3 GB at Q3_K_M. No amount of processing power compensates for a card that cannot hold it.
-
02
Decide how long your conversations run
The conversation occupies memory too, and grows as it goes. Set the slider to the length you expect: at long context Oryx 34B can slip off a card that handles short questions easily.
-
03
Choose how far you will compress it
Compression is what makes Oryx 34B fit smaller cards, at some cost in accuracy — Q3_K_M on the smallest card that fits. A minimum quality removes the ones that go too far.
-
04
Rank by throughput rather than spec sheet
Sort by speed to see how cards rank for Oryx 34B. It will not match a gaming ordering — generation is bound by memory bandwidth, which is why the B200 tops it at 99.7 tok/s.
-
05
Read the fit column last
The fit column separates cards that just manage Oryx 34B from those with room to spare. Buy for the second if the context might grow.
-
06
Check the card from the other side
Every card name links to its own page, which runs the same calculation across the whole model catalogue. Worth a look before buying for Oryx 34B alone — a card is usually bought for more than one model.
Answers
Oryx 34B — common questions
When was Oryx 34B released?
Oryx 34B was published in September 2024. Capability per parameter has improved considerably since, so a newer model of the same size is often the better use of the same hardware.
What is Oryx 34B used for?
Oryx 34B works in Multimodal, Vision, 3D modeling, Video, Language, and is recorded as handling visual question answering, Video compression, Image captioning, Video description, Language modeling/generation. These are the areas it was designed around; they describe intent rather than a hard boundary.
Where can I download Oryx 34B?
Its weights are published under the THUdyh organisation on Hugging Face. We do not host model files — this site calculates what hardware is needed to run them.
Can I run Oryx 34B if it does not fit in my GPU?
Partly. Layers that do not fit sit in system memory and run at a fraction of the speed, so a mostly-offloaded Oryx 34B is rarely worth using — the nearest miss we calculate is short by 6.9 GB. Every figure here assumes the whole model is on the card.
Would two GPUs run Oryx 34B faster?
Two cards buy memory rather than speed. That matters for Oryx 34B only if one card cannot hold it — 132 can, so a second adds little.
Why does the quantisation differ between cards for Oryx 34B?
A larger card holds a more accurate copy. Across the cards that run Oryx 34B, 5 compression levels are used; the floor control above pins it to one.
How accurate are these Oryx 34B speed estimates?
They are calculated from specifications rather than measured, and each carries a range — 60–159 tok/s on the B200, for instance. The same model and card vary by thirty to fifty per cent depending on the inference software and its version.
What GPU do I need to run Oryx 34B?
The smallest card in our catalogue that holds Oryx 34B is the RTX A4500, with 20 GB of memory. It runs the model at Q3_K_M using about 17.3 GB, and produces roughly 21.5 tokens per second. 132 cards in total can run it.
How fast is Oryx 34B on a GPU?
It depends on the card. The quickest we calculate is a B200 at about 99.7 tokens per second; the slowest that still runs it manages considerably less. Reading speed is around ten tokens per second, and 103 of the cards that can run Oryx 34B clear that.
How much VRAM does Oryx 34B need?
About 17.3 GB at Q3_K_M compression, which is what the smallest card that runs it uses. Less compression needs more: the figures in the memory column above are recalculated for each card, because each one holds the least-compressed version it can.
Can I run Oryx 34B on a 24 GB GPU?
Yes. A GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with 24 GB runs it at Q4_K_M, using about 21.3 GB and generating roughly 38.5 tokens per second — a tight fit.
Is Oryx 34B open source?
Its weights are published, so Oryx 34B can be downloaded and run on your own hardware. Note that open weights is not the same as open source in the full sense — it says nothing about the training data, the training code, or the commercial terms attached.
How many parameters does Oryx 34B have?
Oryx 34B has 34B parameters. That figure is the total, and it is what decides how much memory the model needs — roughly half a gigabyte per billion at the compression most people use.
Who created Oryx 34B?
Oryx 34B was published by Tsinghua University,Tencent,Nanyang Technological University, based in China, categorised as academia,Industry,Academia.
The other direction
Looking at it from the other side?
This page starts from the model. If you already own a card and want to know everything it will run, start from the hardware instead.